From Adverse Drug Event Detection to Prevention

Summary

Background: Errors related to medication seriously affect patient safety and the quality of healthcare. It has been widely argued that various types of such errors may be prevented by introducing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) at the point of care.

Objectives: Although significant research has been conducted in the field, still medication safety is a crucial issue, while few research outcomes are mature enough to be considered for use in actual clinical settings. In this paper, we present a clinical decision support framework targeting medication safety with major focus on adverse drug event (ADE) prevention.

Methods: The novelty of the framework lies in its design that approaches the problem holistically, i.e., starting from knowledge discovery to provide reliable numbers about ADEs per hospital or medical unit to describe their consequences and probable causes, and next employing the acquired knowledge for decision support services development and deployment. Major design features of the frame-work’s services are: a) their adaptation to the context of care (i.e. patient characteristics, place of care, and significance of ADEs), and b) their straightforward integration in the healthcare information technologies (IT) infrastructure thanks to the adoption of a service-oriented architecture (SOA) and relevant standards.

Results: Our results illustrate the successful interoperability of the framework with two commercially available IT products, i.e., a Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, respectively, along with a Web prototype that is independent of existing health-care IT products. The conducted clinical validation with domain experts and test cases illustrates that the impact of the framework is expected to be major, with respect to patient safety, and towards introducing the CDSS functionality in practical use.

Conclusions: This study illustrates an important potential for the applicability of the presented framework in delivering contextualized decision support services at the point of care and for making a substantial contribution towards ADE prevention. None-theless, further research is required in order to quantitatively and thoroughly assess its impact in medication safety.

Keywords

Adverse drug events - clinical decision support systems (CDSS) - connectivity - contextualization - interoperability - service-oriented architecture (SOA) - medication safety

• References

• 1 Institute of Medicine. Preventing Medication Errors The National Academic Press; US: 2007
• 2 Schachter M. The epidemiology of medication errors: how many, how serious?. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67 (06) 621-623.
• 3 Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, Hsieh TC, Bates DW. Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 (04) 306-314.
• 4 Aronson JK. Medication errors: definitions and classification. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67 (06) 599-604.
• 5 Nebeker JR, Hurdle JF, Hoffman J, Roth B, Weir CR, Samore MH. Developing a taxonomy for research in adverse drug events: potholes and signposts. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9 (Nov-Dec suppl) S80-S85.
• 6 Murff HJ, Patel VL, Hripcsak G, Bates DW. Detecting adverse events for patient safety research: a review of current methodologies. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36 (1-2) 131-143.
• 7 Kuperman GJ. et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (01) 29-40.
• 8 van der Sijs H, van Gelder T, Vulto A, Berg M, Aarts J. Understanding handling of drug safety alerts: a simulation study. Int J Med Inf 2010; 79 (05) 361-369.
• 9 Jung M, Hoerbst A, Hackl WO, Kirrane F, Borbolla D, Jaspers MW, Oertle M, Koutkias V, Ferret L, Massari P, Lawton K, Riedmann D, Darmoni S, Maglaveras N, Lovis C, Ammenwerth E. Attitude of physicians towards automatic alerting in Computerized Physician Order Entry systems: A comparative international survey. Methods Inf Med 2013; 52 (02) 99-108.
• 10 Chazard E. et al. Detection of adverse drug events: proposal of a data model. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 148: 63-74.
• 11 Chazard E, Ficheur G, Bernonville S, Luyckx M, Beuscart R. Data mining to generate adverse drug events detection rules. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2011; 15 (06) 823-830.
• 12 Forster AJ, Jennings A, Chow C, Leeder C, van Walraven C. A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (01) 31-38.
• 13 Koutkias V. et al. Knowledge engineering for adverse drug event prevention: on the design and development of a uniform, contextualized and sustainable knowledge-based framework. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (03) 495-506.
• 14 ISO/IEC 10746-1:1998 ITU-T Recommendation X.901, Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model - Part 1: Overview
• 15 Chen D, Doumeingts G, Vernadat F. Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Comput Ind 2008; 59 (07) 647-659.
• 16 Singh MP, Huhns MN. Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents. New York: Wiley; 2005
• 17 Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (02) 146-155.
• 18 Katehakis DG, Sfakianakis SG, Kavlentakis G, Anthoulakis DN, Tsiknakis M. Delivering a lifelong integrated electronic health record based on a service oriented architecture. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; 11 (06) 639-650.
• 19 Ammenwerth E, Hackl WO, Riedmann D, Jung M. Contextualization of automatic alerts during electronic prescription: researchers’ and users’ opinions on useful context factors. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 169: 920-924.
• 20 Niès J. et al. Information contextualization in decision support modules for adverse drug event prevention. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 166: 95-104.
• 21 de Clercq PA, Hasman A, Blom JA, Korsten HHM. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64 (2-3) 285-318.
• 22 Oracle SOA Suite, Available at: www.oracle.com/us/products/middleware/soa/Lastaccess February 19 2014
• 23 OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee Common Alerting Protocol Standard, v. 1.2 (CAP-V1.2). July 2010. Available at: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP- v1.2-os.pdf Last access: February 19 2014
• 24 Brender J, Talmon J, Egmont-Petersen M, McNair P. Measuring quality of medical knowledge. Proceedings of MIE 1994; 69-74.
• 25 Bernonville S. et al. Three different cases of exploiting decision support services for adverse drug event prevention. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 166: 180-188.
• 26 Dolin RH. et al. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (01) 30-39.
• 27 The PSIP (Patient Safety through Intelligent Procedures in medication) Prototypes Portal. Available at: http://psip.univ-lille2.fr/prototypes/public/Lastaccess February 19 2014
• 28 Koutkias VG, Niès J, Jensen S, Maglaveras N, Beuscart R. Patient Safety Informatics. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 166 IOS Press
• 29 Rommers MK. et al. Development of a computerised alert system, ADEAS, to identify patients at risk for an adverse drug event. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (06) e35
• 30 Wright A, Sittig DF. SANDS: a service-oriented architecture for clinical decision support in a National Health Information Network. J Biomed Inform 2008; 41 (06) 962-981.