Hepatitis C virus (HCV) will appear in the history of human medicine as a unique case
of speedy “discovery to cure.” Indeed, blood-borne non-A, non-B hepatitis was not
recognized as an important medical entity until the late 1970s. The causative agent,
HCV, was identified in 1989. Only 25 years later, new highly active antiviral drug
combinations are reaching the Western world's markets, bringing the hope for possible
therapeutic eradication….
This unforeseeable outcome should not be seen as a “miracle,” but as the result of
a conjunction of efforts and favorable circumstances. These include (1) the outstanding
work of pioneer researchers in transfusion medicine and viral hepatitis who identified
non-A, non-B hepatitis as an infectious disease transmitted by blood, likely caused
by a viral agent, and characterized its epidemiology; (2) the discovery of HCV, one
of the most important of the 20th century, that used an original approach based on molecular biology methods, subsequently
used to discover a large number of other viruses; (3) the work of academic research
laboratories that developed the in vitro models required to unravel the HCV life cycle
and screen large chemical compound libraries in the search for specific antiviral
inhibitors; (4) the enormous amounts of money made available by the financial world
for HCV drug development, based on the assumption of a quick return-on-investment
due to the size and accessibility of the HCV treatment market; (5) the invaluable
experience acquired by biotech and larger pharmaceutical companies in the successful
preclinical and clinical development of antiviral drugs against HIV; and (6) the worldwide
investment of academic clinical teams in phase I to III clinical trials that offered
their patients early access to the new therapies and will finally move many of the
drugs they tested to approval. Thus, the current HCV therapeutic revolution is the
result of an exemplary collaboration between academic and private entities that may
serve as an example for future therapeutic developments in other disease areas.
In this exciting context, the enormous volume of bench research and clinical data
generated and presented over the past few years has also created a lot of confusion.
Thus, this issue of Seminars in Liver Disease is particularly timely in summarizing the state of the art in new HCV drug development.
In the first article, Daniel Rupp and Ralf Bartenschlager describe the HCV life cycle,
its different steps and actors, and the potential targets it offers for antiviral
interventions. I then present the classes of new HCV drugs approved or still in clinical
development, their mechanisms of action, and the basic concepts on which highly efficient
curative strategies are founded. Current and future interferon-containing strategies
are described by Andrew Aronsohn and Donald Jensen. The results of interferon-free
regimens are split into two articles: strategies including a nucleoside/nucleotide
analogue are discussed by Jordan Feld, while Tania Welzel and Stefan Zeuzem present
the new nucleoside/nucleotide-free drug regimens. Specific aspects of HCV treatment
in the liver transplant setting are discussed by Sabela Lens, Martina Gambato, Maria-Carlota
Londoño, and Xavier Forns in their contribution, while Mark Sulkowski presents the
new treatment approaches available for the HIV–HCV coinfected population. Because
a therapeutic approach based solely on antiviral drugs may not be sufficient to eradicate
HCV infection, which involves 184 million people worldwide with a still high incidence
in many areas, Jonathan Honegger, Yan Zhou, and Christopher Walker discuss the reality
of the need for a prophylactic or protective vaccine and present the results of preclinical
studies with different HCV vaccine approaches. Finally, because HCV infection is not
limited to countries that will be able to afford the cost of new curative therapies,
the global HCV issue is discussed by Maud Lemoine and Mark Thursz, with special focus
on access to care in resource-constrained areas. All of these authors should be lauded
for their enthusiastic participation, the quality of their work, and their commitment
to produce their piece quickly after the November 2013 Liver Meeting, to provide the
readers with complete, up-to-date information.
Are we foreseeing the end of the HCV story? Probably just the beginning of the end.
With such high infection cure rates, access to therapy, including broad-scale screening,
diagnosis, access to care facilities, medication cost coverage, etc., is going to
become a major issue, both in the developed and developing world. Eradicating infection
from the nearly 200 million infected individuals worldwide with antiviral drugs may
take decades. Cured infections will not all mean cured patients. Indeed, patients
with cirrhosis remain at high risk for life-threatening complications, such as liver
decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma, after they definitively eliminate infection.
Nevertheless, we should not deny ourselves the pleasure of realizing that the HCV
infection cure rates will be over 95% with the new all-oral, interferon-free strategies,
a situation that nobody would have foreseen only 3 years ago. I hope this issue of
Seminars in Liver Disease will help its readers to understand how the field got where it currently is and in
what direction it is now moving. We, scientists and physicians involved in HCV research
and care, should be proud of our collective achievements and full of hope for our
HCV-infected patients. The beginning of the end just means that this end will have
an end, and we will probably see it.