Keywords
Caffeine - Dantrolene - Diazepam - Ketamine - Opipramol
1
Introduction
Caffeine, a methylxanthine derivative, is considered as the most widely used central
nervous system (CNS) stimulants by man.[1] Caffeine is used in different foods and drinks like tea, coffee, and cola.[2] as well as over-the-counter medications such as headache preparations.[2] Furthermore, methylxanthines in the forms of theophylline and aminophylline, are
widely used as medications to treat asthma[3] and apnea, especially in the newborns.[4]
In spite of widespread use of methylxanthines in the medicine and food industry, there
are many reports about the serious side-effects of these agents, particularly in the
toxic doses. A life-threatening seizure may be an important complication of methylxanthine
therapy.[5] Methylxanthines are a trigger of the epileptic seizures in the patients without
any history of epilepsy and a risk factor for the patients with underlying epilepsy.[6] More importantly, methylxanthine-induced seizures may be resistant to the conventional
and new anti-epileptic drugs.[7]
[8]
The exact mechanism of methylxanthine-induced seizure is not completely understood.
However, the inhibition of adenosine receptors and the activation of ryanodine receptors
may be the main mechanisms responsible for the methylxanthine-induced seizure.[9] The ryanodine receptors activation increases the intracellular concentration of
calcium in neurons, and this may contribute to the convulsant activity of methylxanthines.[10] New generation antiepileptic drugs such as levetiracetam ameliorated peak height
of intracellular calcium induced by caffeine.[11] Therefore, drugs that affect intracellular calcium may be useful for managing methylxanthine-induced
seizures.
N-methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) and ryanodine receptors are actively involved in the intracellular
calcium modulation. The ionic channels of NMDA receptors are highly permeable to calcium.[12] and raise intracellular calcium in neurons.[13] Moreover, ryanodine receptors are caffeine-sensitive calcium stores that mobilize
calcium from intracellular pools.[10] Thus, the effects of NMDA or ryanodine receptors modulators on the intracellular
calcium concentration may be useful for the control of caffeine-induced seizures.
Sigma receptors are chaperone proteins that are located on the sarcoplasmic reticulum.[14] These receptors have important roles in modulating NMDA receptors-mediated glutamate
neurotransmission and intracellular calcium.[14],[15] Some reports have implied that sigma receptors may be involved in the pathophysiology
of epileptic seizure.[16] Sigma-1 receptor modulators like dextrorphan, carbetapentane, and pentazocine protected
animals against kainic acid or maximal electroshock seizures.[17]
[18]
[19] Moreover, a specific sigma receptor agonist produced antiepileptic effects in the
rat hippocampal slices.[20] Therefore, sigma receptor modulators may be the potential drugs for managing methylxanthine-induced
seizure.
Opipramol is an antidepressant and anti-anxiety drug[21]
[22] with high affinity for the sigma receptors, particularly the sigma-1 subtype[22] and low affinity for the dopamine and NMDA receptors.[23]
[24] Opipramol exerted neuroprotective effects in the animal models of ischemia.[25] In our previous work this agent produced an anti-epileptic effect in the pentylenetetrazole
(PTZ)-induced seizures.[26] However, there is no other report about the opipramol effects in the caffeine-induced
seizure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the antiepileptic effects
of opipramol, a sigma receptor agonist, against caffeine-induced seizures in mice.
We also aimed to show ketamine, a NMDA receptor antagonist, and dantrolene, a ryanodine
receptor antagonist, effects against the caffeine-induced seizures in mice and their
interaction with opipramol in this animal model.
2
Materials and methods
2.1
Chemicals
We bought opipramol and ketamine from Sigma (USA) and caffeine powder from Merck (USA).
Diazepam and normal saline were procured from Daru Pakhsh Pharmaceutical Co., Iran.
Opipramol, ketamine, dantrolene, diazepam and caffeine were dissolved in saline. We
used all compounds by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection 30 min before caffeine administration. All the compounds were used in
a volume of 0.1 ml per 10 g of animal’s body weight.
2.2
Animals and treatments
Male albino Swiss strain of mice was obtained from Razi Institute (Tehran, Iran).
We kept animals in the Plexiglas cages (5 animals per cage) on a regular dark/light
cycles (12 h/12 h), controlled temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and free access to food and
water. Seventy-two mice were randomly allocated to the nine separate groups (n = 8).
