Keywords
thoracolumbar myelopathy - vertebral instability - arachnoid diverticulum - pia-arachnoid
fibrosis - intervertebral disc protrusion
Introduction
Chronic progressive thoracolumbar myelopathies have been described in Pug dogs secondary
to a variety of conditions including but not exclusive to constrictive myelopathy,
pia-arachnoid fibrosis, spinal arachnoid diverticulum, intervertebral disc protrusion
and dorsal hemivertebrae leading to kyphosis.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Pug dogs appear predisposed to congenital vertebral malformations, including caudal
articular process dysplasia, which have been identified in dogs with or without neurological
dysfunction (De Decker S. Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Thoracic Congenital
Vertebral Malformations in Screw-Tailed Brachycephalic Dogs. Neurology, Scientific
Session in ACVIM, Seattle, Washington, United States, 2018).[10]
[11]
[12] Caudal articular process dysplasia encompasses congenital anomalies which include
hypoplastic (partial absence) and aplastic (complete absence) caudal articular processes.
It is unclear why caudal articular process dysplasia occurs.[13]
[14] While caudal articular process dysplasia can occur at any level of the vertebral
column, it is most commonly diagnosed in the T10 to T13 region.[10]
[12] Caudal articular process dysplasia has been proposed to result in loss of stability
of the vertebral column and has been associated with arachnoid fibrosis, adhesions,
tethering of the spinal cord and disruption of normal cerebrospinal fluid circulation.[13] This has previously been termed ‘constrictive myelopathy’ (Smiler KL, Patterson
JS. Constrictive Myelopathy: a cause of hind limb ataxia unique to Pug dogs? Poster
in Tufts' Canine and Feline Breeding and Genetics Conference, Boston, Massachusetts,
United States, 2013).[8] However, biomechanical studies examining the vertebral column of Pug dogs are lacking
and an association between caudal articular process dysplasia and the development
of constrictive myelopathy has not been proven and remains controversial. Prior trauma
has been implicated in the development of constrictive myelopathy in at-risk individuals.[8]
Hemivertebrae are less common in Pug dogs than other brachycephalic breeds[11] and their association with neurological deficits remains unclear.[10] Although some reports suggested the association between a kyphotic Cobb angle higher
than 35° and neurological deficits in brachycephalic screw-tailed dog breeds with
at least one vertebral malformation,[11]
[15] this was not found in Pug dogs in another study.[10] The presence of spondylosis deformans in combination with hemivertebrae has been
found to be associated with neurological deficits in Pug dogs; chronic vertebral instability
has been implicated in the pathogenesis, although further dynamic spinal imaging studies
are necessary to support this hypothesis.[10]
In a previous report regarding canine spinal arachnoid diverticulum, spinal pathologies
such as hemivertebra, disc protrusions or spondylosis were identified in the immediate
vicinity of the spinal arachnoid diverticulum.[6] The presence of caudal articular process dysplasia was not investigated in this
study. Surgical decompression was performed with short-term neurological deterioration
in three of the four of the dogs postoperatively. It is not known whether vertebral
stabilization would have improved the outcome in that study. As the potential recurrence
of neurological deficits after surgery for spinal arachnoid diverticulum is expected
to occur after a median time of 20.5 months,[1] the short long-term follow-up and the lack of postoperative imaging would prevent
further conclusions from the aforementioned surgical study.[6]
Thoracolumbar intervertebral disc protrusion has been reported to result in disc-associated
dynamic compression.[16]
[17] Stress myelography[16] was considered an acceptable diagnostic tool, and hemilaminectomy with vertebral
stabilization was an effective treatment resulting in long-term neurological improvement
in all dogs. Vertebral stabilization has been hypothesized to prevent further disc
protrusion, promote disc atrophy and prevent any dynamic component of spinal cord
compression.[18]
A poor long-term outcome with surgical management of spinal arachnoid diverticulum
was described in Pug dogs,[1]
[19] although the cause of the poor long-term outcome was not investigated. A dynamic
spinal cord compression was reported in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal arachnoid diverticulum,
using stress myelography.[20] Although myelographic stress study remains a somewhat subjective method for the
evaluation of dynamic spinal cord compression,[16]
[20]
, long-term neurological improvement after vertebral stabilization was noted in three
of five dogs.[20] The presence of an intramedullary lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adjacent
to spinal arachnoid diverticulum was suspected to lead to a worse outcome in the remaining
two dogs.[20]
A poor surgical outcome was also reported for constrictive myelopathy in Pug dogs
with caudal articular process dysplasia; however, this study did not record the number
of dogs that underwent vertebral stabilization.[8] Surgery to address pia-arachnoid fibrosis via subarachnoid–subarachnoid shunt placement
has been previously described[9]; however, clinical signs continued to progress. Although this study considered caudal
articular process dysplasia and vertebral instability as predisposing factors for
pia-arachnoid fibrosis formation, they were only investigated and ruled out via radiography.
