CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2015; 48(01): 098
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.155284
Letters to Editor
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Diverse classification systems for maxillectomy defects: Simplifying or complicating the treatment plan?

Himanshi Aggarwal
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Prashanti Eachempati
1   Departments of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia
,
Pradeep Kumar
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2019 (online)

 

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Yadav P. Recent advances in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2014; 47: 185-90
  • 2 Bidra AS, Jacob RF, Taylor TD. Classification of maxillectomy defects: A systematic review and criteria necessary for a universal description. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 261-70
  • 3 Kumar P, Alvi HA, Rao J, Singh BP, Jurel SK, Kumar L. et al. Assessment of the quality of life in maxillectomy patients: A longitudinal study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5: 29-35
  • 4 Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: Classification. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 554-7
  • 5 Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 352-63