Yearb Med Inform 2016; 25(S 01): S18-S20
DOI: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s026
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Preface - Access to Knowledge Revisited

Donald A.B. Lindberg
1   Director Emeritus, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
,
Betsy L. Humphreys
2   Acting Director, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 May 2016

Publication Date:
06 March 2018 (online)

Summary

Objective: To review and update the Preface to the 1998 Yearbook of Medical Informatics, which had as its Special Topic “Health Informatics and the Internet”.

Method: Assessment of the accuracy of predictions made in 1998 and consideration of key developments in informatics since that time.

Results: Predictions made in 1998 were generally accurate regarding reduced dependence on keyboards, expansion of multimedia, medical data privacy policy development, impact of molecular biology on knowledge and treatment of neoplasms, and use of imaging and informatics to advance understanding of brain structure and function. Key developments since 1998 include the huge increase in publicly available electronic information; acknowledgement by leaders in government and science of the importance of biomedical informatics to societal goals for health, health care, and scientific discovery; the influence of the public in promoting clinical research transparency and free access to government-funded research results; the long-awaited arrival of electronic health records; and the “Cloud” as a 21st century reformulation of contracting out the computer center. Conclusions: There are many challenging and important problems that deserve the attention of the informatics community. Informatics researchers will be best served by embracing a very broad definition of medical informatics and by promoting public understanding of the field.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lindberg DA. Preface – Access to Knowledge. Yearb Med Inform 1998; 1-3.
  • 2 Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL. Rising expectations: access to biomedical information. Yearb Med Inform 2008; 165-72.
  • 3 Miller N, Lacroix EM, Backus JE. MedlinePlus: building and maintaining the National Library of Medicine’s consumer health Web service. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000; Jan 88 (Suppl. 01) 11-7.
  • 4 Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, Kimura M, Tryka K, Bagoutdinov R. et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet 2007; Oct 39 (Suppl. 10) 1181-6.
  • 5 Hripcsak G, Duke JD, Shah NH, Reich CG, Huser V, Schuemie MJ. et al. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 574-8.
  • 6 Halamka JD. The State of Information Security 2015. Life as a Healthcare CIO. 2015 Dec 9 [cited 2016 Jan 9] Available from http://geekdoctor.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-state-of-information-security-2015.html
  • 7 Zhao Y, Polley EC, Li MC, Lih CJ, Palmisano A, Sims DJ. et al. GeneMed: An Informatics Hub for the Coordination of Next-Generation Sequencing Studies that Support Precision Oncology Clinical Trials. Cancer Inform 2015 Mar 19 14 (Suppl. 02) 45-55.
  • 8 Jorgenson LA, Newsome WT, Anderson DJ, Bargmann CI, Brown EN, Deisseroth K. et al. The BRAIN Initiative: developing technology to catalyse neuroscience discovery. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2015 May 19 370(1668).
  • 9 Califf RM, Zarin DA, Kramer JM, Sherman RE, Aberle LH, Tasneem A. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010. JAMA 2012 May 2 307 (Suppl. 17) 1838-47.
  • 10 Wu M, Sirota M, Butte AJ, Chen B. Characteristics of drug combination therapy in oncology by analyzing clinical trial data on ClinicalTrials.gov. Pac Symp Biocomput 2015; 68-79.
  • 11 Drazen JM. Sharing individual patient data from clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 201-2.
  • 12 Advisory Committee to the Director, National Institutes of Health.. Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group. The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program – Building a Research Foundation for 21st Century Medicine. 2015 Sept 17. [Cited 2016 Jan 9] Available from acd.od.nih.gov/reports/PMI_WG_report_2015-09-17-Final.pdf
  • 13 HL7 launches Argonaut Project to advance FHIR interoperability standard. Health Manag Technol 2015; Feb; 36 (Suppl. 02) 26.
  • 14 Joint Initiative on SDO Global Health Informatics Standardization. [Cited 2016 Jan 9] Available from http://www.jointinitiativecouncil.org.
  • 15 Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J, Buntin M, Corn M, Etheredge L. et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; Jan 22 (Suppl. 01) 43-50.
  • 16 Mandl KD, Mandel JC, Kohane IS. Driving Innovation in Health Systems through an Apps-Based Information Economy. Cell Syst 2015; Jul 1 (Suppl. 01) 8-13.
  • 17 MacArthur JA, Morales J, Tully RE, Astashyn A, Gil L, Bruford EA. et al. Locus Reference Genomic: reference sequences for the reporting of clinically relevant sequence variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; Jan 42 Database issue D873-8.
  • 18 Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S. et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2016 Jan 4 44 D1 D862-8.
  • 19 Rubinstein WS, Maglott DR, Lee JM, Kattman BL, Malheiro AJ, Ovetsky M. et al. The NIH genetic testing registry: a new, centralized database of genetic tests to enable access to comprehensive information and improve transparency. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; Jan 41 Database issue D925-35.
  • 20 Feltus FA, Breen 3rd JR, Deng J, Izard RS, Konger CA, Ligon 3rd WB. et al. The Widening Gulf between Genomics Data Generation and Consumption: A Practical Guide to Big Data Transfer Technology. Bioinform Biol Insights 2015 Sep 23 9 (Suppl. 01) 9-19.
  • 21 Ferucci DA. Introduction to “This is Watson”. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2012; May-Jul 3-4: 1-15.