Introduction
Introduction
The long-term clinical practice of traditional Chinese medicine (CM) confirms its
importance and essential role in the health care system in China, especially in the
prevention and treatment of chronic diseases [1]. With its unique theoretical system and accumulated clinical experiences, CM has
developed a comprehensive therapeutic approach and gained the confidence of the public.
More and more patients with chronic diseases prefer the CM treatment or the integration
of CM treatment with biomedicine therapy. Although CM is currently facing some significant
challenges from both the application of modern medicine and social development, its
practice still accounts for around 20 % of all health care delivered in China [2].
The nutritional status and sanitary conditions have been significantly improved for
the people in China, and the major causes of mortality have changed from infectious
diseases to coronary heart disease and other chronic illnesses [3]. Meanwhile, the Chinese government has realized that an affordable and easily accessible
health care system will be essential for the stability of the country. “The high cost
to receive health care and the inconvenience to access it” have become two major complaints
among Chinese people [4]. In an effort to address these concerns and provide high-quality, affordable, and
accessible health care to Chinese people, the Chinese government has explored a number
of approaches to remodel the health care system, which has been significantly reformed
since the beginning of the 1980s [5], and new initiatives were launched in 2006, which are aimed to provide at least
one community health care center for every 30 000 to 100 000 citizens. The centers
will integrate Western medicine (WM, biomedicine) and CM, which will move CM into
full application in the treatment of chronic diseases in China.
This paper is to review the role of CM in the treatment of chronic diseases in China
and discuss the major issues in spreading the application of CM worldwide for this
purpose.
CM is an Important Health Ccare Approach in China
CM is an Important Health Ccare Approach in China
There is a saying in China: CM is good at treating chronic diseases since it is focusing
on the Ben (root) of the disease, and Western medicine (WM) is good at treating acute
diseases since it is focusing on the Biao (phenomenon) of the disease. The distribution
of patient visits in different departments in China hospitals in 2009 showed that
over 30 % of the patient visits (both of inpatients and outpatients) were found in
the internal medicine departments (the majority of the patients had chronic diseases)
in CM hospitals ([Fig. 1]) [6], while patient visits to internal medicine departments of WM hospitals are remarkably
lower (about 21–25 %). The data also showed that there were more than 10 % patient
visits to CM departments of general (WM) hospitals (12.7 % and 18.8 % inpatients and
outpatients, respectively). The results indicated that the patients with chronic diseases
in China are willing to see CM doctors either in CM hospitals or in CM departments
of WM hospitals.
Fig. 1 Distribution of patient visits in different departments in WM and CM hospitals in
the year of 2009.
Two surveys on the use of CM from patients with chronic diseases conducted by our
team in Beijing from 2008 to 2009 also support that CM has been favored by these patients
(unpublished data). The first survey was conducted on 968 patients with any of the
4 most common chronic diseases in China: diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease,
and osteoporosis. The results show that more than half of the respondents believed
that CM therapies could help them improve their health situation. The other survey
was conducted on the health care professionals in community clinics in Beijing and
focused on the major perception of the role of CM. A total of 306 medical staff members
were included in the survey, and the majority expressed a desire to provide both WM
and CM for the patients. All of them expressed fully confidence on the important role
of CM in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Furthermore, a total of
278 responders expressed their willingness to accept further CM training to improve
their health care career. The results suggest that the role of CM in the treatment
of chronic diseases retains a good image not only for the public in China but also
among the health care professionals.
The data of recent years from the Ministry of Public Health of China shows that the
quality and efficiency of the medical service in CM and WM hospitals are similar ([Fig. 2]) [6], [7]. However the average expenditure for both outpatient and inpatient in CM hospitals
was lower than in WM hospitals ([Fig. 3]), even though the average stay in hospital of inpatients in CM hospitals was longer
than in WM hospitals ([Fig. 4]). The data indicated that CM therapy is relatively cheaper than WM therapy. That
might be one of the reasons why CM is favored both by patients with chronic diseases
and professionals in community clinics and the Chinese authorities encourage the use
of CM for the treatment of chronic diseases.
Fig. 2 Quality and efficiency of the medical service in CM and WM hospitals in 2009.
Fig. 3 Average medical expense (Chinese RMB) per outpatient and inpatient in CM and WM hospitals.
Fig. 4 Average stay (days) in CM and WM hospitals.
