Key words birdshot retinochoroiditis - Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease - stromal choroiditis -
indocyanine green angiography - immunosuppressive therapy
Schlüsselwörter Birdshot-Retinochoroiditis - Morbus Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada - stromale Aderhautentzündung
- Indocyaningrünangiografie - immunosuppressive Therapie
Introduction
The appraisal of choroiditis has been hampered in the past because imaging access
to the choroid was very limited, relying mainly on B echography that gave solely gross
information of the choroid, needing substantial involvement to produce a positive
result [1 ]. As a consequence, the terminology used to characterize choroidal fundus lesions
was very vague and only descriptive, including the inadequate term of “white dot syndromes”
finally universally used after it was first proposed in 1995 [2 ]. Since indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has become available, a much more sensitive
and precise method for the exploration of inflammatory choroidal involvement is at
our disposal and allows us to better identify choroidal lesions, even showing small
subclinical ones, not reported by other classical diagnostic methods [enhanced depth
imaging-optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), fluorescein angiography, slit lamp
examination]. ICGA also led to a better understanding of the physiopathological mechanisms
of the different choroiditis entities [3 ], [4 ], thanks to a schematic interpretation in posterior uveitis using a standard protocol
[5 ], [6 ].
Based on ICGA patterns, at least two main mechanisms at the origin of most choroiditis
entities were identified [3 ], [7 ]:
Choriocapillaritis, causing choriocapillaris hypoperfusion and/or non-perfusion [8 ]
Stromal choroiditis, characterized by foci or infiltration of the choroidal stroma
together with vasculitis of the larger choroidal vessels [9 ], [10 ]
By using a global approach including multimodal imaging allowing for the assessment
of inflammation in all ocular compartments, we analyzed two stromal choroiditis entities,
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) and birdshot retinochoroiditis (BRC). Our purpose
was to point out the striking similarities and the main differences of these two diseases
regarding epidemiology and genetic background, physiopathology, inflammatory mechanism,
and structures involved. This could then lead to a better understanding of the evolutionary
pattern and therapy response, hoping to reach optimal management guidelines for both
of these entities.
ICGA for Choroidal Imaging in Inflammation
ICGA for Choroidal Imaging in Inflammation
ICGA provides profound insight into the pathological processes located in the choroid
because of the specific physical and optical properties of the indocyanine green (ICG)
molecule [5 ], [6 ], [7 ]. The almost completely protein-bound ICG molecule constitutes a macromolecular complex
that is approximately 200 times larger than the small fluorescein one, giving it entirely
different physical properties. Unlike fluorescein, it is too large to egress from
inflamed retinal vessels unless the blood-retinal breach is very severe. In contrast,
at the level of the choriocapillaris that is characterized by large fenestrations,
both molecules egress alike. However, while the small fluorescein molecule is quickly
washed out, the large protein-bound ICG molecule remains entangled in the choroidal
stroma and progressively produces a background fluorescence. This background fluorescence
can be impaired and then produces hypofluorescent areas from at least two mechanisms:
(1) choriocapillaris non-perfusion or hypoperfusion such as in choriocapillaritis
[8 ] or (2) inflammatory foci that are infiltrating the choroidal stroma impairing the
natural diffusion of the ICG molecule [9 ], [10 ]. In the former case, the hypofluorescent areas usually have a confluent geographic
aspect, whereas in the latter, the hypofluorescent dots are usually small, regular,
round, evenly distributed lesions characteristic of stromal choroiditis that have
been assimilated by an analogy to icebergs, otherwise unseen in the choroid [7 ]. The other crucial property of ICG is that it fluoresces at 830 nm, allowing an
in-depth view through the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of the mechanisms indicated
here above. Giving access to this highly vascularized tissue, the use of ICGA in the
investigation of ocular inflammatory disorders of the posterior segment appears unavoidable,
enhancing the diagnostic possibilities and optimizing the management of these entities
[11 ].[12 ], [13 ], [14 ].
Stromal Choroiditis
The second ICGA pattern identified in the previous paragraph, representing inflammatory
foci located in the choroidal stroma, could be referred to as stromal choroiditis
[4 ]. The stromal choroid can be infiltrated, as other organs, by systemic diseases such
as tuberculosis or sarcoidosis, a nonobligatory, chance location of a disease that
involves organs in an unexplained and seemingly unrelated manner. From our perspective,
this situation should be referred to as secondary stromal choroiditis as the choroid
does not seem to be generating the inflammation per se but seems to only be an innocent
bystander of a systemic process.
However, in primary stromal choroiditis such as VKH and BRC, the most frequent entities,
the inflammatory foci, are generated by the choroidal structures themselves, which
in turn triggers an autoimmune reaction. In both situations, inflammatory infiltration
is accompanied by a choroidal vasculitis [6 ].
The ICGA features of primary stromal choroiditis are characterized by five ICG angiographic
signs including [5 ]:
Early hyperfluorescent stromal vessels
Regular, round, more or less evenly distributed hypofluorescent dark dots (HDDs)
Fuzziness and loss of pattern of large choroidal vessels in the intermediate phase
Late diffuse hyperfluorescence
Disc hyperfluorescence, if the inflammation is severe
A proposed angiographic scoring system allows to precisely quantify ICGA lesions with
a numerical score [15 ], [16 ].
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease (VKH)
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease (VKH)
Introduction and history
VKH disease is a bilateral primary stromal choroiditis caused by an autoimmune reaction
against a stromal melanocyte-associated protein. Ocular disease is associated with
systemic manifestations, including inflammation of the meninges [cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF)mononuclear pleocytosis], auditory disturbances, and integumentary changes (vitiligo,
alopecia, and poliosis) [17 ].
Ocular inflammation starts in the choroidal stroma and then spills over to produce
the classical clinical picture of a bilateral panuveitis with papillitis, exudative
retinal detachments, and an anterior mostly granulomatous uveitis. Treatment consists
of high-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy that should probably be associated with
nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy in most cases. The first case of VKH was described
in 1906 by Alfred Vogt in Switzerland who reported a case of poliosis associated with
intraocular inflammation [18 ]. The first Japanese case of VKH disease was described by Jujiro Komoto in 1911,
followed by several cases reported by Yoshizo Koyanagi in 1914 [19 ], [20 ]. In 1926, Einosuke Harada described a primary posterior uveitis associated with
exudative retinal detachments accompanied by CFS pleocytosis [21 ], [22 ]. In 1929, Koyanagi published his review of 16 patients with bilateral chronic iridocyclitis
associated with vitiligo, alopecia, poliosis, deafness, and tinnitus [23 ]. In 1939, Babel, and in 1949, Bruno and McPherson unified the disorders described
by Vogt, Koyanagi, and Harada, and suggested that these seemingly disparate entities
were a continuum of the same disease process [24 ], [25 ]. Since then, the uveomeningoencephalitic syndrome has been known as VKH disease.
