J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24(5): 327-332
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1080535
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Mechanical Resistance of Peripheral Nerve Repair with Biological Glue and with Conventional Suture at Different Postoperative Times

Marcelo Tadashi Nishimura1 , Nilton Mazzer1 , Cláudio Henrique Barbieri1 , Carlos Alberto Moro1
  • 1Department of Biomechanics, Medicine, and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (Laboratory of Bioengineering), Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, USP, Program of Post-Graduation in Orthopedics, Traumatology, and Rehabilitation, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 July 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Regardless of its type, the repair of a peripheral nerve must ideally permit early motion of the affected limb and resist disruption by the tensile forces generated throughout the healing process and regeneration. A comparative study of the mechanical resistance of the repair of the sciatic nerve with biological glue and conventional microsurgical suture over time was undertaken in 48 rats. Both right and left sciatic nerves were exposed simultaneously and repaired at random with the glue on one side and conventional suture on the opposite side. Mechanical resistance of the repair was evaluated in situ with a universal testing machine using a hooklike accessory applied proximally to the repair site, immediately and at 7, 14, and 28 days postoperatively. A load was applied at the rate of 2 mm/min till rupture. The resistance of both types of repair significantly increased up to day 14 (p < 0.001), and the repair with the glue was significantly less resistant than repair with conventional suture immediately postoperatively (p < 0.001) and on day 7 (p = 0.03). Resistance became equivalent for the two types of repair on days 14 (p = 0.67) and 28 (p = 0.34). The change in resistance of both types of repair with time was in accordance with the power function numeric formula.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Millesi H, Meissl G, Berger A. The interfascicular nerve-grafting of the median and ulnar nerves.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;  54 727-750
  • 2 Terzis J K. Clinical microsurgery of the peripheral nerve: the state of the art.  Clin Plast Surg. 1979;  6 247-267
  • 3 Jabaley M E, Wallace W H, Heckler F R. Internal topography of major nerves of the forearm and hand: a current review.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;  5 1-18
  • 4 Jabaley M E. Nervios periféricos. In: McCarthy JG, May JW, Littler JW Cirurgia Plástica: La mano. Buenos Aires; Panamericana 1992: 528-546
  • 5 Maeda T, Hori S, Sasaki S, Maruo S. Effects of tension at the site of coaptation on recovery of sciatic nerve function after neurorrhaphy: evaluation by walking-track measurement, electrophysiology, histomorphometry, and electron probe X-ray microanalysis.  Microsurgery. 1999;  19 200-207
  • 6 Young J Z, Medawar P B. Fibrin sutures of peripheral nerves.  Lancet. 1940;  2 126-128
  • 7 Seddon H J, Medawar P B. Fibrin suture of human nerves.  Lancet. 1942;  2 87-88
  • 8 Tarlov I M, Benjamin B. Plasma clot and silk suture of nerves.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;  76 366-370
  • 9 Singer M. The combined use of fibrin film and clot in end-to-end union of nerves: an experimental study.  J Neurosurg. 1945;  2 102-125
  • 10 Matras H, Dinges H P, Mamoli B, Lassmann H. Non-sutured nerve transplantation (a report on animal experiments).  J Maxillofac Surg. 1973;  1 37-40
  • 11 Matras H, Braun F, Lassmann H, Ammerer H P, Mamoli B. Plasma clot welding of nerves (experimental report).  J Maxillofac Surg. 1973;  1 236-247
  • 12 Kuderna H. Clinical application of nerve-anastomoses adhesion using fibrinogen.  Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1976;  21 135
  • 13 Egloff D V, Narakas A. Nerve anastomosis with human fibrin. Preliminary clinical report (56 cases).  Ann Chir Main. 1983;  2 101-115
  • 14 Bento R F, Miniti A. Anastomosis of the intratemporal facial nerve using fibrin tissue adhesive.  Ear Nose Throat J. 1993;  72 663
  • 15 Slooff A CF. Neurosurgical reconstruction of obstetric brachial plexus lesions with the use of fibrin sealing. In: Schlag G, Ascher PW, Steinkogler FJ, Stammberger H Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1994: 68-75
  • 16 Sterkers O, Julien N, Bouccara D, Sterkers J M. Fibrin glue anastomosis of the facial nerve. In: Schlag G, Hole J Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1995: 105-110
  • 17 Narakas A, Bonnard C. Ten years experience using Tissucol in the repair of the brachial plexus and neighbouring nerves. In: Schlag G, Hole J Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1995: 95-104
  • 18 Menovsky T, Bartels H MAR. Stabilization and accurate trimming of nerve ends: practical use of fibrin glue. Technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 224-225
  • 19 Cruz N I, Debs N, Fiol R E. Evaluation of fibrin glue in rat sciatic nerve repairs.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;  78 369-373
  • 20 Smahel J, Meyer V E, Bachem U. Glueing of peripheral nerves with fibrin: experimental studies.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1987;  3 211-220
  • 21 Moy O J, Peimer C A, Koniuch M P, Howard C, Zielezny M, Katikaneni P R. Fibrin seal adhesive versus nonabsorbable microsuture in peripheral nerve repair.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1988;  13 273-278
  • 22 Nishihira S, McCaffrey T V. Repair of motor nerve defects: comparison of suture and fibrin adhesive techniques.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;  100 17-21
  • 23 Bento R F, Miniti A. Comparison between fibrin tissue adhesive, epineural suture and natural union in intratemporal facial nerve of cats.  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1989;  465 1-36
  • 24 Jin Y, Dehesdin D, Hemet J, Bagot D'Arc C, Creissard P, Tadie M. Comparative experimental study of nerve repairs by classical suture or biological adhesive.  Neurochirurgie. 1990;  36 378-382
  • 25 Maragh H, Meyer B S, Davenport D, Gould J D, Terzis J K. Morphofunctional evaluation of fibrin glue versus microsuture nerve repair.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1990;  6 331-337
  • 26 Menovsky T, Beek J F. Laser, fibrin glue, or suture repair of peripheral nerves: a comparative functional, histological, and morphometric study in the rat sciatic nerve.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 694-699
  • 27 Temple C LF, Ross D C, Dunning C E, Johnson J A. Resistance to disruption and gapping of peripheral nerve repairs: in vivo biomechanical assessment of techniques.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;  20 645-650
  • 28 Sames M, Blahos Jr J, Rokyta R, Benes Jr V. Comparison of microsurgical suture with fibrin glue connection of the sciatic nerve in rabbits.  Physiol Res. 1997;  46 303-306
  • 29 Ornelas L, Padilla L, Di Silvio M et al.. Fibrin glue: an alternative technique for nerve coaptation—Part I. Wave amplitude, conduction velocity, and plantar-length factors.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006;  22 119-122
  • 30 Ornelas L, Padilla L, Di Silvio M et al.. Fibrin glue: an alternative technique for nerve coaptation—Part II. Nerve regeneration and histomorphometric assessment.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006;  22 123-128

Cláudio Henrique BarbieriM.D. 

Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor

Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto–USP Campus Universitário, 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil

    >