In the health care system reform of China, to set up the National Essential Drug List
and Drug List for Insurance Coverage are primary steps towards the provision of accessible,
affordable, effective, and safer health care for all. In the National Essential Drug
List in China (issued in 2009 for community clinics), there are 102 CM products out
of total 307 drugs, and CM products are recommended to treat patients with chronic
diseases. In the National Health Insurance Drug List (Version 2009), there are a total
of 683 CM products (also called proprietary Chinese medicines, PCM) which are mainly
for internal medicine application. Among them, 103 are commonly used for the treatment
of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. These essential policies on CM in
China, which are based on its clinical effectiveness in a long history, supply a solid
base for further development and application of CM in the Chinese health care system.
Since China has good policies for CM development, there are steadily increasing trends
in application, numbers of personnel, and medical services in China ([Figs. 5] and [6]). China has been encouraging the development of CM products in the past 20 years.
The data shows that the output value of the pharmaceutical industry in CM in 2007
was up to 669.7 billion RMB (Yuan) which amounts to 26.4 % of the total value for
the pharmaceutical industry in China. On the other hand, there are much more functional
foods developed from CM in China. A study shows that, as of the end of September 2010,
China had totally reviewed 10 118 functional food applications, and most of them are
formulated with Chinese Materia Medica (CMM) ingredients. Among them, 1307 items have
the function of improving immunity, 780 of regulating blood lipids, 327 of regulating
blood glucose, 94 are used as antioxidants, 140 for improving memory, 292 for improving
sleep, 566 as antifatigue agents, 191 as anti-hypoxia agents, 222 for weight-reduction,
225 for improving osteoporosis, and 328 as purgation agents. As to the application
of CMM, 856 items of health functional foods used Ginseng Radix, Ginseng rubra Radix, Codonopsis Radix, or Panacis Quinquefolii Radix as ingredients, with the main
effects as immune regulators, antifatigue, and antiaging ingredients. These health
products, with total sales about 40 billion RMB (Yuan), have become essential products
used by patients with chronic diseases for prevention and rehabilitation.
Fig. 5 The ratios of CM personnel to total health care professionals in China.
Fig. 6 The ratios of CM medical services to total medical services.
CM as one part of the Chinese health care system has been favored by both patients
and medical professionals. Especially patients with chronic diseases welcome CM treatment,
and more medical professionals believe that CM is good at the prevention and treatment
of chronic diseases. Based on the preference for CM in the treatment of chronic diseases,
Chinese authorities encourage further application and overall development of CM in
the health care system.
CM Has Shown Efficacy in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases
CM Has Shown Efficacy in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases
The very large clinical services of CM in China attract an increasing number of scientists
focusing on demonstrating or providing evidence of the efficacy of CM for treating
chronic diseases in the past 30 years. Although the interest in and use of CM is not
the most valuable indication that CM is effective, it does show at least that patients
with chronic diseases and the physicians who treat them are looking for CM therapeutic
options.
More CM clinical studies have been reported (in Chinese) in China over the past 30
years ([Fig. 7]), and the majority are observational ones since it is still difficult to conduct
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for CM with its unique diagnostic approach. The
observational clinical studies on CM do show its efficacy for the treatment of chronic
diseases. The treatment processes, which include individually prescribed, bulk-dispensed,
water-based decoctions, are the professional standard of CM care in China [8]. This means that decoctions have their own particular indications and uses in a
large outpatient population. Usually, nonrandomized controlled clinical trials and
observational studies indicate decoctions' efficacy while their effectiveness tested
by RCTs has not yet been verified.
Fig. 7 The number of papers in total CM clinical studies and RCTs for 10 chronic diseases
published in China from 1979 to 2009 in the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database
(CBM) (http://sinomed.imicams.ac.cn/index.jsp).
Recently, numerous RCTs have been conducted in China to evaluate the efficacy of PCMs
generated from well-known Chinese medicine formulae or from currently effective practice
formulae for the treatment of chronic diseases. Some studies have shown good effectiveness
in the treatment of certain chronic diseases, such as hypertension [9], gastroenteritis [10], diabetes mellitus [11], rheumatoid arthritis [12], cerebrovascular disease [13], intervertebral disc disorders [14], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [15], ischemic heart disease [16], cholelith and cholecystitis [17], and peptic ulcer [18]. However, the efficacy evaluation focus on PCM is not comprehensive enough since
the clinical trials are not so good to evaluate the individually prescribed decoctions.
In fact, the bulk of current RCTs are testing one substance's action on a specific
chronic disease diagnosed with WM (biomedicine) and aimed to prove the “one size fits
all” hypothesis, while CM practice is more personalized and the herbal combination
is prescribed individually on the basis of each person's particular CM pattern (Zheng
or syndrome).