Etiology and epidemiology
VKH eye disease is a primary stromal choroiditis caused by a multisystem TH2 autoimmune
reaction against a tyrosinase-like protein in melanocytes [26 ], [27 ], [28 ]. VKH disease affects predominantly heavily pigmented races such as Asians, Hispanics,
American Indians, and Asian Indians [17 ]. It can occur in Caucasians, but this is uncommon [29 ], [30 ]. The incidence of VKH disease is variable around the world. It is more common in
Japan, where it accounts for 6.8 – 9.2% of all uveitis referrals [31 ], [32 ], than in the United States or Northern Europe, where it accounts for only 1 – 3%
of all uveitis referrals [30 ].
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of typical initial-onset acute disease does not pose a problem, as characteristic
symptoms and signs are those of a panuveitis, usually granulomatous, including exudative
serous retinal detachments, papillitis, some vitritis, and granulomatous or non-granulomatous
anterior uveitis that is progressively becoming more prominent with weeks of evolution
[33 ]. Diagnosis is more difficult when it is not performed at the very onset of disease
and when patients received suboptimal treatment before being seen by a specialized
center. Therefore, several sets of diagnostic criteria have been published, starting
in 1978, with those published by Sugiura [34 ], followed by the American Uveitis Society criteria in 1980 [35 ]. In 2001, the “revised criteria for VKH” were published that divided VKH cases into
three categories, complete, incomplete, and possible VKH, which became widely used
since then [36 ]. However, such attempts were unsatisfactory as they mixed acute and chronic features
and failed to distinguish between them [37 ]. Today the main impact is placed on early diagnosis, which is possible thanks to
ICGA and EDI-OCT choroidal thickness measurements, both positive at a rate of 100%
in initial-onset disease and representing disease-defining criteria [38 ]. These two modalities are also essential to diagnose ongoing VKH in early chronic
evolution.
Clinical features and stages
Prodromal stage
At the start of the disease, patients may complain of headaches (a precious diagnostic
element very often present), nausea, fever, meningismus, and orbital pain. Sometimes
patients complain of flu-like symptoms, scalp and skin tenderness as well as cochlear-vestibular
signs (tinnitus, hearing loss, vertigo) [39 ], [40 ]. This prodromal stage usually lasts for a few days. At this stage, no ocular clinical
signs are recorded yet, as the inflammatory reaction is still confined to the choroidal
stroma and would be visible only by ICGA ([Fig. 1 ]). During the prodromal stage, if symptoms are very accentuated, patients may be
seen in the neurology department, in which case an MRI is usually performed and often
negative [41 ].
Fig. 1 During the prodromal stage of the disease, subclinical choroidal inflammation is
silently developing in the choroidal stroma, as shown in the cartoon (top left). This
subclinical choroidal involvement can only be detected by ICGA. On the fundus pictures
shown on the top right, the fundus of the left eye is discolored yellow due to massive
choroidal VKH infiltration. The fundus of the right eye looks normal, and this patient
was diagnosed as “unilateral” VKH. FA of the right eye shows no lesions (six bottom
left frames), but ICGA (six bottom right frames) clearly shows numerous HDDs, indicating
choroidal granuloma.(Source: Herbort CP jr., Abu El Asrar AM, Yamamoto JH et al. Reappraisal
of the management of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: sunset glow fundus is no more a
fatality. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37: 1383–1395; License CC-BY 4.0)
Uveitic acute exudative stage (initial-onset disease)
Ocular findings
The disease becomes clinically apparent when choroidal inflammation spills over, usually
very rapidly to the neighboring structures, the optic disc, retina, ciliary body,
and, after a few days, the anterior chamber. By definition, the disease is bilateral,
but it can be asymmetric and one eye can be involved subclinically at onset. The expression
of the disease is that of a bilateral granulomatous posterior or panuveitis with predominant
posterior involvement initially [42 ]. The symptoms consist of blurry vision and ocular discomfort. Classical anterior
clinical signs are an anterior often granulomatous uveitis with minimal to moderate
anterior chamber flare and cells associated with small to mid-sized granulomatous
keratic precipitates (KPs) ([Fig. 2 ]). Sometimes, the degree of intraocular inflammation in acute disease is such that
there is subciliary fluid accumulation at the origin of ciliary detachment causing
myopisation and shallowing of the anterior chamber ([Fig. 3 ]).
Fig. 2 Acute initial-onset exudative VKH disease. Peripapillary and retinal exudative serous
detachments seen on fuduscopy (top left) and FA (bottom left). Extrachoroidal structures
are involved when the choroidal disease spills over to neighboring structures (cartoon,
top right). OCT clearly shows the detachment of the neurosensory retina (middle figure
on the right). Moderate granulomatous anterior uveitis accompanying posterior involvement
(bottom right).(Source: Herbort CP jr., Abu El Asrar AM, Yamamoto JH et al. Reappraisal
of the management of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: sunset glow fundus is no more a
fatality. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37: 1383–1395; License CC-BY 4.0 )
Fig. 3 Subciliary detachment in hyperacute VKH disease. Ultrasound biometry (UBM) picture
showing liquid under the ciliary body producing ciliary body detachment that caused
acute myopisation.
In initial-onset acute disease, the most severe involvement occurs posteriorly and
later involves more anterior structures.
Posterior signs, early on in the acute phase of the disease, consist of swelling of
the optic disc seen in conjunction with vitreous cellular infiltration of diverse
amplitude. Characteristics of VKH are the multifocal exudative non-rhegmatogenous
serous retinal detachments around the optic disc and in the posterior pole ([Fig. 2 ]). In case the disease progresses in the absence of treatment, the serous retinal
detachments can evolve into bullous retinal detachments and can involve more peripheral
areas. Sometimes, in the periphery, round yellow-white lesions can be seen (Dahlen-Fuchs
lesions). Retinal vasculitis is not a fundus feature of VKH [10 ].
Extraocular involvement in initial-onset acute disease
As the autoimmune reaction is also directed against melanocytes found in other parts
of the body, systemic disease accompanies ocular involvement. In the acute inaugural
disease, extraocular involvement predominantly involves the meninges at the origin
of CSF monocytic pleocytosis, a very helpful diagnostic investigation that can be
performed to confirm the diagnosis. Another extraocular site involved in acute disease
is the inner ear, causing dysacousis/tinnitus and hearing loss, revealed by performing
an audiogram [43 ].
Evolution to chronic disease can be stopped by early, vigorous, and prolonged therapy
If inflammation suppressive therapy (IST) comprising steroidal and nonsteroidal immunosuppression
is introduced within 3 – 4 weeks of onset of the symptoms, or the “therapeutic window
of opportunity” [37 ], the disease can be cured as long as subclinical recurrences are immediately managed
with increased IST. If treatment is suboptimal, the disease will evolve into the chronic
stage, which is characterized by two types of courses: chronic smouldering progressing
disease or chronic disease with acute exacerbations.
Chronic stages of disease
Chronic smouldering progressive disease
Ocular findings
In most cases, acute VKH patients receive sufficient treatment to suppress the clinically
apparent disease, meaning extrachoroidal spillover disease (retina, optic disc, vitreous
body). However, subclinical intraocular inflammation can persist and be detected by
laser flare photometry, which can show a subclinical flare undetectable by slit lamp
examination [44 ], or ICGA, showing active choroidal inflammation.
