Training-Related Changes in the Brain: Evidence from Human Auditory-Evoked Potentials

Kelly L. Tremblay

doi:10.1055/s-2007-973438

Seminars in Hearing, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Hear 2007; 28(2): 120-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973438

Training-Related Changes in the Brain: Evidence from Human Auditory-Evoked Potentials

Kelly L. Tremblay¹

¹Associate Professor, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Auditory-evoked potentials are being used to examine training-related changes in the human central auditory system, and there is converging evidence that focused listening training, using various training methods and different types of stimuli alters evoked neural activity. Such training-related changes are often described in terms of physiological plasticity, a process whereby the neural representation of the acoustic cue is modified with training. In this review, the concept of plasticity is discussed from a broader perspective. Specifically addressed is how electrophysiological methods are being used to study physiological modifications that occur with training, and how this information might contribute to the rehabilitation of people who wear hearing aids and cochlear implants.

KEYWORDS

Auditory plasticity - auditory training - perceptual learning - electrophysiology - event-related potentials - mismatch negativity - N100 - P1-N1-P2 complex

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES

1 Eggermont J J. The correlative brain: theory and experiment. In: Friston KJ Neutral Interaction (Studies of Brain Function). New York; Springer-Verlag 1990: 1-36
2 Steinschneider M, Schroeder C E, Arezzo J C, Vaughan H G. Physiologic correlates of the voice onset time boundary in primary auditory cortex (A1) of the awake monkey: temporal response patterns. Brain Lang. 1995; 48(3) 326-340
3 Steinschneider M, Reser D, Schroeder C E, Arezzo J C. Tonotopic organization of responses reflecting stop consonant place of articulation in primary auditory cortex (A1) of the monkey. Brain Res. 1995; 674(1) 147-152
4 Steinschneider M, Arezzo J, Vaughan J HG. Speech evoked activity in the auditory radiations and cortex of the awake monkey. Brain Res. 1982; 252(2) 353-365
5 Steinschneider M, Volkov I O, Noh M D, Garell P C, Howard M A. Temporal encoding of the voice-onset-time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 82(5) 2346-2357
6 Phillips D P, Hall S E. Response timing constraints on the cortical representation of sound time structure. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88(3) 1403-1411
7 Ahissar E, Nagarajan S, Ahissar M et al.. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98(23) 13367-13372
8 Schreiner C E, Mendelson J, Raggio M W, Brosch M, Krueger K. Temporal processing in cat primary auditory cortex. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1997; 532 54-60
9 Irvine D RF, Rajan R. Injury-and use-related plasticity in the primary sensory cortex of adult mammals: possible relationship to perceptual learning. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1996; 23(10-11) 939-947
10 Willott J F. Changes in frequency representation in the auditory system of mice with age-related hearing impairment. Brain Res. 1984; 309(1) 159-162
11 Willott J F. Aging and the Auditory System. San Diego; Singular 1991
12 Javel E, Shepherd R K. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res. 2000; 140(1-2) 45-76
13 Shepherd R K, Baxi J H, Hardie N A. Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 82(3) 1363-1380
14 Kral A, Hartmann R, Tillein J, Heid S, Klinke R. Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12(8) 797-807
15 Chang E F, Merzenich M M. Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development. Science. 2003; 300(5618) 498-502
16 Stelmachowicz P G, Kopun J, Mace A, Lewis D E. The perception of amplified speech by listeners with hearing loss: acoustic correlates. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 98(3) 1388-1399
17 Tyler R S, Summerfield A Q. Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear. 1996; 17(3 Suppl) 38s-50s
18 Watson C S. Auditory perceptual learning and the cochlear implant. Am J Otol. 1991; 12(Suppl) 73-79
19 Robinson K, Summerfield A Q. Adult auditory learning and training. Ear Hear. 1996; 17(3 Suppl) 51S-65S
20 Robinson K, Gatehouse S. The time course of effects on intensity discrimination following monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 99(2) 1255-1258