We hypothesized that Pug dogs diagnosed with T3 to L3 myelopathy and with intramedullary
hyperintensity at the same level of thoracolumbar caudal articular process dysplasia
had neurological signs in association with dynamic spinal cord compression or vertebral
instability. Therefore, vertebral stabilization in isolation or with the treatment
of the concurrent compressive pathologies (such as spinal arachnoid diverticulum and
intervertebral disc protrusion) would reduce the recurrence of the disease and ameliorate
clinical signs.
Materials and Methods
Imaging Technique
Patients underwent routine MRI scanning of the thoracolumbar spine using a high-field
scanner (1.5T; Siemens Symphony Tim system, Erlangen Germany) under general anaesthesia
in dorsal recumbency. The imaging protocol included sagittal and transverse plane
on T2-weighted images (repetition time [TR] 3650 ms, echo time [TE] 100 ms, field
of view [FOV] 280 mm, Matrix 512 × 448), sagittal and transverse planes on T1-weighted
images (TR 550ms, TE 12ms, FOV 280 mm, matrix 512 × 448); dorsal plane in short-tau
inversion recovery images (TR 3400 ms, TE 40ms, FOV 300mm, matrix 384 × 270). To provide
a better contrast between cerebrospinal fluid and other surrounding structures such
as arachnoid webs and arachnoid adhesions, the three-dimensional constructive interference
in steady state (3D-CISS) images were acquired in a transverse plane (TR 11.5 ms,
TE 5.75 ms, FOV 170, Matrix 256 × 256, slice thickness 1mm). With the aid of the multiplanar
reconstruction software integrated to the MRI scanner, 3D-CISS data were further processed
in sagittal and dorsal planes. Computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed
of the entire thoracolumbar spine using a 160-slice scanner (Aquilion Prime Toshiba,
Otawara Japan) with dogs positioned in dorsal recumbency, using the following exposure
parameters: 120kV, 120 to 150mAs, 200mm FOV. The raw data were processed using the
bone algorithm, which was subsequently evaluated in three orthogonal planes and three-dimensional
volumetric reconstruction.
The MRI spinal cord abnormalities were recorded according to widely accepted descriptions.
Thus, an increase in intra-medullary T2-weighted signal intensity at the affected
level represented oedema, pre-syrinx and/or gliosis[21]; an intra-dural extra-medullary lesion represented spinal arachnoid diverticulum,
if a significant expansion of the subarachnoid space containing a fluid with signal
identical to cerebrospinal fluid distorted the normal shape of the spinal cord and
subarachnoid space, causing spinal cord compression[22]; an intra-dural extra-medullary lesion represented pia-arachnoid fibrosis, if multiple
linear hypo-intense bands appeared to transverse the arachnoid space[9]; an extra-dural compression represented intervertebral disc protrusion, if bulging
of the annulus fibrosus and dorsal longitudinal ligament was present. Intervertebral
disc protrusion was considered severe, when the subarachnoid space and epidural fat
were focally absent and the outline of the spinal cord was distorted and mild, when
subarachnoid space and epidural fat were absent without spinal cord distortion.[23]
Case Selection
Pug dogs were retrospectively recruited from electronic patient records at Fitzpatrick
referrals between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were Pug dogs that were presented
with clinical signs compatible with a T3 to L3 myelopathy; MRI confirming the cause
of thoracolumbar myelopathy and CT confirming caudal articular process dysplasia occurred
at the same level as the MRI abnormalities, and record of surgical management that
included vertebral stabilization in isolation or with concurrent spinal cord decompression.
Patient data collected included patient age, sex, neutering status, other spinal surgery
performed prior to referral, duration of clinical signs (months), the presence or
absence of urinary or faecal incontinence and the neurological status before and after
surgical intervention. This was classified based on the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale
(TSCIS).[24]
Surgical Technique
The surgical procedure was chosen by the primary surgeon according to the lesion localization
and imaging appearance. Therefore, we divided the cases in three surgical groups:
intervertebral disc protrusion, spinal arachnoid diverticulum and pia-arachnoid fibrosis.
The intervertebral disc protrusion group included only cases with severe extradural
compression due to intervertebral disc protrusion associated with intramedullary hyperintensity
at the same level of caudal articular process dysplasia. These were managed with decompression
(hemilaminectomy or mini-hemilaminectomy with partial lateral corpectomy) and vertebral
stabilization. The spinal arachnoid diverticulum group included cases with intradural
compression due to spinal arachnoid diverticulum associated with intramedullary hyperintensity
at the same level of caudal articular process dysplasia. These were managed with dorsal
laminectomy, dorsal mid-line durotomy, dural marsupialization and vertebral stabilization.
