Der Klinikarzt 2018; 47(05): 226-229
DOI: 10.1055/a-0593-3645
Serie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Neuer Stellenwert des PFO-Verschlusses in der klinischen Praxis

Aktuelle Studien, veränderte Datenlage und offene Fragen
Ulf Ziemann
Abteilung Neurologie mit Schwerpunkt neurovaskuläre Erkrankungen und Neuroonkologie, und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 May 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Was tun bei Patienten mit kryptogenem Schlaganfall und persistierendem Foramen Ovale (PFO)? Nach bisheriger Datenlagen wurden durch die neurologischen und kardiologischen Leitlinien in aller Regel eine sekundärprophylaktische Therapie mit einem Thrombozytenfunktionshemmer empfohlen. Drei im September 2017 im New England Journal of Medicine publizierte Studien (CLOSE, REDUCE, RESPECT-Langzeitdaten) verändern die Datenlage: hiernach ist der PFO-Verschluss gegenüber einer rein medikamentösen thrombozytenfunktionshemmenden Therapie sekundärprophylaktisch besser wirksam, allerdings nur bei ausgewählten Patienten. In diesem Beitrag werden die neuen Studien und ihre Wertigkeit inklusive zahlreicher offener Fragen kritisch besprochen.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 17-20
  • 2 Schneider B, Zienkiewicz T, Jansen V. et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and correlation with autopsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 1202-1209
  • 3 Meissner I, Khandheria BK, Heit JA. et al. Patent foramen ovale: innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 440-445
  • 4 Lechat P, Mas JL, Lascault G. et al. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. New Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1148-1152
  • 5 Homma S, Di Tullio MR, Sacco RL. et al. Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study. Stroke 1994; 25: 582-586
  • 6 Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C. et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. New Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1740-1746
  • 7 Cramer SC, Rordorf G, Maki JH. et al. Increased pelvic vein thrombi in cryptogenic stroke: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study. Stroke 2004; 35: 46-50
  • 8 Alsheikh-Ali AA, Thaler DE, Kent DM. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic?. Stroke 2009; 40: 2349-2355
  • 9 Meier B, Frank B, Wahl A. et al. Secondary stroke prevention: patent foramen ovale, aortic plaque, and carotid stenosis. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 705-713 713a, 713b
  • 10 Calvet D, Mas JL. Closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: a never ending story. Curr Opin Neurol 2014; 27: 13-19
  • 11 Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J. et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. New Engl J Med 2012; 366: 991-999
  • 12 Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE. et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. New Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1092-1100
  • 13 Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP. et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. New Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1083-1091
  • 14 Hankey GJ. Secondary stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 178-194
  • 15 Messé SR, Gronseth G, Kent DM. et al. Practice advisory: Recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale (update of practice parameter): Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2016; 87: 815-821
  • 16 European Stroke Organisation Executive C, Committee ESOW. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 457-507
  • 17 Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 2011; 42: 227-276
  • 18 Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B. et al. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. New Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1011-1021
  • 19 Sondergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF. et al. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke. New Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1033-1042
  • 20 Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE. et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke. New Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1022-1032
  • 21 Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR. et al. The ASCOD phenotyping of ischemic stroke (Updated ASCO Phenotyping). Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 36: 1-5
  • 22 Kent DM, Ruthazer R, Weimar C. et al. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology 2013; 81: 619-625
  • 23 Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB. et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 429-438
  • 24 Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS. et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. New Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2478-2486
  • 25 Poli S, Diedler J, Härtig F. et al. Insertable cardiac monitors after cryptogenic stroke – a risk factor based approach to enhance the detection rate for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23: 375-381