Horm Metab Res 2015; 47(05): 344-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548793
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Building Trust: The History and Ongoing Relationships Amongst DSD Clinicians, Researchers, and Patient Advocacy Groups

A. C. Lossie
1   Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, USA
,
J. Green
2   Accord Alliance, A Project of the Tides Center, Whitehouse Station, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 21 November 2014

accepted 05 March 2015

Publication Date:
13 April 2015 (online)

Abstract

Individuals born with differences or disorders of sex development (DSD) have been marginalized by society and the health care system. Standards of care in the mid-20th century were based on fixing the child with a DSD, using hormonal and surgical interventions; these treatments and the diagnoses were almost never disclosed to the child, and sometimes they were not disclosed to the parents. This led to secrecy, shame, and stigma. When these children became adults and demanded access to their medical records, the realization of the depth of secrecy led to the formation of activism groups that shook the medical community. Despite precarious beginnings, advocates, health care professionals, and researchers were able to elicit changes in the standard of care. The 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders called for a multidisciplinary approach to care and questioned the evidence for many of the standard procedures. Standard of care moved from a concealment model to a patient-centered paradigm, and funding agencies put resources into determining the future paths of research on DSD. Recognition of the need to address patient priorities led to changing international standards for including patients in research design. Some challenges that remain include: the findings from the Institute of Medicine that sexual and gender minorities experience poor health outcomes; establishing trust across all parties; developing a common language and creating venues where individuals can participate in dialogue that addresses personal experiences, research design, clinical practices and intervention strategies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Money J, Hampson JG, Hampson JL. Hermaphroditism: recommendations concerning assignment of sex, change of sex and psychologic management. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955; 97: 284-300
  • 2 Nordenstrom A, Thyen U. Improving the communication of healthcare professionals with affected children and adolescents. Endocr Develop 2014; 27: 113-127
  • 3 Hrabovszky Z, Hutson JM. Androgen imprinting of the brain in animal models and humans with intersex disorders: review and recommendations. J Urol 2002; 168: 2142-2148
  • 4 Gluer S, Fuchs J, Mildenberger H. Diagnosis and current management of penile agenesis. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 628-631
  • 5 Kolesinska Z, Ahmed SF, Niedziela M, Bryce J, Molinska-Glura M, Rodie M, Jiang J, Sinnott RO, Hughes IA, Darendeliler F, Hiort O, van der Zwan Y, Cools M, Guran T, Holterhus PM, Bertelloni S, Lisa L, Arlt W, Krone N, Ellaithi M, Balsamo A, Mazen I, Nordenstrom A, Lachlan K, Alkhawari M, Chatelain P, Weintrob N. Changes over time in sex assignment for disorders of sex development. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e710-e715
  • 6 Imperato-McGinley J, Peterson RE, Gautier T, Sturla E. Androgens and the evolution of male-gender identity among male pseudohermaphrodites with 5alpha-reductase deficiency. N Eng J Med 1979; 300: 1233-1237
  • 7 Money J. Ablatio penis: normal male infant sex-reassigned as a girl. Arch Sex Behav 1975; 4: 65-71
  • 8 Diamond M, Sigmundson HK. Sex reassignment at birth. Long-term review and clinical implications. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997; 151: 298-304
  • 9 Baratz AB, Sharp MK, Sandberg DE. Disorders of sex development peer support. Endocr Develop 2014; 27: 99-112
  • 10 Karkazis K, Tamar-Mattis A, Kon AA. Genital surgery for disorders of sex development: implementing a shared decision-making approach. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2010; 23: 789-805
  • 11 Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development . Clinical Guidelines for Management of Disorders of Sex Development in Childhood. In: Accord Alliance 2006;
  • 12 Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development . Handbook for Parents. In: Accord Alliance 2006;
  • 13 Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, Hughes IA. International Consensus Conference on Intersex organized by the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine S , the European Society for Paediatric E . Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. International Consensus Conference on Intersex. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e488-e500
