Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) instability is common and reported to be 25 to 50% in
general population. The prevalence of TMJ instability is high among females. It is
the major etiological factor contributing to TMJ dislocations.[1] Monitoring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) is routinely used during spine surgery
for assessment of intact spinal motor functions and also to look for any possible
evolving iatrogenic spinal cord injury. Though considered a safe procedure, MEP monitoring
at certain instances can cause forceful masseter contraction. This is due to the proximity
of the cervical C3 and C4 stimulation areas to the adjacent motor cortex where facial
muscles are represented. Hence, few studies on accidental stimulation of facial motor
cortex resulting in tongue lacerations and teeth dislocations are reported.[2] In our study, we aim to report a rare instance of TMJ dislocation during spine surgical
monitoring and we also describe the preventive measures taken during revision surgery.
The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee, and necessary
consent was obtained from the patient. The patient was 76 years old and presented
with secondary atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) due to type 2 odontoid fracture, following
a trivial fall. Nurick scale is a six-grade system to assess severity of locomotion
and he had a score of 3/6. The Medical Research Council grading was 4 in all the groups
of muscles. He was planned for posterior C1 to C2 fusion in prone position.
Awake fiberoptic intubation was performed and anesthesia was induced with propofol
1.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg. The maintenance was achieved using total intravenous
propofol 6 mg/kg/h and fentanyl 1 μg/kg/h infusions. MEPs were recorded using transcranial
electrical stimulation with corkscrew-like electrodes inserted onto the scalp at C3
and C4 representative area of the cortex (10–20 system, American Electroencephalographic
Society, 1994b). Constant-voltage stimulation was applied in trains of four rectangular
pulses (pulse duration 50 ms, interstimulus interval 2 ms, 300 V) using NIM Eclipse
(Medtronic, United States) intraoperative monitoring unit. MEPs were recorded from
abductor digiti minimi and brachioradialis in the upper limbs, tibialis anterior and
adductor hallucis longus in the lower limbs. The impedance of all electrodes was maintained
below 5 kV. The stimulus strength was determined by giving currents starting from
150 V and gradually escalating up to a strength of 300 V until good compound motor
action potentials (CAMPs) were elicited. The depth of anesthesia was maintained within
a bispectral index range of 30 to 40. AAD was reduced by gentle manipulation with
the head fixed on Sugita frame. Intraoperatively, C1 to C2 fusion was performed with
Magerl transarticular screw and the onlay bone grafting was obtained from iliac autograft.
Following surgery, the patient was extubated uneventfully.
In the immediate postoperative period, patient developed jaw tightness and was unable
to close his mouth completely. On examination ([Fig. 1A]), he had fullness in both sides of the face, jaw trismus with a gap in the inter
incisor area. On palpation of the cheek, there was a sizeable gap of one fingerbreadth
in the TMJ indicating dislocation. The same was confirmed using a computed tomography
(CT) of the face and neck showing grade 2 joint dislocation ([Fig. 1B]).[3] An urgent plastic surgeon opinion was sought and the TMJ was reduced via an intraoral
closed reduction technique ([Fig. 1C]) under moderate sedation.[4]
Fig. 1 (A) Image showing the inability to close the oral cavity (open lock). (B) CT 3D model showing the dislocated temporomandibular joint (in the circle). 3D, three-dimensional;
CT, computed tomography. (C) After intraoral closed reduction technique. (D) Chin strap to prevent dislocation.
The patient made a good recovery with no complications or focal neurological deficits.
CT scan was done to assess the position of the screw in C1 to C2, which revealed an
improper screw position. It was decided to go for a revision surgery of C1 to C2 fusion
with an iliac bone graft. During the revision surgery, we intubated him via nasal
route using fiberoptic bronchoscope and kept a stabilization brace, which wraps the
face ([Fig. 1D]) and forces the mandible upward, preventing potential dislocation. The patient was
then placed in the prone position and transcranial MEPs were recorded. We removed
malpositioned transarticular screws and modified it using C1 to C2 Goel's fusion with
C1 lateral mass, C2 pars screws, and rods. A C-arm “X-ray check” was performed on
table at the end of the surgery before extubation. It showed intact TMJ and the chin
strap was kept in place for few more hours until the patient was fully awake.
Temporomandibular joint dislocation is associated with severe pain and tenderness
over the jaw. If left untreated for more than 14 days, it may lead to fibrosis of
the dislocated joint and rare cases of TMJ fracture have been reported. These complications
may require surgical treatment.[5] To the best of our knowledge, TMJ dislocation during MEP recording has not been
reported in the literature till date. We hypothesize that in our case, MEP recording
would have stimulated the facial motor cortex, contributing to the activation of facial
muscles leading to TMJ dislocation. The main priority during intubation for anesthesia
is to prevent any maneuvers leading to aggressive movement at the TMJ, thereby dislocating
it. Hence, during the revision surgery, we made modifications such as nasotracheal
intubation, chin strap ([Fig. 1D]), and low voltage stimulation to elicit MEPs. Techniques requiring low voltage stimulation
for acquiring better MEPs include multitrain electrical stimulation,[6] D-wave monitoring,[7] and double train transcranial electrical stimulation.[8] It also warrants adequate attention for identification of at-risk individuals during
preoperative assessment and instituting the above-mentioned principles for prevention
and early management of dislocation.
In conclusion, TMJ dislocation is one of the underrated potential complications that
has to be carefully considered during MEP monitoring for any spinal surgery. Preanesthetic
evaluation of at-risk individuals needs adequate precautions and modifications in
the surgical and anesthesia management techniques that might limit joint mobility
and prevent TMJ dislocations.