We used opipramol in three different doses (10, 20 and 50 mg/kg), ketamine (50 mg/kg),
dantrolene (40 mg/kg), opipramol (20 mg/kg) plus ketamine (50 mg/kg), opipramol (20
mg/kg) plus dantrolene (40 mg/kg), diazepam (5 mg/kg as a positive control) and the
vehicle 30 min before caffeine injection. The dose selection was mainly according
to our previous studies on the dantrolene, opipramol, and ketamine effects against
PTZ seizure.[26]
[27] The diagram in [Fig. 1] shows drug using schedule. The experiment was approved by the local Animal Ethics
Committee, which follows the European Communities Council to minimize the number and
suffering of animals.
Fig. 1. The schedule of drug administration and seizure monitoring in mice.Mice were treated
with drugs (opipramol (10, 20 and 50 mg/kg)), ketamine (50 mg/kg), dantrolene (40
mg/kg), opipramol (20 mg/kg) + ketamine (50 mg/kg), opipramol (20 mg/kg) + dantrolene
(40 mg/kg), diazepam (5 mg/kg), and vehicle. All the treatments were used 30 min before
the administration of caffeine (1000 mg/kg) and monitored for 30 min for the onset
and occurrence of clonic and tonic-clonic seizures, and mortality.
2.3
Caffeine-induced seizure
We used caffeine (1000 mg/kg) to induce the clonic and tonic-clonic seizure in mice.
After caffeine injection, mice were placed in the separate cages and watched for 30-min.
According to the Łukawski et al. experiment,[28] we considered three seconds clonus of the whole animal body with loss of righting
reflex as the clonic seizure. Generalized clonus of animal body with the extension
of both forelimb and hindlimb was defined as the generalized tonic-clonic seizure.
We recorded the latency of caffeine-induced seizures and death as the onset of clonic
and generalized tonic-clonic seizures and the time of death of animals after using
caffeine.
2.4
Data analysis
We reported data as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for the recorded variables.
We analyzed the variables with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney
U test. The significant level was considered the p-value of <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS software version 18.
3
Results
3.1
Effects of different treatments on the onset of caffeine-induced clonic seizure
Animals treated with opipramol at a dose of 50 mg/kg (χ2 = 0.00, p = 0.001) or diazepam (χ2 = 0.00, p = 0.001) had a higher onset of clonic seizure compared with the vehicle-treated
group. However, the onset of clonic seizure in the animals treated with opipramol
at the doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg was not significantly different from the vehicle-treated
group (χ2 = 25.00, p = 0.46; and, 46χ2 = 25.50, p = 0.49, respectively). Dantrolene alone or with opipramol (20 mg/kg) increased
the latency of clonic seizure compared with the control group (χ2 = 13.50, p = 0.05; and χ2 = 6.00, p = 0.006, respectively). Moreover, the latency of clonic seizure in the
animals treated with opipramol + dantrolene was significantly higher than the opipramol-
(20 mg/kg) or dantrolene-treated groups (χ2 = 9.00, p = 0.02; and χ2 = 11.00, p = 0.03, respectively). The onset of clonic seizure in the animals treated
with ketamine alone or with opipramol (20 mg/kg) was not significantly different from
the vehicle-treated group (χ2 = 24.00, p = 0.40; and χ2 = 24.00, p = 0.40, respectively). Moreover, the onset of clonic seizure in the animals
treated with ketamine + opipramol (20 mg/kg) was not significantly different from
ketamine (χ2 = 29.50, p = 0.79) or opipramol (20 mg/kg) (χ2 = 27.00, p = 0.60) groups. The effects of different treatments on the onset of clonic
seizure induced by caffeine are summarized in [Fig. 2]. All animals in different groups including the diazepam group experienced tonic-clonic
seizures.
Fig. 2. The effects of different treatments on the onset of clonic seizure induced by caffeine
in mice.Drugs were administered interaperitoneally 30 min before the injection of
caffeine. Data presented as mean ± standard error of mean and analyzed using Mann-Whitney
U test. Each group consisted of 8 animals. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 compared with
the vehicle-treated group, † compared with the opipramol (20 mg/kg) and ‡ p < 0.05
compared with dantrolene, opi: opipramol, ket: ketamine, dant: dantrolene.