  • 14 Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Smit WM, Bernelot Moens HJ, Van de Laar MA. Determinants of engagement in face-to-face and online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e106
  • 15 Creighton SM, Minto CL, Steele SJ. Objective cosmetic and anatomical outcomes at adolescence of feminising surgery for ambiguous genitalia done in childhood. Lancet 2001; 358: 124-125
  • 16 Mouriquand P, Caldamone A, Malone P, Frank JD, Hoebeke P. The ESPU/SPU standpoint on the surgical management of Disorders of Sex Development (DSD). J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10: 8-10
  • 17 Sandberg DE, Asciutto AJ, Haddad E. University of Michigan disorders of sex development (DSD) research and quality improvement symposium. Adv Exp Med Biol 2011; 707: 151-162
  • 18 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian G, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities . The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. National Academies Press (US); 2011
  • 19 NICHD, NIH, HHS . Growing up with Disorders of Sex Development (DSD): Critical Developmental Issues for Children and Families Affected by DSD. In 2014; 1-10
  • 20 Wiesemann C, Ude-Koeller S, Sinnecker GH, Thyen U. Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169: 671-679
  • 21 Lee P, Schober J, Nordenstrom A, Hoebeke P, Houk C, Looijenga L, Manzoni G, Reiner W, Woodhouse C. Review of recent outcome data of disorders of sex development (DSD): emphasis on surgical and sexual outcomes. J Pediatr Urol 2012; 8: 611-615
  • 22 Sandberg DE, Gardner M, Cohen-Kettenis PT. Psychological aspects of the treatment of patients with disorders of sex development. Seminars Reproduct Med 2012; 30: 443-452
  • 23 Fedele DA, Kirk K, Wolfe-Christensen C, Phillips TM, Mazur T, Mullins LL, Chernausek SD, Wisniewski AB. Primary caregivers of children affected by disorders of sex development: mental health and caregiver characteristics in the context of genital ambiguity and genitoplasty. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2010; 2010 690674
  • 24 Kirk KD, Fedele DA, Wolfe-Christensen C, Phillips TM, Mazur T, Mullins LL, Chernausek SD, Wisniewski AB. Parenting characteristics of female caregivers of children affected by chronic endocrine conditions: a comparison between disorders of sex development and type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Nurs 2011; 26: e29-e36
  • 25 Wolfe-Christensen C, Fedele DA, Kirk K, Phillips TM, Mazur T, Mullins LL, Chernausek SD, Lakshmanan Y, Wisniewski AB. Degree of external genital malformation at birth in children with a disorder of sex development and subsequent caregiver distress. J Urol 2012; 188: 1596-1600
  • 26 Wolfe-Christensen C, Fedele DA, Mullins LL, Lakshmanan Y, Wisniewski AB. Differences in anxiety and depression between male and female caregivers of children with a disorder of sex development. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2014; 27: 617-621
  • 27 Niela-Vilen H, Axelin A, Salantera S, Melender HL. Internet-based peer support for parents: a systematic integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 1524-1537
  • 28 Shilling V, Morris C, Thompson-Coon J, Ukoumunne O, Rogers M, Logan S. Peer support for parents of children with chronic disabling conditions: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Develop Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 602-609
  • 29 Zordan RD, Juraskova I, Butow PN, Jolan A, Kirsten L, Chapman J, Sedgwick C, Charles M, Sundquist K. Exploring the impact of training on the experience of Australian support group leaders: current practices and implications for research. Health Expect 2010; 13: 427-440
  • 30 Steginga SK, Smith DP, Pinnock C, Metcalfe R, Gardiner RA, Dunn J. Clinicians’ attitudes to prostate cancer peer-support groups. BJU Int 2007; 99: 68-71
  • 31 Young DK, Kwok TC, Ng PY. A single blind randomized control trial on support groups for Chinese persons with mild dementia. Clin Intervent Aging 2014; 9: 2105-2112
  • 32 Chiou CJ. Diabetes self-care behaviors and disease control in support group attenders and nonattenders. J Nurs Res 2014; 22: 231-241
  • 33 Mentis M, Messinis L, Kotrotsiou E, Angelopoulos NV, Marneras C, Papathanasopoulos P, Dardiotis E. Efficacy of a support group intervention on psychopathological characteristics among caregivers of psychotic patients. Int J Soc Psychiatr 2014; DOI: 10.1177/0020764014547075.
  • 34 Lorenzo AJ, Pippi Salle JL, Zlateska B, Koyle MA, Bagli DJ, Braga LH. Decisional regret after distal hypospadias repair: single institution prospective analysis of factors associated with subsequent parental remorse or distress. J Urol 2014; 191: 1558-1563
  • 35 Lee PA, Wisniewski AB, Baskin L, Vogiatzi MG, Vilain E, Rosenthal SM, Houk C. Advances in diagnosis and care of persons with DSD over the last decade. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2014; 2014: 19