Horm Metab Res 2008; 40(7): 479-483
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077051
Humans, Clinical

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of M22-based ELISA and Human-TSH-Receptor-based Luminescence Assay for the Measurement of Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies in Patients with Thyroid Diseases

C. Liu 1 , 2 [*] , D. Hermsen 3 [*] , J. Domberg 2 , C. Graeber 2 , H. Hautzel 4 , Y. Duan 1 , K. F. Xu 1 , C. P. Liu 1 , X. D. Mao 1 , K. Cupisti 5 , W. A. Scherbaum 2 , M. Schott 2
  • 1Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 3Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 5Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received 17.03.2008

accepted 15.04.2008

Publication Date:
26 May 2008 (online)

Abstract

Previously, a new procedure for measuring serum TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) was reported in which the autoantibodies inhibit binding of a human monoclonal thyroid stimulating antibody M22 to TSHR-coated ELISA plate wells (TRAb ELISA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of this assay in comparison to the second generation TRAb assay (TRAb LIA) based on the recombinant human TSH-receptor and chemiluminescence technology (TRAb LIA). Among the 158 patients, 84 patients suffered from Graves’ disease (GD), 34 patients had Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and 40 patients had euthyroid nodular thyroid disease (NTD) without signs of autoimmunity. TRAb measurements were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Out of 84 GD patients, 80 (95.2%) were TRAb positive as detected by the TRAb LIA. One GD patient had TRAb values within the grey zone (1.0–1.5 IU/l). All patients with HT and NTD were negative except in 6 (8.1%) cases whose TRAb values were within the grey zone. On the basis of the recommended cutoff value (TRAb 1.0 IU/l), the TRAb ELISA found 78 of 84 (92.9%) GD patients to be TRAb positive. None of the patients with HT, but two cases (5.0%) with NTD were TRAb positive. The diagnostic sensitivity of the TRAb LIA and TRAb ELISA assays was 95.2 and 92.9%, while the specificity was 100% and 97.3%, respectively. There was a close correlation (r=0.968, p<0.0001) between both assays in 84 patients with GD. Additionally, the between-run imprecision close to the cutoff limit was assessed. The calculated between-run coefficient of variation (CV) of the TRAb ELISA was 28.2% at the recommended cutoff value of 1.0 IU/l. Due to the evaluated imprecision data we propose a higher cutoff value correlating with a between-run CV of 20% (functional assay sensitivity). Our results indicate that due to a worse imprecision the TRAb ELISA has a slightly lower sensitivity and specificity compared to the TRAb LIA assay. These findings suggest that the M22 monoclonal antibody-based TRAb ELISA is not as reliable as other second generation TRAb assays in the diagnosis of Graves’ diseases.

References

1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence

M. SchottMD 

Department of Endocrinology

Diabetes and Rheumatology

University Hospital Düsseldorf

Moorenstr.5

40225 Düsseldorf

Germany

Phone: +49/211/811 78 10

Fax: +49/211/811 78 60

Email: [email protected]

    >