3.2
Effects of different treatments on the onset of caffeine-induced tonic-clonic seizure
The animals treated with diazepam had a higher onset of tonic-clonic seizure compared
with the control group (χ2 = 0.00, p = 0.001). The latency of caffeine-induced tonic-clonic seizure in the animals
treated with opipramol at the doses of 20 and 50 mg/kg was higher than the vehicle-treated
group (χ2 = 10.00, p = 0.021; and χ2 = 13.00, p = 0.046, respectively). However, opipramol at a dose of 10 mg/kg had no
effect on the latency of caffeine-induced tonic-clonic seizure in mice (χ2 = 24.500, p = 0.43). Animals treated with ketamine or ketamine + opipramol (20 mg/kg)
had a higher onset of tonic-clonic seizures compared with the control group (χ2 = 12.00, p = 0.035; and U = 14.00, p = 0.06, respectively). Furthermore, the latency
of caffeine-induced tonic-clonic seizure in the animals treated with dantrolene +
opipramol (20 mg/kg) was significantly higher than the vehicle-treated group (χ2 = 4.00, p = 0.003). Moreover, the onset of tonic-clonic seizure in the animals treated
with dantrolene+ opipramol (20 mg/kg) was higher than the dantrolene (χ2 = 9.50, p = 0.018) or opipramol (20 mg/kg) (χ2 = 10.00, p = 0.021) groups. In contrast, the onset of tonic-clonic seizure in the
animals treated with dantrolene was not significantly different from the vehicle-treated
group (χ2 = 17.00, p = 0.11). The effects of different treatments on the onset of tonic-clonic
seizure induced by the caffeine are summarized in [Fig. 3]. The 100% of animals in the all treatment groups including the diazepam group experienced
tonic-clonic seizure. Moreover, there was no significant difference regarding the
severity of seizure between different treatment groups (p > 0.05).
Fig. 3. The effects of different treatments on the onset of tonic-clonic seizure induced
by caffeine in mice.Drugs were administered interaperitoneally 30 min before the injection
of caffeine. Data presented as mean ± standard error of mean and analyzed using Mann-Whitney
U test. Each group consisted of 8 animals. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 compared with
the vehicle-treated group, † p < 0.05 compared with opipramol (20 mg/kg), ‡ p < 0.05
compared with dantrolene, opi: opipramol, ket: ketamine, dant: dantrolene.
3.3
Effects of different treatments on the time of death of animals challenged with the
convulsive doses of caffeine
All the animals, including diazepam-treated ones, died after the tonic-clonic convulsion
induced by the higher doses of caffeine. However, diazepam (χ2 = 0.00, p = 0.001), opipramol (20 mg/kg) (χ2 = 8.50, p = 0.013), opipramol (50 mg/kg) (χ2 = 9.00, p = 0.015), ketamine (χ2 = 8.00, p = 0.011), ketamine + opipramol (20 mg/kg) (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.007), and dantrolene + opipramol (20 mg/kg) (χ2 = 1.00, p = 0.001) increased the latency of death of animals challenged with high
doses of caffeine. However, opipramol (10 mg/kg) or dantrolene alone had no effect
on the time of death of animals challenged with high doses of caffeine. [Fig. 4] shows the effects of different treatment on the latency of death of animals challenged
with high doses of caffeine.
Fig. 4. The effects of different treatments on the time of death of animals challenged with
caffeine.Drugs were administered interaperitoneally 30 min before the injection of
caffeine in mice. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean and analyzed
using Mann-Whitney U test. Each group consisted of 8 animals. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 compared with
the vehicle-treated group, † p < 0.05 compared with opipramol (20 mg/kg), ‡ p < 0.05
compared with dantrolene, opi: opipramol, ket: ketamine, dant: dantrolene.
4
Discussion
Our study showed that opipramol, a sigma receptor agonist, attenuated the caffeine-induced
seizures. There is no other study about the effect of sigma receptor agonists against
methylxanthine-induced seizures. However, our previous study revealed that opipramol
may be effective for the PTZ-induced seizure management.[26] We showed that opipramol increased the onset of PTZ-induced clonic and tonic-clonic
seizures in mice.[26] Moreover, there are some reports about the anticonvulsant activity of sigma receptor
modulators in different models of epilepsy. Sigma receptor agonists like carbetapentane,
morphinan derivatives, and pentazocine attenuated seizures induced by different convulsants.[17]
[18]
[19] SKF83959, a selective sigma-1 receptor modulator, also ameliorated seizures induced
by different convulsants such as maximal electroshock, PTZ, and kainic acid.[29] Therefore, sigma receptor agonists may be effective against different animal models
of epilepsy and can be considered for the epileptic seizure treatment.
The exact mechanism of action of opipramol against caffeine-induced seizure is not
completely clear. However, the intracellular calcium regulation via sigma-1 receptors
may be an important target for the anticonvulsant activity of opipramol. Sigma receptors
have been shown to block both voltage-gated calcium channels and ionotropic glutamate
receptors.[30]
[31] On the other hand, caffeine-induced intracellular calcium release suppressed post-synaptic
GABAA currents[32] and produced seizure.[33] Therefore, decreasing intracellular calcium by opipramol may suppress the inhibitory
effects of caffeine on the GABAA receptors and increase the threshold for the caffeine-induced seizures.
