Aesthetic Microtia Reconstruction with Medpor

ABSTRACT

The complex architecture of the auricle makes it one of the most challenging structures for the reconstructive surgeon to re-create. Overlying the ear’s unique cartilage framework are layers of varied soft tissues forming a three-dimensional organ, which is distinctively positioned on the head. Arguably, the most challenging auricle to reconstruct is third-degree microtia due to a near-total absence of native tissue and a need for lifelong durability of the reconstruction. Many methods of reconstruction have been studied; autogenous costal cartilage reconstruction has been one of the more traditional methods, with favorable long-term results reported by several surgeons. However, this technique requires tremendous artistic and technical skill on the part of the surgeon-sculptor to construct a realistic-appearing ear. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) is a stable, alloplastic implant that can integrate with host tissues, is resistant to infection, and has been successfully applied to reconstruction of the head and neck. For auricular reconstruction, Medpor-enveloped in a temporoparietal fascial flap with full-thickness skin graft coverage-is a durable and aesthetically gratifying alternative in microtic patients. This alternative surgical technique reduces surgical time and morbidity, standardizes results among surgeons, and facilitates an aesthetic, natural-appearing reconstruction of the auricle.

KEYWORDS

Medpor auricular framework - microtia - temporoparietal flap

REFERENCES

• 1 Pham T V, Early S V, Park S S. Surgery of the auricle.  Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  19 53-74
• 2 Sclafani A P, Mashkevich G. Aesthetic reconstruction of the auricle.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;  14 103-116
• 3 Tolleth H. A hierarchy of values in the design and construction of the ear.  Clin Plast Surg. 1990;  17 193-207
• 4 Quatela V C, Thompson S K, Goldman N D. Microtia reconstruction.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;  14 117-127
• 5 Aguilar E F. Auricular reconstruction in congenital anomalies of the ear.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;  9 159-169
• 6 Romo III T, Presti P M, Yalamanchili H R. Medpor alternative for microtia repair.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;  14 129-136
• 7 Jahrsdoerfer R A, Kesser B W. Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon.  Facial Plast Surg. 1995;  11 274-277
• 8 Weerda H. Classification of congenital deformities of the auricle.  Facial Plast Surg. 1988;  5 385-388
• 9 Brent B. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 319-334
• 10 Brent B. Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts: a review of personal experience with 1000 cases.  Clin Plast Surg. 2002;  29 257-271
• 11 Tanzer R C. Microtia-a long-term follow-up of 44 reconstructed auricles.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;  61 161-166
• 12 Leach Jr J L, Jordan J A, Brown K R et al.. Techniques for improving ear definition in microtia reconstruction.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;  48 39-46
• 13 Avelar J. Importance of ear reconstruction for the aesthetic balance of the facial contour.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986;  10 147-156
• 14 Furnas D W. Complications of surgery of the external ear.  Clin Plast Surg. 1990;  17 305-318
• 15 Adams Jr W P, Rohrich R J, Gunter J P et al.. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 265-270
• 16 Thomson H G, Kim T Y, Ein S H. Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 961-968
• 17 Ohara K, Nakamura K, Ohta E. Chest wall deformities and thoracic scoliosis after costal cartilage graft harvesting.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  99 1030-1036
• 18 Cronin T D, Ascough B M. Silastic ear construction.  Clin Plast Surg. 1978;  5 367-378
• 19 Sclafani A P, Romo III T, Silver L. Clinical and histologic behavior of exposed porous high-density polyethylene implants.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  99 41-50
• 20 Shanbhag A, Friedman H I, Augustine J et al.. Evaluation of porous polyethylene for external ear reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1990;  24 32-39
• 21 Williams J D, Romo III T, Sclafani A P et al.. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;  123 578-583
• 22 Frodel J L, Lee S. The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124 1219-1223
• 23 Romano J J, Iliff N T, Manson P N. Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures.  J Craniofac Surg. 1993;  4 142-147
• 24 Kim D Y, Cho K S, Lee S Y et al.. Surgical correction of cryptotia using Medpor.  Ann Plast Surg. 1999;  42 693-699
• 25 Wellisz T. Reconstruction of the burned external ear using a Medpor porous polyethylene pivoting helix framework.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  91 811-818
• 26 Romo III T, Fozo M S, Sclafani A P. Microtia reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework.  Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  16 15-22
• 27 Park C, Lew D H, Yoo W H. An analysis of 123 temporoparietal fascial flaps: anatomic and clinical considerations in total auricular reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 1295-1306
• 28 Romo III T, Morris L GT, Kohan D et al.. Reconstruction of congenital microtia-atresia: outcomes with the Medpor/BAHA approach. Accepted for publication in Annals of Plastic Surgery