This subclinical evolution is at the origin of the development of “sunset glow fundus”
(SGF) despite (suboptimal) therapy. SGF is explained by the progressive loss of stromal
melanocytes due to low-grade choroidal inflammation. As the disease process begins
to wane, the posterior portion of the globe characteristically shows depigmentation
[45 ], [46 ] ([Fig. 4 ]). This “sunset glow” appearance of the fundus, reflecting the stromal pigment loss,
has been described to reach close to 100% in most studies and is said to be more common
in Asian patients, most likely just because these fundi are more heavily pigmented.
Fig. 4 Signs found in chronically evolving disease. Chronic granulomatous uveitis with old
pigmented KPs (top left), Koeppe nodules, iris infiltration, and Bussacca nodules
(top right). Scars from Dalen-Fuchs nodules are shown on the middle left picture and
sunset glow fundus on the right middle picture. Mottled irregular, disturbed RPE in
the posterior pole and high water marks indicate a limit of reattached serous retinal
detachment as well as disc hyperfluorescence, as seen on the FA frame (bottom left).
Only ICGA can show that the disease is still active, as shown by the numerous dark
dots (bottom right).(Source: Herbort CP jr., Abu El Asrar AM, Yamamoto JH et al. Reappraisal
of the management of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: sunset glow fundus is no more a
fatality. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37: 1383–1395; License CC-BY 4.0)
Extraocular findings
The acute auditory difficulties can persist and may affect 30 ~ 40% of patients. They
are then characterized by sensorineural hearing loss, usually involving the higher
frequencies. Skin lesions (vitiligo, poliosis, and alopecia) typically occur during
the chronic stage. These signs have landmarked the disease as they are very demonstrative
in historical series that represent the natural course of the disease in the pretreatment
era [23 ]. Their occurrence has decreased since more sustained therapy has been introduced
[47 ].
Chronic disease with recurrences
Recurrences of inflammatory attacks can occur in suboptimally treated patients and/or
during the tapering of therapy. These recurrent attacks resemble the uveitic acute
exudative stage, with some differences. Their characteristics will depend on how important
the stromal choroidal melanocytes loss was during the initial uveitic acute stage
and the subsequent smouldering phase of disease. If the loss of melanocytes was important,
the predominant part of the inflammation will be anterior, as it is classically described,
because this is probably where the bulk of the remaining melanocytes is. However,
if the loss of choroidal stromal melanocytes was scarce, recurrences can present themselves
similar to de novo uveitic acute exudative disease. Nevertheless, the posterior component
of inflammation is usually less pronounced and, although serous exudative detachments
can occur, this is a much rarer feature. Anterior granulomatous uveitis is a more
prominent feature, with its classical signs of granulomatous KPs that can take a mutton-fat
aspect and that are very often pigmented, together with Koeppe nodules, diffuse iris
infiltration or Bussacca nodules, and irido-crystalline synechiae ([Fig. 4 ]). Sometimes, what seems to be a purely anterior recurrence is associated with a
subclinical posterior recurrence only shown by the resurgence of HDDs on ICGA [48 ].
Complications
SGF seems to be the consequence of smouldering choroiditis in insufficiently treated
disease and can be avoided if early, adequately dosed, and prolonged therapy is given
to suppress clinical and/or occult choroidal inflammation [47 ]. It should therefore be considered a complication of undertreated cases. As in all
posterior inflammatory diseases, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) may occur. The
proportion of patients with CNV is difficult to establish and varies among series,
but appears to be occurring in less than 5% of cases. With the availability of intravitreal
anti-VEGF agents, the prognosis of inflammatory CNVs has become much better [49 ].
Glaucoma, occurring in up to 27% of VKH patients, should be managed along the usual
guidelines of inflammatory glaucoma [50 ]. Cataracts, usually cortico-induced, occur in up to 42% of VKH patients. All these
numbers reflect an era with suboptimal treatment, and should be treated with caution.
Investigational procedures
Fluorescein angiography (FA)
In the uveitic acute exudative stage of the disease, FA characteristically shows numerous
punctuate hyperfluorescent pinpoint dots at the level of the RPE [51 ] ([Fig. 2 ]). These dots gradually become more fluorescent, as dye is progressively leaking
into the subretinal space and stains the surrounding subretinal fluid. The homogeneous
pooling of the fluid clearly outlines the full extent of neurosensory detachments.
Optic nerve hyperfluorescence is classically seen. In the subacute and chronic stages,
when the exudative retinal detachments have resolved, FA generally demonstrates areas
of fluorescence transmission (window defect) and blockage in the areas of damaged,
clumped RPE ([Fig. 4 ]). At this stage, the characteristic high water line can be seen, identifying the
limits the detachments reached, and is represented by the abrupt transition from the
granular rearranged area of the pigment epithelium to the uniform screen of intact
RPE ([Fig. 4 ]). At this stage, there is also very often a persistent disc hyperfluorescence, indicating
ongoing disease that is nearly always confirmed by the presence of choroidal lesions
seen on ICGA ([Fig. 4 ]). FA beautifully outlines the extra-choroidal lesions of uveitic acute exudative
disease, but most of the time does not add essential information that is not already
available by clinical examination and fundus photography. The retina itself is not
involved primarily in VKH, but lesions are secondary to choroidal inflammation.
Indocyanine green angiography ([Fig. 5 ])
Being a primary stromal choroiditis, the initial inflammatory events in VKH start
in the choroidal stroma before massively infiltrating the full thickness of the stroma,
and ICGA is therefore the method of choice to establish and monitor choroidal inflammation
[52 ], [53 ]. In that respect, ICGA is able to detect early subclinical disease as well as subclinical
recurrences during tapering of IST, which OCT in its EDI mode is not able to do [54 ].
Fig. 5 ICG angiographic signs. ICGA is the only technique to analyze choroidal inflammatory
signs, including early stromal hyperfluorescent vessels (top left), HDDs, indicating
choroidal granuloma (top right), and fuzzy indistinct choroidal vessels (top two frames
of bottom left quartet). After 3 days of intravenous megadoses of methylprednisolone,
the normal pattern of vessels is again recognizable (bottom two frames of bottom left
quartet). Bottom right quartet of frames shows diffuse late hyperfluorescence and
a hyperfluorescent inflamed disc.(Source: Herbort CP jr., Abu El Asrar AM, Yamamoto
JH et al. Reappraisal of the management of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: sunset glow
fundus is no more a fatality. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37: 1383–1395; License CC-BY 4.0)
Many publications on ICGA signs in VKH are available [55 ], [56 ]. However, these publications include VKH cases at different stages and no clear
definition of ICGA signs before therapeutic intervention has been given. Information
from ICGA publications was difficult to interpret. Herbort et al. systematized the
ICG findings trying to identify signs that are consistently found and useful for the
follow-up of choroidal involvement [57 ]. They identified four signs, the most important being HDDs indicating stromal granulomas
([Fig. 5 ]). The three other reliable ICGA signs for evaluation and follow-up were early hyperfluorescent
choroidal vessels, fuzzy indistinct large choroidal vessels indicating choroidal vasculitis
and ICGA disc hyperfluorescence ([Fig. 5 ]). Other ICGA signs seen are inhomogeneity of choriocapillaris perfusion and late
diffuse choroidal hyperfluorescence, which are, however, difficult to evaluate in
a standard fashion. A recent study showed that these ICGA signs were also present
in Japanese as well as Saudi Arabian patients, indicating that they are universally
found signs [58 ], [59 ].
