Yearb Med Inform 2015; 24(01): 34-37
DOI: 10.15265/IY-2015-027
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Health Information Technology Coordination to Support Patient-centered Care Coordination

O. Steichen
1  AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Internal Medicine Department, Paris, France
2  Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1142, LIMICS, Paris, France; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, LIMICS, (UMR_S 1142), Bobigny, France; INSERM, U1142, LIMICS, Paris, France
W. Gregg
3  Clinical Informatics, Hospital Corporation of America, Nashville TN, USA
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Patient-centered Care Coordination› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen


13. August 2015

10. März 2018 (online)


Objective: To select papers published in 2014, illustrating how information technology can contribute to and improve patient-centered care coordination.

Method: The two section editors performed a literature review from Medline and Web of Science to select a list of candidate best papers on the use of information technology for patient-centered care coordination. These papers were peer-reviewed by external reviewers and three of them were selected as “best papers”. Results: The first selected paper reports a qualitative study exploring the gap between current practices of care coordination in various settings and idealized longitudinal care plans. The second selected paper illustrates several unintended consequences of HIT designed to improve care coordination. The third selected paper shows that advanced analytic techniques in medical informatics can be instrumental in studying patient-centered care coordination.

Conclusions: The realization of true patient-centered care coordination is dependent upon a number of factors. Standardization of clinical documentation and HIT interoperability across organization and settings is a critical prerequisite for HIT to support patient-centered care coordination. Enabling patient involvement is an efficient means for goal setting and health information sharing. Additionally, unintended consequences of HIT tools (both positive and negative) must be measured and taken into account for quality improvement.