Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(02): 119-126
DOI: 10.3414/ME16-02-0020
REHAB
Schattauer GmbH

An Immersive Virtual Reality Platform to Enhance Walking Ability of Children with Acquired Brain Injuries

Emilia Biffi
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
,
Elena Beretta
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
,
Ambra Cesareo
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
2   Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
,
Cristina Maghini
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
,
Anna C. Turconi
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
,
Gianluigi Reni
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
,
Sandra Strazzer
1   Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 09 March 2016

accepted: 21 January 2016

Publication Date:
25 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: Acquired brain injury (ABI) may result in lifelong impairment of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functions. Several rehabilitative treatments are often needed to support walking recovery, thus participants’ engagement becomes a crucial aspect, especially when patients are children. In the last few years, traditional physiotherapy (PT) has been flanked by innovative technologies for rehabilitation in the fields of robotics and Virtual Reality (VR). Preliminary results have shown interesting perspectives in the use of a VR system, the GRAIL (Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab), in improving walking abilities in a small group of children with ABI, although further insights are needed about its use as rehabilitative tool in the pediatric population.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitation treatment on a GRAIL system for the improvement of walking abilities, in a group of children suffering from ABI.

Methods: 12 children with ABI (study group – SG; mean age = 12.1 ± 3.8 years old) underwent a 10-session treatment with the GRAIL, an instrumented multi-sensor platform based on immersive VR for gait training and rehabilitation in engaging VR environments. Before (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1), the participants were assessed by means of functional scales (Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), 6-Minute Walk Test (6minWT) and the 3D-Gait Analysis, over ground (OGA) and on GRAIL (GGA).

Results: All the participants completed the rehabilitative treatment. The functional evaluations showed an improvement in Gross Motor abilities (GMFM-88, p = 0.008), especially in standing (GMFM-D, p = 0.007) and walking (GMFM-E, p = 0.005), an increase of the endurance (6minWT, p = 0.002), and enhanced autonomy in daily life activities (FAQ, p = 0.025). OGA identified a significant decrease of the Gillette Gait Index for the impaired side and a general increase of symmetry. GGA showed improvements in spatiotemporal parameters and joints range of motion that moved towards normality and symmetry recovery.

Conclusions: A 10-session treatment with GRAIL on children with ABI led to improvements in their walking abilities and enhanced their engagement during the training. This is desirable when long life impairments are faced and children’s motor functions have to be regained and it supports the leading role that VR might have in the rehabilitation field.