The ICGA signs were seen in quasi 100% of the fresh, de novo, untreated disease, and
the first sign to respond to therapy was disc hyperfluorescence. In acute recurrent
attacks, the same signs can be observed. However, in chronic smoldering disease, only
HDDs and fuzzy indistinct choroidal vessels indicate ongoing choroidal inflammation.
Precise measurement of retinochoroidal inflammatory involvement is available thanks
to a proposed angiographic scoring system [15 ], [16 ].
ICGA was also able to show, in our cases, with seemingly unilateral disease, that
there was in fact occult choroiditis in the controlateral eye ([Fig. 1 ]). Therefore, there is probably no such thing as unilateral VKH, as in all published
cases of alleged unilateral VKH, ICGA had not been performed to exclude subclinical
controlateral choroiditis before starting treatment.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and enhanced depth imaging (EDI)
OCT has been shown to be a useful tool to measure and monitor serous retinal detachments
during the acute and chronic stages of VKH disease, with the ability to show shallow
serous detachments not otherwise seen [60 ]. However, OCT is mainly better at showing extrachoroidal spillover retinal involvement
and does not give information on subclinical smouldering choroidal disease.
Since the introduction of EDI-OCT, various studies reported the importance of monitoring
choroidal involvement by measuring its thickness, another useful modality that will
help to lead to a rapid diagnosis of initial-onset disease [61 ]. EDI-OCT is also useful to follow the long-term evolution of choroidal thickness
[62 ]. It is, however, not useful, due to not being reactive enough, to monitor the evolution
of choroidal inflammation in the acute and post-acute phases. Moreover, it does not
give information on the peripheral choroid [54 ].
Other investigational procedures
Ultrasound biometry (UBM) is not an essential investigation for VKH but, in the uveitic
acute exudative stage when acute myopisation is occurring, UBM will show subciliary
exudation [33 ] ([Fig. 3 ]). For a long time, classical B-scan ultrasound (US) analysis was the only device
that could give information on choroidal involvement until ICGA and EDI-OCT became
available, but is now obsolete. CSF analysis shows mononuclear pleocytosis in most
patients at the same time or soon after the onset of ocular symptoms and may persist
much longer than is usually reported. Therefore, CSF testing by performing a lumbar
puncture is best when done early in the disease for confirmation of the diagnosis
[63 ]. In atypical cases, or in cases modified by previous (insufficient) treatment, CSF
analysis is still justified several months after onset, as in our hands it is far
from unusual to get positive results. Autorefraction can show refractive changes due
to massive subciliary choroidal effusion, producing myopic changes, and can be used
for monitoring purposes [33 ]. Laser flare photometry is very useful in VKH, as it can exactly determine the degree
of anterior chamber inflammation. In a recent study [10 ], the mean flare value for VKH at presentation was 119.5 ± 179.5 ph/ms (range 3.7
to 629, n of eyes = 12).
Treatment
The principal problems in the treatment of VKH patients are twofold.
The deferral in the initiation of therapy because of diagnostic delay [64 ], especially in non-endemic areas.
The presently practiced therapy that is aimed at the suppression of the clinically
apparent disease and that is adjusted and tapered only according to the resolution
of the extrachoroidal, clinically visible disease.
The treatment regimen published and practiced for VKH from our perspective seems to
be insufficient regarding the immunosuppression used as well as the dosage and duration.
When the clinically apparent disease is controlled under initial therapy with normalization
of functional and morphological parameters such as visual acuity, fundus picture,
retinal OCT, and FA, monitoring by ICGA has shown that choroidal inflammation is still
active and progressing [65 ]. This persistence of choroidal subclinical disease is explaining the evolution towards
SGF in most case series receiving standard therapy [45 ], [46 ].
Therefore, in our opinion, VKH therapy has two phases. First, treatment of the uveitic
acute exudative and post-acute stages of the disease, and monitoring of the resolution
of choroidal inflammation with the help of ICGA in the convalescent phase. Second,
ICGA-assisted adjustment and discontinuation of therapy with a reincrease of therapy
with each subclinical ICGA detected recurrence of choroidal inflammation as well as
ICGA monitoring of choroidal inflammation once therapy has been discontinued [53 ], [54 ].
Acute uveitic exudative stage and post-acute stage (2 months)
The severity of VKH disease and its propensity to respond to treatment can be very
diverse. In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that dual steroidal and
nonsteroidal immunosuppressive IST is recommended, although a proportion of mild cases
might be overtreated [64 ]. A 3-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone (500 to 1000 mg per day) is recommended
followed by high-dose oral prednisone (1.0 to 1.2 mg/kg) for 4 – 6 weeks. At the onset
of disease, we tend to combine systemic prednisone with ciclosporine (CsA), a quick
acting immunosuppressant and mycophenolic acid, which becomes effective only after
several weeks with progressive tapering of corticosteroids over a period of 4 – 6
months, progressive tapering CsA over a period of 6 – 9 months, and long-term maintenance
of non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy such as mycophenolic acid. When persisting
or recurring subclinical choroidal inflammation is detected by ICGA, an additional
immunomodulator such as an anti-TNF-α agent is added [66 ].
Determination of efficacy of a therapeutical agent is greatly helped by ICGA, as it
is reactive and a response is seen quickly when the chosen therapy is efficient. ICGA
gives the clinician great security to monitor tapering. In case of recurrence of subclinical
ICGA-detected choroiditis (reappearance of HDDs), IST is reincreased and/or a novel
immunomodulatory substance is added [53 ], [54 ], [67 ].
Long-term tapering of inflammation suppressive therapy until absence of recurrence
of choroidal disease
Tapering off with treatment takes much longer than the treatment duration that is
usually recommended, until successful tapering without subclinical disease recurrence
in the choroid is achieved. In a series of 9 patients treated with ICGA-assisted management,
the mean duration of treatment was 27.3 months ± 38.2 months (range 9 – 114), which
is much longer than the 6 to 9 months cited in the literature. The advantage of such
a relentless therapy is a high proportion (7/9 cases, 78%) of “healed” cases with
no recurrent activity within a mean follow-up period without therapy of 26 ± 14.8
months as well as a low proportion of cases with sunset glow fundus (3/9, 33%) [53 ].
