Keywords
adrenal tumors - osteoporosis - MACS - hypercortisolism - mild autonomous cortisol
secretion - fractures
Introduction
The terminology mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), previously known as
subclinical hypercortisolism or subclinical Cushing’s Syndrome, was recently adopted
by the new European guidelines for adrenal incidentalomas (AI), released by the
European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) in collaboration with the European Network
for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT). According to these guidelines, MACS is
diagnosed in patients with AI based on the presence of serum cortisol after a 1-mg
dexamethasone suppression test (1-mg DST) above 50 nmol/L or 1.8 µg/dL, provided
there are no signs or symptoms of overt Cushing’s syndrome (mostly catabolic signs)
[1]
[2].
While signs or symptoms of overt Cushing’s syndrome are absent, MACS can be
associated with similar metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone complications as in
Cushing’s syndrome. Among them, osteoporosis and fragility fractures have been
associated with MACS, although a paucity of data has been published using the newly
adopted criteria to define MACS. Therefore, the ESE-ENSAT guidelines still consider
the association of MACS and osteoporosis not well established, and large prospective
cohort studies are required. Moreover, the role of noninvasive radiological tools
in
evaluating the impact of MACS on bone microarchitecture and estimating fracture risk
in AI with MACS is yet to be determined. Nevertheless, screening for vertebral
fractures in patients with MACS is encouraged by the guidelines, although no
definite guidance on medical management was reported. Very recent data [3]
[4], however, seem to reinforce the concept that a full evaluation of bone
metabolism should be performed in patients with MACS.
This narrative review aims to provide updates on the connections between MACS and
bone fragility/osteoporosis. The term ‘MACS-related osteoporosis’ (MACS-ROP) will
be
used to describe this still-debated type of secondary osteoporosis, which will
certainly need further research for its evaluation and management.
Pathophysiology
Most data on the detrimental effects of cortisol exposure to bone metabolism
derive from literature on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), due to
exogenous glucocorticoids [5]. While
there might be similarities between GIOP and MACS-ROP, some distinct features
should also be highlighted. In MACS-ROP, the time of onset of the cortisol
excess is virtually unknown because AIs are discovered, by definition, for
reasons unrelated to the adrenal mass. Therefore, cortisol exposure to the bone
might be of variable duration, with stable or possibly progressive patterns. By
contrast, in GIOP, the dose and duration of exogenous glucocorticoids is
obvious, and this has allowed derivation of fracture risk estimates with
stratification according to the dose of administered prednisone-equivalents
[6]. Exposure to low doses of
corticosteroids to reach a cumulative dose of 10 g or more is also detrimental
to bone, with clinical data showing decreased fracture risk within the first
year after cessation of low-dose glucocorticoid administration [5]. The last scenario might be
remarkably similar to what may occur in MACS-ROP, where one of the main
pathogenetic factors might be the exposure time in conjunction with the degree
of cortisol secretion. Although the degree of cortisol secretion can be
empirically graded by 1-mg DST cortisol, the excess cortisol secretion during
the 24 hours cannot be derived by this single threshold, which means that the
amount and time of onset of cortisol excess in MACS are still difficult to
estimate and will be so until further research.
Nevertheless, glucocorticoid-induced bone loss can be linked to multiple factors.
Beyond dose, duration, and route of administration, which all apply to GIOP,
some pathogenetic factors that can also apply to MACS-ROP can be highlighted.
First, two isoenzymes affect the biological activity of glucocorticoids,
11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) and type 2 (11β-HSD2),
which respectively catalyze the conversion of (inactive) cortisone into (active)
cortisol, and vice versa. 11β-HSD2 converts cortisol into cortisone, thereby
protecting bone cells and the skeleton. This may influence the skeletal
sensitivity to hypercortisolism [7].
11β-HSD1 activity increases with age, with potentially major clinical relevance
in the older population [8].
With exogenous glucocorticoids, a transient increase in bone resorption followed
by maintained bone resorption with persistent blunted bone formation is usually
the main mechanism behind bone loss and fractures. Osteoblast and osteocyte
apoptosis are promoted by glucocorticoid excess, with osteoblast precursors
differentiation shifted to adipocytes rather than mature osteoblasts. Decreased
intestinal calcium absorption due to disruption of active transport of calcium
[9] and vitamin D metabolism
[10] and increased Parathyroid
hormone within the physiologic range further contribute to bone loss [11]. Glucocorticoids also enhance
renal excretion of calcium and decrease levels of growth hormone, gonadotropins,
and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which in turn cause lower levels of bone
active hormones like insulin-like growth factor-1, estrogens, and androgens
[12]. Not only the bone but also
the muscle seems to be negatively affected by mild glucocorticoid excess.