The pia-arachnoid fibrosis group included cases affected by intramedullary hyperintensity
only or associated with subarachnoid fibrous bands at the same level of caudal articular
process dysplasia. These cases were managed with vertebral stabilization only due
to the absence of spinal cord compression.
Vertebral stabilization was performed using Imexx miniature threaded interface pins,
enshrouded in a bolus of tobramycin impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone
cement. All cases underwent postoperative CT at the time of the surgery and occasionally
at 6 weeks or 6 months postoperative. All cases had perioperative treatment with corticosteroids
at an anti-inflammatory dose (∼0.5 mg/kg once daily) and underwent a rehabilitation
programme under the supervision of a chartered physiotherapist.
Postoperative follow-up was obtained through re-examination by the surgeon. Clinical
records from re-examinations were available at the immediate postoperative period,
at the discharge from the hospital and at a variable time during the postoperative
period ([Table 1]). Follow-up phone interviews were obtained by one of the authors (AT). Questions
were directed to gain information on the ambulatory status, presence of discomfort
and level of exercise compared with the preoperative status. Additional details on
urinary or faecal incontinence and cause of death (when applicable) were also recorded.
Table 1
Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS) pre- and post-vertebral stabilization, hospitalization
time and follow-ups in 14 cases with caudal articular process dysplasia
|
GROUPS
|
|
Post-surgery with no stabilization
|
Pre-stabilization
|
Immediate post-stabilization
|
At discharge
|
Hosp
time
|
Clinical follow-up
|
Phone follow-up
|
Outcome
|
|
Case no.
|
TSCIS
|
|
|
Total score
|
|
|
Total score
|
|
|
Total score
|
|
Total score
|
|
|
Total score
|
|
Compared with pre-op
|
|
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
Days
|
L
|
R
|
L
|
R
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
1
|
IVDP
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
7
|
3
1
2
|
3
1
2
|
6
|
6
|
4
2
2
|
4
1
2
|
8
|
7
|
3
|
5
2
2
|
5
2
2
|
9
|
9
|
4.9
|
Better
|
10.4
|
Good
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
2
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
4
|
8
|
7
|
4
0
2
|
3
0
2
|
6
|
5
|
5
1
2
|
4
0
2
|
8
|
6
|
2
|
5
1
2
|
5
1
2
|
8
|
8
|
5.5
|
Better
|
10.4
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
3
|
G
PP
N
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
2
2
|
7
|
8
|
6
|
5
1
2
|
5
2
2
|
8
|
9
|
6.3
|
Better
|
11.1
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
4
|
PAF
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
1
0
2
|
2
0
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
5
|
6
|
4
|
4
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
6
|
6
|
2.8
|
Oral sarcoma/
Euthanatized
|
|
Poor
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
5
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
2
0
2
|
2
0
2
|
4
|
4
|
3
0
2
|
3
0
2
|
5
|
5
|
3
|
−
|
−
|
-
|
-
|
−
|
Better
|
23.5
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
6
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
2
0
2
|
3
0
2
|
4
|
5
|
3
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
1
0
2
|
1
0
2
|
3
|
3
|
9.8
|
Worse/uses dog wheelchair
|
10
|
Poor
|
|
0
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
7
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
5
1
2
|
7
|
8
|
3
|
5
1
2
|
5
2
2
|
8
|
9
|
2.2
|
Better
|
10.1
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
8
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
5
|
8
|
9
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
5
|
5
2
2
|
4
1
2
|
9
|
7
|
2.6
|
Same
|
23
|
Satisfactory
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
9
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
2
|
4
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
6
|
6
|
8.2
|
Worse
|
13.3
|
Poor
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
10
|
SAD
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
4
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
6
|
6
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
5
2
2
|
5
2
2
|
9
|
9
|
2.1
|
Better
|
14.5
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
11
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
3
0
2
|
3
0
2
|
5
|
5
|
3
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
5
|
6
|
12
|
1
0
2
|
1
0
2
|
3
|
3
|
4.2
|
Much worse/
Euthanatized
|
16.6
|
Poor
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
12
|
G
PP
N
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
3
0
2
|
3
0
2
|
5
|
5
|
4
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
6
|
6
|
2
|
5
2
2
|
5
2
2
|
9
|
9
|
8.3
|
Same
|
13.4
|
Satisfactory
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
13
|
G
PP
N
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
4
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
7
|
7
|
5
1
2
|
5
1
2
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
6
2
2
|
6
2
2
|
10
|
10
|
8
|
Back to normal
|
10.2
|
Excellent
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
14
|
G
PP
N
|
3
0
2
|
4
0
2
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
8
|
8
|
0
0
2
|
0
0
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
1
2
|
4
1
2
|
6
|
7
|
4
|
4
1
2
|
5
2
2
|
7
|
9
|
3.4
|
Better
|
24
|
Good
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
MEDIAN:
|
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
|
|
8
|
9
|
4.9
|
|
13.3
|
|
Abbreviations: G, gait; Hosp, hospitalization; L, left pelvic limb; N, nociception;
PP, proprioceptive positioning; R, right pelvic limb.
