CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42(04): 424-430
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.424
Original Article

Combined Orbital Fractures: Surgical Strategy of Sequential Repair

Su Won Hur
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Sung Eun Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Kyu Jin Chung
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Jun Ho Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Tae Gon Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
› Author Affiliations
This article was supported by Yeungnam University grants in 2014.

Background Reconstruction of combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures with a comminuted inferomedial strut (IMS) is challenging and requires careful practice. We present our surgical strategy and postoperative outcomes.

Methods We divided 74 patients who underwent the reconstruction of the orbital floor and medial wall concomitantly into a comminuted IMS group (41 patients) and non-comminuted IMS group (33 patients). In the comminuted IMS group, we first reconstructed the floor stably and then the medial wall by using separate implant pieces. In the non-comminuted IMS group, we reconstructed the floor and the medial wall with a single large implant.

Results In the follow-up of 6 to 65 months, most patients with diplopia improved in the first-week except one, who eventually improved at 1 year. All patients with an EOM limitation improved during the first month of follow-up. Enophthalmos (displacement, 2 mm) was observed in two patients. The orbit volume measured on the CT scans was statistically significantly restored in both groups. No complications related to the surgery were observed.

Conclusions We recommend the reconstruction of orbit walls in the comminuted IMS group by using the following surgical strategy: usage of multiple pieces of rigid implants instead of one large implant, sequential repair first of the floor and then of the medial wall, and a focus on the reconstruction of key areas. Our strategy of step-by-step reconstruction has the benefits of easy repair, less surgical trauma, and minimal stress to the surgeon.

This article was presented as a poster at the 2014 Congress of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery in Prague, Czech Republic, on September 23-26, 2014.




Publication History

Received: 15 April 2015

Accepted: 01 June 2015

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2015. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kim JW, Goldberg RA, Shorr N. The inferomedial orbital strut: an anatomic and radiographic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18: 355-364
  • 2 Wright ED, Davidson J, Codere F. et al. Endoscopic orbital decompression with preservation of an inferomedial bony strut: minimization of postoperative diplopia. J Otolaryngol 1999; 28: 252-256
  • 3 Burm JS, Chung CH, Oh SJ. Pure orbital blowout fracture: new concepts and importance of medial orbital blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1839-1849
  • 4 Kim YH, Kim TG, Lee JH. et al. Inlay implanting technique for the correction of medial orbital wall fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 321-326
  • 5 Su GW, Harris GJ. Combined inferior and medial surgical approaches and overlapping thin implants for orbital floor and medial wall fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22: 420-423
  • 6 Choi JC, Fleming JC, Aitken PA. et al. Porous polyethylene channel implants: a modified porous polyethylene sheet implant designed for repairs of large and complex orbital wall fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 15: 56-66
  • 7 Nunery WR, Tao JP, Johl S. Nylon foil "wraparound" repair of combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24: 271-275
  • 8 Cho RI, Davies BW. Combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures involving the inferomedial strut: repair technique and case series using preshaped porous polyethylene/titanium implants. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2013; 6: 161-170
  • 9 Scolozzi P, Momjian A, Heuberger J. et al. Accuracy and predictability in use of AO three-dimensionally preformed titanium mesh plates for posttraumatic orbital reconstruction: a pilot study. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: 1108-1113
  • 10 Lee KM, Park JU, Kwon ST. et al. Three-dimensional pre-bent titanium implant for concomitant orbital floor and medial wall fractures in an East asian population. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 480-485
  • 11 Fan X, Li J, Zhu J. et al. Computer-assisted orbital volume measurement in the surgical correction of late enophthalmos caused by blowout fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19: 207-211
  • 12 Kempster R, Beigi B, Galloway GD. Use of enophthalmic implants in the repair of orbital floor fractures. Orbit 2005; 24: 219-225