Methods Inf Med 2009; 48(01): 76-83
DOI: 10.3414/ME0576
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Mapping the Domain of Medical Informatics

M. J. Schuemie
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
J. L. Talmon
2   School for Public Health and Primary Care, CAPRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
P. W. Moorman
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
J. A. Kors
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 23 May 2008

accepted: 24 September 2008

Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: The domain of medical informatics (MI) is not well defined. It covers a wide range of research topics. Our objective is to characterize the field of MI by means of the scientific literature in this domain.

Methods: We used titles and abstracts from MEDLINE records of papers published between July 1993 and July 2008, and extracted uni-, bi- and trigrams as features. Starting with the ISI category of medical informatics, we applied a semi-automated procedure to identify the set of journals and proceedings pertaining to MI. A clustering algorithm was subsequently applied to the articles from this set of publications.

Results: MI literature can be divided into three subdomains: 1) the organization, application, and evaluation of health information systems, 2) medical knowledge representation, and 3) signal and data analysis. Over the last fifteen years, the field has remained relatively stable, although most journals have shifted their focus somewhat.

Conclusions: We identified the scientific literature pertaining to the field of MI, and the main areas of research. We were able to show trends in the field, and the positioning of different journals within this field.

 
  • References

  • 1 van Bemmel JH, Musen MA. (eds). Handbook of Medical Informatics. 2nd edition. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2002
  • 2 Lorenzi NM. Towards IMIA 2015 – the IMIA Strategic Plan. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (01) 1-5.
  • 3 IMIA. http://www.imia.org/strategic/PDF/IMIA_Strategic_Plan_Final.pdf 2007
  • 4 Elkin P. Personal communication. 2008
  • 5 Musen MA, van Bemmel JH. Challenges for Medical Informatics as an Academic Discipline. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (01) 1-3.
  • 6 Andrews JE. An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. J Med Libr Assoc 2003; 91 (01) 47-56.
  • 7 Morris TA, McCain KW. The structure of medical informatics journal literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (05) 448-466.
  • 8 Bansard JY, Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Cameron G, Clark D, van Mulligen E, Beltrame E. et al. Medical informatics and bioinformatics: a bibliometric study. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; 11 (03) 237-243.
  • 9 Raghupathi W, Nerur S. Research Themes and Trends in Health Information Systems. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (05) 435-442.
  • 10 McCray AT, Srinivasan S, Browne AC. Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994 pp 235-239.
  • 11 Jelier R, Schuemie MJ, Roes PJ, van Mulligen EM, Kors JA. Literature-based concept profiles for gene annotation: The issue of weighting. Int J Med Inform 2007 , Sep 7.
  • 12 Ludl M, Widmer G. Towards a Simple Clustering Criterion Based on Minimum Length Encoding. Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning; 2002; Helsinki, Finland:: Springer; 2002. pp 258-269.
  • 13 Heer J, Card SK, Landay JA. Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. CHI (Computer Human Interaction) Conference Proceedings; 2005 April 2-7; Portland, OR; 2005
  • 14 Rebholz-Schuhman D, Cameron G, Clark D, van Mulligen E, Coatrieux JL, Del Hoyo Barbolla E. et al. SYMBIOmatics: synergies in Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics – exploring current scientific literature for emerging topics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8 (01) S18.