Int J Sports Med 1987; 08(6): 401-406
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1025694
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Prediction of Lactate Threshold and Fixed Blood Lactate Concentrations from 3200-m Running Performance in Male Runners

A. Weltman, D. Snead, R. Seip, R. Schurrer, S. Levine, R. Rutt, T. Reilly, J. Weltman, A. Rogol
  • Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Memorial Gymnasium, Curry School of Education, and Department of Pediatrics and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 March 2008 (online)

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of a 3200-m time trial for predicting V̇O2 and running velocity at lactate threshold (LT), fixed blood lactate concentrations of 2.0, 2.5, and 4.0 mM, and peak, 42 male runners (X̄ age = 31.1 ± 8.3 years; X̄ ht = 176.8±6.6 cm; X̄ wt = 70.4 ± 10.0 kg) completed a V̇O2 peak/LT test and a 3200-m time trial. The continuous treadmill protocol started at 0% grade 150 m/min and increased 10 m/min every 3 min until exhaustion. Velocity at LT, 2.0, 2.5, and 4.0 mM was determined from individual velocity blood lactate relationships, and V̇O2 values were determined from individual plots ov V̇O2 vs velocity. V̇O2 peak and velocity peak were chosen as the highest values observed. Oxygen uptake at LT, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0 mM, and peak was 52.51, 56.61, 58.31, 61.70, and 64.21 ml/kg·min-1, respectively, while the velocities associated with LT, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0 mM, and peak were 235.5, 251.5, 259.8, 273.5, and 285.5 m/min, respectively. During the 3200-m time trial (X̄ time = 11.28±0.96 min), 400-m split times and cumulative times were recorded. Twenty-nine subjects were randomly assigned to a validation sample and the remaining subjects were used for cross-validation purposes. Regression analysis revealed that a 3200-m time trial was a good predictor of both V̇O2 (ml/kg·min-1) and velocity (m/min) at LT, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0 mM, and peak. In the validation sample correlation coefficients between 3200-m time and velocity at LT, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0 mM, and peak were r=0.85, 0.85, 0.86, 0.88, and 0.87, respectively, and the standard error of estimate ranged from ±11.1 m/min (3.9% for velocity max) to ±14.5 m/min (6.2% for velocity LT). For V̇O2 (ml/kg· min-1) correlation coefficients ranged from r=0.73 (3200-m time vs V̇O2 peak) to r=0.79 (3200-m time vs V̇O2 4.0 mM) with standard errors of estimate ranging from ±6.7% (V̇O2 4.0 mM) to ±8.3% (V̇O2 LT). In the cross-validation sample correlation coefficients between actual and predicted velocities ranged from r=0.88 (velocity 2.0 mM) to r=0.97 (velocity peak) while correlation coefficients between actual and predicted V̇O2 values ranged from r=0.61 (V̇O2 LT) to r=0.81 (V̇O2 2.5 mM). Mean differences between actual and predicted values in the cross-validation group were not significantly different for any variable. It was concluded that in male runners performance on a 3200-m time trial accurately predicts V̇O2 and velocity at LT, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0 mM, and peak. The present findings have applicability for exercise prescription and running performance in male runners.

    >