Compared to referent subjects, patients with MACS demonstrated reduced muscle
strength, as evaluated by the nondominant hand grip strength and sit-to-stand
test [13].
At the molecular level, the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand
(RANKL)-RANK-osteoprotegerin (OPG) system is significantly affected. RANKL is
secreted by osteoblasts and osteocytes to promote osteoclast recruitment,
activation, and bone resorption through interaction with its receptor RANK. OPG
derives from osteoblasts only and acts as a decoy receptor for RANKL, preventing
it from binding to RANK on osteoclasts. After prolonged exposure to
glucocorticoids, similar to what may occur in MACS-ROP, OPG decreases, thereby
promoting the activation of osteoclasts. Depletion of osteoblasts, though, leads
to decreased RANKL expression, with maintenance of a higher-than-normal
RANKL-OPG ratio, which seems to be the main mechanism behind persistent
bone loss over time during a state of low bone turnover [14].
In conclusion, GIOP and possibly MACS-ROP, as well, result from reduced bone
formation due to osteoblast damage, continued bone resorption, and reduced
skeletal sensing of biomechanical forces by osteocyte apoptosis [15]. While in-vitro and in-vivo data
on GIOP are abundant, in MACS-ROP, a bone biopsy study, the gold standard method
of assessing bone turnover, has never been performed, thereby limiting
speculations on the underlying pathophysiology.
[Fig. 1] briefly summarizes the
putative mechanisms implicated in the pathophysiology of MACS-ROP.
Fig. 1 Pathophysiology of MACS-Related Osteoporosis (MACS-ROP).
MACS-ROP is likely characterized by a state of normal- to low bone
turnover, promoted by osteoblast and and osteocyte apoptosis, although
bone loss may be maintained over time because of relative osteoclast
activation compared to persistently reduced bone formation. This could
be explained by RANK-L prevailing over osteoprotegerin due to cortisol
excess. Sclerostin is reduced after a prolonged glucocorticoid exposure
likely due to reduction in osteocyte number and function, which cause
impairment to biomechanical properties of bone. Abbreviations: AI,
adrenal incidentaloma; MACS, mild autonomous cortisol secretion; OPG,
osteoprotegerin; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ
ligand.
Fracture prevalence in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion
Fracture prevalence in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion
Several studies have reported an increased prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility
fractures in patients with AI and MACS [7]. Studies reporting fractures in MACS are presented in [Table 1]. The definition of MACS
(previously described as subclinical hypercortisolism) was different across the
studies because of the heterogeneous consensus around this pathological entity/state
over the past 10–15 years. A meta-analysis published in 2016 [7] showed that the prevalence of vertebral
fractures in MACS is, on average, 63%, compared with 28% in patients with adrenal
incidentalomas without MACS. When a control group was present, MACS showed a higher
prevalence of vertebral fractures compared to patients without MACS. As regards
patients’ country of origin, most data derive from Italian patients, with fewer data
coming from the US, Japan, or Brazil.
Table 1 Mild autonomous cortisol secretion-related
osteoporosis (MACS-ROP): prevalence and incidence of fractures among
study cohorts investigating MACS.
|
First Author Year [Ref]
|
Design
|
MACS definition
|
Number of pts with MACS
|
Age (years)
|
Female/Male Ratio
|
Vertebral fracture definition
|
Vertebral Fractures Prevalence
|
Vertebral Fractures Incidence
|
All Fractures Prevalence
|
All Fractures Incidence
|
Vertebral fracture Prevalence in the control population
|
Country
|
|
Chiodini et al. 2004 [17]
|
R
|
At least two out of: 1) urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels above
70.0 mcg/24 (193.1 nmol/24 h), 2) 1-mg DST
cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL (82.8 nmol/L); and 3) ACTH levels below
10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L)
|
21
|
42.9 (pre-menopause) 63.9 (post-menopause)
|
70/0
|
Radio
|
42.9% (pre-menopause) 78.6% (post-menopause)
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
27.3% (0% in premenopausal women; 37.7% in post-menopausal
women)
|
Italy
|
|
Tauchmanovà et al. 2007 [18]
|
R, cross-sectional
|
1-mg DST cortisol>3 μg/dL
|
35
|
46
|
35/0
|
Radio
|
57.0%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
