Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(01): 30-35
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555926
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Influence of Glove Type on Simulated Wheelchair Racing Propulsion: A Pilot Study

I. Rice
1   Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
,
J. Dysterheft
2   Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, Urbana, United States
,
A. W. Bleakney
3   Disability Rehabilitation Education Services, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, United States
,
R. A. Cooper
4   Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 23 June 2015

Publication Date:
28 October 2015 (online)

Abstract

Our purpose was to examine the influence of glove type on kinetic and spatiotemporal parameters at the handrim in elite wheelchair racers. Elite wheelchair racers (n=9) propelled on a dynamometer in their own racing chairs with a force and moment sensing wheel attached. Racers propelled at 3 steady state speeds (5.36, 6.26 & 7.60 m/s) and performed one maximal effort sprint with 2 different glove types (soft & solid). Peak resultant force, peak torque, impulse, contact angle, braking torque, push time, velocity, and stroke frequency were recorded for steady state and sprint conditions. Multiple nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pair’s tests were used to detect differences between glove types, while effect sizes were calculated based on Cohen’s d. During steady state trials, racers propelled faster, using more strokes and larger contact angle, while applying less impulse with solid gloves compared to soft gloves. During the sprint condition, racers achieved greater top end velocities, applying larger peak force, with less braking torque with solid gloves compared to soft gloves. Use of solid gloves may provide some performance benefits to wheelchair racers during steady state and top end velocity conditions.

 
  • References

  • 1 (IPC) IPC . Classification IPC Athletics. In. Bonn, Germany: 2014
  • 2 (IPC) IPC . International Paralympic Committee (IPC) Athletics Rankings. In. Bonn, Germany: 2014
  • 3 Boninger ML, Baldwin M, Cooper RA, Koontz A, Chan L. Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 608-613
  • 4 Boninger ML, Cooper RA, Baldwin MA, Shimada SD, Koontz A. Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 910-915
  • 5 Churton E, Keogh JW. Constraints influencing sports wheelchair propulsion performance and injury risk. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2013; 5: 3
  • 6 Cooper An Exploratory Study of Racing Wheelchair Propulsion Dynamics. Adapt Phys Act Quart 1990; 7: 74-85
  • 7 Cooper RA. Wheelchair racing sports science: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27: 295-312
  • 8 Cooper RA, Robertson RN, VanSickle DP, Boninger ML, Shimada SD. Kinetics, Propulsion, Upper limb b, Wheelchair. Methods for Determining Three-Dimensional Wheelchair Pushrim Forces and Moments – A Technical Note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34: 162-170
  • 9 Cooper RA. RRBF. Anthropometry and Push-Ring Diameter for Wheelchair Racing. JCRPO Journal 1996; 2: 1-13
  • 10 Goosey-Tolfrey V. Supporting the paralympic athlete: focus on wheeled sports. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 2237-2243
  • 11 Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Fowler NE, Campbell IG, Iwnicki SD. A kinetic analysis of trained wheelchair racers during two speeds of propulsion. Med Engin Physics 2001; 23: 259-266
  • 12 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 30: 701-702
  • 13 Higgs C. Sport performance: Technical developments. The Proceedings from VISTA’93, an International Conference on High Performance Sport for Athletes with Disabilities. 1994 1993; R. Hansen Centre
  • 14 Mason BS, van der Woude LH, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Influence of glove type on mobility performance for wheelchair rugby players. J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 559-570
  • 15 Moss AD, Fowler NE, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. The intra-push velocity profile of the over-ground racing wheelchair sprint start. J Biomech 2005; 38: 15-22
  • 16 Nyland J, Snouse SL, Anderson M, Kelly T, Sterling JC. Soft tissue injuries to USA paralympians at the 1996 summer games. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 368-373
  • 17 O’Connor TJRR, Cooper RA. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of racing wheelchair propulsion. Adapt Phys Act Quart 1998; 15: 1-14
  • 18 Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage; 1991
  • 19 Shimada SD, Robertson RN, Bonninger ML, Cooper RA. Kinematic characterization of wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998; 35: 210-218
  • 20 Van der Woude L, Veeger H, Rozendal R. Propulsion technique in hand rim wheelchair ambulation. J Med Engin Technol 1989; 13: 136-141
  • 21 Vanlandewijck Y, Theisen D, Daly D. Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. Sports Med 2001; 31: 339-367
  • 22 Veeger H, Rozendaal L, Van Der Helm F. Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech 2002; 17: 211-218