Scale: G (0–6); PP (0–2); N (0–2).
Outcome
Outcome was classified as excellent, if no signs of neurological dysfunction were
found on follow-up examinations and the owner perceived the dog was clinically normal,
with no restriction in physical activities. Outcome was considered good, if minimal
signs of neurological dysfunction were found on follow-up examinations and the owner
perceived the dog had improved but showing some restrictions in physical activities.
Outcome was considered satisfactory, if moderate signs of neurological dysfunction
were found on follow-up examinations and the owner perceived the dog was the same
as prior surgery. Outcome was poor, if the dog failed to improve or continued to deteriorate.
Outcome was also considered poor for cases where the euthanasia was elected due to
comorbidities.
Results
Fourteen cases were eligible for inclusion in this study ([Tables 2] and [3]). Median age of presentation was 8.5 years (range: 2–11.8). Sex of the dogs were
entire male (n = 5), neutered male (n = 4), entire female (n = 1) and neutered female (n = 4). All Pug dogs displayed varying degree of spastic paraparesis and pelvic limb
ataxia at the time of initial presentation with a median TSCIS of 7 out of 10 ([Table 1]). Seven cases had urinary or faecal incontinence, or both, prior to vertebral stabilization
([Table 2]). The median duration of clinical signs prior to presentation to our referral hospital
was 6.5 months (range: 0.4–30). The median follow-up obtained from re-examination
was 4.9 months (range: 2.1–9.8) and via phone interview was 13.3 months (range: 10–24).
Table 2
Clinical details and MRI findings in 14 cases with dysplasia
|
Cases
|
Sex
|
Location of CAP dysplasia
|
Spinal cord hyperintensity on T2WI
|
GROUPS
|
Age on presentation (years)
|
Duration signs (months)
|
Incontinence PRE-
stabilization
|
Incontinence POST-
stabilization
|
Others
|
Euthanasia
|
|
IVDP
|
PAF
|
SAD
|
|
1
|
FN
|
T10–11, T11–12, T12–13
|
T12–T13
|
T12–T13 severe
|
–
|
–
|
6.9
|
0.8
|
F
|
F
|
|
|
|
2
|
MN
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13b
|
L1–L2
|
L1–L2 severe
|
–
|
–
|
9.2
|
1.5
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
ME
|
T10–11b, T11–12b
|
T12
|
T12–T13
severe
|
|
PAF
mild
|
10.5
|
23.2
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
4
|
ME
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13b
|
T11–T12
|
–
|
PAF
|
–
|
7.6
|
1.0
|
–
|
–
|
Oral sarcoma
|
✓
|
|
5
|
FN
|
T11–12b, T12–13r
|
T11–T12
|
T11–T12 mild
|
PAF
|
−
|
11.8
|
24.0
|
F
|
iF
|
|
|
|
6
|
MN
|
T10–11l, T11–12r, T12–13l
|
T9–T10
|
–
|
PAF
|
–
|
8.9
|
9.0
|
F
|
U/F
|
Bladder infection
|
|
|
7
|
ME
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13b
|
T13–L1
|
–
|
PAF
|
–
|
6.5
|
4.0
|
U/F
|
iU/F
|
|
|
|
8
|
FN
|
T11–12b
|
T11–T12
|
T11–T12 mild
|
–
|
–
|
8.5
|
0.4
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
9
|
ME
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13r
|
T11–T12
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
5
|
0.7
|
–
|
F
|
|
|
|
10
|
FN
|
T11–12b, T12–13l, T13-L1l
|
T10–T11 (presyrinx)
|
–
|
|
SAD
|
8.1
|
3.0
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
11
|
ME
|
T10–11b, T11–12b
|
T10–T11 (presyrinx)
|
–
|
|
SAD
|
8.9
|
30.0
|
U/F
|
U/F
|
Syringomyelia
Deep stromal ulcer
|
✓
|
|
12
|
MN
|
T10–11b, T11–12r
|
T7–T10 (presyrinx)
|
–
|
|
SAD
|
9
|
15.0
|
F
|
–
|
|
|
|
13
|
FE
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13r
|
T12–T13
|
–
|
|
SAD
|
2
|
12.3
|
U/F
|
–
|
|
|
|
14
|
MN
|
T10–11b, T11–12b, T12–13l
|
T9–T12 (presyrinx)
|
–
|
|
SAD
|
8.5
|
27.5
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
Median:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations: b, bilateral; CAP, caudal articular process; F, faecal; FE, female
entire; FN, female neutered; i, improved; IVDP, Intervertebral disc protrusion; L,
lumbar; l, left; ME, male entire; MN, male neutered; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging;
PAF, pia-arachnoid fibrosis; r, right; SAD, spinal arachnoid diverticulum; T, thoracic;
U, urinary.