1.4%
|
Italy
|
|
Chiodini et al. 2009 [19]
|
R
|
At least two out of: 1) urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels above
70.0 mcg/24 (193.1 nmol/24 h), 2) 1-mg DST
cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL (82.8 nmol/L); and 3) ACTH levels below
10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L)
|
85
|
63
|
53/32
|
Radio
|
70.6%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
21.8%
|
Italy
|
|
Chiodini et al. 2009 [20]
|
R, cross-sectional
|
At least two out of: 1) urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels above
70.0 mcg/24 (193.1 nmol/24 h), 2) 1-mg DST
cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL (82.8 nmol/L); and 3) ACTH levels below
10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L)
|
22
|
66
|
0/22
|
Radio
|
72.7%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
20.0%
|
Italy
|
|
Tauchmanova et al. 2009 [21]
|
RCT on clodronate in MACS
|
1-mg DST cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL and at least one other
abnormality (low ACTH, UFC, daily cortisol average)
|
46
|
43
|
46/0
|
Radio
|
63.0%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
Italy
|
|
Morelli et al. 2011 [22]
|
R, longitudinal
|
At least two out of: 1) urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels above
70.0 mcg/24 (193.1 nmol/24 h), 2) 1-mg DST
cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL (82.8 nmol/L); and 3) ACTH levels below
10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L)
|
27
|
65
|
Not reported
|
Radio
|
55.6%
|
81.5% (cumulative percentage at month 24) (+48.1% Vertebral
fractures at month 24)
|
/
|
/
|
28.9% (non-functioning AI)
|
Italy
|
|
Eller-Vainicher et al. 2012 [23]
|
R, cross-sectional
|
At least two of the following three parameters: (1) 24-h urinary
free cortisol (UFC) levels>70 mg/ 24 h; (2) 1-mg
DSTcortisol>3 μg/dL;(3) ACTH<10 pg/mL
|
34
|
66.3
|
19/15
|
Radio
|
82.4%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
45.6% (non-functioning AI)
|
Italy
|
|
Morelli et al. 2013 [24]
|
P
|
At least two of the following three parameters: (1) 24-h urinary
free cortisol (UFC) levels>70 mg/ 24 h; (2) 1-mg
DSTcortisol>3 μg/dL;(3) ACTH<10 pg/mL
|
51 (41 unilateral; 10 bilateral)
|
66(unilateral) 62(bilateral)
|
28/13 (unilateral) 4/6(bilateral)
|
Radio
|
46.3%(unilateral) 70%(bilateral)
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
Italy
|
|
Lasco et al. 2014 [25]
|
R
|
(1) increased urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels>70 g per 24 h
(193 nmol/24 h); (2) 1-mg DST cortisol>1.8 μg/dL (50 nmol/L)
and (3) cortisol levels after 2-day low dose DST>1.8 μg/dL
(50 nmol/l)
|
3
|
57
|
3/0
|
Radio
|
100%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
Italy
|
|
Salcuni et al. 2016 [26]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol>5.0 mcg/dl (138 nmol/l) or in the presence
of greater than or equal to two out of the following
alterations: 1 mg-DST cortisol>3.0 mcg/dl (83 nmol/l),
ACTH<10 pg/ml (2.2 pmol/l), 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFC)
levels>70 mcg/24 h (193 nmol/24 h)
|
55 (23 conservatively treated, 32 surgically treated) Follow-up:
≈28 months (conservatively treated) ≈40 months (surgically
treated)
|
65 (conservatively treated) 61 (surgically treated)
|
32/ 23
|
Radio
|
54.5%
|
+12/23 (52.1%) (conservatively treated)+3/32 (9.4%) (surgically
treated)
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
Italy
|
|
Kim et al. 2018 [27]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol>5.0 μg/dL (138 nmol/L) or 1-mg DST
cortisol>2.2 μg/dL (61 nmol/L) plus ACTH<10 pg/mL(2.2
pmol/L) or DHEA-S<80 μg/dL (2.17 μmol/L) in men
or<35 μg/dL (0.95 μmol/L) in women
|
61
|
59.5 (males) 51.2 (females)
|
31/30
|
Radio
|
0
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
2.5% (non-functioning AI)
|
South Korea
|
|
Ahn et al. 2019 [28]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol>5 μg/dl (138.0 nmol/L) or 1-mg DST
cortisol>61.0 nmol/L plus ACTH<2.2 pmol/L or
DHEA-S<2.17 μmol/L in men or<0.95 μmol/L in women
|
109
|
39 (pre-menopausal women) 59.7 (post-menopausal women) 56.9 (
|
56/53
|
Radio
|
0
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
1.7%
|
Korea
|
|
Moraes et al. 2020 [29]
|
Cross-sectional
|
1-mg DST cortisol between 1.9–5.0 μg/dL (50–138 nmol/L)
|
30
|
60
|
26/4
|
Radio
|
81.3%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
55.6% (non-significantly different)
|
Brazil
|
|
Ishida et al. 2021 [30]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L) or overnight 8-mg DST