21 Bakin J S, Weinberger N M. Classical conditioning induces CS specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig. Brain Res. 1990; 536(1-2) 271-286
22 Barlow H B, Foldiak P. Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex. In: Miall RMD, Mitchison, GJ The Computing Neuron. New York; Addison-Wesley 1989: 54-72
23 Tremblay K. Beyond the ear: physiological perspectives on auditory rehabilitation. Semin Hear. 2005; 26(3) 127-136
24 Tremblay K. Page ten. Hearing aids and the brain: what's the connection?. Hearing J. 2006; 59 10-16
25 Neuman A C. Central auditory system plasticity and aural rehabilitation of adults. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005; 42(4, Suppl 2) 169-186
26 Tremblay K L. Central auditory plasticity: implications for auditory rehabilitation. The Hearing Journal. 2003; 56(1) 10-17
27 Tremblay K L, Kraus N. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45(3) 564-572
28 Willott J F. Physiological plasticity in the auditory system and its possible relevance to hearing aid use, deprivation effects, and acclimatization. Ear Hear. 1996; 17(3 Suppl) S66-S77
29 Souza P E, Tremblay K L. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects. Trends Amplif. 2006; 10 119-143
30 Alcantara J I, Dooley G J, Blamey P J, Seligman P M. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners. Audiology. 1994; 33(1) 15-27
31 Sweetow R, Palmer C V. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16(7) 494-504
32 Naatanen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987; 24(4) 375-425
33 Naatanen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci. 1990; 13(2) 201-288
34 Hall J. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1992
35 Stapells D R. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: A literature meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Path Audiol. 2000; 24(2) 74-83
36 Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neurootol. 1997; 2(5) 281-307
37 Naatanen R. The mismatch negative (MMN). In: Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 1992: 136-200
38 Steinschneider M, Dunn M. Electrophysiology in Developmental Neuropsychology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Elsevier Science 2002: 91-146
39 Woods D L. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1995; 44 102-109
40 Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006
41 Martin B A, Tremblay K, Stapells D R. Principles and applications of cortical evoked potentials. In: Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006: 482-507
42 Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, King C, Tremblay K, Nicol N. Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995; 7 27-32
43 Tremblay K, Kraus N, Carrell T D, McGee T. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102(6) 3762-3773
44 McClaskey C L, Pisoni D B, Carrell T D. Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 34(4) 323-330
45 Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(16) 3557-3560
46 Menning H, Roberts L. Pantev, C. Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training. Neuroreport. 2000; 11(4) 817-822
47 Menning H, Imaizumi S, Zwitserlood P, Pantev C. Plasticity of the human auditory cortex induced by discrimination learning of non-native, mora-timed contrasts of the Japanese language. Learn Mem. 2002; 9(5) 253-267
48 Atienza M, Cantero J L, Dominguez-Marin E. The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem. 2002; 9(3) 138-150
49 Gottselig J M, Brandeis D, Hofer-Tinguely G, Borbely A A, Achermann P. Human central auditory plasticity associated with tone sequence learning. Learn Mem. 2004; 11(2) 162-171
50 Picton T W, Alain C, Woods D L et al.. Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol. 1999; 4(2) 64-79
51 Sharma A, Dorman M. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset-time. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106(2) 1078-1083
52 Tremblay K L, Piskosz M, Souza P. Aging alters the neural representation of speech-cues. Neuroreport. 2002; 13(15) 1865-1870
53 Tremblay K L, Piskosz M, Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114(7) 1332-1343
54 Tremblay K, Kejriwal C, De Nisi J. Auditory training and the N1-P2 complex. Abstract presented at: International Evoked Audiometry Response Study Group Meeting July 22-27, 2001 Vancouver, Canada
55 Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear. 2001; 22(2) 79-90
56 Tremblay K, Kraus N, Carrell T D, McGee T. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102(6) 3762-3773
