Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027520
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Highly Iodinated Intravenous Contrast Material for PET/CT – a Feasibility Study
Hochkonzentriertes intravenöses Kontrastmittel in der PET/CTPublication History
received: 20.2.2008
accepted: 7.5.2008
Publication Date:
18 July 2008 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Intravenöse Kontrastmittel (KM) werden in der PET/CT-Bildgebung für eine akkurate Lokalisation einer Läsion verwendet. Sie können jedoch einen Einfluss auf die Quantifizierung der PET-Radionuklidaufnahme haben und Artefakte verursachen, wenn die CT-Daten für die Schwächungskorrektur der PET verwendet werden. Ziel der Studie war zu testen, ob die Gabe hoch konzentrierten Kontrastmittels (HKKM, 400 mg Iod/ml) im Vergleich zur Gabe eines niedriger konzentrierten Kontrastmittels (LKKM, 300 mg Iod/ml) zu einer höheren Zahl von Artefakten und einer größeren Ungenauigkeit in der Nuklidquantifizierung führt. Material und Methoden: In 60 PET/CT-Untersuchungen (je 30 mit HKKM und LKKM) wurde die Traceranreicherung (maximaler Standardized Uptake Value – SUVmax) und die Schwächung in der CT (Hounsfield Units) an 16 definierten Stellen in Gefäßen und Parenchym gemessen. Die Anzahl möglicher PET-Artefakte wurde dokumentiert. Der Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon-Test wurde zur Feststellung statistisch signifikanter Unterschiede verwendet (p < 0,05). Ergebnisse: HKKM verursachte weder einen signifikanten Anstieg des SUVmax (p > 0,05) noch eine vermehrte Anzahl an PET-Artefakten (p > 0,05) bei gleichzeitig signifikanter Steigerung der CT-Schwächung im Vergleich zu LKKM in 11 / 16 Lokalisationen (p = 0,002). Schlussfolgerung: Die Anwendung hochkonzentrierten Kontrastmittels in der PET/CT führt nicht zu einer Verschlechterung der PET-Bildqualität und sollte bei der Gestaltung zukünftiger PET/CT-Protokolle berücksichtigt werden.
Abstract
Purpose: Intravenous contrast materials (CM) are of benefit in PET/CT imaging. However, CM may influence tracer quantification and may cause artifacts when using the CT data for PET attenuation correction. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of applying a highly concentrated CM (HCCM, 400 mg iodine/ml) in PET/CT in comparison to a lower concentrated CM (LCCM, 300 mg iodine/ml). Materials and Methods: In 60 whole-body FDG PET/CT scans (30 scans each with HCCM and LCCM), tracer uptake (maximal standardized uptake value – SUVmax) and CT attenuation (Hounsfield Units) were quantified at 16 positions in different vessels and parenchyma. The number of potential PET artifacts was documented. The Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Test was performed for statistical assessment (p < 0.05). Results: HCCM did not cause a significant increase in the SUVmax (p > 0.05) or the number of PET artifacts (p = 0.69) while simultaneously significantly increasing CT attenuation (p = 0.002) as compared to LCCM in 11 / 16 positions. Conclusion: The application of HCCM seems feasible in PET/CT and should be considered in future protocols.
Key words
PET/CT - contrast medium - artifact - attenuation correction
References
- 1 Rodriguez-Vigil B, Gomez-Leon N, Pinilla I. et al . PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47 1643-1648
- 2 Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S. et al . Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45 25S-35S
- 3 Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Beyer T. et al . To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45 56S-65S
- 4 Setty B N, Sahani D V, Ouellette-Piazzo K. et al . Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30 818-822
- 5 Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H. et al . Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2002; 224 757-763
- 6 Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T. et al . Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183 157-162
- 7 Rau M M, Setty B N, Blake M A. et al . Evaluation of renal transplant donors with 16-section multidetector CT angiography: comparison of contrast media with low and high iodine concentrations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18 603-609
- 8 Kinahan P E, Townsend D W, Beyer T. et al . Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998; 25 2046-2053
- 9 Nakamoto Y, Chin B B, Kraitchman D L. et al . Effects of nonionic intravenous contrast agents at PET/CT imaging: phantom and canine studies. Radiology. 2003; 227 817-824
- 10 Cohade C, Osman M, Nakamoto Y. et al . Initial experience with oral contrast in PET/CT: phantom and clinical studies. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44 412-416
- 11 Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A. et al . Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46 429-435
- 12 Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Egelhof T. et al . Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43 1339-1342
- 13 Antoch G, Jentzen W, Freudenberg L S. et al . Effect of oral contrast agents on computed tomography-based positron emission tomography attenuation correction in dual-modality positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003; 38 784-789
- 14 Mawlawi O, Erasmus J J, Munden R F. et al . Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186 308-319
- 15 Yau Y Y, Chan W S, Tam Y M. et al . Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error?. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46 283-291
- 16 Berthelsen A K, Holm S, Loft A. et al . PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005; 32 1167-1175
- 17 Antoch G, Kuehl H, Kanja J. et al . Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation. Radiology. 2004; 230 879-885
- 18 Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T. et al . Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003; 30 588-596
- 19 Vogel M N, Brechtel K, Klein M D. et al . Vergleich verschiedener Atem- und Kontrastmittelprotokolle bezüglich Bild- und Koregistrierungsqualität bei 18F-FDG-PET/CT-Untersuchungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2007; 179 72-79
- 20 Allen-Auerbach M, Yeom K, Park J. et al . Standard PET/CT of the chest during shallow breathing is inadequate for comprehensive staging of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47 298-301
- 21 Heusner T A, Fronz U, Jentzen W. et al . Effekt verschiedener Chemoembolisationsmaterialien auf die CT-basierte Schwächungskorrektur der PET/CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2007; 179 1159-1165
- 22 Fleischmann D. High-concentration contrast media in MDCT angiography: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 N39-N43
- 23 Fleischmann D. Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 M14-M20
- 24 Fleischmann D. Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 45 S88-S93
- 25 Hanninen E L, Vogl T J, Felfe R. et al . Detection of focal liver lesions at biphasic spiral CT: randomized double-blind study of the effect of iodine concentration in contrast materials. Radiology. 2000; 216 403-409
- 26 Reinhardt M J, Joe A Y, Jaeger U. et al . Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24 1178-1187
- 27 Pfannenberg A C, Aschoff P, Brechtel K. et al . Value of contrast-enhanced multiphase-CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging. Br J Radiol. 2007; 80 437-445
- 28 Pfannenberg A C, Aschoff P, Brechtel K. et al . Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus standard-dose contrast-enhanced CT in combined PET/CT protocols for staging and therapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34 36-44
- 29 Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H. et al . Optimizing scan delays of fixed duration contrast injection in contrast-enhanced biphasic multidetector-row CT for the liver and the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29 195-201
- 30 Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H. et al . MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187 W25-W32
- 31 Shin J A, Park J W, An M. et al . Diagnostic Accuracy of (18)F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol. 2006; 12 546-552
- 32 Yagyu Y, Awai K, Inoue M. et al . MDCT of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: a prospective study using contrast materials with different iodine concentrations. Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184 1535-1540
Priv.-Doz. Dr. Gerald Antoch
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Essen
Hufelandstr. 55
45122 Essen, Germany
Phone: ++ 49/2 01/72 38 45 99
Fax: ++ 49/2 01/7 23 15 48
Email: gerald.antoch@uni-due.de