As the evidence gathering tools, systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses provide
synthesis of available research. The number of SRs and meta-analysis on CM is increasing
rapidly after evidence-based medicine (EBM) was introduced and practiced in China.
Here, recently published findings of SRs that explore a range of evidence on CM for
the treatment of chronic diseases have been summarized.
For herbal medicines used against irritable bowel syndrome, 75 randomized trials,
involving 7957 participants are included [19]. Traditional Chinese formulae showed significant improvement of the global symptoms.
22 CMM demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in symptom improvement. Six
tested PCM showed an additional benefit from the combination therapy compared to conventional
monotherapy. Some herbal medicines deserve further examination in high-quality trials.
For Chinese herbal medicines used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 66
randomized trials, involving 8302 participants are included [20]. Methodological quality was generally low. Some PCM showed hypoglycemic effects
in type 2 diabetes. Some PCM deserve further examination in high-quality trials.
Danshen (Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae) and related PCM were introduced into clinical
practice for the treatment of ischemic stroke in 1970 in China. Six trials involving
494 patients were included [21]. These Dan Shen products were associated with a significant increase in the number
of patients with a positive outcome. No deaths were reported within the first two
weeks of treatment or during the whole follow-up period. The authors suggest that
further high-quality randomized controlled trials should be performed.
Most of the clinical studies have been shown to be inconclusive about CM for the treatment
of chronic diseases [22], [23], [24], [25]. Reasons were multiple. Most of these projects employed “standard” randomized controlled
designs that were not suitable for CM trial designs, and some of the research had
not involved collaboration between WM and CM researchers. Thus, there was a failure
to consider only the fundamental concepts of CM. It is important to incorporate the
concepts of both WM and CM into research protocols, thus collaboration between WM
and CM practitioners is essential. Despite the fact that RCT is considered to be the
methodology offering the highest level of evidence, different types of research are
needed to answer different types of clinical questions. Observational studies and
case reports often are the best research methods suitable for certain clinical researches.
CM efficacy research is one of them. A case report indicated effective treatment for
diabetic foot ulcers with integration of CM and WM [26].
CM is holistic and conceptual, and it identifies and treats patterns rather than diseases.
Because of the unique characteristics of CM pattern classification, CM efficacy evaluation
on one herbal product or preparation should focus on a specific subgroup of patients
with a specific disease. Unfortunately, many SRs on CM efficacy, which declared that
there were no solid evidences to support the CM intervention efficacy and indicated
that the quality of clinical trials of CM are needed for collecting evidence to support
CM clinical application, have neglected the application of CM pattern classification
[27]. For example, based on our search on China Biology Medicine (Chinese) and Pubmed
(English) databases, there were 180 RCTs on Danshen herbal products, which is commonly
used in clinical practice in China for activation of blood stasis (based on CM theory),
and only two studies described the trial design based on CM pattern classification.
Since CM pattern classification is aimed to further classify the patients into subgroups,
the efficacy would be improved if the responsive cases could be distinguished from
nonresponsive cases with CM patterns. Therefore, the incorporation of CM pattern classification
into disease diagnosis, an innovative approach by additional specific diagnosis based
on CM theory for documented indications, would greatly improve the assessment of the
efficacy of CM interventions.
It has been reported that CM pattern differentiation can help to specify the indications
for combination of biomedical therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
and our previous work indicated that the total effective rate of CM intervention could
be predicted to be 80 % if 10 % of the patients were classified with a corresponding
CM pattern [28]. This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial suggested the CM pattern (or CM
related symptom assemblages) to have predictive roles considering the American College
of Rheumatology 20 % response criteria (ACR20) evaluation in RA. Our other RCT was
performed to compare the symptomatic effects on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
(BPH) treated by two therapeutic approaches, WM and CM, and the results showed that
CM is a potentially effective treatment in improving the quality of life (QOL), prostate
volumes, and maximum urine flow ratio (UFR) for a subgroup of patients with BPH, and
the non-urethra-related symptoms experienced by BPH patients might be one of the parameters
for further distinguishing the effects of CM and WM [29]. The results suggest that it may also be useful in defining specific indications
both for CM interventions and biomedical therapies used for the treatment of other
chronic diseases.