Table 3
Details of surgical intervention and congenital vertebral malformations in 14 cases
with caudal articular process dysplasia
|
Cases
|
Diagnosis and surgical procedure prior to stabilization
(if performed)
|
Months between surgeries
|
GROUPS
|
Details of surgical procedure with stabilization
|
N. pins per vertebra per side
|
Side of stabilization
|
Additional details
|
|
Previous diagnosis
|
HL
|
dLM
|
D
|
M
|
|
mHL
|
dLM
|
LPC
|
M
|
STAB
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
IVDP
|
L T12–T13
|
|
+
|
|
L T10–T13
|
2
|
U
|
T13 transitional
|
|
2
|
|
|
L L1–L2
|
|
+
|
|
L T13–L2
|
2
|
U
|
L1 transitional
|
|
3
|
SAD
|
|
T12–T13
|
|
+
|
18
|
R T12–T13
|
|
+
|
|
L T11–T13
|
2
|
U
|
Kyphoscoliosis
|
|
4
|
|
|
PAF
|
|
|
|
|
T11–L1
|
2 + 1
|
B
|
One pin on each side on T11
T13 transitional vertebra/
6 lumbar vertebrae
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T11–T13
|
2 + 1
|
B
|
L7 sacralization
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7–T9
|
1 + 1
|
B
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T13–L2
|
2 + 1
|
B
|
T13 transitional vertebra/
6 lumbar vertebrae
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T11–T12
|
2 + 1
|
B
|
Two pins on each side on T11
6 lumbar vertebrae
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R T10–T13
|
2
|
U
|
One pin in T10
Loose caudal pin in T13
|
|
10
|
|
|
SAD
|
|
T10–T12
|
|
+
|
R T10–T12
|
2
|
U
|
C7 and L1 transitional vertebrae
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
T10–T11
|
|
+
|
L T10–T12
|
2
|
U
|
L7 sacralization
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
T10–T11
|
|
+
|
R T10–T11
|
2
|
U
|
|
|
13
|
SAD
|
L T12–T13
|
|
+
|
|
7
|
|
T12–T13
|
|
+
|
L T11–T13
|
2
|
U
|
|
|
14
|
IVDP
|
LT12–T13
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
T12–T13
|
|
+
|
L T12–L1
|
2
|
U
|
Kyphoscoliosis
Adhesion of the epaxial muscles
One pin in T13
C7 transitional
|
Abbreviations: B, bilateral; CAP, caudal articular process; dLM, dorsal laminectomy;
D, durectomy; HL, hemilaminectomy; IVDP, intervertebral disc protrusion; L, left;
LPC, lateral partial corpectomy; M, durotomy and marsupialization; mHL, mini-hemilaminectomy;
PAF, pia-arachnoid fibrosis; R, right; SAD, spinal arachnoid diverticulum; STAB, vertebral
stabilization; TSCIS, Texas spinal cord injury scale; U, unilateral; +, performed.
MRI Findings
Caudal articular process dysplasia was localized between T10 and L1 ([Table 2]). In all cases, there was an intramedullary lesion at the level of caudal articular
process dysplasia evident as hyperintense signal on T2-weighted image (T2WI). Five
cases showed intervertebral disc protrusion, but only in three cases it was associated
with extra-dural spinal cord compression ([Fig. 1]). Nine cases had a relevant intra-dural extra-medullary lesion identified on T2WI
and 3D-CISS sequences, which was suspected to represent pia-arachnoid fibrosis in
four cases and spinal arachnoid diverticulum in five cases. Two cases showed mainly
intramedullary signal changes without evident spinal cord compression ([Table 2]). Nine cases had other congenital vertebral malformations such as transitional vertebrae
and abnormal number of vertebrae and two cases showed kyphoscoliosis following the
first surgical procedure performed without vertebral stabilization ([Table 3]).
Fig. 1 Case 5: mid-sagittal and transverse T2-weighted (T2W) (A and B) images at the level of T11 to T12 intervertebral disc space showing a mild intervertebral
disc protrusion (IVDP) (blue arrow) at the level of caudal articular process dysplasia.
Case 1: mid-sagittal and transverse T2W (C and D) images at the level of T12 to T13 intervertebral disc space showing severe IVDP
(blue arrows) at the level of caudal articular process dysplasia. (Siemens Symphony
Tim system, 1.5 T, Erlangen, Germany).
