Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.102603
Assessing the quality of evidence for verbal autopsy diagnosis of stroke in Vietnam
Publication History
Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)
ABSTRACT
Background: Information on the leading causes of mortality will continue to rely on verbal autopsy (VA) in developing countries. The accuracy of VA methods in correctly ascertaining the cause for each individual death is crucial in order to have confidence in the data collected through the procedure. Accuracy of the VA procedure is generally established by carrying out validation studies involving a comparison of the underlying cause of death derived from the VA with a reference underlying cause from medical records. Such validation is only possible in cases for which clinical records are available, and this is clearly not the case for most deaths in developing countries. We attempt to verify the accuracy of VA evidence by reviewing the responses to specific symptom questions and other information recorded in verbal autopsy questionnaires that were assigned cerebrovascular conditions (stroke) as causes of death upon physician review in Vietnam. Materials and Methods: A national sample mortality surveillance activity identified deaths and causes of death that had occurred during 2008 in selected communes in 16 provinces distributed across Vietnam. All cases from the northern provinces of Hanoi, Hai Duong, Quang Ninh and Thanh Hoa with ICD codes pertaining to cerebrovascular diseases were identified. A total of 326 VA questionnaires for deaths from cerebrovascular diseases were reviewed and analysed in detail for the presence of symptoms pertaining to stroke. The respondents’ narration of the chronological disease history and the hospital diagnosis was also examined with an aim to explore supporting signs for diagnosis and to verify the quality of VA interview. Differences between responses among cases with and without hospital admission were examined using Chi-squared test of statistical significance. Results: Ninty percent of the cases diagnosed as stroke were found to have positive response to the key symptoms; viz., paralysis (in structured question or free text) and history of stroke. For the remaining 10% of cases, stroke was assigned as a cause-of-death based on other suggestive cardiac signs and symptoms such as hypertension, unconsciousness, or headache, etc. Community had different perspectives of “paralysis” and “stroke” which might have affected the diagnosis of stroke in some aspects. Respondents of cases with hospital admission or visit were found to have a better recall of disease symptoms than those without hospital admission. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest the possible utility of VA content analysis method to back up the low coverage of conventional validation studies in developing countries owing to nonavailability of medical records. The understanding of the VA content would also form the basis for improvement in the quality of interviews and collection of data to achieve better quality information in future.
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Byass P. Who needs cause-of-death data. PLos Med 2007; 4: 1715-6
- 2 World Health Report. Changing History. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004
- 3 Mathers CD, Fat DM, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD. Counting the dead and what they died of: An assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 171-7
- 4 Setel PW, Sankoh O, Rao C, Velkoff VA, Mathers C, Gonghuan Y. et al Sample registration of vital events with verbal autopsy: A renewed commitment to measuring and monitoring vital statistics. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 611-7
- 5 Chandramohan D, Maude GH, Rodrigues LC, Hayes RJ. Verbal autopsies for adult deaths: Issues In their development and validation. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 213-22
- 6 Rao C, Osterberger B, Anh T, MacDonald M, Chúc N, Hill P. Compiling mortality statistics from civil registration systems in Viet Nam: The long road ahead. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 58-65
- 7 Rao C, Hoa NP, Phung H. Strengthening mortality and cause of death reporting systems in Viet Nam: A report on the mortality component of the Evidence for Health Policy in Viet Nam (VINE) Project. Vietnam: Hanoi Medical University; Brisbane, Australia: School of Population Health, University of Queensland; 2012
- 8 Hoa N, Rao C, Hoy D, Hinh N, Chuc N, Ngo D. Mortality measures from sample-based surveillance: Evidence of the epidemiological transition in Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90: 764-72
- 9 World Health Organisation. Verbal autopsy standards: Ascertaining and attributing cause of death. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007
- 10 Ngo AD, Rao C, Hoa NP, Adair T, Chuc NT. Mortality patterns in Vietnam, 2006: Findings from a national verbal autopsy survey. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 78
- 11 Nguyen TK, Nguyen PH, Rao C, Ngo DA. Identification of cause of death using interviews: Training document for interviewers. Hanoi Viet Nam Ministry of Health, Viet Nam Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Hanoi Medical University 2011
- 12 Nguyen TK, Nguyen PH, Rao C, Ngo DA. Identification of cause of death using interviews: Training document for doctors and researchers. Hanoi Viet Nam Ministry of Health, Viet Nam Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Hanoi Medical University 2011
- 13 Hoy DG, Rao C, Hoa NP, Suhardi S, Lwin AM. Stroke mortality variations in South East Asia: Empirical evidence from the field. Int J Stroke 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
- 14 Mathers CD, Boerma T, Ma Fat D. Global and regional causes of death. Br Med Bull 2009; 92: 7-32
- 15 Wang L, Yang G, Jiemin M, Rao C, Wan X, Dubrovsky G. et al Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics in rural China using verbal autopsies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61: 519-26
- 16 Polprasert W, Rao C, Adair T, Pattaraarchachai J, Porapakkham Y, Lopez AD. Cause-of-death ascertainment for deaths that occur outside hospitals in Thailand: Application of verbal autopsy methods. Popul Health Metr 2010; 8: 13
- 17 Rao C, Soemantri S, Djaja S, Suhardi M, Adair T, Wiryawan Y. et al Mortality in Central Java: Results from the Indonesian mortality registration system strengthening project. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 325
- 18 Edlow JA. Stroke. Westport: Greenwood Press; 2008
- 19 Wiebers DO, Feigin VL, Brown RD. Handbook of stroke. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006
- 20 Greveson GC, Gray CS, French JM, James OF. Long-term outcome for patients and carers following hospital admission for stroke. Age Ageing 1991; 20: 337-44
- 21 Isaacs B. Treating stroke: Home or hospital?. Br Med J 1978; 2: 1640
- 22 Lomer M, McLellan D. Informing hospital patients and their relatives about stroke. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 33