Importance of Frontal Horn Ratio and Optimal Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in the Treatment of Very Low Pressure Hydrocephalus

Danielle Houlden; Dmitriy Khodorskiy; Sandra Miller-Portman; Maria S. Li

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633666

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, Table of Contents

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 01): S1-S188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633666

Poster Presentations

Importance of Frontal Horn Ratio and Optimal Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in the Treatment of Very Low Pressure Hydrocephalus

Authors

Danielle Houlden

¹McGill, Montreal, Qubec, Canada
Dmitriy Khodorskiy

²Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
Sandra Miller-Portman

³Neurogens, Chang Wat Chiang Mai, Thailand
Maria S. Li

⁴University of Montreal, Montreal, Qubec, Canada

Abstract

Full Text

Background Unlike low pressure hydrocephalus, very low pressure hydrocephalus (VLPH) is a rarely reported clinical entity previously described to be associated with poor outcomes and to be possibly refractory to treatment with continued cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage at subatmospheric pressures 1 and 2. We present four cases of VLPH following resection of suprasellar lesions and hypothesize that untreatable patients can be identified early, thereby avoiding futile prolonged external ventricular drainage in ICU.

Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of four cases of VLPH encountered between 2007 and 2015 in two different institutions and practices and tried to identify factors contributing to successful treatment. We hypothesized that normalization of frontal horn ratio (FHR), optimization of volume of CSF drained, and avoidance of fluid shifts would contribute to improve Glasgow—s coma score (GCS). We examined fluid shifts by studying net fluids shifts and serum levels of sodium, urea, and creatinine. We used Pearson—s and Spearman—s correlations to identify measures that would correlate with improved GCS.

Results Our study reveals that improving GCS is positively correlated with decreased FHR and increased CSF drainage within an optimal range. The most important determinant of good outcome is retention of brain viscoelasticity as evidenced by restoration and maintenance of good GCS despite fluctuations in FHR.

Conclusion Futile prolonged subatmospheric drainage can be avoided by declining to continue treatment in patients who have permanently altered brain compliance secondary to unsealed CSF leaks, irremediable ventriculitis, and who are therefore unable to sustain an improved neurological examination.