cortisol≥1.0 μg/dl
|
55
|
62
|
33/22
|
Radio
|
51.0%
|
/
|
/
|
/
|
70% (non-significantly different)
|
Japan
|
|
Li et al. 2021 [31]
|
R (Population-based)
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L)
|
81
|
63
|
55/26
|
Radiology reports
|
7.4% (only symptomatic vertebral fractures)
|
/
|
Any fracture: 44.4%
|
30% at 10 years (estimate)
|
3.7%
|
USA
|
|
Izawa et al. 2022 [32]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L)
|
237
|
56
|
182/55
|
Radiology reports
|
/
|
/
|
14.8% (fragility fractures not otherwise specified)
|
/
|
/
|
Japan
|
|
Dogra et al. 2023 [33]
|
R, cross-sectional
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L)
|
212
|
61
|
155/57
|
Questionnaire
|
/
|
/
|
Any fragility fracture: 9%
|
/
|
/
|
USA
|
|
Zavatta et al. 2023 [3]
|
R, cross-sectional
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L)
|
238
|
66
|
151/87
|
Both Radio and Clinical (chart review)
|
31.7% (4.6% clinical VFs)
|
/
|
34.0%
|
/
|
24.1% (non-functioning AI)
|
Italy
|
|
Favero et al. 2023 [4]
|
R
|
1-mg DST cortisol≥1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/L)
|
230 (cross-sectional arm) 66 (Longitudinal arm)
|
64
|
137/93
|
Radio
|
62.6%
|
36.4%
|
/
|
/
|
10.0%
|
Italy
|
Abbreviations: MACS-IOP, mild autonomous cortisol secretion-induced
osteoporosis; AI, adrenal incidentalomas; P, prospective; R, Retrospective;
Radio, radiological or morphometric (review of radiological images); VF,
vertebral fracture.
Heterogenous MACS definitions across study cohorts [16] have thus far produced heterogeneous
fracture prevalences [7]. Several studies
mentioning fractures in patients with benign adrenal masses were designed using a
1-mg DST cortisol cut-off of 3 mcg/dL (82.7 nmol/L), while others had lower cut-off
values. Importantly, the DST was not even mandatory in a few studies, and different
additional criteria were often used to define MACS. The two most recent major
studies on MACS and fractures adopted the 1-mg DST threshold currently recommended
by the ESE-ENSAT guidelines [1]. Even
considering this, there is no evident trend between fracture prevalence and 1-mg DST
cortisol. Older studies [17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29] with a 1-mg DST
cortisol cut-off>3 mcg/dL showed a highly variable prevalence of vertebral
fractures ranging from 43% to 100%. More recent studies performed with 1-mg DST
cortisol cut-off>1.8 mcg/dL (50 nmol/L) [3]
[4]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33] demonstrated similar rates regardless
of the size of the cohort, with fracture prevalence in larger cohorts ranging from
31.7% to 62.6% ([Table 1]).
Most fractures in MACS are vertebral fractures, while non-vertebral fractures are
likely less present or under-reported. In our recent study [3], vertebral fractures were often of mild
grade (Genant’s grade 1) and asymptomatic. Mild vertebral fractures were also more
common in MACS compared with non-functional adrenal incidentalomas and accounted for
the disproportion of vertebral fractures between MACS and non-functional AI groups.
Moreover, the evaluation of asymptomatic (detected through radiological imaging
only) or symptomatic (the patients seek medical care due to pain or discomfort)
vertebral fractures may likely explain the discrepancy in the prevalence among some
studies. Indeed, in the study of Li et Al. [31] evaluating symptomatic or clinical vertebral fractures, the
prevalence of this condition was 7.4%, much lower than that reported in the Italian
studies, which also described morphometric asymptomatic vertebral fractures.
Symptomatic vertebral fractures seem infrequent in MACS, with only two studies
reporting their prevalences of 4.6% [3]
and 7.4% [31].
Non-vertebral fractures have rarely been reported in MACS-ROP studies. Only three
studies mention the prevalence of all fragility fractures [3]
[31]
[33], detected with
different methodologies. According to this paucity of data, prevalence of fragility
fractures, including vertebral fractures, would lie between 9% and 44.4% in patients
with MACS. The reasons why non-vertebral fractures might be less common are unclear,
although we could speculate that this might be due to a less severe phenotype
compared to overt hypercortisolism; in other words, MACS is likely to cause
subclinical vertebral fractures rather than causing symptomatic clinical fractures.
The less severe spectrum of hypercortisolism is the most likely explanation, which
is also supported by the fact that GRADE 1 – but not GRADE 3 – vertebral fractures
are the most prevalent.
