Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate

Lauren Medeiros Paniagua; Alana Verza Signorini; Sady Selaimen da Costa; Marcus Vinicius Martins  Collares; Sílvia Dornelles

doi:10.7162/S1809-97772013000300006

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17(03): 265-273
DOI: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000300006

Original Article

Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate

Authors

Lauren Medeiros Paniagua

¹Speech Language Pathologist. Doctor of Science in Children's and Teenager's Health- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS. Professor of Speech-Language Pathology at Fatima College (RS).
Alana Verza Signorini

²Undergraduated Speech pathology - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (fellow undergraduated of CNPq).
Sady Selaimen da Costa

³MD; MSc; PhD.Associate Professor - Department Of Otolaryngology & Head And Neck Surgery School Of Medicine - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Marcus Vinicius Martins Collares

⁴MD; PhD. Associate Professor Department of Surgery; Head, Plastic Surgery Section - School of Medicine/Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Sílvia Dornelles

⁵Speech Pathology, MSc, PhD. Professor Department of Speech Pathology - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Abstract

Summary

Introduction: The velopharyngeal sphincter (VPS) is a muscle belt located between the oropharynx and the nasopharynx. Investigations of velopharyngeal function should include an auditory-perceptual evaluation and at least 1 instrument-based evaluation such as videonasoendoscopy.

Aim: To compare the findings of auditory-perceptual evaluation (hypernasality) and videonasoendoscopy (gap size) in individuals with cleft lip/palate.

Method: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study assessing 49 subjects, of both sexes, with cleft lip/palate followed up at the Otorhinolaryngology Service and the Speech Therapy outpatient clinic of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). The results from the auditory-perceptual evaluation and the videonasoendoscopy test were compared with respect to the VPS gap size.

Results: Subjects with moderate/severe hypernasality had more severe velopharyngeal closure impairment than those with a less severe condition. The interaction between hypernasality severity and the presence of other speech disorders (p = 0.035), whether compensatory and/or obligatory, increased the likelihood of having a moderate-to-large gap in the velopharyngeal closure.

Conclusions: We observed an association between the findings of these 2 evaluation methods.