RCT, as a good approach to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention, should be used
widely in CM clinical study, and CM pattern classification should be incorporated
into the RCT design in order to make sure that we can assess the real efficacy of
CM in the treatment of chronic diseases. Following the active and important role of
CM in the treatment of chronic diseases, the Chinese government continued to raise
research funding for evidence-based CM, and more than fifty CM RCTs programs were
supported in the “Eleventh Five-Year” plan (2006–2010) by the Ministry of Science
and Technology. We believe that more positive results from RCTs with CM pattern classification
will be shown up in the near future.
CM Has Been Proved to Be Relatively Safe in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases
CM Has Been Proved to Be Relatively Safe in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases
CM is regarded as safe since CM practice has a history of several thousands of years,
and it achieved personalized therapy by means of a successful organization of concerted
actions derived from holistic, multitarget, and multidimensional pharmacological actions
[30]. However, the safety issues of CM have been established through experience of clinical
practice during the evolution and development of the traditional practice.
We searched literatures on safety and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of CM treatment
from 1978 to October of 2010 in the Sinomed database (http://sinomed.imicams.ac.cn/),
and there are altogether 30 631 related papers on the safety of CM. The increasing
literature number on ADRs after the year 2005 indicated the close attention paid to
the safety issue of CM recently in China. [Table 1] shows the summary of adverse events for chronic diseases reported in SRs (CM vs.
Pharmaceuticals) focusing on the common chronic diseases in China. The conclusion
exhibited a desirable safety profile of CM compared to pharmaceuticals.
Table 1 Summary of adverse events for chronic diseases reported in SRs (CM vs. pharmaceuticals).
Disease
|
Intervention
|
Year published
|
Journal
|
Authors' conclusions
|
Hypertension
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
2008
|
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
|
The incidence of adverse reaction is 9.66 % [31].
|
CM
|
2008
|
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
|
The adverse effect is diarrhea, incidence rate is about 2.56 % [22].
|
Intervertebral disc disorders
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
2007
|
None
|
Many adverse events were reported, more details in the article [32].
|
CM
|
2009
|
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
|
No adverse events reported in included studies [23].
|
COPD
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
2005
|
The Cochrane Library
|
There was an increased risk of adverse effects, including increased blood glucose,
adrenal suppression, and reduced serum osteocalcin [33].
|
CM
|
2009
|
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
|
Gastrointestinal adverse events reported in 3 RCTs. No serious adverse events from
the herbal medicines were reported [24].
|
Ischaemic heart disease
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
2010
|
Lancet
|
Serious drug-related adverse events were not significantly increased by fibrates (17 413
participants, 225 events), although increases in serum creatinine concentrations were
common (1.99, 1.46–2.70; p < 0.0001) [34].
|
CM
|
2008
|
Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
|
No adverse events reported in included studies [23].
|
CM products (including CMM) could be applied according to the principles of diagnosis
and treatment in CM, and based on that, CM practice can be considered as safe. There
are various studies reporting the good safety of CM decoctions in the treatment of
some chronic diseases [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. Our survey also showed that both CM practitioners and patients believe that decoction
is effective and safe (unpublished data). Although the majority of herbal products
(PCMs) have been reported to be safe [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], the safety issues were still more prevalent in many PCMs when compared to CM decoctions
due to the usually long-period usage of PCM. The latest published National Adverse
Drug Reaction (ADR) Report by State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) asserted that
in the year of 2009, only 13.3 % ADRs were related to Chinese medicines, and totally
about 2600 categories were involved in these reactions, among which, 99.5 % were relevant
to PCM, less than 0.5 % to decoctions. In particular, 52 % of the total ADRs were
related to CM injections [48]. In the past years, the safety issue on CM injections was a hot topic, and questions
such as whether CM injection could be considered to be a traditional dosage form and
how to set up the quality control were discussed both in scientific research and the
administration field. The issues about CM injection products have aroused the high
attention of the authorities [49]. The SFDA has set up a mandatory documentation system for CM injections, with such
determinations as the basic ingredients in CM injections must be clear, the single
components of the active ingredient injection should not be less than 90 %, and the
systemic clinical trials should be a prerequisite for safety assessment [50].
To evaluate the safety of CM is complicated by using conventional methodological approaches
since CM products are complex, which includes chemical complexity, in particular in
prescriptions containing multiple herbal medicines, the lack of known synergetic active
ingredients, the risk of contaminants such as pesticides, heavy metals, and the addition
of other ingredients (sometimes pharmaceuticals), deterioration and variation in composition
[30]. Furthermore, the interactions between CM and pharmaceutical drugs might be another
issue related to the safety of CM, and it should also be addressed [51].