Lastly, sex differences are expected to impact bone fragility even in patients with
adrenal incidentalomas. Whether an elevated 1-mg DST cortisol might be a risk factor
for fractures in both sexes with the same magnitude is still to be demonstrated. In
a recent study [3], we showed a net sex
dimorphism in terms of fracture risk between women and men, with post-menopausal
women with MACS being at significantly higher risk. In our study, the prevalence of
fragility fractures in women 65 or older was 48.8% in MACS, while in non-functional
AI was much lower (29.5%, P=0.008). When women’s age was less than 65 years, we did
not observe significant differences between fracture rates in MACS (12.0%) and
non-functional AI (15.8%). In men, fracture prevalence was similar between groups
(37.9% in MACS vs 30.3% in non-functional AI, P=0.206). The risk of fractures in men
was only dependent on age and not on the presence of MACS, as opposed to
post-menopausal women, where age, smoking history, and 1-mg DST cortisol were all
independent factors for fracture. The concept of sex dimorphism in MACS was recently
supported by a major study investigating age- and sex- disparities in the occurrence
of cardiovascular diseases and mortality [34]. Women with MACS, and especially those younger than 65 years, were
particularly prone to cardiovascular disease and mortality compared with men, in
whom MACS did not seem to be an additional risk factor for those endpoints across
all ages. In our study [3], sex
dimorphism emerged, especially in women after 65 years, where MACS could well
represent an additional risk factor for fracture beyond age and menopause. These
findings suggest that women before 65 years should be prioritized for cardiovascular
screening, while women older than 65 years should undergo a complete bone metabolism
evaluation. These speculations come from our cross-sectional study [3] and must be validated in targeted
longitudinal studies. The underlying causative mechanisms remain to be elucidated,
although sex hormone levels across different ages, bone microarchitecture, and
menopausal status could be important parameters accounting for gender differences
in
MACS-ROP.
By contrast, the study by Favero et al. [4] found similar prevalences of vertebral fractures in women (62.0%) and
in men (63.4%), and MACS predicted the presence of prevalent vertebral fractures
independently of gender, with age and low lumbar spine BMD as independent
contributors. Earlier studies did not have sufficient numerosity to make any
speculation on potential gender differences in MACS-ROP. Based on discordant results
in the recently published studies, further research on gender-related fracture risk
in MACS should be implemented, hopefully including accurate assessments of baseline
estradiol and androgens both in women and in men.
Fracture incidence in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion
Fracture incidence in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion
Compared to studies about prevalence of fractures in MACS, fewer data are available
about incident fractures in MACS. Four longitudinal studies were conducted, all of
which suggest that probability of fractures in this category of patients is not
negligible ([Table 1]).
The first longitudinal assessment of fracture risk was carried out by Morelli et al.
who evaluated a cohort of 27 patients with MACS at baseline, 12 months, and 24
months [22]. At the end of follow-up, the
MACS group showed a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures (81.5%) compared with
baseline (55.6%, P=0.04) regardless of age, gender, BMI, BMD, and time since
menopause. The incidence of new vertebral fractures was greater in the MACS group
(48%) than in the non-functional group (n=76) (13%; P=0.001). The definition of MACS
in this study was based on a combination of different hormonal criteria, including
1-mg DST cortisol>3.0 mcg/dL as an optional criterion, among others.
The second longitudinal study on MACS and fractures was that of Salcuni and
colleagues [26], comparing MACS
conservatively treated (n=23) to MACS surgically treated (n=32). At the end of
follow-up (average of 27.7 months in the conservatively treated group and 39.9
months in the surgically treated group), patients with new vertebral fractures were
12/23 (52.2%) in the conservatively treated group, while only 3/32 (9.4%) in the
surgical group. The Authors concluded that surgery in MACS produced a 30% vertebral
fracture risk reduction, regardless of age, gender, follow-up duration, 1-mg DST
cortisol, lumbar spine BMD, and prevalent vertebral fractures at baseline. The
definition of MACS in this study was based on the same criteria as the previous one
[22] plus 1-mg DST
cortisol>5 µg/dL as an optional additional single criterion.
The third study by Li et al. [31]
evaluated the cumulative incidence of clinical fractures at follow-up in MACS
compared to non-functional AI. Longitudinal numbers in this study were small, and
the estimated incidence of fractures at 10 years was 30% in MACS and 29% in
non-functioning AI, with no significant differences. A significant limitation was
the number of patients at year 10 of follow-up, respectively 14 in MACS (starting
from 42 patients at baseline) and 25 (starting from 78 patients at baseline) in
non-functioning AI. The definition of MACS in this study was based on 1-mg DST
cortisol>1.8 µg/dL, which is the currently recommended threshold [1].
