Limb apraxia in aphasic patients

ABSTRACT

Limb apraxia is usually associated with left cerebral hemisphere damage, with numerous case studies involving aphasic patients. The aim of this study was to verify the occurrence of limb apraxia in aphasic patients and analyze its nature. This study involved 44 healthy volunteers and 28 aphasic patients matched for age and education. AH participants were assessed using a limb apraxia battery comprising subtests evaluating lexical-semantic aspects related to the comprehension/production of gestures as well as motor movements. Aphasics had worse performances on many tasks related to conceptual components of gestures. The difficulty found on the imitation of dynamic gesture tasks also indicated that there were specific motor difficulties in gesture planning. These results reinforce the importance of conducting limb apraxia assessment in aphasic patients and also highlight pantomime difficulties as a good predictor for semantic disturbances.

RESUMO

A apraxia de membros está frequentemente associada com lesões do hemisfério esquerdo, com inúmeros casos de pacientes afásicos. O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a ocorrência da apraxia de membros em pacientes afásicos bem como a natureza desse distúrbio. O estudo foi realizado com 28 indivíduos afásicos e 44 controles pareados segundo a idade e a escolaridade. Todos os participantes foram avaliados com uma extensa bateria de apraxia de membros, consistindo de subtestes que avaliaram a compreensão e a produção dos aspectos léxico-semânticos relacionados aos gestos bem como produção motora propriamente dita. Os pacientes afásicos apresentaram dificuldades em tarefas envolvendo aspectos conceptuais da produção gestual. A dificuldade encontrada na imitação de gestos dinâmicos também indicou déficits no processamento gestual independente do déficit conceptual observado nestes pacientes. Esses resultados reforçam a importância da avaliação da apraxia de membros e apontam para a dificuldade de realização de pantomimas como indicativa de déficits semânticos.

Keywords:

apraxias - apraxia - ideomotor - aphasia - neuropsychological tests

Palavras-chave:

apraxias - apraxia ideomotora - afasia - testes neuropsicológicos

• References

• 1 Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 1997.
• 2 Goldenberg G. Apraxia and beyond: life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex. 2003;39(3):509-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70261-2
• 3 De Renzi E, Lucchelli F. Ideational apraxia. Brain. 1988;11 1(5):1173-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/111.5.1173
• 4 De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol. 1980;37(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1980.00500500036003
• 5 Wheaton LA, Hallett M. Ideomotor apraxia: a review. J Neurol Sci. 2007;260(1-2):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.014
• 6 Cubelli R, Marchetti C, Boscolo G, Della Sala S. Cognition in action: testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(2):144-65. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1226
• 7 Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(1):63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)00104-W
• 8 Goldenberg G, Hermsdörfer J, Spatt J. Ideomotor apraxia and cerebral dominance for motor control. Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00034-8
• 9 Goldenberg G, Strauss S. Hemisphere asymmetries for imitation of novel gestures. Neurology. 2002;59(6):893-7. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.59.6.893
• 10 Hanna-Pladdy B, Daniels SK, Fieselman MA, Thompson K, Vasterling JJ, Heilman KM et al. Praxis lateralization: errors in right and left hemisphere stroke. Cortex. 2001;37(2):219-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70569-0
• 11 Roy EA, Heath M, Westwood D, Schweizer TA, Dixon MJ, Black SE et al. Task demands and limb apraxia in stroke. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(2):253-79. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1230
• 12 Leiguarda R, Clarens F, Amengual A, Drucaroff L, Hallett M. Short apraxia screening test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(8):867-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.951315
• 13 Perez-Marmol JM, Lopez-Alcalde S, Carnero-Pardo C, Canadas-De la Fuente GA, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Garcia-Rios MC. Creation and design of a test for the Evaluation of Upper Limb Apraxia (EULA) based on a cognitive model: a pilot study. Rev Neurol. 2015;60(2):66-74.
• 14 Geschwind N. The apraxias: neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement. Am Sci. 1975;63(2):188-95.
• 15 Raymer AM, Maher LM, Foundas AL, Heilman KM, Rothi LJ. The significance of body part as tool errors in limb apraxia. Brain Cogn. 1997;34(2):287-92. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0919
• 16 Schnider A, Hanlon RE, Alexander DN, Benson DF. Ideomotor apraxia: behavioral dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. Brain Lang. 1997;58(1):1 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1770
• 17 Basso A, Marangolo P. Cognitive neuropsychological rehabilitation: the emperor's new clothes? In: Basso A, Cappa S, Gianotti G, editors. Cognitive neuropsychology and language rehabilitation. East Sussex: Psychology Press; 2000. p. 219-29.
• 18 Mantovani-Nagaoka J. Ortiz KZ. The influence of age, gender and education on the performance of healthy individuals on a battery for assessing limb apraxias. Dement Neuropsychol. 2016;10(3):232-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003010
• 19 Cera ML, Ortiz KZ, Bertolucci PH, Minett TS. Speech and orofacial apraxias in Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(10):1679-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000781
• 20 Canzano L, Scandola M, Gobbetto V, Moretto G, D’Imperio D, Moro V. The Representation of Objects in Apraxia: From Action Execution to Error Awareness. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00039
• 21 Okamoto IH. Influência da escolaridade na avaliação das praxias numa população idosa normal [mestrado}. Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 1997.
• 22 Reis A, Petersson KM, Castro-Caldas A, Ingvar M. Formal schooling influences two- but not three-dimensional naming skills. Brain Cogn. 2001;47(3):397-41 1. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1316
• 23 Arévalo A, Perani D, Cappa SF, Butler A, Bates E, Dronkers N. Action and object processing in aphasia: from nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain Lang. 2007;100(1):79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.012
• 24 Buxbaum LJ, Kyle K, Grossman M, Coslett HB. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex. 2007;43(3):41 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70466-0
• 25 Frey SH. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex. 2007;43(3):368-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70462-3
• 26 Ardila A, Rosselli M, Rosas P. Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: visuospatial and memory abilities. Brain Cogn. 1989;1 1(2):147-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(89)90015-8
• 27 Hermsdörfer J, Terlinden G, Mühlau M, Goldenberg G, Wohlschläger AM. Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;36 2:T109-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.037
• 28 Duffy RJ, Duffy JR. An investigation of body part as object (BPO) responses in normal and brain-damaged adults. Brain Cogn. 1989;10(2):220-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(89)90054-7
• 29 Ochipa C, Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Ideational apraxia: a deficit in tool selection and use. Ann Neurol. 1989;25(2): 190-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410250214
• 30 Wang L, Goodglass H. Pantomime, praxis, and aphasia. Brain Lang. 1992;42(4):402-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90076-Q