Our study showed that different classes of drugs affect different seizure types induced
by caffeine. In accordance, ketamine, a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, suppressed
caffeine-induced tonic-clonic seizure while dantrolene, a selective ryanodine receptor
antagonist, inhibited caffeine-induced clonic seizure. It is tentative to speculate
that NMDA receptors may be involved in the tonic-clonic seizure. In this regard, non-convulsive
doses of NMDA potentiated caffeine-induced seizures.[34] In addition, the activation of ryanodine receptors by caffeine may contribute to
the clonic seizure. However, ketamine is not a selective inhibitor of NMDA receptors
and at higher doses binds to other receptors such as opioid μ- receptors, sigma receptors,[35] and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.[36] Taken together, it can be proposed that different pathways may be involved in various
seizure types induced by high doses of caffeine.
The present study demonstrated that diazepam, a GABAA agonist, ameliorated both the clonic and tonic-clonic seizures induced by caffeine.
In agreement with our study, Marangos et al.[37] showed that benzodiazepines suppressed caffeine-induced seizures. Therefore, it
is likely that inhibiting GABAA receptors may be involved in both seizures produced by high doses of caffeine. However,
in the present study, diazepam did not completely inhibit caffeine-induced seizure.
Thus, other mechanisms such as the activation of NMDA and ryanodine receptors may
contribute to the caffeine-induced seizures. Moreover, clinical data have shown that
diazepam is not fully effective in the patients suffering from status epileptic-induced
by the toxic doses of methylxanthines.[8] As mentioned, the toxic doses of caffeine may interact with different pathways other
than GABAA receptors and blockade of one pathway may not be sufficient to inhibit methylxanthines-induced
seizures.
In our study, using opipramol and dantrolene exerted higher effects against caffeine-induced
seizures compared with the opipramol or dantrolene group alone. This implies that
sigma receptor activation and ryanodine receptor inhibition may potentiate each other’s
effects against caffeine-induced seizures. Furthermore, different pathways for the
calcium regulation may contribute to the caffeine-induced seizures. It has been demonstrated
that deregulated calcium homeostasis and intracellular calcium elevation have provoked
epileptic seizure.[38] Some studies have shown that ryanodine receptors have important roles in the intracellular
calcium regulation and epileptic conditions.[39] Other studies have shown that caffeine-induced calcium release via ryanodine receptors
may play important roles in the neuronal hyper-excitability and generation of seizure.[40] Moreover, dantrolene has suppressed caffeine-induced calcium release from the intracellular
stores in the rat dorsal root ganglion neurons.[41] Therefore, dantrolene protective effects against caffeine-induced seizure may be
related to the ryanodine receptors inhibition and reversing caffeine effects on the
intracellular calcium. Moreover, sigma receptors modulate intracellular calcium by
affecting both membrane channels and calcium mobilization from intracellular stores.[31] Therefore, potentiating effects of sigma receptors and ryanodine receptor antagonists
on the intracellular calcium may augment the effects of these two classes of drugs
against caffeine-induced seizures. However, the interaction of sigma receptors and
ryanodine receptors has not been fully understood.
Other than the above-mentioned mechanisms, caffeine interaction with other systems
may have a potential role in the convulsant effects of this substance. It has been
suggested that the antagonistic effects of caffeine on the adenosine receptors may
contribute to its pro-convulsant effects.[42]
The main limitation of our study may be the administration of non-specific receptor
modulators like ketamine for studying caffeine-induced seizures. It is highly recommended
to use specific receptor modulators in the future studies and to use the sigma receptor
agonists in different seizure models like electroconvulsive shock or Kainic acid-induced
seizure models.
5
Conclusion
Opipramol, a sigma receptor agonist, attenuated seizures produced by high doses of
caffeine. Moreover, the activation of sigma receptors and the inhibition of ryanodine
receptors may produce potentiating effects against caffeine-induced seizures. Drugs
from different classes attenuated the caffeine-induced seizures in mice. This may
imply that different mechanisms such as inhibition of GABAA receptors, activation of NMDA and ryanodine receptors, and increasing intracellular
calcium may contribute to the caffeine-induced seizures. Moreover, the combination
of drugs with different mechanisms of action may be more effective to control methylxanthine-induced
seizures.
Conflict of interest
The authors have none to declare.
Author’s contribution
Mojtaba Keshavarz: the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting
and revising the article and final approval of the manuscript.
Seyyed Ahmadreza Hoseini: acquisition of data, drafting the manuscript and final approval
of the manuscript.
Samad Akbarzadeh: the design of the study, analysis of data, revising the manuscript
and final approval of the manuscript.