PDF herunterladen
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2007; 39(4): 225-234
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-981390
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Die Frühbehandlung der transversalen Kieferrelation

Early Transverse Treatment[1] S. D. Marshall1 , K. A. Southard1 , T. E. Southard1
  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Iowa, IA, USA
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. Januar 2008 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Verbreiterung des Oberkieferzahnbogens im Milch- oder Wechselgebiss zur Verbesserung der transversalen Harmonie der Zahnbögen wird als Frühbehandlung der transversalen Kieferrelation bezeichnet und gehört zur ersten Phase einer Zwei-Phasen-Behandlung. Üblicherweise wurde bisher die frühzeitige Expansion des Oberkieferzahnbogens zur Korrektur eines seitlichen Kreuzbisses durchgeführt. Unlängst wurde ausgeführt, dass die frühe Behandlung der Transversalen auch bei Abwesenheit eines seitlichen Kreuzbisses zur Verbesserung eines Zahnbogenlängendefizits und zur Erleichterung einer Distalbisskorrektur vorteilhaft wäre. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Sachargumente für eine frühe Behandlung der Transversalen bei Vorliegen und bei Fehlen eines seitlichen Kreuzbisses.

Abstract

Expansion of the maxillary arch to improve transverse inter-arch relationships during the primary or mixed dentition stage is considered early treatment as part of a two-phase treatment protocol. Traditionally, early expansion has been used to correct posterior crossbite. More recently, it has been suggested that early transverse treatment may be beneficial, in the absence of posterior crossbite, to improve arch length deficiency, and to facilitate correction of skeletal class II malocclusions. In the article, the rationale for early transverse treatment in the presence and absence of posterior crossbite is reviewed.

Schlüsselwörter

transversale Kieferrelation - Frühbehandlung - Kreuzbiss

Key words

transverse inter-arch relationships - early treatment - crossbite

1 Der Artikel erschien erstmals in: Seminars in Orthodontics 2005; 11(3): 130-139. Der Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Elsevier Ltd.