The fourth and most recent longitudinal cohort of MACS evaluated for incident
vertebral fractures was described in the study by Favero et al. [4]. A group of 66 patients with MACS was
compared with 60 patients without MACS and followed for an average of 25.6 months
and 24 months, respectively (P=0.083). Incident vertebral fractures occurred in
36.4% of patients with MACS, while only 10% of patients without MACS experienced
vertebral fractures. Symptomatic vertebral fractures trended toward significance
(9.1% vs 1.7% in MACS vs. non-MACS, P=0.069). Incident vertebral fractures were
independently predicted by MACS but not by other anticipated risk factors such as
age, baseline prevalent vertebral fractures, type 2 diabetes mellitus, female sex,
lumbar spine BMD, and duration of follow-up. MACS were about 2.8 times more likely
than non-MACS to develop vertebral fractures. Interestingly, patients with low ACTH
levels were more likely to report fractures (31.7%) than patients with normal ACTH
levels (15.9%, P<0.036), although this relationship was lost after adjustment for
the above-mentioned confounders. The definition of MACS in this study was based on
1-mg DST cortisol>1.8 µg/dL. Of note, prevalent and incident non-vertebral
fractures were not reported in this study.
The last of these four studies might have important clinical implications. Since
almost a third of patients may experience a vertebral fracture during follow-up, a
careful fracture risk evaluation should be carried out as soon as the patient is
diagnosed with MACS, considering that vertebral fractures in this setting may occur
regardless of their BMD T-score. However, it appears difficult to correctly estimate
patients’ fracture risk as opposed to what usually occurs in patients without MACS,
due to paucity of clinical predictors.
Overall, because of the limited number of patients at follow-up, fracture incidence
in patients with MACS should be further investigated, hopefully with larger
longitudinal cohorts, to unveil, if any, predictors of fragility fractures through
sufficiently powered multivariate analyses.
Bone density and quality in mild autonomous cortisol secretion
Bone density and quality in mild autonomous cortisol secretion
The detrimental effects of glucocorticoids on bone are often exerted regardless of
bone mineral density, thereby making bone density less useful to stratify patients’
fracture risk [7]. Trabecular bone is
affected more than cortical bone by glucocorticoids, and the association of
trabecular BMD reduction (i. e., predominantly lumbar spine BMD) should be
considered consistently demonstrated in patients with MACS [7]. By contrast, robust longitudinal data
on BMD variations over time are missing.
Bone microarchitecture can be indirectly studied using the Trabecular Bone Score
(TBS), which is a relatively innovative tool applied to lumbar DXA to predict
fracture risk based on the assessment of trabecular connectivity derived from the
gray-scale texture of lumbar spine DXA images. TBS (TBS Insight, Medimaps, Meriganc,
France) has been shown to improve fracture risk evaluation, predicting fractures
independently of DXA during treatment with exogenous glucocorticoids and has been
included in the FRAX algorithm to refine fracture risk [35].
Eller-Vainicher et al. [23] first
investigated TBS in MACS. Thirty-four patients with MACS were compared with 68
patients without MACS and 70 controls, finding lower TBS Z-score values in MACS
compared with other groups. Low TBS was independently associated with prevalent
vertebral fractures in MACS, regardless of age, BMI, gender, or lumbar spine BMD.
TBS correlated with the number and severity of vertebral fractures. Importantly, TBS
was inversely correlated with 1-mg DST cortisol (R=-0.29, P=0.003). In the same
study, in a subgroup of 40 patients who were followed for 24 months, TBS was
reported to independently predict new vertebral fractures after adjustment for
lumbar spine BMD (not significant), BMI (not significant) and age (not significant)
with an Odds-ratio of 11.2 (1.7–71.4) for every TBS Z-score unit decrease.
The second study on TBS was conducted by Vinolas et al. [36], who compared patients with MACS
(n=29) to patients with non-functional AI (n=18). Both groups were similar, in terms
of age, BMI, and female sex. TBS was lower in MACS (1.30±0.09) as compared to
non-functional AI (1.37±0.12), with 52% of patients MACS vs. 33% of those with
non-functional AI having a degraded or partially degraded TBS microarchitecture
(P=0.05). No longitudinal data on TBS are yet available in patients with MACS,
although it seems that after remission of overt Cushing’s syndrome TBS, improves
rapidly as opposed to BMD (+10% vs.+3% within an average of 15 months, P<0.02)
[7].
The last study on TBS [27] available to
date was conducted on 61 patients with MACS (30 men, 31 women) and 355 subjects with
non-functional AI used as comparators. The study showed that 1-mg DST cortisol was
inversely correlated with TBS in men (β=-0.133, P=0.045) and women (β=-0.140,
P=0.048). Women with MACS had 2.2% lower TBS (P=0.040) than women with
non-functional AI. A degraded TBS (<1.230) was associated with 1-mg DST cortisol
(odds ratio [OR] 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–4.53).