Treatment of chronic VKH disease
In case the disease has escaped to chronicity because of insufficient or late treatment,
the objective can no longer be curing the disease. In most cases, the disease will
evolve in a smouldering fashion with acute recurrences sometimes, mostly clinically
anterior associated with subclincal stromal choroiditis identified by ICGA. Therapy
will have less impact, and more than one immunosuppressant is usually necessary. The
choice of therapy is often made by trial and error. ICGA monitoring is often helpful
as the effectiveness of a given therapy can be verified by the response of ICGA signs
(HDDs and choroidal vasculitis, angiographic score). The response to therapy will
also advantageously be followed with laser flare photometry.
Birdshot Retinochoroiditis (BRC)
Birdshot Retinochoroiditis (BRC)
Introduction and history
BRC is a bilateral retinochoroidal inflammatory disease without any known systemic
involvement described in 1980 by Ryan and Maumenee [68 ]. A report by Gass in 1981 described 11 patients with the same condition that he
originally called vitiliginous chorioretinitis [69 ]. Association of BRC with major histopathology complex (MHC) type 1 antigen HLA-A29
was reported in 1982 and confirmed in 1992, as being one of the strongest associations
known to date [70 ], [71 ]. The particular clinical characteristic of BRC is that inflammation starts dually
and independently in the choroid and the retina, unlike most uveitis entities where
inflammation originates in one structure involving secondarily adjacent structures
[72 ], [73 ]. At the level of the retina, profuse leaking vasculopathy involves both small capillaries
and large retinal vessels. The choroidal involvement typically is a primary stromal
choroiditis, initially occult, and later producing the typical rice-shaped depigmented
yellow birdshot lesions in the posterior pole and along the vascular arcades ([Fig. 6 a ]). Initially, BRC was not differentiated from other choriocapillaris entities such
as multiple evanescent syndrome (MEWDS), and was even included in the “white dot syndromes”,
however, histopathology has revealed that it is the choroidal stroma that is the site
of inflammation, while the choriocapillaris and the RPE are intact. This therefore
differentiates BRC, and makes it rather a stromal choroiditis [2 ], [74 ]. Unfortunately, it is still included in the choriocapillaritis group, albeit the
physiopathlogical mechanism is different [75 ]. It should further be noted that it is a primary stromal choroiditis, as explained
earlier, in contrast to other diseases like sarcoidosis or tuberculosis. The obligatory
primary site of inflammation is the stroma in BRC [76 ].
Fig. 6 a BRC fundus appearance. Typical oval-shaped depigmented fundus lesions distributed
in the mid-periphery in a patient with a disease evolving for more than 7 years. b Anterior segment view of a non-treated BRC patient showing one single microgranulomatous
KP.
In contrast to VKH disease, where the target of the immune reaction, a stromal choroidal
melanine-associated protein, has been identified, the target of the suspected autoimmune
reaction in BRC is unknown. However, the morbidity in BRC comes from retinal inflammatory
involvement due to massive leakage from capillaries and larger vessels [77 ], [78 ].
Etiology and epidemiology
BRC mainly affects Caucasian patients, an ethnic group with a high prevalence of the
HLA-A29.2 antigen [71 ]. The presence of the HLA-A29 antigen increases the risk of developing the disease,
up to 224-fold [79 ]. The proportion of BRC patients in a European and North American uveitis series
is around 1.2% of uveitis cases. In Southeast Asian populations, BRC has virtually
never been found or described. Typically, BRC affects age groups from 30 to 70 years
with a median age around 50 and there is a strong gender predilection for women, with
an F/M ratio of 3/2 [80 ], [81 ].
Diagnosis
Over the years, several attempts of establishing diagnostic criteria have been made,
including one to establish research criteria for the disease [82 ]. Although the authors initially presented them for study purposes, these criteria
have often been treated as diagnostic ones and are often miscited. Crucial elements
such as ICGA and visual field testing were not listed, while others had only minor
attention (HLA-A29). KPs were listed as an exclusion criterion, although studies showed
them to be present in as much as 20% of cases [83 ]. The main issue of this miscitation was, that by not including ICGA, clinicians
deprive themselves of the possibility to make an early diagnosis, before typical oval,
depigmented, birdshot fundus lesions are present. Recently, newer diagnostic criteria,
reporting early BRC diagnosis, were published and included (1) retinal vasculitis
in small and large veins in one or both eyes, (2) vitritis in one or both eyes, (3)
visual field abnormalities in one or both eyes, (4) ICGA lesions in both eyes (present
in 100% of cases, required criterion), and (5) the presence of the HLA-A29 antigen
(required), with or without oval, depigmented, birdshot fundus lesions [84 ].
Clinical features
BRC, in contrast to VKH, is a disease that involves immediately both the choroid and
the retina in a parallel but independent fashion [73 ]. Involvement is always bilateral, like VKH, but can be asymmetric.
Patients may have ocular complaints such as floaters, loss of brightness and of luster
of colors, fuzziness of vision and, only later, a decrease in visual acuity. As macular
edema often spares the foveola, central vision remains excellent in most cases and
is not a good functional parameter to monitor disease activity and progression, whereas
visual field changes more appropriately identify the progression of the disease [85 ], [86 ], [87 ]. Anterior chamber inflammation is usually slight, at most, with a flare only recordable
by laser flare photometry [88 ] and rare cells. Nevertheless, careful examination of the anterior segment is important.
In cases with a long-standing evolution that have not been treated, it is not rare
to find very few or even a single microgranulomatous KP [83 ] ([Fig. 6 b ]). Interestingly, BRC diagnosis criteria from 2006 exclude patients with KPs or posterior
synechiae [82 ]. However, Knecht et al. reported granulomatous KPs in up to 23% of cases, contradicting
this exclusion criteria [89 ]. Moreover, signs possibly indicating a granulomatous process in BRC have been found
histopathologically in a recent autopsy case of BRC, and could further confirm this
result, although no complete granulomas were identified [74 ]. Vitreous infiltration is usually present and can be prominent in some cases. At
the onset of disease, fundus examination shows papillitis and vasculitis of veins,
but no cream-colored birdshot fundus lesions, which used to be considered the landmark
sign of BRC ([Fig. 7 a, b ]). However, subclinical choroidal involvement is clearly shown by ICGA through numerous
HDDs, indicating occult stromal choroidal infiltration [89 ] ([Fig. 7 c, d ]). The initial extent of retinal involvement is shown by FA, which reveals, in addition
to vasculitis of large vessels, massive capillary exudation to the point that there
is not enough fluorescein upon venous return to mark the large veins [77 ]. This stage is called the wet phase of BRC ([Fig. 7 e ]). In our experience, cystoid macular edema (CMO) involving the foveola is less frequent
than reported in the past and occurs in up to 40% of cases at any time of the evolution
of the disease. Even when there is massive exudation from retinal vessels, the foveola
can remain free of edema [76 ], [90 ] ([Fig. 7 f ], left eye). On the other hand, in equally inflamed eyes, one eye may present CMO,
whereas the other eye remains free of it ([Fig. 7 f ]).
