J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31(05): 342-353
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19051
Research Article
American Academy of Audiology. All rights reserved. (2020) American Academy of Audiology

Influence of Provider Interaction on Patient's Readiness Toward Audiological Services and Technology

Amyn M. Amlani
1   Audigy Group, Vancouver, WA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 June 2020 (online)


Background Patients and providers recognize the importance of patient-centered care. Clinical interactions, however, suggest that audiologists maintain their traditional provider-centered approach.

Purpose The primary purpose of this study was to assess the degree to which provider interaction influenced patient readiness toward audiological services using the neobehavioral concept of need recognition described in consumer decision-making.

Research Design We used a randomized, within-group experimental approach using survey responses to quantify predisposed expectations on ten dimensions toward service and technology provision 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after an audiological assessment. Responses were also categorized as a function of the respondent-perceived professional setting of the provider (medical, rehabilitation, and consumer electronics).

Study Sample Survey respondents included 618 adults {186 males (mean age = 63.1 years; standard deviation [SD] = 5.3) and 432 females [mean age = 58.4 years; SD = 6.2]} from across the United States.

Data Collection and Analysis Data were analyzed using two approaches. First, we used a two-step cluster analysis procedure that revealed natural groupings (i.e., profiles) of respondent characteristics of the ten dimensions. Second, we compared within-group mean differences between pre- and postappointment responses using a univariate analysis of variance, with mean differences reported as a function of professional setting and preappointment responses serving as the control condition.

Results Results revealed that the predisposed expectation profiles among the ten dimensions differed among the professional settings, with rehabilitation having the highest mean response values and consumer electronics having the least mean response values. A descriptive analysis indicated that respondents in the rehabilitation and medical settings presented the greatest interest in amplification before the patient-provider interaction, but the least interest afterward. In addition, postappointment analyses revealed that providers failed statistically to meet patients' predisposed expectations in all three settings.

Conclusions Overall, most respondents' predisposed expectations were unmet during their interaction with an audiologist. These expectations differed across professional settings, with the greatest unmet expectations observed in the rehabilitative and medical settings. Patient readiness is influenced by the behavior of the provider which, at present, appears to be a barrier to patients' acceptance of treatment options.