All these findings support the use of tools to evaluate bone quality in clinical
practice; however, larger cohorts should confirm the above findings and the strength
of association between TBS and fractures in MACS using the newly adopted ESE-ENSAT
threshold of 1-mg DST cortisol>1.8 µg/dL. In other words, further studies should
clarify whether the associations found between TBS and cortisol levels are both
statistically and clinically significant.
In patients with MACS, androgens are typically low. Some intriguing data show that
the cortisol/DHEAs ratio negatively correlates with TBS and lumbar spine BMD. This
ratio seems clinically relevant in women but not in men, regardless of 1-mg DST
cortisol [27]. Interestingly, it seems
that a greater cortisol/DHEAs ratio might negatively impact BMD in post-menopausal
and not in pre-menopausal women [28].
Further data are certainly needed to clarify if there might be an independent effect
of low androgens, especially in women with MACS, across different ages.
High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) could be highly
informative to outline which bone compartment, either cortical or trabecular or
both, might be predominantly affected in MACS-ROP. This technique can quantify
volumetric BMD (vBMD) and bone microarchitecture with several parameters at two
skeletal sites, distal radius and distal tibia, unless these were previously
fractured. The only study reporting data on HR-pQCT was that by Moraes et al. [29], who had 45 patients with
non-functional AI and 30 patients with MACS perform HR-pQCT, as well as DXA and
morphometric spine X-rays. MACS was defined according to the current guidelines
[1] (1-mg DST cortisol>1.8 µg/dL).
Both groups showed similar ages (60 years and 59 years, P=0.97) and female/male
ratios (71.1% and 86.7%, P=0.16), as well as other common risk factors for fractures
(smoking and BMI). At HR-pQCT analysis, several parameters associated with
trabecular bone were significantly lower in MACS than in non-functional AI.
Moreover, none of the cortical bone parameters differed between MACS and
non-functional AI, thereby indicating that this bone compartment might be relatively
spared in MACS. Of note, the radius parameters were more affected than the tibia
parameters, leading the us to hypothesize that the radial trabecular bone could be
more prone to deterioration than the tibial one, because the latter bears more
mechanical load than the radius, and the effect of mild cortisol excess might
therefore go unnoticed in the lower bones of the skeleton.
TBS and HR-pQCT could be more specific radiological tools to detect the effect of
MACS on the bone and, therefore, provide a full picture of MACS-ROP. By contrast,
the effect of mild cortisol exposure is not easily captured by areal BMD by DXA.
Likely, the impact of subtle cortisol excess might only be captured with
radiological techniques investigating trabecular bone and bone microarchitecture,
and these might be used to predict vertebral fracture incidence after robust
validation.
Bone turnover markers (BTM) in mild autonomous cortisol secretion
In primary osteoporosis, BTM can assist the clinician in decision-making on which
anti-osteoporotic drug could be chosen, in monitoring compliance to medications
and their early effectiveness because consistent data have shown an association
between variations of BTMs and fracture risk reduction [37]. The use of BTMs in GIOP is not
well-established because they are significantly affected by glucocorticoids
[37]. N-terminal propeptide of
type 1 collagen (P1NP) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) are serum
markers of osteoblast activity that are usually decreased in GIOP and increase
after withdrawal of glucocorticoid therapy. Osteocalcin (OC) is typically low or
suppressed, while β-C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) may vary [14].
Although data on BTMs are very scarce in MACS populations, significant
alterations of BTMs have not thus far emerged between patients with MACS and
non-functional AI. Three studies on BTMs reported slightly discordant results.
In a US [38] (n=92) and European
study [3] (n=86), CTX did not differ
between MACS and non-functional AI. BSAP [3] and OC [38] were also
similar between MACS and non-functional AI. Reduced serum sclerostin levels were
observed in patients with MACS vs. those with non-functional AI [38], which may be explained by
decreased osteocyte function or numbers likely due to chronic glucocorticoid
exposure. By contrast, in a Japanese study, Ishida et al. [30] reported that BSAP and OC were
higher in MACS (n=55) than in non-functional AI (n=12). However, in the latter
study, the control group consisted of only a few patients, limiting the
interpretation of the results.
Data on the changes in BTMs after adrenalectomy are even more scarce. Athimulam
et al. [38] observed a significant
increase in osteocalcin and CTX levels in 8 patients with MACS after
adrenalectomy, while sclerostin and P1NP did not change.
Overall, BTMs might be useful in assessing the effect of glucocorticoids on the
bone, although more data is needed to define their clinical relevance in the
management of MACS-ROP.