Keywords

Cleft Palate - Velopharyngeal Sphincter - Communication Disorders - Evaluation

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Altmann EBC. Anatomia e fisiologia do esfíncter velofaríngeo. In: Altmann EBC, , editor. Fissuras labiopalatinas. 4 ed. Carapicuíba: Pró-fono; 1997. p. 133–56
2 Lofiego JL. Fissura Labiopalatina: avaliação, diagnóstico e tratamento fonoaudiológico. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1992
3 Silva DP , et al. Aspectos patofisiológicos do esfíncter velofaríngeo. Arq Int Otorrrinolaringol 2008; 12 (3) 426-35
4 Altmann EBC, Ramos ALNF, Khoury RBF. Avaliação Fonoaudiológica. In: Altmann EBC. Fissuras Labiopalatinas. Carapicuíba: Pró- Fono; 2005. p. 325–66.
5 Finkelstein Y , et al. Axial Configuration of velopharyngeal valve and its valving mechanism. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995; 32: 299-305
6 Skolnick ML, Mccall GN, Barnes M. The sphincter mechanism of velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J 1973; 10: 286-305
7 Croft CB, Shprintzen RJ, Rakoff SJ. Patterns of velopharyngeal valving in normal and cleft palate subjects: a multi-view videofluoroscopic and nasendoscopic study. Laryngoscope 1980; 91: 265-71
8 Shprintzen RJ, Bardach J. Cleft palate Speech management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York: Mosby; 1995
9 Trindade IEK, Trindade Junior AS. Avaliação funcional da inadequação velofaríngea. In: Carreirão S, Lessa S, Zanini AS, , editors. Tratamento das fissuras labiopalatinas. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1996. p. 223–35
10 Golding-Kushner KJ , et al. Standartization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an international working group. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 337-48
11 Rocha DL. Insuficiência Velofaríngea. In: Mélega JM. Cirurgia Plástica- Fundamentos e Arte - Cirurgia reparadora de Cabeça e Pescoço. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 2002. p. 178–96
12 Genaro KF, Yamashita RP, Trindade IKE. Avaliação clínica e instrumental na fissura labiopalatina. In: Ferreira LP, Befi-Lopes DM, Limongi SCO. Tratado de Fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Rocca; 2004. p. 456–77
13 Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 1991; 28: 184-9
14 Nakamura N, Ogata Y, Sasaguri M, Suzuki A, Kikuta R , Ohishi. Aerodynamic and cephalometric analyses of velopharyngeal structure and function following repushback surgery for secundary correction in cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40: 46-53
15 Pontes PAL, Behlau MS. Nasolaringoscopia. In: Altmann EBC. Fissuras labiopalatinas. 4th ed. Carapicuíba: Pró-fono; 2005. p. 175–83
16 Kuehn DP, Henne LJ. Speech Evaluation and Treatment for Patients With Cleft Palate. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12 (1) 103-9
17 Pegoraro- Krook MI, Dutka-Souza JCR, Magalhães LCT, Feniman MR. Intervenção fonoaudiológica na fissura palatina. In: Ferreira LP, Befi-Lopes DM, Limongi SCO, , editors. Tratado de Fonoaudiologia. 1st ed. São Paulo: Rocca; 2004. p. 439–55
18 Bzoch KR. Introduction to the study of communicative disorders in cleft palate and related craniofacial anomalies. In: Bzoch KR, , editor. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. 5th ed. Austin: pro-ed; 2004. p. 3–66
19 Kummer AW. Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) and resonance disorders. In: Kummer AW. Cleft Palate and craniofacial anomalies: the effects on speech and resonance. San Diego: Singular Thomson Learning; 2001. p. 145–76
20 Kummer AW, Briggs M, Lee L. The relationship between the characteristics of speech and velopharingeal gap size. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40 (6) 590-6
21 Laczi E, Sussman JE, Stathopoulos ET, Huber J. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality compared to HONC measures: The role of experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; Mar; 42 (2) 202-11
22 Camargo LOS , et al. Oclusão velofaríngea em indivíduos submetidos à nasoendoscopia na Clínica de Educação para Saúde (CEPS). Salusvita 2001; 20: 35-47
23 Netto ABC, Cervantes O. Comparative study among cleft patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency treated with speech therapy and pharyngoplasty. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2011; 26: 631-8
24 Shyammohan A, Sreenivasulu D. Speech Therapy with Obturator, J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010; 10: 197-9
25 Henningsson G , et al. Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45: 1-17
26 Kummer AW. Speech therapy for errors secondary to cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Speech Lang 2011; 32: 191-8
27 Lam DJ, Starr JR, Perkins JA, Lewis CW, Eblen LE, Dunlap J, Sie KCY. A comparison of nasoendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (3) 394-402
28 Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1973
29 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Bometrics 1977; Mar; 33 (1) 159-74
30 Altmann EBC, Lederman H. Videofluroscopia da Deglutição e do Esfíncter Velo-Faríngico: Padronização do Exame. Pró-fono Rev de Atual Cient 1990; 2: 9-16
31 Pulkkinen J, Ranta R, Heliövaara A, Haapanen M. Craniofacial characteristics and velopharyngeal function in cleft lip/palate children with and without adenoidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 259: 100-4
32 Hardin-Jones MA, Brown CK, Van Demark DR, Morris HL. Long-term speech results of cleft palate patients with primary palatoplasty. Cleft palate Craniofac J 1993; 30: 55-63
33 Kirschner RE, Randall P, Wang P, Jawad A, Duran M, Huang BAK , et al. Cleft palate repair at 3 to 7 months of age. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2000; 105: 2127-32
34 Van Lierde KM, Monstrey S, Bonte K, Van Cauwenberge P, Vinck B. The Long-term speech outcome in Flemish Young adults two different types of palatoplasty. Int J of Pediat Oto 2004; 68: 865-75
35 Khosla RK, Mabry K, Charles L, Castiglione FACS. Clinical Outcomes of the Furlow Z-Plasty for Primary Cleft Palate Repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45: 501-10
36 Genaro KF, Fukushiro AP, Suguimoto MLFCP. Avaliação e tratamento dos distúrbios da fala. In: Trindade IEK, Silva Filho OG. Fissuras Labiopalatinas: Uma abordagem Interdisciplinar. São Paulo: Santos; 2007. p. 109–22
37 Trindade IEK, Genaro KF, Yamashita RP, Miguel HC, Fukushiro AP. Proposta de classificação da função velofaríngea na avaliação perceptivo-auditiva da fala. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica 2005; 17: 259-62
38 John A, Sell D, Sweeney T, Harding-Bell A, Williams A. The Cleft palate audit for speech-augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43: 272-88
39 Yoon PJ, Starr JR, Perkins JA, Bloom D, Sie KCY. Interrater and intrarater reliability in the evaluation of Velopharyngeal insufficiency within a single institution. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 132: 947-51
40 Sie KCY, Starr JR, Bloom DC, Cummingham M , et al. Multicenter interrater and intrarater reliability in the endoscopic evaluation of Velopharyngeal insufficiency. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 757-63
41 Pegoraro-Krook MI, Dutka-Souza JCR, Marino VCC. Nasoendoscopy of Velopharynx before and during diagnostic therapy. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 181-8
42 Di Ninno CQMS, Rezende ALF, Jesus JDS, Pires JS, Godinho RN, Britto DBO. Caracterização do padrão de fechamento velofaríngeo em pacientes com fissura palatina. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012; 17: 161-6
43 Penido FA, Noronha RM, Caetano KI, Jesus MS, Di Ninno CQ, Britto AT. Correlação entre os achados do teste de emissão de ar nasal e da nasofaringoscopia em pacientes com fissura labiopalatina operada. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2007; 12: 126-34
44 Jesus MS, Penido FA, Valente P. Avaliações fonoaudiológicas clínica e instrumental em indivíduos com fissura labiopalatina. In: Jesus MS, Di Ninno CQ. Fissura labiopalatina: fundamentos para a prática fonoaudiológica. São Paulo: Roca; 2009
45 Shi B. Consideration and treatment of clinical problems of lip cleft and palate cleft. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2005; 15: 125-7
46 Qi C, Qian Z, Bing S, Heng Y, Tian M, Guang-ning Z. Study of relationship between clinical factors and velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16: 945-50
47 Piccoli EMH. Hipernasalidade. In: Ferreira LP, , editor. Um pouco de nós sobre voz. . [place, publisher unknown]; 1992. p. 119–32
48 Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayor R. Hypernasality in the presence of “adequate” Velopharyngeal closure. CleftPalate Craniofac J 1994; 30: 150-4
49 Kuehn DP, Moon JB. Velopharyngeal closure force and levatorvelipalatini activation levels in varying phonetic contexts. Journal Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: 51-62