Keywords
intracranial aneurysm - surgery - neurophysiological monitoring - intraoperative angiography
Palavras-chave
aneurisma intracraniano - cirurgia - monitorização neurofisiológica - angiografia
intraoperatória
Introduction
The surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms is a routine operation in the neurosurgeon
practice. They may be unruptured or ruptured, and surgical clipping enables mass effect
control and the avoidance of further bleeding or rebleeding. The majority of intracranial
aneurysms is located near the skull base, and are related to branching sites of large
vessels of the anterior or posterior circulation. Morphologically, aneurysms may be
small, large or giant, and saccular or fusiform. They may also be classified according
to the fundus/neck ratio and their content (thrombosed, partially thrombosed or calcified).[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
Complex aneurysms are those with morphological irregularities, usually large or giant;
thrombosed, partially thrombosed or calcified; with aberrant fundus/neck ratio, and
near eloquent neurological structures. These cases demand special skills by the surgical
team. A preoperative complete investigation associated with the correct intraoperative
planning is essential for maximum success. Currently, these cases need special technology
application, including navigation, neurophysiological monitoring, and intraoperative
real-time angiographic evaluations by immunofluorescence.[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
In the present report, we describe two cases of complex aneurysms successfully treated,
and discuss the role of neurophysiological monitoring. In these two cases of supra-
and infratentorial complex giant aneurysms, intraoperative monitoring was extremely
relevant because the aneurysms were closely related to eloquent brain structures such
as: the medulla, the cerebellum, the lower cranial nerves (IX, X, XI, XII), the posterior
inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), the vertebral artery, the internal carotid artery,
and the perforating arteries of these vessels.
Case Descriptions
Case 1
The first case was of a 36-year-old male patient with a history of left holocranial
pulsatile headache with irradiation to the cervical region. It was persistent, relieving
with usual analgesic use. There were no other complaints and/or neurological deficits.
The neurological examination was normal. His previous medical history was unremarkable.
The patient was submitted to cerebral angiography, which disclosed a fusiform lesion
of the left internal carotid artery (ICA), reaching the bifurcation of the ICA, the
M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and segment A1 of the anterior cerebral
artery (ACA). There was no subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) associated ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Complex and fusiform internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation aneurysm reaching
the proximal M1 and A1 segments.
The patient underwent microsurgical clipping of the aneurysm and vessel reconstruction
by a pterional approach with adjunct use of neurophysiological monitoring ([Fig. 2]). Additionally, we used indocyanine green to address the intraoperative flowmetry
after clipping. Multimodal neurophysiological monitoring was performed from the beginning
to the end of the procedure, with the following techniques ([Fig. 3]):
Fig. 2 Aneurysmal clipping and vessel reconstruction. Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine
green (ICG) revealing good blood flow.
Fig. 3 Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring revealing no disturbances during clipping.
-
Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) by stimuli in the upper and lower limbs.
-
Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial electrical stimuli, with registration
in muscles of the upper and lower limbs.
-
Electroencephalogram (EEG) with ten channels for depth assessment anesthesia and train-of-four
(TOF) to evaluate neuromuscular blockade.
The reconstruction was accomplished by clipping the proximal ACA and reconstructing
bifurcation walls with clips.[3] During surgery, neurophysiological monitoring was unremarkable, and the postoperative
neuroimage and clinical picture were adequate ([Fig. 4]). The patient was discharged in the fifth postoperative day, without neurological
impairment.
Fig. 4 Postoperative images disclosing total aneurysmal exclusion and preservation of blood
flow.
Case 2
A 54-year-old female patient presented with a history of dizziness and nausea for
weeks, which was associated with moderate to severe pulsatile persistent holocranial
headache relieved by analgesics. After a few days, the patient evolved with left hemiparesis
(grade IV), with gait disturbances and falling, as well as alteration of the lower
cranial nerves (X, XII) on the left (dysphagia, dysphonia).
She underwent cranial tomography and magnetic resonance, which revealed an extra-axial
nodular lesion on the left side of the medulla measuring 2 cm in diameter, heterogeneous,
hypodense in the periphery and hyperdense in the center, closely related to the left
vertebral artery, and deforming the medulla. The hypothesis of a vascular lesion was
raised, and she underwent a vascular study ([Fig. 5]).
Fig. 5 Large, complex and partially thrombosed aneurysm near the medulla. Inside the aneurysm
there were also different phases of intramural bleeding.
The images of the cerebral angiography showed a communication of the vascular lesion
with the left vertebral artery through a narrow, saccular lesion ([Fig. 6]). The patient was submitted to a left far lateral approach with partial resection
of the occipital condyle and the C1 left arch, to better approach the lesion, which
had an intimate contact with the vertebral artery and ipsilateral brainstem ([Fig. 7]). Additionally, we used indocyanine green to address the intraoperative flowmetry
after clipping.
Fig. 6 Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm arising together with the PICA
and measuring 10 × 6 mm.
