Rectal carcinoids are rare tumors, most of which are diagnosed incidentally during
routine colonoscopy. Unfortunately, endoscopists tend to attempt resection using traditional
resection methods, such as snare, which often results in incomplete resection [1]
[2]. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) method has recently been proposed as
a valuable endoscopic treatment for rectal carcinoids, because it provides a higher
en bloc resection rate than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), enabling
accurate pathologic diagnosis and potentially curative treatment [3]
[4]
[5].
A 66-year-old woman was evaluated by upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies
in 2015 for epigastralgia without other accompanying symptoms. During colonoscopy,
an 8-mm rectal polyp with a preserved mucosal pattern was found about 3 cm proximally
to the dentate line ([Fig. 1 a]). Pathological assessment reported a well-differentiated carcinoid tumor (G1), based
on a mitosis count of 1 per high-power field and Ki67 staining of less than 2 %. Abdominal
and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans and the level of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid
were unremarkable. No endosonography was performed as part of the staging because
locoregional staging in carcinoids less than 1 cm has low sensitivity and resection
serves as both a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.
Fig. 1 Endoscopic views showing: a a carcinoid tumor; b markings made around the margins of the lesion; c tumor resection along with full-thickness resection of the rectal wall; d the defect following resection with perirectal fat visible in the depth of the lesion
– the lesion was left open to heal spontaneously owing to its location.
The lesion was resected using the ESD technique ([Video 1]). Resection margins were marked using a 2.5-mm FlushKnife, ball type ([Fig. 1 b]). We performed careful full-thickness wall sectioning, preserving the previously
marked margins. After completing sectioning of the perimeter of the margins, we proceeded
to complete the resection with a polypectomy snare ([Fig. 1 c, d]). Histological analysis of the specimen showed a tumor 6 mm in diameter and 3-mm
thick with mucosal involvement and part of the submucosa with tumor-free lateral and
vertical margins, confirming a surgical R0 resection ([Fig. 2]).
Video 1 A carcinoid tumor of 1 cm in diameter is identified in the lower rectum. Resection
margins are marked and careful full-thickness wall sectioning is performed, preserving
the previously marked margins. After sectioning of the perimeter of the margins has
been completed, resection is completed with a polypectomy snare.
Fig. 2 Macroscopic appearance of the resected pathological specimen containing the tumor
and peripheral tissue.
The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and endoscopic follow-up at 3 months
showed a scar with no macroscopic signs of relapse. The patient remains under follow-up
at 12 months with no recurrence of her disease ([Fig. 3]).
Fig. 3 Follow-up endoscopy 3 months post-intervention showing a scar at the resection site.
In expert hands, full-thickness resection is an effective treatment for early lower
rectal submucosal carcinoids, achieving curative treatment with a minimal incidence
of abdominal complications.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques
in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all
contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