Literatur

  • 1 Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior crossbite.  Eur J Orthod. 1984;  6 25-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kutin G, Hawes R. Posterior crossbites in the deciduos and mixed dentitions.  Am J Orthod. 1969;  56 491-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Helm S. Malocclusion in Danish children with adolescent dentition: an epidemiologic study.  Am J Orthod. 1968;  54 352-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hanson M, Barnard L, Case J. Tongue thrust preschool children. Part II: dental occlusal patterns.  Am J Orthod. 1970;  57 15-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kurol J, Bergland L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition.  Eur J Orthod. 1992;  14 173-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Betts N, Vanarsdall R, Barber H. et al . Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency.  Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1995;  10 75-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics. 3rd ed. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago IL 1973; 530-542
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Clinch L. Development of deciduous and mixed dentition.  Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1966;  17 135-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Higley L. Crossbite mandibular malposition.  J Dent Child. 1968;  35 221-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Linder A. Longitudinal study of the effect of early interceptive treatment in 4-year-old children with unilateral cross-bite.  Scand J Dent Res. 1989;  97 432-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Myers D, Barenie J, Bell R. et al . Condylar position in children with functional posterior crossbites: before and after crossbite correction.  Pediatr Dent. 1980;  2 190-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yoshikane T, Pullinger A, Turley P. Characteristics of functional posterior crossbites in the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Masters of Science Thesis. Los Angeles CA, University of California, School of Dentistry 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Hesse K, Artun J, Joondeph D. et al . Changes in condylar position and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;  111 410-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 O'Byrn B, Sadowsky C, Schneider B. et al . An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral crossbite.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;  107 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Malocclusion traits and symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders in children with severe malocclusion.  Eur J Orthod. 1998;  20 543-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nerder P H, Bakke M, Solow B. The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study.  Eur J Orthod. 1999;  21 155-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pinto A, Buschang P, Throckmorton G. et al . Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;  120 513-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T, Lahtela P. Relationship between craniofacial and condyle path asymmetry in unilateral cross-bite patients.  Eur Orthod Soc. 1990;  12 408-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Haas A. Rapid palatal expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening midpalatal suture.  Angle Orthod. 1961;  31 73-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Marshall S, Dawson D, Southard K. et al . Transverse molar movements during growth.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;  124 615-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thilander B, Lennartsson B. A study of children with unilateral posterior crossbite, treated and untreated, in the deciduous dentition: occlusal and skeletal characteristics of significance in predicting long-term outcome.  J Orofac Orthop. 2002;  63 371-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jacobs J, Bell W, Williams C E. et al . Control of transverse dimension with surgery and orthodontics.  Am J Orthod. 1980;  77 284-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Grummons D, Kappeyne Van De Copollo M. A frontal asymmetry analysis.  J Clin Orthod. 1987;  21 448-465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Janson G, Metaxas A, Woodside D. et al . Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;  119 406-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ricketts R M. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics, the first fifty years.  Angle Orthod. 1981;  51 115-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Vanarsdall R. Transverse dimension and long-term stability.  Semin Orthod. 1999;  5 171-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Allen D, Rebellato J, Sheats R. et al . Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites.  Angle Orthod. 2003;  73 515-524
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schroder U, Schroder L. Early treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in children with bilaterally contracted maxillae.  Eur J Orthod. 1984;  6 65-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kantomaa T. Correction of unilateral crossbite in the deciduous dentition.  Eur J Orthod. 1986;  8 80-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Skieller V. Expansion of the midpalatal suture by removable plates, analysed by the implant method.  Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1964;  40 143-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Harberson V, Myers D. Midpalatal suture opening during functional posterior cross-bite correction.  Am J Orthod. 1978;  74 310-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bell R, LeCompte J. The effects of maxillary expansion using a quad-helix appliance during the deciduous and mixed dentitions.  Am J Orthod. 1981;  79 152-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Clambotti C, Ngan P, Durkee M. et al . A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.  Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;  119 11-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ferrario V, Garattini G, Colombo A. et al . Quantitive effects of nickel-titianium palatal expander on skeletal and dental structures in the primary and mixed dentition: a preliminary study.  Eur Orthod Soc. 2003;  25 401-410
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Cetlin N, TenHoeve A. A nonextraction treatment.  J Clin Orthod. 1983;  17 404-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Erdinc A, Ugur T, Erbay E. A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;  116 287-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Herold J. Maxillary expansion: a retrospective study of three methods of expansion and their long-term sequelae.  Br J Orthod. 1989;  16 195-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Stöckli P, Willert H. Tissue reactions in the temporomandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey.  Am J Orthod. 1971;  60 142-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McNamara J. The role of functional appliances in contemporary orthodontics. In: Johnston L (ed). New Vistas in Orthodontics. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Woodside D, Metaxas A, Aluna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;  92 181-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance image and cephalometric radiographs investigation.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  115 607-618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 DeVincenzo J. Changes in mandibular length before, during and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;  3 241-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: stability or relapse?.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;  104 319-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: a powerful Class II corrector. In: Nanda R (ed). Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Lande M. Growth behavior of the human bony facial profile as revealed by serial cephalometric roentgenology.  Angle Orthod. 1952;  22 78-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Subelny J. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures.  Am J Orthod. 1959;  45 481-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Sinclair P, Little R. Dentofacial maturation of untreated normals.  Am J Orthod. 1985;  88 146-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Feldman I, Lundstrom F, Peck S. Occlusal changes from adolescence to adulthood in untreated patients with Class II Division 1 deepbite malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1999;  69 33-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Carter N. Dentofacial changes in untreated Class II Division 1 subjects.  Br J Orthod. 1987;  14 225-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 You Z, Fishman L, Rosenblum R. et al . Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;  120 598-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lager H. The individual growth pattern and stage of maturation as a basis for treatment of distal occlusion with overjet. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1967; 137-145
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Guymon M. A cephalometric evaluation of a two phase treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Master of Science Thesis. Baylor University, Houston 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Haas A. Headgear therapy: the most efficient way to distalize molars.  Semin Orthod. 2000;  6 79-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 McNamara J. Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort?.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;  121 572-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 McNamara J, Brudon W. Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Needham Press, Ann Arbor MI, 2001; 57
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Little R. Stability and relapse: early treatment of arch length deficiency.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;  121 578-581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Gianelly A. Rapid palatal expansion in the absence of crossbites: added value?.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;  124 362-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Der Artikel erschien erstmals in: Seminars in Orthodontics 2005; 11(3): 130-139. Der Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Elsevier Ltd.

Dr. T. E. Southard

Department of Orthodontics · College of Dentistry · University of Iowa

USA-Iowa City

IA 52242

Telefon: +1 / 3 19 / 3 35 72 88

Fax: +1 / 3 19 / 3 35 68 47

      >