Surgical Treatment
Surgical treatments are summarized in [Tables 2] and [3]. Of the fourteen Pug dogs that underwent vertebral stabilization, three underwent
decompressive procedures prior to vertebral stabilization via partial lateral corpectomy
(intervertebral disc protrusion group), six underwent vertebral stabilization only
(pia-arachnoid fibrosis group) and five underwent dorsal laminectomy for spinal arachnoid
diverticulum marsupialization prior to vertebral stabilization (spinal arachnoid diverticulum
group). Five cases had bilateral stabilization, while the other nine cases had a unilateral
stabilization ([Table 3]). The selection of unilateral or bilateral fixation was based on surgeon preference;
the main indication for unilateral stabilization was to limit surgical dead space
over a dorsal laminectomy defect, due to the presence of a PMMA bolus. All dogs had
postoperative CT, two dogs had imaging at 6 weeks (cases 3 and 6) and two dogs at
6 months (cases 9 and 12).
Three cases (case 3, 13 and 14) ([Tables 2] and [3]) had undergone previous surgical interventions without the identification of caudal
articular process dysplasia: Cases 3 ([Fig. 2]) and 13 ([Fig. 3]) had previously undergone decompression (durotomy and marsupialization or durectomy)
for spinal arachnoid diverticulum, with signs related to thoracolumbar myelopathy
present for over 5.5 months. Due to the further neurological deterioration, spinal
MRI and CT scan were performed 18 and 7 months (in cases 3 and 13 respectively) after
the first surgical intervention. These confirmed the presence of caudal articular
process dysplasia in both cases. Case 3 developed intervertebral disc protrusion and
mild kyphoscoliosis at the previous surgical site; while in case 13, recurrence was
attributed to reformation of the spinal arachnoid diverticulum. Partial lateral corpectomy
and vertebral stabilization were performed in case 3; while dorsal spinal arachnoid
diverticulum marsupialization and spinal stabilization were performed in case 13.
Case 14 ([Fig. 4]) underwent hemilaminectomy to treat a suspected intervertebral disc protrusion with
signs related to thoracolumbar myelopathy present for over a month. Following a reported
short-lived (2–4 weeks) amelioration of the clinical signs, the dog demonstrated a
progressive deterioration of clinical signs. Spinal CT and MRI scans performed 26
months after the first surgical intervention supported the presence of caudal articular
process dysplasia and spinal arachnoid diverticulum adjacent to the region of the
previous hemilaminectomy. Mild kyphoscoliosis and the adhesion of the epaxial muscles
to dura mater at the previous surgical site were present. Spinal arachnoid diverticulum
marsupialization and vertebral stabilization were performed in this case ([Table 2] and [3]).
Fig. 2 Case 3: mid-sagittal T2-weighted (T2W) and three-dimensional constructive interference
in steady state (3D-CISS) (A and B) and transverse T2W and 3D-CISS (C and D) images at the level of T12 to T13 intervertebral disc space demonstrating the recurrence
of spinal arachnoid diverticulum (SAD) (white arrow), intervertebral disc protrusion
(blue arrow) and kyphoscoliosis following SAD surgery. (Siemens Symphony Tim system,
1.5 T, Erlangen, Germany).
Fig. 3 Case 13: mid-sagittal and transverse T2-weighted (T2W) (A and B) performed at another referral hospital prior to hemilaminectomy to treat spinal
arachnoid diverticulum (SAD) (white arrow) and mid-sagittal and transverse three-dimensional
constructive interference in steady state (C and D) images post-hemilaminectomy without vertebral stabilization at the level of T12
to T13 intervertebral disc space demonstrating the laminectomy site (blue arrow) and
the recurrence of SAD (white arrow) (Siemens Symphony Tim system, 1.5 T, Erlangen,
Germany).
Fig. 4 Case 14: mid-sagittal and transverse T2-weighted (T2W) (A and B) and mid-sagittal and transverse three-dimensional constructive interference in steady
state (C and D) images at the level of T12 to T13 intervertebral space demonstrating the recurrence
of SAD (white arrow), mild kyphoscoliosis and the adhesion of the epaxial muscles
to dura mater at the previous surgical site (blue arrow) (Siemens Symphony Tim system,
1.5 T, Erlangen, Germany).
Surgical Outcome
In all cases that underwent vertebral stabilization, we observed transient neurological
deterioration (TSCIS: median of 6 out of 10) in the immediate postoperative period
with a tendency to return to the preoperative status by discharge (TSCIS: median of
7 out of 10) ([Table 1]). In 10 cases, we detected neurological improvement (TSCIS: median 8.5 out of 10)
at the clinical follow-up at 4.9 months and phone interview follow-up at 13.3 months.
Median hospitalization time was 4 days (range: 2–12).
