Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65(04): 338-342
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583297
Original Cardiovascular
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Titanium Plate Fixation versus Conventional Closure for Sternal Dehiscence after Cardiac Surgery

Roemer J. Vos
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Lisa Jongbloed
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Uday Sonker
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Geoffrey T. L. Kloppenburg
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 November 2015

22 March 2016

Publication Date:
13 May 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background Postoperative sternal dehiscence with or without mediastinitis is a complication of cardiac surgery leading to considerable disability. Titanium plate fixation can provide sternal stability in patients with a dehiscent sternum. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of titanium plate fixation with conventional treatment methods such as steel wire cerclage and pectoralis muscle reconstruction.

Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 42 patients who underwent sternal refixation after dehiscence or secondary wound closure after poststernotomy mediastinitis. Clinical outcomes during hospital stay and follow-up were determined.

Results Twenty patients were closed using sternal plates. Twenty-two patients were closed conventionally: 8 using pectoral muscle reconstruction and 14 using cerclage steel wires. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Indications of sternal closure were similar. Sternal stability at hospital discharge was achieved more often using sternal plating (90 vs. 50%, p = 0.005), mainly in patients closed after treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis (100 vs. 22%, p = 0.002). Hospital stay was similar in both groups (10 [5–23] vs. 12 (5–21) days, p = 0.527). There was no inhospital mortality.

Conclusion Titanium plate fixation is superior in stabilizing the sternal bone when compared with conventional refixation methods, especially in secondary closure after poststernotomy mediastinitis.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dalton ML, Connally SR, Sealy WC. Julian's reintroduction of Milton's operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53 (3) 532-533
  • 2 Fawzy H, Osei-Tutu K, Errett L , et al. Sternal plate fixation for sternal wound reconstruction: initial experience (retrospective study). J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6: 63
  • 3 Robicsek F, Daugherty HK, Cook JW. The prevention and treatment of sternum separation following open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73 (2) 267-268
  • 4 Huh J, Bakaeen F, Chu D, Wall Jr MJ. Transverse sternal plating in secondary sternal reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136 (6) 1476-1480
  • 5 Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Will A , et al. Sternal reconstruction with titanium plates in complicated sternal dehiscence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (1) 139-145
  • 6 Moerenhout K, Rodrigus I, De Bock D, Vergauwen W, Stockman B. Titanium transverse plate fixation: a new solution for old sternal problems. Acta Chir Belg 2009; 109 (3) 371-375
  • 7 Baillot R, Cloutier D, Montalin L , et al. Impact of deep sternal wound infection management with vacuum-assisted closure therapy followed by sternal osteosynthesis: a 15-year review of 23,499 sternotomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (4) 880-887
  • 8 Plass A, Emmert MY, Pilsl M , et al. Sternal plate closure: indications, surgical procedure and follow-up. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 59 (1) 30-33