Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin 2019; 44(03): 188-193
DOI: 10.1055/a-0889-1200
Viewpoint
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bewegung im Kindes- und Jugendalter – zwischen Effekten und Empfehlungen

Physical Activity in Children and Youths – Effects and Recommendations
Christine Graf
1   Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Abt. Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung am Institut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaft
,
Nina Ferrari
1   Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Abt. Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung am Institut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaft
2   Kölner Zentrum für Prävention im Kindes- und Jugendalter am Herzzentrum der Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 May 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Der Nutzen von körperlicher Aktivität bzw. einer Reduktion von vermeidbarer Sitzzeit ist im Kindes- und Jugendalter unbestritten. So ist insbesondere ab dem Grundschulalter belegt, dass ein aktiver Lebensstil mit einer Senkung kardiometabolischer Risikofaktoren, einer Verbesserung der muskuloskeletalen Gesundheit sowie einem Benefit für die kognitive und psychosoziale Entwicklung assoziiert ist. Generell gilt, je mehr Bewegung desto höher der gesundheitliche Nutzen. Ab dem Kindergartenalter sollten mindestens 180, ab Grundschulalter mindestens 90 min Bewegungszeit pro Tag erreicht werden. Vermeidbare Sitzzeiten, insbesondere die Nutzung von Bildschirmmedien, sollen dagegen auf ein Minimum reduziert werden. Allerdings zeigt sich weltweit, auch in Deutschland, ein zunehmender Rückgang der Bewegungszeit und eine Zunahme des Konsums audiovisueller Medien. Damit verbunden ist eine Verschlechterung der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit. Dies wiederum korreliert invers mit ausgewählten gesundheitlichen Parametern wie beispielsweise dem Body-Mass-Index (BMI), Blutdruck und/oder Lipiden. Bislang gibt es keinen Goldstandard wie dieser Negativspirale begegnet werden kann. Verhältnispräventive Ansätze gelten aktuell am erfolgversprechendsten, brauchen aber für eine konsequente Umsetzung den entsprechenden politischen Willen.

Abstract

Background The benefits of physical activity and a reduction of sedentary behaviour are undoubted in childhood and adolescence. There is good evidence in terms of the reduction of cardio-metabolic risk factors, improvement of musculoskeletal health, as well as a benefit for cognitive and psychosocial development, especially at primary school age. In general, a higher amount of physical activity is associated with more health benefits. Preschool age children should achieve 180 min of physical activity daily, from primary school age at least 90 min daily are recommended. Sedentary behaviour, especially screen time, are to be reduced to a minimum. However, there is a growing decline in physical activity and an increase in screen time worldwide as well as in Germany. This is associated with a decrease in physical fitness correlating inversely with chosen health parameters like body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and/or lipids. So far, there is no gold standard how this negative trend can be countered. Community based approaches are currently the most promising, but they need the corresponding political will for consistent implementation.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Graf C, Ferrari N, Beneke R. et al. Empfehlungen für körperliche Aktivität und Inaktivität von Kindern und Jugendlichen – Methodisches Vorgehen, Datenbasis und Begründung. Gesundheitswesen 2017; 79 (Suppl. 01) S11-S19
  • 2 Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE. et al. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 2259-2279
  • 3 Rauner A, Jekauc D, Mess F. et al. Tracking physical activity in different settings from late childhood to early adulthood in Germany: the MoMo longitudinal study. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 391
  • 4 Graf C, Beneke R, Bloch W. et al. Recommendations for promoting physical activity for children and adolescents in Germany. A consensus statement. Obes Facts 2014; 7: 178-190
  • 5 Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 126-131
  • 6 Truelove S, Vanderloo LM, Tucker P. Defining and Measuring Active Play Among Young Children: A Systematic Review. J Phys Act Health 2017; 14: 155-166
  • 7 Rachele JN, McPhail SM, Washington TL. et al. Practical physical activity measurement in youth: a review of contemporary approaches. World J Pediatr 2012; 8: 207-216
  • 8 Vallance JK, Gardiner PA, Lynch BM. et al. Evaluating the Evidence on Sitting, Smoking, and Health: Is Sitting Really the New Smoking?. Am J Public Health 2018; 108: 1478-1482
  • 9 Finger JD, Varnaccia G, Borrmann A. et al. Körperliche Aktivität von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. Journal of Health Monitoring 2018; 3: 24-31
  • 10 Fernandes HM. Physical activity levels in Portuguese adolescents: A 10-year trend analysis (2006 – 2016). J Sci Med Sport 2018; 21: 185-189
  • 11 Chillón P, Martínez-Gómez D, Ortega FB. et al. Six-year trend in active commuting to school in Spanish adolescents. The AVENA and AFINOS Studies. Int J Behav Med 2013; 20: 529-537
  • 12 dos Santos FK, Maia JA, Gomes TN. et al. Secular trends in habitual physical activities of Mozambican children and adolescents from Maputo City. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11: 10940-10950
  • 13 Bucksch J, Sigmundova D, Hamrik Z. et al. International Trends in Adolescent Screen-Time Behaviors From 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health 2016; 58: 417-425
  • 14 Bucksch J, Inchley J, Hamrik Z. et al. Trends in television time, non-gaming PC use and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among German adolescents 2002 – 2010. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 351
  • 15 Keane E, Kelly C, Molcho M. et al. Physical activity, screen time and the risk of subjective health complaints in school-aged children. Prev Med 2017; 96: 21-27
  • 16 Lang JJ, Belanger K, Poitras V. et al. Systematic review of the relationship between 20m shuttle run performance and health indicators among children and youth. J Sci Med Sport 2018; 21: 383-397
  • 17 Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middle-income countries between 1981 and 2014. Br J Sports Med 2017; pii: bjsports-2017-097982. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097982.
  • 18 Carson V, Lee EY, Hewitt L. et al. Systematic review of the relationships between physical activity and health indicators in the early years (0 – 4 years). BMC Public Health 2017; 17 (Suppl. 05) 854
  • 19 Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Janssen X. et al. Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behaviour and health indicators in the early years (0-4 years). BMC Public Health 2017; 17 (Suppl. 05) 868
  • 20 Janssen I, Roberts KC, Thompson W. Is adherence to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Guidelines for Children and Youth associated with improved indicators of physical, mental, and social health?. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2017; 42: 725-731
  • 21 Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N. et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41: S240-S265
  • 22 Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW. et al. How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 78
  • 23 Adams MA, Johnson WD, Tudor-Locke C. Steps/day translation of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guideline for children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013; 10: 49
  • 24 O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C. et al. The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 573-591
  • 25 World Health Organization. Draft WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018 – 2030. Geneva: WHO; 2017
  • 26 World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013 – 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013
  • 27 Brand T, Pischke CR, Steenbock B. et al. What works in community-based interventions promoting physical activity and healthy eating? A review of reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11: 5866-5888
  • 28 Kellou N, Sandalinas F, Copin N. et al. Prevention of unhealthy weight in children by promoting physical activity using a socio-ecological approach: what can we learn from intervention studies?. Diabetes Metab 2014; 40: 258-271
  • 29 Downing KL, Hnatiuk JA, Hinkley T. et al. Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in 0-5-year-olds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 314-321
  • 30 Somerset S, Hoare DJ. Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18: 47