Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30(02): 181-183
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_302_19
Interventional Radiology

Low incidence of vascular uptake during ganglion impar sympathetic nerve blocks for coccydynia

Authors

  • Patrick M Foye

    Coccyx Pain Center, Newark, New Jersey, United States
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Woon TK Jason

    School of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Kevin Y Zheng

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Kenneth K Leong

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States

Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
Preview

Abstract

Context: Focal sympathetic nerve blocks of the ganglion impar are often effective treatments for coccydynia (coccyx pain) and other pelvic pain syndromes. These injections are generally performed under contrast-enhanced fluoroscopic guidance. Vascular uptake may potentially occur during the injection and vascular uptake rates have been reported for other spinal injections, but never for ganglion impar blocks. Aims: The purpose of the study was to determine vascular uptake rates during fluoroscopy-guided ganglion impar blocks. Settings and Design: An academic/University-based Coccyx Pain Center. Methods and Materials: A total of 78 consecutive trans-coccygeal ganglion impar blocks were analyzed for vascular uptake of contrast as determined by intermittent fluoroscopy. Statistical Analysis Used: Direct calculation of incidence. Results: Only one patient (1.3%) demonstrated a vascular uptake pattern, which was readily recognized and corrected by slightly adjusting the position of the needle tip and thereby subsequently obtaining the desired contrast pattern at the ganglion impar. Conclusions: Vascular uptake incidence is low during ganglion impar blocks. This information can be one of the multiple factors considered when a physician is deciding whether or not to use contrast in an individual patient.



Publication History

Received: 11 June 2019

Accepted: 20 February 2020

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2020. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India