Any kind of medicines when used inappropriately may turn beneficial pharmacological
actions into toxicity [52]. Inappropriate application of CM could lead to more ADRs in clinical practice. CM
herbs (CMM) and CM products (such as herbal extract and PCM) recorded in the Chinese
pharmacopoeia (version 2010) either have been used for thousands of years for prevention
and treatment of diseases in China or passed a strict safety evaluation, and when
applied or prescribed according to CM theory, they have been proven to be safe. Also
the potent and toxic CMMs are included in the Pharmacopoeia with warning and precaution
to use. In addition, all the CM products were proven to have high quality, efficacy,
and safety with strict examinations, including the tests based on Good Agricultural
Practice (GAP), Good Sourcing Practice (GSP), Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Good
Manufacturing Practice (GMP), and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) [53]. Unprofessional CM practice or improper application of CM would lead to unfavorable
adverse events. For example, in clinical research, it has been reported that the side
effects of a Tripterygium multiglycoside preparation in RA patients with CM dampness-heat
pattern were lower than in patients with CM yin-deficiency of liver and kidney pattern
[54]. One retrospective study also pinpointed that the main factors related to safety
problems of the Niuhuang Jiedu tablet are irrational drug use and drug quality [55]. Thus, to ensure clinical rational application of CM and improve the quality of
CM products are the major steps for safer CM application in clinics. On the other
hand, some ADRs in CM treatment might be due to the misunderstanding of CM. In view
of CM, some ADRs can be regarded as a sign of CM pattern change, and CM pattern can
be a predictive factor for effectiveness. Thus, it is important to explore the correlation
between ADRs and efficacy. In a RCT, it was reported that gastrointestinal ADRs were
inversely correlated with efficacy in conventional biomedical therapy for the treatment
of RA [56]. To better achieve the goal of further analysis and comprehension on ADR, detailed
and particular ADR related efficacy analysis is essential in clinical research.
CM safety profile is essential for CM application in clinical practice, especially
in patients with chronic diseases since they often need prolonged treatment with CM
products. Though clinical application based on CM theory and strict quality control
can improve the safer application of CM, CM safety has not been fully determined,
and further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms of CM products in order to
decipher their toxic activities.
Major Issues for Worldwide Application of CM
Major Issues for Worldwide Application of CM
CM has been influencing the health care system in China for thousands of years, and
supplies about one-fifth of the medical services nowadays in China. More importantly,
CM takes an active role in preventive and rehabilitative medicine in China. Though
CM has been spread worldwide recently, there are still some obstacles for further
application of CM in medical services worldwide. The major issues include the CM specific
diagnostic approaches and interventions.
CM specific diagnostic approach: pattern classification
CM pattern classification is applied to stratify the patients based on CM information.
CM pattern classification has been proven to be more essential, as many CM physicians
prefer to prescribe herbal formulae for patients based on this classification. Increasing
numbers of medical researchers recognized that the combination of disease diagnosis
in biomedicine and pattern classification in CM is essential for the clinical practice,
and it has been a common practice model in China since it may produce a better clinical
effect [57]. However, there are still some problems in the application of CM pattern classification
for the treatment of chronic diseases in the biomedicine field.
The first is that the practice of pattern classification is very difficult, since
pattern classification is mainly based on symptoms (including self-reported signs),
tongue and pulse diagnosis [58]. Poor understanding in CM pattern classification will lead to the unsuitable application
of CM products, and most of the products (such as PCMs) are used by biomedicine doctors
and can be obtained from markets. Furthermore, the unsuitable application of the PCM
will result in lower efficacy and even higher risks in safety. Therefore simplifying
the pattern classification would be the most important issue for better understanding
of CM by biomedicine professionals for further CM application. A recent study shows
that the symptoms, though diversified in a disease, can be clustered into specific
groups with biostatistical approaches [59]. Thus, it is possible for us to find some approaches to simplify the CM pattern
classification and to guide the application of herbal products in future clinical
practice.
The second problem is the lack of CM pattern criteria for clinical practice in the
treatment of diseases. In some RCTs, patients with the same disease were recruited
and received CM or conventional therapies, respectively, and the CM pattern classification
was ignored. In these studies, conventional treatment tends to produce a better curative
effect than CM. This should be the major reason why the RCTs failed to evaluate the
real efficacy of CM since CM could be used only to treat part of the patients with
corresponding CM pattern. Therefore, CM pattern classification criteria become the
key issue both for RCT and clinical practice. Recently pattern criteria were recommended
based on expert consensus and analysis of CM information obtained from the disease
[60]. We believe that the CM pattern criteria, even primary criteria, could be very helpful
for further application of CM products since they could be revised during the application.
