Venous thromboembolism diagnosis: unresolved issues

Marc Righini; Grégoire Le Gal; Henri Bounameaux

doi:10.1160/TH14-06-0530

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Thromb Haemost 2015; 113(06): 1184-1192
DOI: 10.1160/TH14-06-0530

Theme Issue Article

Schattauer GmbH

Venous thromboembolism diagnosis: unresolved issues

Marc Righini

¹Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

,

Grégoire Le Gal

²Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

,

Henri Bounameaux

¹Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

Recent advances in the management of patients with suspected VTE have both improved diagnostic accuracy and made management algorithms safer, easier to use and well standardised. These diagnostic algorithms are mainly based on the assessment of clinical pretest probability, D-dimer measurement and imaging tests, mainly represented by compression ultrasound (CUS) for suspected DVT and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or lung ventilationperfusion scan for pulmonary embolism. These diagnostic algorithms allow a safe and cost-effective diagnosis for most patients with suspected VTE. In this review, we focus on the challenge of diagnosing VTE in special patient populations, such as elderly patients, pregnant women, or patients with a prior VTE. Some additional challenges are arising that might require adjustments to current diagnostic strategies, such as the reduced clinical suspicion threshold, resulting in a lower proportion of VTE among suspected patients; the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of VTE, especially regarding calf deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE).

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosis - pulmonary embolism - D-dimer - age-adjusted D-dimer - compression ultrasonography - computed tomography pulmonary angiography

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O. et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1760-1768.
2 van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV. et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 295: 172-179.
3 Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G. et al. Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 957-970.
4 Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM. et al. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 709-718.
5 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-1798.
6 Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK. et al. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 886-892.
7 Di Nisio M, Squizzato A, Rutjes AW. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 296-304.
8 Righini M, Perrier A, De Moerloose P. et al. D-Dimer for venous thromboembolism diagnosis: 20 years later. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 06: 1059-1071.
9 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBO Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 657-660.
10 Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA. et al. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1452-1457.
11 Timmons S, Kingston M, Hussain M. et al. Pulmonary embolism: differences in presentation between older and younger patients. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 601-605.
12 Kokturk N, Oguzulgen IK, Demir N. et al. Differences in clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism in older vs younger patients. Circ J 2005; 69: 981-986.
13 Robert-Ebadi H, Le Gal G, Carrier M. et al. Differences in clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism in women and men. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 693-698.
14 Le Gal G, Bounameaux H. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1244-1246.
15 Meguid El, Nahas A, Bello AK. Chronic kidney disease: the global challenge. Lancet 2005; 365: 331-340.
16 Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E. et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1393-1399.
17 Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H. et al. Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2000; 109: 357-361.
18 Douma RA, le Gal G, Sohne M. et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cutoff value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. Br Med J 2010; 340: c1475.
19 Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL. et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. J Am Med Assoc 2014; 311: 1117-1124.
20 Douma RA, Tan M, Schutgens R. et al. Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded. Haematologica 2012; 97: 1507-1513.
21 Le Gal G, Righini M, Sanchez O. et al. A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 963-966.
22 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 98-107.
23 Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA. et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2007; 298: 2743-2753.
24 Chan WS, Lee A, Spencer FA. et al. Predicting deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: out in “LEFt” field?. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 85-92.
25 Righini M, Jobic C, Boehlen F. et al. Predicting deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: external validation of the LEFT clinical prediction rule. Haematologica 2013; 98: 545-548.
26 Chan WS, Lee A, Spencer FA. et al. D-dimer testing in pregnant patients: towards determining the next ‘level’ in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 1004-1011.
27 Le Gal G, Kercret G, Ben Yahmed K. et al. Diagnostic value of single complete compression ultrasonography in pregnant and postpartum women with suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective study. Br Med J 2012; 344: e2635.
28 Chan WS, Ray JG, Murray S. et al. Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1170-1175.
29 Chan WS, Chunilal S, Lee A. et al. A red blood cell agglutination D-dimer test to exclude deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 165-170.
30 Nijkeuter M, Geleijns J, de Roos A. et al. Diagnozing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: rationalizing fetal radiation exposure in radiological procedures. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1857-1858.
31 Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Med Assoc 2007; 298: 317-323.
32 Roy P-M, Meyer G, Vielle B. et al. Appropriateness of Diagnostic Management and Outcomes of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 157-164.
33 Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G. et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2014. Epub ahead of print
34 Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM. et al. Value of D-dimer testing for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 176-180.
35 Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA. et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 698-707.
36 Klok FA, Tijmensen JE, Haeck ML. et al. Persistent dyspnea complaints at longterm follow-up after an episode of acute pulmonary embolism: results of a questionnaire. Eur J Intern Med 2008; 19: 625-629.
37 Le Gal G, Kovacs MJ, Carrier M. et al. Validation of a diagnostic approach to exclude recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 07: 752-759.
38 Prandoni P, Noventa F, Ghirarduzzi A. et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients Haematologica 2007; 92: 199-205.
39 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Bernardi E. et al. The diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 402-406.
40 Linkins LA, Stretton R, Probyn L. et al. Interobserver agreement on ultrasound measurements of residual vein diameter, thrombus echogenicity and Doppler venous flow in patients with previous venous thrombosis. Thromb Res 2006; 117: 241-247.
41 Westerbeek RE, Van Rooden CJ, Tan M. et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging of the evolution of acute deep vein thrombosis of the leg. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 06: 1087-1092.
42 Tan M, Mol GC, van Rooden CJ. et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging differentiates acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis from residual thrombosis. Blood 2014; 124: 623-627.
43 van Langevelde K, Tan M, Sramek A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography developments in imaging of venous thromboembolism. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 1302-1312.
44 Stein PD, Matta F. Noninvasive imaging in pulmonary embolism according to age and gender. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2014; 20: 143-146.
45 Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS. et al. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 1716-1722.
46 Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR. et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2317-2327.
47 Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 831-837.
48 Carrier M, Kimpton M, Le Gal G. et al. The management of a sub-segmental pulmonary embolism: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian thrombosis physicians. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 09: 1412-1415.
49 den Exter PL, van Es J, Klok FA. et al. Risk profile and clinical outcome of symptomatic subsegmental acute pulmonary embolism. Blood 2013; 122: 1144-1149 quiz 1329.
50 Carrier M, Righini M, Le Gal G. Symptomatic subsegmental pulmonary embolism: what is the next step?. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 1486-1490.
51 Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR. et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2007; 245: 315-329.
52 Righini M, Paris S, Le Gal G. et al. Clinical relevance of distal deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 56-64.
53 Bernardi E, Camporese G, Buller HR. et al. Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2008; 300: 1653-1659.
54 The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). J Am Med Assoc 1990; 263: 2753-2759.
55 Le Duc-Pennec A, Le Roux PY, Cornily JC. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of singlephoton emission tomography ventilation/perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2012; 141: 381-387.
56 Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 743-750.
57 Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE. et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 434-443 W142–143.
58 Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 92-97.
59 Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy P-M. et al. Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: The Revised Geneva Score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 165-171.
60 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 416-420.
61 Miniati M, Monti S, Bauleo C. et al. A diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism based on standardised pretest probability and perfusion lung scanning: a management study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 1450-1456.
62 Miniati M, Monti S, Bottai M. A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2003; 114: 173-179.
63 Kline JA, Nelson RD, Jackson RE. et al. Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39: 144-152.
64 Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M. et al. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2131-2136.
65 Gibson NS, Sohne M, Kruip MJ. et al. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: 229-234.