Fig. 7 Benign case of BRC managed by close follow-up without treatment. Fifty-eight-year-old
patient that consulted for fuzzy vision with floaters. At presentation the fundus
examination showed minimal signs limited to a slight depigmentation of the fundus
(a ). FA showed disc hyperfluorescence, vasculitis of the large vessels, and patchy mottled
hyperfluorescence caused by leakage of small retinal vessels (b ). ICGA showed numerous HDDs in the intermediate angiographic phase. Some of these
dots persist into the late phase, probably representing full-thickness choroidal inflammatory
infiltrates, but most are no longer detected in the late phase as the hyperfluorescence
coming from large abnormally permeable vessels causes isofluorescence (c and d ). Even at the presenting stage of the disease, there was a lack of fluorescein demarcation
of the veins, not due to a circulatory delay, as the ICG angiographic taken at 20‘’
already shows dye in the veins. This is explained by the massive intraretinal leakage
from small retinal vessels, so that there is never enough dye in the large veins to
opacify them (e ). It was decided to watch the patient without treatment because visual acuity was
not diminished, visual field changes were minimal, and there was no cystoid macular
edema (CME) in the left eye (f ). After 6 years without treatment, the visual acuity and visual fields did not deteriorate,
fundus lesions increased (g ), and ICGA HDDs diminished (h, i ) but the macula remained free of CME.
For ongoing disease, especially in belatedly diagnosed cases and if treatment is insufficient,
the fundus examination reveals progressively more cream-colored, oval, birdshot fundus
lesions ([Fig. 7 g ]). Regression of ICGA dark dots occurs following therapy ([Fig. 7 h, i ]). It is supposed that this corresponds to the resolution of the lymphocytic infiltration
without stromal scarring but bearing with it the depletion of melanocytes corresponding
to the cream-colored birdshot fundus lesions. Therapy usually allows stabilization
of the disease, but in some cases diagnosed with delay, the process can evolve towards
a pseudo-retinitis pigmentosa when extensive damage is caused to the chorioretina
([Fig. 8 a ]). The functional corollary is a badly damaged visual field, with reduced color vision
in parallel with reduced amplitudes in electroretinography [91 ], [92 ] ([Fig. 8 b ]).
Fig. 8 Case of burnout BRC, despite maximal therapy, with a fundus picture resembling retinitis
pigmentosa fundus (a ) and severely altered visual fields (b ).
Investigational procedures
Fluorescein angiography (FA)
FA accounts for the retinal involvement and optic nerve inflammation in BRC. FA findings
in the active phase of the disease need to be distinguished from FA findings in quiet
or burned out disease. In early active disease, FA shows sectorial vasculitis of large
vessels, mainly retinal veins. The predominant sign, however, is diffuse vasculitis
of small vessels (capillaries) that is at the origin of mottled hyperfluorescence
all over the fundus, termed the wet phase of BRC ([Fig. 9 a ]). These widespread mottled areas of hyperfluorescence do not correspond to the dark
hypofluorescent dots seen in ICG, clearly indicating that choroidal or retinal inflammations
are not the consequence of each other, but develop independently [73 ], [76 ]. In many cases, this massive fluorescein leakage from capillaries or precapillary
arterioles is at the origin of diffuse retinal fluorescein impregnation. The leakage
is often such that there is not enough fluorescein to mark the large veins [77 ] ([Fig. 9 b ] and [7 e ]). This was erroneously interpreted by Gass in his article on “vitiliginous chorioretinitis”
as an arteriovenous circulatory delay [69 ]. When dual FA and ICGA is performed, actually no arteriovenous perfusion delay is
seen, as the ICG dye reaches the central vein within 20 seconds after injection into
the antecubital vein ([Fig. 9 b ] and [7 e ]). The failure to see fluorescein in the large veins is explained by the fact that,
due to massive retinal exudation, there is not enough fluorescein to sufficiently
impregnate the large veins and make them fluoresce [77 ] ([Fig. 9 b ] and [7 e ]). Consequently, retinal function is impaired in cases with such a massive exudation
from small and large retinal vessels.
Fig. 9 a Leakage of the microvasculature. FA shows diffuse, patchy, mottled hyperfluorescent
areas all over the fundus, indicating diffuse vasculitis of the small vessels. b Pseudo-delay in retinal arteriovenous circulation. Massive retinal exudation causing
a pseudo-delay of arteriovenous circulation as large veins are still not opacified
at 45 seconds.
Disc hyperfluorescence of diverse intensity is usually seen in all cases of early
active disease. CMO is best investigated by FA at onset and can be followed by FA.
In addition, OCT allows for a closer follow-up of CMO [78 ], [90 ], [93 ]. In our series of patients mostly under corticosteroid/Immunosuppressive treatment,
the rate of patients presenting a CMO with foveolar involvement did not exceed 30 – 40%
[72 ] ([Fig. 7 f ]).
In burned-out or quiet long-lasting cases, the main FA findings are mostly window
defects of atrophic areas, showing early hypofluorescence and late hyperfluorescence.
Retinal vessels tend to become slender and, in some cases, chorioretinal atrophy can
evolve towards a pseudo-retinitis pigmentosa fundus picture. There are very often
chronic edematous macular changes or macular retinal pigment alterations as a sequel
of long-standing retinal fluid impregnation.
Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA)
So far, only the retinal involvement was accessible for clinical and angiographic
examinations and could be analyzed in detail. Since ICGA has become available, choroidal
inflammatory involvement became accessible to analysis and monitoring [5 ]. ICGA represents a major improvement in the investigation of BRC by showing the
importance of choroidal involvement. The interpretations given to the characteristic
ICGA images obtained from BRC patients were only conjectures that have, however, now
been confirmed by histopathological analysis of an autopsy case of BRC [74 ].
Like FA, ICG angiographic findings have to be distinguished according to the stage
and activity of the disease. For diagnostic purposes, ICGA is most useful in a newly
presenting disease, as it detects subclinical choroidal stromal infiltration prior
to the apparition of fundus signs [93 ]. Later, ICGA is a great tool to monitor the choroidal inflammatory evolution during
therapy.
In early and non-treated disease, the main findings are numerous HDDs that correspond
to stromal inflammatory foci shown by histopathology ([Fig. 7 c, d ], [10 a – e ], [11 a, b ]). They have a regular size and are evenly distributed in the posterior pole and
the mid-periphery, and have the value of a disease-defining criterion, as they are
present in 100% of cases at a time when the characteristic oval shaped, cream-colored,
birdshot fundus lesions are not yet present. The case exposed in [Fig. 10 a – e ] shows that in the early stage of disease, fundus lesions are not yet visible, whereas
ICGA clearly shows a birdshot type of involvement of the choroid ([Fig. 10 a – e ]). These HDDs are detected from the post-early angiographic frames, but are best
seen during the intermediate and/or late phase of angiography ([Fig. 7 c ] and [9 a ]). They either persist up to the late angiographic phase or become isofluorescent
in the late phase depending on whether the foci occupy the whole thickness of the
stroma or are only partial thickness granulomas ([Fig. 7 c, d ] and [11 a, b ]). Typically, the physiopathological process explaining the HDDs in BRC is the principle
proper to ICGA of a “mass effect”, where a space occupying an inflammatory lesion
in the choroidal stroma impairs the normal diffusion of the ICG dye physiologically
extruding from the fenestrated choriocapillaris ([Fig. 12 ]). In addition to visualization of the infiltrates, ICGA also shows vasculitis of
the larger choroidal vessels that have a fuzzy appearance in the intermediate phase
of angiography and give rise to late diffuse choroidal hyperfluorescence [93 ] ([Fig. 13 a, b ]). The hypothesis of a vasculitic process at the origin of the fuzzy appearance seen
on ICGA has also been confirmed by histopathology since the first ICGA reports [74 ]. This abnormal leakage from large choroidal vessels also contributes to “erase”
the partial thickness stromal foci in the late phase of ICGA ([Fig. 14 ]). It has to be stressed that these findings consisting of HDDs and fuzzy vessels
are not pathognomonic to BRC, but can also be found in other diseases such as VKH
disease, where the same physiopathological processes of stromal infiltrates and choroidal
vasculitis are present.