Treatment of mild autonomous cortisol secretion-related osteoporosis
Treatment of mild autonomous cortisol secretion-related osteoporosis
The best approach to MACS with bone complications such as osteoporosis or fragility
fractures is still to be elucidated. While the latest ESE-ENSAT guidelines suggested
performing the screening for asymptomatic vertebral fractures in patients with MACS,
no specific recommendations regarding the treatment of MACS-ROP have been provided
due to a lack of robust data. Until further targeted studies, the indications for
the management of MACS-ROP can be borrowed from the current recommendation for
osteoporosis and GIOP.
Medical management
It is reasonable, as in GIOP [15], to
optimize calcium intake through diet and/or supplements, meeting the national
daily allowances, and maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at>30 ng/mL.
Especially younger populations could benefit from this conservative approach in
MACS, without the need for pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis [7].
At present, only one study has reported data on the effectiveness of
anti-osteoporotic drugs in MACS-ROP. In a randomized controlled trial comparing
100 mg weekly clodronate+500 mg of calcium ad 800 UI of vitamin D3 daily to
calcium and vitamin D3 supplements only, the bisphosphonate was able to increase
lumbar spine BMD, to lower BTMs by up to a third, and to prevent the occurrence
of vertebral fractures. The study was small, with 23 patients allocated to each
study arm, and only a 12-month follow-up.
Theoretically, until further evidence is reported, patients could be treated
according to international guidelines for osteoporosis [39]
[40], bearing in mind that the safety
and effectiveness of virtually all anti-osteoporotic medications have not been
tested in MACS. Some suggest that GIOP guidelines [41] should also be considered when
choosing pharmacological options for the treatment of MACS-ROP, although 1-mg
DST cortisol values cannot be translated into prednisone-equivalent to estimate
fracture risk, making these GIOP recommendations difficult to adapt to
MACS-ROP.
Surgical management
The previously mentioned study by Salcuni and colleagues [26], though not randomized, suggests
that MACS patients treated with adrenalectomy could reduce vertebral fracture
risk by about 30%, although robust evidence should be further provided before
recommending adrenal surgery to prevent fracture risk in MACS. An unresolved
issue is whether prevalent bone fractures could be considered as an indication
to treat mild cortisol excess. Further data are also needed to assess whether
osteoporosis could be the only criterion for adrenal surgery referral, even for
younger patients with no other comorbidities (e. g., diabetes or
hypertension).
Post-operative management
Previous evidence suggests that a state of relatively high bone turnover could be
present after remission of overt Cushing’s Syndrome or MACS [38]
[42], and management of this condition
is debated [7]. In this circumstance,
bone apposition could be blunted by antiresorptives (bisphosphonates or
denosumab); therefore, the current consensus is to treat patients with calcium
and vitamin D3 supplements to favor BMD recovery after the resolution of
hypercortisolism [7]
[42]. Whether this phenomenon may be
present in all surgically treated patients with MACS should be further studied,
along with possible risk factors such as age, sex, time from MACS diagnosis, or
others. In this regard, a prospective collection of biochemical mineral indices
and DXA parameters in all patients just before adrenalectomy and after 6 and 12
months could be pursued to monitor bone density recovery and unravel its
underlying mechanisms.
Conclusions
Evidence on MACS-ROP is increasing, with recent data on fracture prevalence
confirming those from earlier studies. Vertebral fracture prevalence may vary
depending on the threshold of 1-mg DST cortisol, on the different study methods used
to define vertebral fractures (e. g., asymptomatic vs. symptomatic), or possibly on
the heterogeneous populations from different countries. Non-vertebral fractures
appear to be a relatively spared complication, possibly because of relatively young
cohorts or because trabecular bone rather than cortical bone seems more affected in
the pathophysiology of MACS-ROP. Bone microarchitecture is mildly but significantly
deteriorated in the few studies available thus far. Bone mineral density is
non-specific in MACS-ROP and should be evaluated in conjunction with morphometric
X-rays of the spine, as currently recommended, and possibly with innovative
radiological tools such as TBS or HR-pQCT in tertiary centers. Management of bone
health in MACS, until further evidence is available, should be individualized after
considering the bone quantity and quality together.
Areas of future research
-
The fracture risk assessment in MACS is currently not standardized, and
radiological tools for assessing bone quality needs validation in larger
prospective cohorts before being implemented in clinical practice.
-
Primary prevention of fractures in MACS and gender differences in fracture
incidence should be investigated.
-
The management of MACS-ROP should be further investigated, as well as whether
medical or surgical treatments are more effective in improving bone density
and bone quality. Sufficiently powered studies could also be designed with
fragility fractures as primary outcomes in medically treated vs. surgically
treated MACS.
-
The best pharmacological treatment or treatment sequence to speed up bone
density and quality recovery after remission of MACS needs further
investigation.