  • References

  • 1 Amlani AM. Application of the Consumer Decision-Making Model to hearing aid adoption in first-time users. Sem Hear 2016; 37 (02) 103-119
  • 2 Amlani AM, Taylor B, Weinberg T. Increasing hearing aid adoption rates through value-based advertising and price unbundling. Hear Rev 2011; 18: 10-17
  • 3 Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision-making — the pinnacle of patient-centered care. New Engl J Med 2012; 366: 780-781
  • 4 Beattie PF, Nelson RM. Preserving the quality of the patienttherapist relationship: an important consideration for value-centered physical therapy care. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2008; 38 (02) 34-35
  • 5 Blackwell RD, Miniard PW, Engel JF. Consumer Behavior. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College; 2001
  • 6 Boisvert I, Clemesha J, Lundmark E, Crome E, Barr C, McMahon CM. Decision-making in audiology: balancing evidence-based practice and patient-centered care. Trend Hear 2017; 21: 1-14
  • 7 Childers TL, Rao AR. The influence of familial and peerbased reference groups on consumer decisions. J Consum Res 1992; 19 (02) 198-211
  • 8 Coulson NS, Ferguson MA, Henshaw H, Heffernan E. Applying theories of health behavior and change to hearing health research: time for a new approach. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (03) S99-S104
  • 9 Cox R. 20Q: hearing aid provision and the challenge of change. Audiol Online, Article 12596. 2014 https://www.audiologyonline.com . Accessed October 7, 2019
  • 10 Ekberg K, Barr C, Hickson L. Difficult conversations: talking about cost in audiology consultations with older adults. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (11) 854-861
  • 11 Ekberg K, Grenness C, Hickson L. Addressing patients' psychosocial concerns regarding hearing aids within audiology appointment for older adults. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (03) 337-350
  • 12 Ekberg K, Grenness C, Hickson L. Application of the transtheoretical model of behaviour change for identifying older clients' readiness for hearing rehabilitation during history taking in audiology appointments. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (03) S42-S51
  • 13 Ekberg K, Meyer C, Scarinci N, Grenness C, Hickson L. Family member involvement in audiology appointments with older people with hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (02) 70-76
  • 14 Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975
  • 15 Frederick AA, Prins N. Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2016
  • 16 Gilligan J, Weinstein BE. Health literacy and patientcentered care in audiology—implications for adult aural rehabilitation. J Comm Dis Deaf Stud Hear Aids 2014; 2: 110
  • 17 Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M. Integrated care. Int J Integr Care 2001; 1 (02) e21
  • 18 Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Léevesque A, Davidson B. Patient-centered care: a review of rehabilitative audiologists. Int J Audiol 2014; a 53 (01) S60-S67
  • 19 Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Davidson B. Patient-centered audiological rehabilitation: perspectives of older adults who own hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2014; b 53 (01) S68-S75
  • 20 Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Meyer C, Davidson B. The nature of communication throughout diagnosis and management planning in initial audiologic rehabilitation consultations. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (01) 36-50
  • 21 Hibbard JH. Patient activation and the use of information to support informed health decisions. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 100 (01) 5-7
  • 22 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001
  • 23 Kirande K, Merchant A, Sivakumar K. Relationship among time orientation, consumer innovativeness, and innovative behavior: the moderating role of product characteristics. Acad Market Sci 2011; 1: 99-116
  • 24 Koutsimanis G, Getter K, Behe B, Harte J, Almenar E. Influences of packing attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce. Appetite 2012; 59: 270-280
  • 25 Laplante-Léevesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. What makes adults with hearing impairment take up hearing aids or communication programs and achieve successful outcomes?. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (01) 83-92
  • 26 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Stages of change in adults with acquired hearing impairment seeking help for the first time: application of the transtheoretical model in audiologic rehabilitation. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (04) 447-457
  • 27 Laplante-Lévesque A, Jensen LD, Dawes P, Nielsen P. Optimal hearing aid use: focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (02) 193-202
  • 28 Lutfey KE, Gerstenberger E, McKinlay JB. Physician styles of patient management as a potential source of disparities: cluster analysis from a factorial experiment. Health Serv Res 2013; 48 (03) 1116-1134
  • 29 Manchaiah VKC, Stephens D, Meredith R. The patient journey of adults with hearing impairment: the patient’s views. Clin Otolaryngol 2011; 36 (03) 227-234
  • 30 Martćc-Kehl MI, Wernery J, Folkers G, Schubiger PA. Quality of animal experiments in anti-angiogenic cancer drug development—a systematic review. PLoS One 2015; 10 (09) e0137235
  • 31 McCormack B. Person-centredness in gerontological nursing: an overview of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13: 31-38
  • 32 McCormack B, McCance TV. Development of a framework for person-centered nursing. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56 (05) 472-479
  • 33 Moore L, Britten N, Lydahl D, Naldemirci Ö, Elam M, Wolf A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of personcentered care in different healthcare contexts. Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 31: 662-673
  • 34 Østergaard O, Jantzen C. Shifting perceptive in consumer research: from buyer behavior to consumption studies. In: Beckman SC, Elliott RH. , eds. Interpretive Consumer Research—Paradigms, Methodologies, and Applications. Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens Forlag; 2000: 9-23
  • 35 Poost-Foroosh L, Jennings MB, Cheesman MF. Comparison of client and clinician views of the importance factors in clientclinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (03) 247-259
  • 36 Poost-Foroosh L, Jennings MB, Shaw L, Meston CN, Cheesman MF. Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption. Trends Amp 2011; 15 (03) 127-139
  • 37 Preminger JE, Oxenbøll M, Barnett MB, Jensen LD, Laplante-Levesque A. Perceptions of adults with hearing impairment regarding the promotion of trust in hearing healthcare service delivery. Int J Audiol 2015; 54: 20-28
  • 38 Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR. , eds. Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration: Oxford Series in Clinical Psychology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005: 147-171
  • 39 Qamar N, Pappalarado AA, Arora VM, Press VG. Patientcentered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2011; 2: 81-109
  • 40 Rogers CR. Client-Centered Therapy: It’s Current Practice, Implications and Theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1951
  • 41 Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Q 1966; 44 (03) 94-127
  • 42 Saha S, Beach MC, Cooper LA. Patient centeredness, cultural competence, and healthcare quality. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100 (11) 1275-1285
  • 43 Salovey P, Rothman AJ, Rodin J. Health Behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1998
  • 44 Santana MJ, Manalili K, Jolley RJ, Zelinsky S, Quan H, Lu M. How to practice person-centered care: a conceptual framework. Health Expect 2018; 21 (02) 429-440
  • 45 Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman S, Papesh M. Application of the health belief model: development of the Hearing Beliefs Questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (08) 558-567
  • 46 Schiffman LG, Wisenblit JL. Consumer Behavior. 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013
  • 47 Stepien K, Baernstein A. Educating for empathy. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (05) 524-530
  • 48 Storbeck J, Clore GL. On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cogn Emot 2007; 21 (06) 1212-1237
  • 49 Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. J Fam Pract 1997; 44: 169-176
  • 50 Thom DH, Hall MA, Pawlson LG. Measuring patients’ trust in physicians when assessing quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; 23: 124-132
  • 51 Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY. A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev 2000; 107 (01) 101-126