Fig. 10 BRC in the early stage of disease. Forty-two-year-old man who consulted for blurred
vision OS. Diffuse vitritis without fundus lesions in the left eye (a ); FA shows pronounced retinal vasculitis in the symptomatic left eye (b ) and minimal changes in the asymptomatic right eye (c ); ICGA clearly shows numerous HDDs in the left symptomatic eye (d ) but even more HDDs in the right asymptomatic eye (e ). Based on the left fluorescein signs and bilateral ICGA signs, BRC was suspected,
and the search for the presence of the HLA-A29 antigen was performed, which tested
positive.
Fig. 11 BRC with severe functional impairment at presentation. Fifty-seven-year-old woman
that presented with floaters and an impression of dimness of vision. Fundus imaging
shows minimal signs with only faint dyspigmentation (a ). Typical oval-shaped hypofluorescent dots seen in early disease, while fundus lesions
are still discrete and scarce. These lesions responded very well to emergency posterior
sub-Tenonʼs steroid injection (b , set of six pictures on the right). Presence of severe large and small retinal vessel
vasculitis (c , six top frames) that also responded well to sub-Tenonʼs steroid injection (c , six bottom frames). The presenting visual fields showed extremely severe changes
that, to a large extent, regressed after initiation of therapy (d ).
Fig. 12 HDDs in BRC. (a ) Cartoon explaining the “mass effect” of a granuloma partially occupying the choroidal
stroma. (b ) Recent histopathology seems to confirm this hypothesis, clearly showing a partial
thickness choroidal infiltrate (courtesy Drs. Gaudio, Brooks-Crafword, and Rao). Exudation
from inflamed large choroidal vessels explains both the late diffuse hyperfluorescence
and the fact the partial thickness lesions are “erased” in the late angiographic phase
(c ).(Source for Fig. 12a: Bruno Jeannin)
Fig. 13 Fuzziness of large choroidal vessels. (a ) Cartoon explaining the pathological choroidal hyperfluorescence in addition to the
physiological background fluorescence from the choriocapillaris, coming from non-fenestrated
large vessels. Inflamed vessels appear fuzzy in the area with numerous HDDs (b , left), rapidly responding to corticosteroid therapy with their pattern more sharply
visible again (b , right).(Source for Fig. 13a: Bruno Jeannin)
Fig. 14 Cartoon showing the difference between depigmented birdshot fundus lesions and ICGA
HDDs.(Source: Bruno Jeannin)
The ICGA findings in treated or quiet disease are less pronounced and reflect the
good response of choroidal lesions to corticosteroid/immunosuppressive therapy. HDDs
tend to resolve, and the larger choroidal vessels regain a normal aspect with progressive
resolution of their fuzzy aspect. The remaining HDDs have a less regular shape and
correspond to chorioretinal atrophy.
Objective and precise measurement of retinochoroidal inflammatory involvement can
be evaluated thanks to a previously published angiographic scoring system [16 ], [94 ].
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and enhanced depth imaging-OCT (EDI-OCT)
OCT is an extremely useful modality to analyze and follow-up retinal morphology and
has shown retrospectively in a collective of suboptimally treated patients that the
retina goes through different phases from early presentation were it is thickened
and exudative, through an intermediate phase were retinal thickness decreases, to
a late phase, where we find a thinned atrophic retina with a very high rate of epiretinal
membranes (ERM) [78 ].
EDI-OCT has been increasingly used recently and is showing choroidal thickening in
initial-onset disease, a characteristic feature of BRC, contributory for diagnosis.
In suboptimally treated patients, choroidal thickness progressively thins over years.
This evolution can be significantly attenuated when patients are treated early and
in a prolonged fashion [95 ].
Visual field testing
We have shown that apart from central visual impairment due to macular edema, visual
field changes are more frequently found than acknowledged in BRC and have probably
more deleterious effects on visual function than recognized so far [85 ], [86 ]. These visual field changes are probably a consequence of retinal dysfunction rather
than from choroidal or optic nerve disease and are seen in parallel to massive fluorescein
exudation [87 ] ([Fig. 11 c, d ]). In our hands, since our first data on the importance of visual field testing,
computerized visual field testing is a routine follow-up examination and the occurrence
or progression of visual field changes are considered an indication to introduce or
increase therapy, despite full visual acuity. This attitude may be an explanation
why the rate of foveolar cystoid macular edema is relatively low in our experience
[72 ].
Electroretinography and physiopathological implications
Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) becomes abnormal as the disease progresses, indicating
relentless retinal deterioration. The ERG can show a decrease of the rod a- and b-wave
amplitudes with an increase of their implicit times [87 ], but the most sensitive and prevalent abnormality is a delay of the cone system-derived
30 Hz flicker ERG [91 ]. Priem et al. showed that the neural layers of the retina were more diffusely and
severely involved than the receptor-RPE-choroid complex with the observation of an
electronegative ERG. There is little evidence indicating outer retinal dysfunction
resulting from choroidal inflammation [92 ].
These findings are in contrast to ERG findings reported in primary inflammatory choriocapillaritis
where outer retinal dysfunction is found and therefore distinguishes BRC from choriocapillaritis
entities also electrophysiologically and they should not be classified together [3 ].
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
Recent reports [96 ], [97 ], [98 ] have started to describe OCTA findings in BRC and have found a diffuse reduction
in the flow of both the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP), with
capillary loops, telangiectatic vessels, and overall signs of altered retinal vasculature.
Changes were more noticeable in the DCP than in the SCP.
Evolution, prognosis, and treatment
Evolution and prognosis of BRC is traditionally considered to cause long-term visual
impairment due to several complications such as cystoid macular edema, scarring, or
choroidal neovascular membranes. Studies reported up to 20% of patients having long-term
best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or less [99 ], [100 ]. However, publications have often hinted that adequate control of intraocular inflammation,
and subsequent disease remissions, would permit significant visual improvement, or
even restoration [101 ], [102 ]. Such an attempt is even more possible thanks to substantially improved diagnostic
means, allowing early diagnosis prior to the apparition of cream-colored birdshot
fundus lesions. Recent studies have shown that aggressive early treatment in patients
could prevent the apparition of the typical birdshot lesions, even after a follow-up
of more than 10 years [85 ], and even prevent thinning and atrophy of the choroid [95 ].