 
  • References

  • 1 Guettard E, Roze E, Abada G, Lemesle C, Vidailhet M, Laurent-Vannier A. et al. Management of spasticity and dystonia in children with acquired brain injury with rehabilitation and botulinum toxin A. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009; 12 (03) 128-138.
  • 2 Forsyth RJ, Salorio CF, Christensen JR. Modelling early recovery patterns after paediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Dis Child. 2010; 95 (04) 266-270.
  • 3 Baque E, Sakzewski L, Barber L, Boyd RN. Systematic review of physiotherapy interventions to improve gross motor capacity and performance in children and adolescents with an acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2016; 30 (08) 948-959.
  • 4 Katz DI, White DK, Alexander MP, Klein RB. Recovery of ambulation after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85 (06) 865-869.
  • 5 Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8 (03) 187-211 discussion 212-219.
  • 6 Cameirao MS, Badia SB, Duarte E, Frisoli A, Verschure PF. The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43 (10) 2720-2728.
  • 7 Gutierrez RO, Galan Del Rio F, Cano de la Cuerda R, Alguacil Diego IM, Gonzalez RA, Page JC. A telerehabilitation program by virtual reality-video games improves balance and postural control in multiple sclerosis patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33 (04) 545-554.
  • 8 O’Neil RL, Skeel RL, Ustinova KI. Cognitive ability predicts motor learning on a virtual reality game in patients with TBI. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33 (04) 667-680.
  • 9 Liao YY, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Wu YR, Fuh JL, Wang RY. Virtual Reality-Based Training to Improve Obstacle-Crossing Performance and Dynamic Balance in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29 (07) 658-667.
  • 10 Kaufman KR, Wyatt MP, Sessoms PH, Grabiner MD. Task-specific fall prevention training is effective for warfighters with transtibial amputations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472 (10) 3076-3084.
  • 11 Villiger M, Bohli D, Kiper D, Pyk P, Spillmann J, Meilick B. et al. Virtual reality-augmented neuro-rehabilitation improves motor function and reduces neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27 (08) 675-683.
  • 12 Webster JS, McFarland PT, Rapport LJ, Morrill B, Roades LA, Abadee PS. Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82 (06) 769-775.
  • 13 Brooks BM. Route learning in a case of amnesia: A preliminary investigation into the efficacy of training in a virtual environment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1999; 9 (01) 63-76.
  • 14 Wang M, Reid D. Using the virtual reality-cognitive rehabilitation approach to improve contextual processing in children with autism. Scientific-WorldJournal. 2013; 2013: 716890.
  • 15 Bellani M, Fornasari L, Chittaro L, Brambilla P. Virtual reality in autism: state of the art. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011; 20 (03) 235-238.
  • 16 Shiri S, Feintuch U, Weiss N, Pustilnik A, Geffen T, Kay B. et al. A virtual reality system combined with biofeedback for treating pediatric chronic headache – a pilot study. Pain Med. 2013; 14 (05) 621-627.
  • 17 Luna-Oliva L, Ortiz-Gutierrez RM, Cano-de la Cuerda R, Piedrola RM, Alguacil-Diego IM, Sanchez-Camarero C. et al. Kinect Xbox 360 as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy in a school environment: a preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33 (04) 513-521.
  • 18 Rosie JA, Ruhen S, Hing WA, Lewis GN. Virtual rehabilitation in a school setting: is it feasible for children with cerebral palsy?. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015; 10 (01) 19-26.
  • 19 Fung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9 (02) 157-162.
  • 20 Hak L, Houdijk H, van der Wurff P, Prins MR, Mert A, Beek PJ. et al. Stepping strategies used by post-stroke individuals to maintain margins of stability during walking. Clin Biomech. 2013; 28 9-10 1041-1048.
  • 21 Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen BJ, Faubert J. Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007; 4: 22.
  • 22 McAndrew PM, Dingwell JB, Wilken JM. Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field. J Biomech. 2010; 43 (08) 1470-1475.
  • 23 Sessoms PH, Wyatt M, Grabiner M, Collins JD, Kingsbury T, Thesing N. et al. Method for evoking a trip-like response using a treadmill-based perturbation during locomotion. J Biomech. 2014; 47 (01) 277-280.
  • 24 Beltran EJ, Dingwell JB, Wilken JM. Margins of stability in young adults with traumatic transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments. J Biomech. 2014; 47 (05) 1138-1143.
  • 25 Darter BJ, Wilken JM. Gait training with virtual reality-based real-time feedback: improving gait performance following transfemoral amputation. Phys Ther. 2011; 91 (09) 1385-1394.
  • 26 Sloot LH, Harlaar J, van der Krogt MM. Self-paced versus fixed speed walking and the effect of virtual reality in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2015; 42 (04) 498-504.
  • 27 van der Krogt MM, Sloot LH, Harlaar J. Overground versus self-paced treadmill walking in a virtual environment in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2014; 40 (04) 587-593.
  • 28 van der Krogt MM, Sloot LH, Buizer AI, Harlaar J. Kinetic comparison of walking on a treadmill versus over ground in children with cerebral palsy. J Biomech. 2015; 48 (13) 3586-3592.
  • 29 Improving walking ability of children with acquired brain injuries by means of an immersive virtual reality platform. Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques. ACM; 2015
  • 30 Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 1997; 39 (04) 214-223.
  • 31 Sloot LH, van der Krogt MM, Harlaar J. Effects of adding a virtual reality environment to different modes of treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2014; 39 (03) 939-945.
  • 32 van den Bogert AJ, Geijtenbeek T, Even-Zohar O, Steenbrink F, Hardin EC. A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013; 51 (10) 1069-1077.
  • 33 D-flow: Immersive Virtual Reality and Real-time Feedback for Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry:. ACM; 2011
  • 34 Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised.. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1974
  • 35 Linder-Lucht M, Othmer V, Walther M, Vry J, Michaelis U, Stein S. et al. Validation of the Gross Motor Function Measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Pediatrics. 2007; 120 (04) e880-886.
  • 36 Novacheck TF, Stout JL, Tervo R. Reliability and validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20 (01) 75-81.
  • 37 Andersson C, Asztalos L, Mattsson E. Six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy. A study of reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20 (06) 488-495.
  • 38 Schutte LM, Narayanan U, Stout JL, Selber P, Gage JR, Schwartz MH. An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. Gait Posture. 2000; 11 (01) 25-31.
  • 39 Beretta E, Romei M, Molteni E, Avantaggiato P, Strazzer S. Combined robotic-aided gait training and physical therapy improve functional abilities and hip kinematics during gait in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015; 29 7-8 955-962.
  • 40 Papathanasiou E, Chevignard M, Vuillerot C, Tiberghien A, Godard I. Pediatric stroke rehabilitation: A review of techniques facilitating motor recovery. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016; 59S: e2.
  • 41 Cho C, Hwang W, Hwang S, Chung Y. Treadmill Training with Virtual Reality Improves Gait, Balance, and Muscle Strength in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016; 238 (03) 213-218.