Download PDF
Rofo 2012; 184(2): 97-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281984
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Nicht rupturierte intrakranielle Aneurysmen: wann suchen, wann behandeln?

Unruptured Brain Aneurysms: When to Screen and When to Treat?
J. Fiehler
Further Information

Publication History

12 August 2011

07 November 2011

Publication Date:
10 January 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Durch die Verbreitung von Schnittbildverfahren mit angiografischen Rekonstruktionen hat die Häufigkeit zugenommen, mit der Aneurysmen hirnversorgender Arterien diagnostiziert werden. Zudem werden Untersuchungen nicht selten von Personen gewünscht, bei deren Verwandten ein Aneurysma oder eine Subarachnoidalblutung diagnostiziert wurde. Der Umgang mit diesem Themen ist für jeden Radiologen bedeutsam und wird hier anhand der neueren Literatur diskutiert. Die Prävalenz von Aneurysmen in der Normalbevölkerung beträgt etwa 2 – 3 %, steigt mit einem Verwandten ersten Grades mit einem Aneurysma auf etwa 4 – 10 % und bei mindestens zwei Verwandten mit Aneurysma auf etwa 20 %. Das Rupturrisiko ist insgesamt bei durchschnittlich etwa 5 % in einem 5-Jahreszeitraum anzusiedeln, ist jedoch tatsächlich sehr variabel und abhängig von individuell zu diskutierenden Faktoren. Das Risiko einer endovaskulären Behandlung liegt nach Literaturdaten bei unter 5 %, wobei für die Risikoabwägung immer die Ergebnisse des jeweiligen Behandlungszentrums herangezogen werden müssen. Die Notwendigkeit eines MRA-Screenings sollte in Kenntnis all dieser Daten individuell mit dem Patienten diskutiert werden.

Abstract

The detection rate of intracranial aneurysms has increased with the improved availability of non-invasive imaging methods. Moreover, persons who have relatives with intracranial aneurysms increasingly demand imaging to rule out aneurysms. To deal with these problems, radiologists require basic knowledge regarding the detection and treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The prevalence of aneurysms in the normal population is 2 – 3 %. It increases to 4 – 10 % in persons with one relative with an aneurysm and to about 20 % in persons with two relatives with an aneurysm. The average natural rupture risk is estimated to be 5 % within 5 years of detection. In the individual case it depends on several variables that are discussed here. According to the literature, the risk of endovascular aneurysm treatment is about 5 %. On the basis of these data, the benefit of MRA screening needs to be discussed individually with the patient.