57 Reinke K S, He Y, Wang C, Alain C. Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 17(3) 781-791
58 Alain C, Snyder J S, He Y, Reinke K S. Changes in auditory cortex parallel rapid perceptual learning. Cereb Cortex. 2006; , in press
59 Bosnyak D J, Eaton R A, Roberts L E. Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40 Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(10) 1088-1099
60 Brattico E, Tervaniemi M, Picton T W. Effects of brief discrimination-training on the auditory N1 wave. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(18) 2489-2492
61 Sheehan K A, McArthur G M, Bishop D V. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 25(2) 547-553
62 Tremblay K L, Billings C J, Friesen L M, Souza P E. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2006; 27(2) 93-103
63 Tremblay K L, Friesen L, Martin B A, Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2003; 24(3) 225-232
64 Friesen L M, Tremblay K L. Acoustic change complexes (ACC) recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 2006; 27 678-685
65 Escera C. New clinical applications of brain evoked potentials: mismatch negativity. Med Clin (Barc). 1997; 108(8) 701-708
66 Pekkonen E, Rinne T, Naatanen R. Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 96(6) 546-554
67 Paavilainen P, Cammann R, Alho K et al.. Event-related potentials to pitch change in an auditory stimulus sequence during sleep. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1987; 40 246-255
68 Teismann I K, Soros P, Manemann E et al.. Responsiveness to repeated speech stimuli persists in left but not right auditory cortex. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(8) 1267-1270
69 Hillyard S A, Hink R F, Schwent V L, Picton T W. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science. 1973; 182(108) 177-180
70 Woldorff M G, Hackley S A, Hillyard S A. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology. 1991; 28(1) 30-42
71 Alain C, Woods D L. Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 1997; 34(5) 534-546
72 Alain C, Izenberg A. Effects of attentional load on auditory scene analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(7) 1063-1073
73 Gravel J, Kurtzberg D, Stapells D R, Vaughan H G, Wallace I F. Case studies. Semin Hear. 1989; 10(3) 272-287
74 Kurtzberg D. Cortical event-related potentials assessment of auditory system function. Semin Hear. 1989; 10 252-261
75 Kraus N, McGee T. Auditory event-related potentials. In: Katz J Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD; Williams and Wilkins 1994: 403-406
76 Rapin I. Evoked responses to clicks in a group of children with communication disorders. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1964; 112 182-203
77 Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P et al.. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16(8) 564-573
78 Korczak P A, Kurtzberg D, Stapells D R. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear. 2005; 26(2) 165-185
79 Billings C, Tremblay K L, Souza P E. Effects of amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiology Neuro-Otology. 2007; , in press
80 Tremblay K, Kalstein L, Billings C, Souza P E. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing aids. Trends Amplif. 2006; 10 155-162
81 Adler G, Adler J. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200- millisecond latency range. Audiology. 1989; 28(6) 316-324
82 Adler G, Adler J. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials. Biol Psychiatry. 1991; 29(4) 347-356
83 Beagley H A, Knight J J. Changes in auditory evoked response with intensity. J Laryngol Otol. 1967; 81(8) 861-873
84 Beagley H A, Knight J J. The auditory evoked cortical response as an index of hearing in practical audiometry. J Laryngol Otol. 1967; 81(3) 347-351
85 Martin B A, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(4) 2155-2161
86 Picton T W, Goodman W, Bryce D. Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity. Acta Otolaryngol. 1970; 70(2) 77-82
87 Rapin I, Schimmel H, Tourk L M, Krasnegor N A, Pollak C. Evoked responses to clicks and tones of varying intensity in waking adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966; 21(4) 335-344
88 Carhart R. Auditory Training. New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1960

Kelly L TremblayPh.D.

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of Washington

1417 NE 42nd St., Seattle, WA 98105

eMail: tremblay@u.washington.edu