Overall, one case had an excellent outcome, seven cases had a good surgical outcome
and two cases had a satisfactory outcome. Four cases had a poor outcome. Case 4 ([Table 2]) was euthanatized for an unrelated cause (a poorly differentiated soft tissue sarcoma
in the oral cavity) ∼7 months post-surgical intervention. During the postoperative
period, the dog remained neurologically stable ([Table 1]). Case 11 was euthanatized 4 months post-surgery due to the lack of neurological
improvement. This case had a long duration of clinical signs before presentation (30
months) ([Table 2]). This dog was diagnosed with concurrent syringomyelia at the level of T1 to T5
vertebrae with a maximum transverse syrinx width of 6mm, became paraplegic immediately
postoperatively ([Table 1]) and developed a deep stromal corneal ulcer during the postoperative period, which
delayed the onset of rehabilitation. The owner elected for euthanasia. Case 9 had
loosening of one of the caudal pins at a 6-month postoperative CT ([Table 3]) and a slight deterioration of the neurological status was reported. This dog had
only one pin was inserted in T10 ([Table 3]) due to a technical challenge: the length of the vertebral fusion, that is, over
four vertebral bodies in combination with the placement of only one pin in the cranial
portion may have contributed to the failure of the implant. Surgical revision was
declined. Case 6 demonstrated neurological deterioration at the clinical and phone
interview follow-ups, becoming non-ambulatory paraparetic ([Table 1]). However, this dog showed only a slight deterioration at discharge and spinal CT
performed approximately 6-week after surgery demonstrated adequate implant positioning
([Table 1]). A severe urinary tract infection developed within the postoperative period and
urinary incontinence were reported to have contributed to the poor outcome.
Following surgical intervention, urinary and faecal incontinence completely resolved
in only two cases (cases 12 and 13), while in two cases (case 5 and 7) its frequency
was reported to have slightly reduced. Faecal incontinence developed in one case (case
9). Urinary or faecal incontinence persisted in the remaining three cases (cases 1,
11, 6) ([Table 2]).
Discussion
Our study was to investigate whether vertebral stabilization was associated with the
resolution or amelioration of clinical signs in Pug dogs diagnosed with thoracolumbar
myelopathy, and with intramedullary hyperintensity present at the level of thoracolumbar
caudal articular process dysplasia.
Overall, we observed neurological improvement in 10 cases. The chronicity of the clinical
signs may have contributed to the persistent of neurological deficits.
Case 13 was the only case with excellent outcome. This was also the youngest Pug dog
([Table 2]) and therefore spinal arachnoid diverticulum was considered to be developmental
rather than acquired. Caudal articular process dysplasia was initially undiagnosed
and we speculated that the neurological progression was potentially associated with
vertebral instability following hemilaminectomy ([Table 3]). The dog showed clinical improvement, when vertebral stabilization was added to
the surgical planning.
Among the group of dogs with a good outcome, two cases (case 3 and 14) with undiagnosed
caudal articular process dysplasia had surgical intervention to address spinal arachnoid
diverticulum and intervertebral disc protrusion respectively. In these cases, the
signs related to the thoracolumbar myelopathy recurred and kyphoscoliosis developed
at the surgical site in association with intervertebral disc protrusion. Kyphoscoliosis
may be secondary to the progression of the disease or increased vertebral instability
following the surgical procedure. The vertebral stabilization subsequently performed
appeared to ameliorate neurological progression.
The significance of caudal articular process dysplasia in our study population remains
controversial and why some dogs with caudal articular process dysplasia should develop
spinal cord disease at the affected level requires further investigation. We speculated
that surgical interventions such as facetectomy, hemi or dorsal laminectomy to approach
the spinal cord at the same site of caudal articular process dysplasia might exacerbate
vertebral instability ([Fig. 5]), leading to kyphoscoliosis and progression of the disease. Hence, the presence
of caudal articular process dysplasia should be considered in surgical planning and
vertebral stabilization may be indicated.
Fig. 5 Case 13: dorsal view of the three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography
showing T12 to T13 previous hemilaminectomy surgery (red square) performed prior the
diagnosis of caudal articular process dysplasia (green arrows). (Toshiba Aquilion
PRIME 160-slice multislice CT scanner, Japan).