Key words

CNS - arteries - aneurysm - cerebral angiography - MR angiography - treatment effects
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 „Einstellungen zur Radiologie in Deutschland“ infas-Umfrage im Auftrag der Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft. ( http://www.nuklearmedizin.de/leistungen/umfrage_pdfs/infas_langfassung.pdf , online-Zugriff am 1.12.11)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bederson JB, Awad IA, Wiebers DO et al. Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A Statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Stroke 2000; 31: 2742-2750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wermer MJ, van der Schaaf IC, Algra A et al. Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysm characteristics: an updated meta-analysis. Stroke 2007; 38: 1404-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 1998; 29: 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rinkel GJ. Intracranial aneurysm screening: indications and advice for practice. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 122-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R et al. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 626-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA et al. Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 1365-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Linn FH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A et al. Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of region, year, and rate of computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1996; 27: 625-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ingall T, Asplund K, Mahonen M et al. A multinational comparison of subarachnoid hemorrhage epidemiology in the WHO MONICA stroke study. Stroke 2000; 31: 1054-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schievink WI, Parisi JE, Piepgras DG. Familial intracranial aneurysms: an autopsy study. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1247-1251 discussion 51–52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ruigrok YM, Buskens E, Rinkel GJ. Attributable risk of common and rare determinants of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2001; 32: 1173-1175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management. Brain 2001; 124: 249-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A et al. Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 673-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Conway JE, Hutchins GM, Tamargo RJ. Marfan syndrome is not associated with intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 1999; 30: 1632-1636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP et al. The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm. Nat Genet 2008; 40: 217-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmidt T, Muhlberger N, Chemelli-Steingruber IE et al. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010; 182: 573-580
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bromberg JE, Rinkel GJ, Algra A et al. Familial subarachnoid hemorrhage: distinctive features and patterns of inheritance. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 929-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wermer MJ, Rinkel GJ, van Gijn J. Repeated screening for intracranial aneurysms in familial subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2003; 34: 2788-2791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brown Jr RD, Huston J, Hornung R et al. Screening for brain aneurysm in the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm study: frequency and predictors of lesion detection. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 1132-1138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bor AS, Koffijberg H, Wermer MJ et al. Optimal screening strategy for familial intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Neurology 2010; 74: 1671-1679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Fasting H et al. Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ferns SP, Nieuwkerk PT, van Rooij WJ et al. Long-term MRA follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms: impact on mood and anxiety. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 343-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002; 33: 1803-1808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Deutschmann HA, Augustin M, Simbrunner J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 628-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lanzman RS, Schmitt P, Kropil P et al. [Nonenhanced MR Angiography Techniques]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011; 183: 913-924
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ et al. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 2011; 77: 667-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Schwab KE, Gailloud P, Wyse G et al. Limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 29-34 (discussion 5)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A et al. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke 1997; 28: 660-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Huang J, van Gelder JM. The probability of sudden death from rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 1101-5 discussion 5–7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Stegmayr B, Eriksson M, Asplund K. Declining mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage: changes in incidence and case fatality from 1985 through 2000. Stroke 2004; 35: 2059-2063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A et al. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1655-1662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston 3rd J et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362: 103-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Raymond J, Guillemin F, Proust F et al. Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. A Critical Review of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and of Appropriate Methods to Address the Clinical Problem. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 85-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Raymond J, Darsaut TE, Molyneux AJ. A trial on unruptured intracranial aneurysms (the TEAM trial): results, lessons from a failure and the necessity for clinical care trials. Trials 2011; 12: 64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Juvela S, Poussa K, Porras M. Factors affecting formation and growth of intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke 2001; 32: 485-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Clarke M. Systematic review of reviews of risk factors for intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 653-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hademenos GJ, Massoud TF, Turjman F et al. Anatomical and morphological factors correlating with rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients referred for endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology 1998; 40: 755-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Broderick JP, Brown Jr RD, Sauerbeck L et al. Greater rupture risk for familial as compared to sporadic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2009; 40: 1952-1957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Juvela S, Porras M, Poussa K. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: probability and risk factors for aneurysm rupture. Neurosurg Focus 2000; 8: Preview 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267-1274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Brunken M, Kehler U, Fiehler J et al. [Coiling vs. clipping: hospital stay and procedure time in intracranial aneurysm treatment]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 989-995
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Nasr DM et al. Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001–2008. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1071-1075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G et al. Patient outcomes are better for unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated at centers that preferentially treat with endovascular coiling: a study of the national inpatient sample 2001–2007. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1065-1070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G et al. Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1755-1761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 CARAT I. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke 2006; 37: 1437-1442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ries T, Buhk J, Kucinski T et al. Intravenous administration of acetylsalicylic acid during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms reduces the rate of thromboembolic events. Stroke 2006; 37: 1816-1821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Fiehler J, Byrne JV. Factors affecting outcome after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 103-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ries T, Wegscheider K, Wulff A et al. Quantification of recurrence volumes after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm as surrogate endpoint for treatment stability. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 593-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Fiehler J, Boor S, Dörbecker R et al. Table for Optimization and Monitoring of Cerebral Aneurysm Therapy (TOMCAT): Results and Implications of the Lead-In Phase. Klin Neuroradiol 2008; 18: 168-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Naggara ON, White PM, Guilbert F et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and efficacy. Radiology 2010; 256: 887-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Rothwell P, Warlow C. Is self-audit reliable?. Lancet 1995; 346: 1623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar