Keywords
cone-beam computed tomography - maxillary sinus - septa - sinus floor augmentation
Introduction
The complex structure of posterior maxillary and maxillary sinus region problematizes
implant rehabilitation of edentulous, most significantly the reduction in alveolar
bone quality and quantity.[1] A significant consequence of this is sinus pneumatization, which can ultimately
lead to septa formation.[2] These septa can then cause membrane perforation in sinus floor augmentation.[3]
Previous studies mostly focused on the existence of maxillary sinus septa in edentulous
jaws.[4]
[5] However, sinus septa have various anatomical manifestations. These are classified
under headings such as septa location, morphology, and orientation. When septa are
evaluated in terms of location, anterior septa exist between the first and second
premolar region (sinus anterior wall) and the mesial of the first molar. Middle region
septa exist between the mesial of the first molar and the distal of the second molar.
Posterior septa are between the distal of the second molar and the posterior sinus
wall. When septa are evaluated in terms of morphology, it is classified as completed
septa or partial septa (uncompleted septa). When septa are evaluated in terms of septa
orientation, different classifications are indicated. But in general, transverse septa
extend in the mediolateral direction. Sagittal septa extend in the anteroposterior
direction. Atypical septa extend outside the transverse and sagittal septa.[1]
[3]
[4]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
The aim of this study was to measure and classify sinus septa variables and to determine
age, gender, and dental status on the presence of septa and also to evaluate the effects
of septa on pathological mucosal thickening.
Materials and Methods
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the maxillary posterior regions of
2,000 patients at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology at the Ege University
Faculty of Dentistry, dated between 2012 and 2015, were retrospectively evaluated
in this study. A 14–7.1/6 No. Ege University Ethics Committee approval was received
for this study, and informed consent was given by participants. CBCT images were analyzed
on the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes.
Pediatric patients were excluded due to their ongoing maxillary sinus development.[12] In CBCT sections, patients with < 6 mm distance from the deepest curvature of the
maxillary sinus floor, patients with turbidity due to motions during tomography and
artifacts due to various causes (beam hardening, noise, metal, and ring artifact),
and insufficient image quality were excluded. Five hundred maxillary sinuses were
ultimately included in this study.
Tomographic images were obtained using a Kodak 9000 3D CBCT device (Kodak Dental Systems,
Carestream, Rochester, New York, United States) with total filtration > 2.5 mm Al,
5 cm × 3.7 cm imaging area, 76 μm isotropic voxel size, and 14-bit contrast resolution.
CBCT images were taken at 70 kVp and maximum 10 mA as the standard. CBCT images were
reviewed and all measurements performed by a single examiner (N.K.) using Kodak 3D
Imaging Software 3.1.9 (Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream, Rochester, New York, United
States).
The number of maxillary sinus septa was determined on the axial sections of CBCT images
for each maxillary sinus. Their locations, orientations, and morphologies on the axial
and sagittal sections and heights on the sagittal sections were determined.
Septa were identified as available in cases with > 4 mm septa height on the sagittal
sections. This measurements were recorded for each septum ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Determining the height of septa on the sagittal section.
The maximum amount of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening was determined as the widest
vertical distance from the thickest point to the sinus floor. A distance > 2 mm was
considered pathological on the sagittal sections. The amount of maximum mucosal thickening
was recorded for all patients ([Fig. 2A]). Septa's effects on pathological mucosal thickening were also assessed.
Fig. 2 (A) Measurement of mucosal thickening. (B) Determining septa location: (1) anterior septa, (2) middle septa, and (3) posterior
septa. (C) Determining septa morphology: (1) completed septa and (2) partial septa. (D–F) Determining septa orientation: (1) transverse septa, (2) sagittal septa, and (3)
atypical septa.
Septa location in the maxillary sinus was determined on the axial and sagittal sections
in CBCT and classified as anterior, middle region, or posterior ([Fig. 2B]). The septa morphology of the maxillary sinus on the same sections was classified
as completed septa or partial septa ([Fig. 2C]). In addition to, maxillary sinus septa orientation was classified on the axial
section as transverse septa, sagittal septa, and atypical septa ([Fig. 2D–F]).
Descriptive statistics were used in the distribution of septa location, orientation,
and morphology; the chi-squared test was used for the relationship of age, gender,
and dental status with septa; and the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate septa's
effects on maximum mucosal thickening. p-Value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The total 376 patients (average age 43.14 ± 17.6) were aged between 18 and 82 years.
Five hundred maxillary sinuses were included in this study. Of these, 244 (48.6%)
were female and 256 (51.2%) were male. The presence of 287 maxillary sinus septa was
determined. There was no septa in the most of patients (52.4%) ([Fig. 3]). The effect of dental status (p = 0.225), gender (p = 0.643), and age (p = 0.063) on the presence of septa was found to be insignificant by chi-squared tests.
Fig. 3 Distribution of number of septa observed in each maxillary sinus.
When the height of the maxillary sinus septa was evaluated, it was measured as 7.36
mm on average (minimum 3.90 mm and maximum 21.67 mm). Mucosal thickening was 1.04
mm on average. The presence of maximum mucosal thickness in cases with septa (6.3
± 6.2 mm) and the presence of maximum mucosal thickness in cases without septa (6.1
± 5.9 mm) were calculated using mean value and standard deviation. When the effect
of septa on pathological mucosal thickening was evaluated, it was found that the highest
distribution value among the groups was pathological mucosal thickening in the absence
of septa in 34.8% ([Fig. 4]). This reveals that the effect of the presence of septa on the amount of the maximum
mucosal thickening was statistically insignificant (p = 0.863).
Fig. 4 Distribution of the effects of septa presence on pathological mucosal thickening.
When the distributions of septa morphology, location, and orientation were evaluated,
the highest values were 75.95% completed septa, 57.49% middle region septa, and 93.37%
transverse septa, respectively ([Table 1]).
Table 1
Distribution of findings of septa location, morphology, and orientation
|
Septa location
|
Septa morphology
|
Septa orientation
|
|
23.7% anterior septa
|
75.95% completed septa
|
93.37% transverse septa
|
|
57.49% middle septa
|
24.05% partial septa
|
3.83% sagittal septa
|
|
18.81% posterior septa
|
|
2.80% atypical septa
|
Discussion
Sinus lift operations may cause sinus membrane perforations due to anatomical variations
and septa. Radiologic evaluation of septa size and location prevents complications
during and after sinus lifts.[10]
Septa prevalence in maxillary sinuses in this study was 47.6%. In previous studies,
researchers determined this ratio between 13.7 and 58%.[3]
[6]
[8]
[11]
[13]
[14]
[15] Studies differ depending on radiographic methods, septa identification criteria,
and samples. The higher prevalence in this study was based on the thin slice interval
of CBCT images (0.076 μm). While some researchers consider heights over 2.5 mm as
septa,[6]
[16]
[17] Jang et al[6] identify the bone walls of 4 mm and above as septa. In our study, the height which
was determined by Jang et al[6] was taken as a reference.
Various radiographic methods, such as panoramic radiography,[14] CT,[8]
[9]
[11]
[14] and CBCT[3]
[6]
[7]
[13]
[18] were used to assess maxillary sinus septa. Here, CBCT was preferred because it facilitates
detailed assessment of maxillary sinus anatomy and decreases surgical risks.[19]
Here, average septa height was 7.36 mm. In the literature, average septa height is
reported as 3.54 mm in panoramic radiography,[14] 6.6 mm in tomographic sections,[4]
[11] and 4.62 mm in CBCT images.[3]
[6]
[11]
[14]
[18] It has been determined that this finding obtained from our study is quite high compared
with the values stated in the literature. This situation is explained by the high
resolution of the CBCT device used in our study. Advanced imaging techniques with
high resolutions, such as CBCT, increase anatomical structures’ detectability.
As surgical operations involving maxillary sinus segments gain prevalence, radiological
evaluation determining size, shape, and location of septa gains importance. In studies
evaluating septa locations,[3]
[6]
[8]
[11] septa were averagely observed to be 28.1% in the anterior region, 52.55% in the
middle region, and 25.19% in the posterior region. Researchers disagree on whether
middle region septa,[18] anterior septa,[6] or posterior septa[15] are more prevalent. However, middle region septa were found more frequently in our
study (57.49%). Inconsistent findings can be explained by different data collection
methods and nonstandardized location determination among researchers. Further studies
are needed to settle these disagreements, as septa location is important in sinus
drainage interruption and pathology formation.
Here, morphologically completed septa (75.95%) were found to be more prevalent than
partial septa (24.05%). Krennmair et al[20] determined completed septa at 95% and partial septa at 5%. Ella et al[9] specified that partial septa accounted for 39% of all septa. The clinical significance
of partial and completed septa depends on their location, height, and the type of
surgery performed.
When our findings were evaluated in terms of septa orientation, transverse septa (93.37%)
were found to be more prevalent than sagittal (3.83%) or atypical septa (2.80%). Although
researchers’ orientation classification shows difference, septa orientation should
be determined before maxillary sinus surgery.[1]
[6] In a study evaluating the relationship between septa orientation and sinus lift
complications, it has been reported that membrane perforation occurs mostly in the
presence of transverse septa and severity of this perforation depends on septa size
and height.[1] In the light of this information, transverse septa cases should be approached carefully.
Different findings of the effects of dental status on septa[3]
[8]
[14] result from differences in radiographic methods and patients’ dental statuses, ages,
genders, and races. For example, two similar studies’ findings differ: Ozeç et al[14] argue that septa prevalence is more frequent in edentulous individuals, while Orhan
et al[3] emphasize increased prevalence in partially edentulous individuals.
In this study, it was determined that septa presence has no statistically significant
effect on mucosal thickening (p = 0.863). Cakur et al[13] identified an inverse relationship between mucosal thickening and septa presence.
Rancitelli et al[18] reported that average mucosal thickness increased around septa.
Our study has significant limitations—such as being a retrospective study, single-observer
measurements, and uneven sample distribution of dental status. On the other hand,
there are no versatile retrospective studies analyzing the septum's characteristic
features and conditions associated with septa presence.
Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were made: (1) In
our study, the use of high-resolution CBCT is thought to be a factor in the findings
of high septa prevalence (47.6%) and high septa height (7.36 mm). (2) This study found
that the effects of dental status, gender, and age on septa presence were negligible
and that septa presence does not affect maximum mucosal thickening. In addition to
these findings, it is thought that during surgical planning, determining the number,
height, morphology, orientation, and localization of the maxillary, sinus septa will
be effective in preventing complications.
Financial Support and Sponsorship
Nil.