As discussed earlier, BRC is characterized by a primary dual simultaneous, although
independent, involvement of the retina and the choroid. The evolution and response
to therapy of retinal and choroidal disease in BRC have a different course, with choroidal
disease responding well to therapy while retinal disease is more resistant.
As prospective control studies are lacking due to the rarity of the disease, management
of BRC is empirical. BRC can be left untreated only as long as no functional impairment
is detected, however, early management of intraocular inflammation should be rapid.
In the absence of cystoid macular edema, the first functional parameter to deteriorate
is not visual acuity but the visual field. If this deterioration is progressing, action
should be taken promptly. Several treatment options have been tried in this regard,
but none have been consensual. Steroids, regardless of their route, are usually part
of the initial regimen and have been proven to improve edema, neovascular membranes,
and even symptoms of nyctalopia [103 ], [104 ], [105 ], however, most agree that the effect is limited in late-stage disease. Immunosuppressive
agents have also been commonly used, but take longer to be efficient and the results
are similar, with a combined approach usually favored over a corticosteroid only or
immunosuppressive only management [102 ], [106 ].
One safe and efficient approach could be to start with sub-Tenonʼs corticosteroid
injections, which could be repeated in case of asymmetrical disease, either accompanied
by a fast-acting immunosuppressant such as CsA, or a slower but safer one such as
mycophenolic acid or even anti-TNF agents. Fifteen percent of the patients reported
did not need systemic therapy after 10 years of follow-up.
There is no set treatment protocol for BRC and the choice of therapy is often empirical.
Traditionally, disease recurrence and evolution are evaluated by EDI-OCT measured
choroidal thickness, or FA, however, such methods do not detect small subclinical
recurrences as efficiently and quickly as ICGA. ICGA is a powerful tool to determine
whether a given therapy has an impact on the disease in a given patient, as the ICGA
scoring system is effective and promptly able to show whether the disease is improving
or not following the introduction of a new therapy. After initial IST with corticosteroids,
the efficient treatment can be fine-tuned through ICGA monitoring, or more precisely,
HDDs [54 ], [67 ].
In case of efficient therapy, the ICGA HDDs respond well to therapy and resolve, leaving
behind depigmented areas that appear as oval, cream-colored, birdshot fundus lesions
unless treatment has been started early, which avoids the development of such lesions.
In contrast, the impact of therapy on retinal involvement is less satisfactory, explaining
the progression of functional loss despite therapy. in some cases. with a deleterious
course.
In recent years, additional knowledge has been gained and significant progress has
been made in the understanding and management of BRC. Clinical signs such as micro-granulomatous
KPs, although rare and not well known, indicate that BRC is to be classified as a
granulomatous uveitis. The importance of ICGA to make the diagnosis early in the disease
when there are no fundus lesions present yet, and its use to follow choroidal involvement
and determine efficacious therapy, has been demonstrated and the presence of ICGA
lesions has become a disease-defining criterion [84 ]. Some publications, having assimilated HDDs to birdshot fundus lesions, have created
some confusion. Cream-colored, oval, birdshot fundus lesions represent scars (atrophy)
of ex-foci having left behind depigmented areas. In contrast, HDDs are active foci
and do not correspond to birdshot fundus lesions [107 ] ([Fig. 14 ]). Hence, identification of HDDs by ICGA can be used and has been used to determine
the degree of activity of BRC [108 ]. Finally, the importance of visual field testing in the therapeutic decision process
and for the follow-up of the disease has only recently been recognized at large and
should be the principal functional parameter to follow, as visual acuity often remains
very good despite disease progression.
Similarities and Differences between VKH and BRC and Consequences of the Therapeutic
Approach
Similarities and Differences between VKH and BRC and Consequences of the Therapeutic
Approach
VKH and BRC are both primary stromal choroiditis entities with inflammatory events
starting and occurring primarily in the choroidal stroma. If the basic mechanisms
are the same, choroidal involvement differs between the two on several points. In
VKH, the inflammatory process is more severe and foci occupy the whole choroidal thickness,
producing, in cases of insufficient treatment, widespread areas of depigmentation
called sunset glow fundus. On the other hand, in BRC, the process is more discreet
and foci are smaller and usually non-coalescent. They do not touch the RPE internally
and donʼt extent as far as the sclera externally, producing the typical oval, cream-colored,
birdshot fundus lesions when inflammation subsides. ICGA signs are similar, showing
the same choroidal vasculitis (fuzzy vessels) and an identical pattern of HDDs. Because
lesions are of partial thickness in BRC, HDDs may become isofluorescent in late ICGA
frames. Because of the more explosive inflammation in VKH, severe cases can show ICGA
disc hyperfluorescence, which is never the case for BRC.
The major difference between the two entities is, however, the fact that in VKH, only
the choroid generates inflammation that is secondarily, affecting adjacent structures
such as the retina and optic disc. In BRC, inflammation comes concomitantly from the
choroid and the retina. This explains why treatment is more successful in VKH, because
once choroidal inflammation is under control, the rest of the inflammation subsides.
In BRC, choroidal inflammation responds in the same positive fashion as VKH, whereas
retinal inflammation is more difficult to control as it is an autonomous process and
not only the consequence of choroidal inflammation. This also explains why maximal
therapy can cure VKH, whereas BRC is irremediable, having a chronic evolution with
treatment that cannot be stopped in most cases. Therefore, treatment has to be introduced
within 3 – 4 weeks for VKH if a cure is the objective, whereas treatment should be
introduced for BRC in the first months of disease onset in order to best control inflammation,
for lack of being able to eradicate it. [Table 1 ] shows a summary of the differences and similarities of these two diseases ([Table 1 ]).
Table 1 Differences and similarities of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) and birdshot chorioretinopathy
(BRC), a summary.
Similarities
VKH
BRC
Stromal choroiditis
++++
+++
Depigmentation type
Sunset glow fundus
Birdshot fundus lesions
HLA association
+
(DR4, DRB1*0405)
++++
100% (HLA-A29)
Response to Tx (Choroid)
++++
(if high dose IST)
++++
Response to Tx (Retina)
N/A
++
Granulomatous uveitis
+++
+
Differences
VKH
BRC
Ethnicity
Asians/Orientals/Hispanics/Amerindians
Caucasians
Primary disease location
Choroid exclusively and secondary involvement of adjacent structures
Choroid and retina
Disease intensity
Acute or hyperacute
Chronic, indolent persistent
Prognosis
Excellent, cure possible if aggressive treatment
Good, but chronic evolution
Conclusions
The appraisal of both VKH and BRC has been marked by substantial progress in the past
years. Diagnostic and monitoring modalities have become extremely effective, allowing
for early diagnosis, which, in turn, led to the emergence of the concept that initial-onset
disease has to be treated as early as possible, which is especially crucial for VKH.
Application of these principles resulted in a cure of the disease for VKH and avoidance
of the development of sunset glow fundus, and a change in the phenotype for BRC, devoid
of the classical oval, cream-colored, birdshot fundus lesions.