CM pattern classification, as the key in CM diagnosis, should be well defined with
biomedical language and thus CM would take a more important role in the treatment
of chronic diseases worldwide.
CM specific intervention: herbal mixture
CM intervention using herbal formulae which consist of several herbs is highly individualized.
In the past decades, more scientists have been trying to elucidate the chemistry and
mechanism of CM intervention in the treatment of disease. Though many progresses have
been made, there is still a long way to go in the clarification of the mechanism through
which an herbal mixture works in the treatment of a disease. Furthermore, the clinical
practice in CM abides by “multiple formulae for one disease based on the changes of
CM pattern and adjusting the formulae based on the change of symptoms”, and this makes
it more difficult to elucidate the action mechanism of an herbal mixture.
Theoretically, there must be some core herbal combinations in the treatment of one
specific disease. We propose a hierarchical analysis algorithm known as discrete derivatives,
which is based on the frequency analysis of herbal combinations used in all published
clinical studies in China [61]. This algorithm can retrieve simple and meaningful herbal combination networks from
large data sets. Taking “RA” as an example, the “core” herbal combinations used in
the treatment of RA consist of 19 CMM: Rumulus Ginnamomi (Gui Zhi), Rhizoma Anemarrhenae
(Zhi Mu), Radix Angelicae Sinensis (Dang Gui), Radix Astragali Mongolici (Huang Qi),
Radix et Rhizoma Clematidis (Wei Ling Xian), Rhizoma Chanxiong (Chuan Xiong), Radix
Paeoniae Alba (Bai Shao), Radix et Rhizoma Tripterygii (Lei Gong Teng), Radix Angelicae
Biserratae (Du Huo), Rhizoma et Radix Notopterygii (Qiang Huo), Olibanum (Ru Xiang),
Myrrha (Mo Yao), Pheretima Aspergillum (Di Long),Radix Aconiti (Chuan Wu), Radix Glycyrrhizae
(Gan Cao), Radix Stephaniae Tetrandrae (Fang Ji), Radix Aconiti Lateralis (Fu Zi),
Radix Saposhnikoviae (Fang Feng), Herba Asari Mandshurici (Xi Xin). Some other CMM
commonly used together with the core complex combinations are often added due to the
changes of CM pattern or symptoms after initial treatment [62]. The understanding of the chemical profiles and bioactivities of the core herbal
combination will help to elucidate the action mechanism of the herbal formula.
Systems biology investigations and symptoms analysis of CMM formulae can be applied
as a holistic approach in analyzing their complexity. This approach has become an
important direction for the elucidation of the action mechanism of herbal mixtures
[63]. Our previous study showed that therapeutic efficacies of Salvia miltiorrhiza (SM) and Panax notoginseng (PN), in combination, indicate interactions between SM and PN in multiple pathways
of biological processes. SM plays a principal role and PN serves as adjuvant to assist
the effects during the treatment of coronary heart disease [64]. Thus, we recommend applying systems biology, including data-mining from prescription
analysis and bioinformatics, for elucidating the mechanisms through which herbal mixtures
work in the treatment of diseases, and studies of quality and adverse effects when
CMMs are not used properly [65].
With the quality, safety, and bioactivity of CM formulae and products assured and
their mechanisms elucidated, the clinical trials of these medications with patients'
reported outcomes should be placed in a priority position for providing CM treatment
worldwide.
Conclusion
Conclusion
In summary, CM has been widely used in China with its convenient accessibility, affordability,
efficacy, and safety in the treatment of chronic diseases. CM practice with quality
practitioners and CMM products should be shared worldwide in the treatment of chronic
diseases for which WM does not have adequate answers. Although CM pattern classification
of diagnosis and treatment, as well as complexity of CM prescriptions may require
further translation into conventional health care terms, the application of modern
biomedical science, bioinformatics, and chemical profiling of CM prescriptions can
be applied to provide new directions for clinical studies with evidence-based approaches
for assessing CM products and practice. Eventually CM will play an important role
in integrative health care worldwide.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the reading of drafts of this manuscript and the technical
assistance offered by Dr. Zheng Guang, Guo Hongtao, and Zha Qinglin. This study was
supported jointly by the National Eleventh Five-Year Support Project of China (2006BAI04A10),
National Science Foundation of China (No. 90709007, 30825047, and 30902003), and MOST
Innovation Project (No. 2008IM020900).