Previous studies had shown an association between abnormal gait and age[25] and the presence and severity of caudal articular process dysplasia with the occurrence
of intervertebral disc protrusion in aged (>8 years old) Pug dogs (Nishida H, Nakata
S, Maeda S, Kamishina H. Characteristics of the caudal articular process abnormalities
in Pugs with thoracolumbar disk herniation. Poster 44 in ESCN/ECVN congress proceedings,
Helsinki, Finland, 2017). In our study, we found that the median age of onset of clinical
signs was 8.5 years; therefore, Pug dogs may not show signs related to caudal articular
process dysplasia until they are older.[10] Previous reports hypothesized loss of stability of the vertebral column secondary
to caudal articular process dysplasia[13] and found the presence of intramedullary lesion on MRI associated with a worse outcome.[20] We suspected that intramedullary lesion in our study may be secondary to chronic
vertebral instability which overtime may lead to the developing of other concurrent
disorders such as pia-arachnoid fibrosis, spinal arachnoid diverticulum and intervertebral
disc protrusion at the same level. We would therefore speculate that to reduce the
prognostic influence of the chronicity of the clinical signs, early vertebral stabilization
could be indicated when intramedullary hyperintensity is diagnosed at the level of
caudal articular process dysplasia. However, further studies are necessary to support
this speculation.
We identified nine Pug dogs with other congenital vertebral malformations such as
transitional vertebrae and abnormal number of vertebrae ([Table 3]). In accordance to previous studies, the common presence of congenital vertebral
malformations may be considered an undirect cause of the neurological dysfunction[10] as the alteration in vertebral biomechanics may contribute to the aetiopathogenesis.[11]
[26]
Although MRI may occasionally demonstrate caudal articular process abnormalities,
the spatial resolution of these small structures is often poor and CT should be used
as a preferred imaging modality to identify the presence of this malformation[10] ([Fig. 6]). Our findings support the usefulness of both MRI and CT in the preoperative assessment
of Pug dogs with thoracolumbar myelopathy.
Fig. 6 Case 8: transverse computed tomography (CT) (A) and transverse T2-weighted image (B) at the level of T11 to T12 intervertebral disc space showing the challenge in diagnosing
caudal articular process dysplasia (white arrows) on magnetic resonance imaging when
compared with CT. (Siemens Symphony Tim system, 1.5 T, Erlangen, Germany; Toshiba
Aquilion PRIME 160-slice multislice CT scanner, Japan).
Surgical outcome was considered poor in four cases (29%) ([Table 1]): Case 4 remained stable during the postoperative period; however, the follow-up
was relatively short due to the concurrent oral sarcoma. Case 11 showed chronic clinical
signs before presentation and had a delay in commencing the rehabilitation programme
due to other comorbidities. Surgical manipulation of a chronically injured spinal
cord and/or recurrence of spinal arachnoid diverticulum may also have contributed
to the reported deterioration. Unfortunately, CT was not repeated in this case. The
presence of syringomyelia concurrent with spinal arachnoid diverticulum has been previously
associated with a negative prognosis[20]
[27]
[28] and has likely further compromised the recovery in this case. The decision of performing
unilateral or bilateral vertebral stabilization did not adversely influence the outcome
or cause any specific types of complications. However, the authors preferred the unilateral
approach for stabilization in the presence of a dorsal laminectomy defect to decrease
dead space and the risk of postoperative compressive haematoma/seroma formation. Case
6 demonstrated further progression of neurological dysfunction; however, CT myelogram
was not performed in this case and the possible recurrence of spinal arachnoid diverticulum
formation, chronicity of the condition or reperfusion injury remains a speculation.
Incontinence may persist despite the amelioration of the neurological dysfunction
([Table 1]). Although it is unclear the reason why the incontinence developed in some dogs
rather than others, this could influence the overall outcome. Hence, we would recommend
performing vertebral stabilization sooner in the course of the disease, to prevent
or minimize permanent neurological deficits.
Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, the small sample size,
the lack of control cases and dynamic studies and the length and nature of follow-up
data gathering. Owner financial constraint was also a limiting factor in the availability
of CT imaging in the postoperative period. Postoperative MRI would be ideal in evaluating
spinal cord and arachnoid space in dogs that show neurological deterioration; however,
the use of stainless-steel implants prevents this because of imaging artefacts arising
from their ferromagnetic properties. Although myelo-CT can assist in evaluating the
arachnoid space following surgical intervention; the increased use of titanium alloy
screws and pins and the development of metal artefact reduction MRI sequences may
help in the future to reduce the size and intensity of susceptibility artefacts, resulting
from magnetic field distortion, and increase anatomical visibility and diagnostic
confidence level.[29]
[30]
[31]
We considered vertebral stabilization in isolation or with concurrent spinal cord
decompression to treat a plethora of conditions which aetiopathogenesis is not well
understood. Future studies may further clarify the complexity of these conditions
and propose novel treatments.
Finally, we would advise to perform both spinal MRI and CT in aged Pug dogs presented
with progressive thoracolumbar myelopathy, and no obvious signs of discomfort. Both
imaging modalities might enable the surgeon to choose the most appropriate surgical
intervention. The findings of our study support the contention that vertebral stabilization
in Pug dogs affected by caudal articular process dysplasia may help to ameliorate
or at least halt the clinical signs associated with thoracolumbar myelopathy, which
have previously been associated with a poor prognosis in this breed.