Laparoscopic Ureterocutaneostomy for Urinary Diversion in Selected Infants

Abstract

Background: Primary surgical correction has obviated the need for urinary diversion in many fields of pediatric obstructive and refluxive uropathy. However, a small number of children are not suitable for primary surgical correction and require temporary diversion. We present a small series of infants who underwent minimally invasive ureterocutaneostomy. Patients and Methods: Four infants (age 1 - 13 months) underwent laparoscopic ureterocutaneostomy. The indication for urinary diversion was a primary obstructive megaureter in 2 patients, deterioration of kidney function due to a posterior urethral valve in 1, and refluxive uropathy of a dysplastic single kidney in another. Laparoscopic ureteral diversion was performed using a 3 trocar technique. In 3 patients, both ureters were identified above the crossing of the iliac vessels and exteriorized through the right and left trocar incision respectively. A loop ureterocutaneostomy was performed in 3, and an end ureterocutaneostomy in 1 patient. Results: Laparoscopic ureterocutaneostomy was feasible and there were no complications in any of the infants. The mean duration of operation was 111 minutes (range 85 to 145). Isotope renography after a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 2 to 16) revealed improved renal drainage in 3 infants, while 1 required kidney transplantation due to progressive renal insufficiency. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ureterocutaneostomy in infants is feasible. It may be considered in a selected group of patients with obstructive or refluxive uropathy in whom urinary diversion is required.

Key words

ureterocutaneostomy - minimally invasive surgery - children - urinary diversion - pediatric urology

References

• 1 Balster S, Schiborr M, Brinkmann O A. et al . Obstructive uropathy in childhood.  Aktuelle Urol. 2005;  36 317-328
• 2 Ghanem M A, Nijman R J. Long-term follow-up of bilateral high (sober) urinary diversion in patients with posterior urethral valves and its effect on bladder function.  J Urol. 2005;  173 1721-1724
• 3 Hendren W H. Diversion and undiversion. O'Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG Pediatric Surgery. Vol. 2, 5th ed. St. Louis; Mosby 1998: 1653-1670
• 4 Jesch N K, Metzelder M L, Kuebler J F, Ure B M. Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy is feasible in the first year of life and is not affected by kidney size.  J Urol. 2006;  176 1177-1179
• 5 Kitchens D M, DeFoor W, Minevich E. et al . End cutaneous ureterostomy for the management of severe hydronephrosis.  J Urol. 2007;  177 1501-1504
• 6 Metzelder M L, Schier F, Petersen C. et al . Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age.  J Urol. 2006;  175 688-691
• 7 Metzelder M L, Kuebler J, Petersen C. et al . Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in children: a prospective study on Ligasure™ versus clip/ligation.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;  16 241-244
• 8 Raney A M, Zimskind P D. Replacement of loop cutaneous ureterostomy without excision of ureteral segment: an experimental study.  J Urol. 1972;  107 39-41
• 9 Rassweiler J J, Seemann O, Frede T. et al . Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases.  J Urol. 1998;  160 1265-1269
• 10 Ring K S, Hensle T W. Urinary diversion. Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB Clinical Pediatric Urology. Vol. 2, 3rd ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders 1992: 865-903
• 11 Schuster T, Stehr M, Dietz H G. Urethral valves and urinary incontinence: bladder function in temporary high diversion.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 1998;  22 517-520
• 12 Trobs R B, Heinecke K, Elouahidi T. et al . Renal function and urine drainage after conservative or operative treatment of primary (obstructive) megaureter in infants and children.  Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;  38 141-147