Fig. 7 Surgery by a far lateral approach to enable the manipulation of the anterior and
lateral lower medullas. Clipping of the aneurysm and postclipping with indocyanine
green (ICG).
Then, the artery remained for 20 minutes with a provisional straight clip, which caused
a decrease in the potential of the ipsilateral XII cranial nerve in this period, with
a return after the clip was repositioned ([Fig. 8]). The patient was discharged in the seventh postoperative day, without neurological
impairment.
Fig. 8 Loss of motor potential of the XI and XII nerves after initial clipping, demanding
repositioning, after which the potentials became normal.
Discussion
Complex aneurysms are difficult lesions to treat. Their irregular morphology and atypical
location and characteristics make surgery attempts potentially harmful and challenging.
On the other hand, due to such peculiarities, treatment by endovascular means is not
ideal, or may be used just in the context of a staged or partial procedure. Therefore,
developing a surgical strategy and additional intraoperative information is key in
these cases.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Complex and giant aneurysms of the ICA (diameter > 2.5 cm) are sometimes associated
with life-threatening complications such as a mass effect, thromboembolic ischemic
stroke, and hemorrhage. Patients can deteriorate rapidly, with neurological deficits
that can lead to death after the rupture of the aneurysm. The risk of injury to perforating
arteries is high, resulting in neurological deficits.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
In the first case herein presented, the major concern was the injury to ICA perforators.
The reconstruction was accomplished by clipping the proximal ACA and reconstructing
bifurcation walls with clips without changes in neurophysiology parameters. This technique
was previously described,[3] and may be used in complex aneurysms of the ICA bifurcation when the communicating
complex is functional and able to provide collateral flow to the ipsilateral ACA territory.[3]
The decision of when to perform the clipping and bypass remains controversial. There
are advantages and disadvantages to each technique. Data from the literature shows
that 95% of patients with extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass and ICA occlusion
had relatively good results, as indicated by the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) after 3
to 64 months of follow-up, but those cases were also associated with an incidence
of 10% of postoperative obstruction with the bypass technique.[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15] This finding indicates that, for patients with anastomotic obstruction, bypass surgery
may be unnecessary. Then, the clipping technique can be the best choice to protect
the main vessel (ICA). Moreover, the ideal technique depends on the expertise of the
surgical team, and may change also depending on intraoperative findings.
Temporary occlusion is required during the clipping and bypass procedures. Collateral
circulation and tolerance to brain ischemia while the ICA is temporarily occluded
is generally assessed according to the preoperative occlusion test. Under general
anesthesia, however, this preoperative analysis may be unreliable, because the metabolic
demand of the anesthetized brain is lower than that of the waking brain.
The second case (giant aneurysm located in the infratentorial region) originated in
the left vertebral artery, and caused mass effect in the brainstem, in addition to
having the PICA originating along the neck of the lesion. Clamping of this artery
to empty the complex aneurysm was unavoidable. Then, it remained for 20 minutes with
a provisional straight clip, which caused a decrease in the potential of the ipsilateral
XII cranial nerve in this period, with a return after the clip was repositioned.
Motor-evoked potentials appear to be more sensitive than SEPs for cerebral blood flow
deficit, for they can detect subcortical ischemia or infarction during the operation
in less than 1 minute, especially pure motor deficits caused by perforating arteries
or large branches. In our cases, the MEPs correlated with the postoperative neurological
status.[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Some reports highlight the use of other intraoperative strategies to address functional
status during surgery. Some studies emphasize the use of micro Doppler probes to make
real-time evaluations of arterial blood flow.[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6] They are useful to analyze blood flow inside the aneurysm and especially after clipping,
to evaluate the patency of the vessel.[5] In the case of the performance of a bypass, it is also useful to analyze the patency
of the bypass. Other groups reported the application of awake craniotomies to perform
complex aneurysm clipping.[4] Similarly to functional neurological tumor surgery, awake craniotomies would enable
a better visualization of functional impairment during surgery, with higher accuracy
compared with routine neurophysiological monitoring.[4] Although we recognize the potential benefits of both strategies, we did not apply
them in our cases.
Another peculiarity of our cases was that we did not use endovascular means. Had we
chosen to use the endovascular treatment, we would not have intraoperative monitoring
in our favor, and, due to the morphology of the lesions, we would have faced an increased
risk of obstruction, and, consequently, morbidity and mortality in the postoperative
period of these complex lesions. Additionally, ours were cases of unruptured aneurysms.
Surely, we managed them rapidly, but had time to make the best preoperative planning.
In the scenario of ruptured aneurysms, especially depending on the severity of the
clinical profile, there is no time to adequately plan surgery and use all the multimodal
neuromonitoring modalities available.
Thus, we believe that treating small or large aneurysms in usual presentations may
be performed with safety in the routine neurosurgical set up. Nevertheless, cases
of complex and giant aneurysms carry several pitfalls, and the use of multimodal intraoperative
monitoring is mandatory to mitigate risks and deliver the best result to the patient.
