J Knee Surg 2022; 35(08): 821-827
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718680
Original Article

Matched-Pair Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Images for Location of the Common Peroneal Nerve in Valgus Knees: Comparison with the Varus Knees

Kwang Am Jung
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
,
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
,
Mohd Irfan Banday
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
,
Abhishek Patil
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
,
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the distance and angular location of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) on axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the valgus knees and compare the measurements with those obtained from the control group. We compared the location of the CPN according to the type of alignment by performing a subgroup analysis. From January 2009 to December 2019, we identified 41 knees with preoperative MRI in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus deformity (valgus group). We performed one-to-two matched-pair analysis to a cohort of patients who underwent MRI but were not candidates for TKA (control group), according to sex and age. The valgus group was classified according to the grading system reported by Ranawat et al, and the control group was also subdivided according to the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle obtained from lower extremity scanography: neutral (–3 to +3 degrees from the neutral mechanical axis), valgus (> +3 degrees), and varus alignment (< –3 degrees). Distance between the CPN and posterolateral cortex of the tibia at the knee joint (distance J) and tibial cut level (distance C) were measured. Angle of the CPN from the central anteroposterior axis of the tibia (angle α) was measured. We compared the measurements between the groups. Distance J was significantly closer in the valgus group (p < 0.001), whereas angle α was significantly smaller in the valgus group (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis. Moreover, a significant correlation was found between distance J and the HKA angle (p < 0.001). The location of the CPN in the valgus knees was closer to the posterolateral cortex of the tibia at the joint level and showed a smaller angle than that in the other aligned knees. We recommend that lateral soft tissue release for valgus knees should not be performed at the joint line. The results of this study suggest that this would be less safe than a release performed at the level of the proximal tibial bone resection.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Yeungnam University Medical Center (No. YUMC 2019–05–030) and informed consent was obtained from all participating patients before procedure.




Publication History

Received: 13 February 2020

Accepted: 06 September 2020

Article published online:
27 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Jenkins MJ, Farhat M, Hwang P, Kanawati AJ, Graham E. The distance of the common peroneal nerve to the posterolateral structures of the knee. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (12) 2907-2911
  • 2 Park JH, Restrepo C, Norton R, Mandel S, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J. Common peroneal nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty: prognostic factors and course of recovery. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (09) 1538-1542
  • 3 Idusuyi OB, Morrey BF. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of predisposing and prognostic factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (02) 177-184
  • 4 Nercessian OA, Ugwonali OF, Park S. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (08) 1068-1073
  • 5 Bruzzone M, Ranawat A, Castoldi F, Dettoni F, Rossi P, Rossi R. The risk of direct peroneal nerve injury using the Ranawat “inside-out” lateral release technique in valgus total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (01) 161-165
  • 6 Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Elkus M, Rasquinha VJ, Rossi R, Babhulkar S. Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (Pt 2): (Suppl. 01) 271-284
  • 7 Whiteside LA. Selective ligament release in total knee arthroplasty of the knee in valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 130-140
  • 8 Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (02) 173-180
  • 9 Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Anatomic and biomechanical aspects of pie crusting posterolateral structures for valgus deformity correction in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (03) 347-353
  • 10 Clarke HD, Schwartz JB, Math KR, Scuderi GR. Anatomic risk of peroneal nerve injury with the “pie crust” technique for valgus release in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (01) 40-44
  • 11 Jia Y, Gou W, Geng L, Wang Y, Chen J. Anatomic proximity of the peroneal nerve to the posterolateral corner of the knee determined by MR imaging. Knee 2012; 19 (06) 766-768
  • 12 Olivecrona C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Stanford BR, Nilsson BY. Tourniquet cuff pressure and nerve injury in knee arthroplasty in a bloodless field: a neurophysiological study. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (02) 159-164
  • 13 Harvie P, Torres-Grau J, Beaver RJ. Common peroneal nerve palsy associated with pseudotumour after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012; 19 (02) 148-150
  • 14 Yang D, Shao H, Zhou Y, Tang H, Guo S. Location of the common peroneal nerve in valgus knees-is the reported safe zone for well-aligned knees applicable?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (11) 3539-3543
  • 15 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
  • 16 Cooke TDV, Sled EA, Scudamore RA. Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 2007; 34 (09) 1796-1801
  • 17 Austin PC. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172 (09) 1092-1097
  • 18 Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005
  • 19 Rausch V, Hackl M, Oppermann J. et al. Peroneal nerve location at the fibular head: an anatomic study using 3D imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (07) 921-926
  • 20 Scott WN. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 6th ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018
  • 21 Koh IJ, Kim MW, Kim JH, Han SY, In Y. Trends in high tibial osteotomy and knee arthroplasty utilizations and demographics in Korea from 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (06) 939-944