CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2015; 48(01): 043-047
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.155268
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Anatomic basis for an algorithmic approach for free fibula flap donor side selection in composite oro-mandibular defects

Mohit Sharma
Department of Plastic Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Abhijeet Wakure
1   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Krishnakumar Thankappan
2   Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Jimmy Mathew
1   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Dayanand Jairaj
1   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Raghuveer Reddy Dudipala
1   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Subramania Iyer
1   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Head and neck oncological resections may result in composite oro-mandibular defects involving the oral mucosa (lining), mandibular bone and the skin (cover). Reconstructive options for such defects have evolved over a period. Free fibula flap reconstruction is currently accepted the world over as the gold standard for oro-mandibular defect reconstruction. Existing literature provides conflicting views about the use of a particular side and orientation of the fibula flap for achieving the optimal outcome. The purpose of this study is to confirm anatomically the effect of bone, soft tissue and vessel orientation on the ease of doing reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This is a cadaveric study. A mandibular model with a defect was used. This was pre plated to maintain continuity. Composite fibula flaps of the same dimension were harvested from both legs of a fresh cadaver. The harvested flaps were used to reconstruct the mandibular defect in different orientations and the best configuration for each reconstructive requirement was assessed. Results: Keeping the peroneal surface for plating, that is, facing outwards, four different configurations of the fibula flap are possible for a given mandibular defect. With a posterior vascular pedicle ipsilateral fibula is suitable for skin cover and contralateral for mucosal lining and the reverse for an anteriorly placed pedicle. Conclusion: The algorithm based selection of appropriate sided fibula flap facilitates complex mandibular reconstruction by placing the right kind of tissue at the right place and helps in reducing the donor site morbidity by allowing the surgeon to harvest only the required amount of skin.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Wei FC, Seah CS, Tsai YC, Liu SJ, Tsai MS. Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for reconstruction of composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 294-304
  • 2 Yagi S, Kamei Y, Torii S. Donor side selection in mandibular reconstruction using a free fibular osteocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 622-7
  • 3 Yadav PS, Ahmad QG, Shankhdhar VK, Nambi GI. There is no donor side specificity of fibula free flap for complex oromandibular reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43: 177-80
  • 4 Cheng M, Huang J. Oral cavity, tongue and mandibular reconstructions. In: Neligan P, Rodriguez E, Losee J. editor. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier; 2013: p. 307-36
  • 5 Hidalgo DA, Rekow A. A review of 60 consecutive fibula free flap mandible reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96: 585-96
  • 6 Sharma M, Balasubramanian D, Thankappan K, Sampathirao CL, Mathew J, Chavre S. et al. Propeller flaps in the closure of free fibula flap donor site skin defects. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71: 76-9