Skin Graft Review in Dermofasciectomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture within 48 Hours: Challenging Historical Practice

Abstract

Introduction Early review of skin graft following dermofasciectomy with skin grafting for Dupuytren’s disease is not standard practice because of the potentially adverse effects on inosculation and neovascularization process of the skin grafting. The purpose of this retrospective case series was to observe whether early review of grafts postoperatively at 48 hours adversely affects graft survival and surgical outcomes.

Materials and Methods Forty-nine primary and revision procedures were retrospectively analyzed for treatment outcomes, postoperative complications, functional hand scoring, and satisfaction rates postoperatively.

Results Thirty-eight patients were treated successfully with no postoperative contracture. There were three treatment failures and two graft failures, with two amputations within these failures. Paired pre- and postoperative Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main scoring demonstrated significant improvement in hand function for primary procedures, with a mean satisfaction score of 7.7 out of 10.

Conclusion We have shown early graft review following dermofasciectomy and full-thickness skin grafting to be safe, allowing early mobilization and splinting, with our postoperative failure and complication rate being within published literature.

Keywords

Dupuytren’s disease - dermofasciectomy - skin graft - postoperative review

Publication History

Article published online:
23 March 2021

• References

• 1 Black EM, Blazar PE. Dupuytren disease: an evolving understanding of an age-old disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (12) 746-757
• 2 Hueston JT. Digital Wolfe grafts in recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1962; 29: 342-344
• 3 Villani F, Choughri H, Pelissier P. [Importance of skin graft in preventing recurrence of Dupuytren’s contracture]. Chir Main 2009; 28 (06) 349-351
• 4 McCash CR. The open palm technique in Dupuytren’s contracture. Br J Plast Surg 1964; 17: 271-280
• 5 Zoubos AB, Stavropoulos NA, Babis GC, Mavrogenis AF, Kokkalis ZT, Soucacos PN. The McCash technique for Dupuytren’s disease: our experience. Hand Surg 2014; 19 (01) 61-67
• 6 Ullah AS, Dias JJ, Bhowal B. Does a ‘firebreak’ full-thickness skin graft prevent recurrence after surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture?: A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (03) 374-378
• 7 Warwick D. Skin grafting in Dupuytren's disease. In Böttcher R, ed. Living Textbook of Hand Surgery. Cologne: GMS Publishing House 2014
• 8 Kan HJ, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Marion ES. et al. Patients’ preferences for treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a discrete choice experiment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 165-173
• 9 Chang J, Neligan PC. Management of Dupuytren’s disease. In Neligan PC, ed. Plastic Surgery: Hand and Upper Limb. Vol 6. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2012: 359
• 10 Chung KC. Hand And Upper Extremity Reconstruction E-Book: A Volume in the Procedures in Reconstructive Surgery Series. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2008: 230
• 11 Braza ME, Fahrenkopf MP. Split-Thickness Skin Grafts. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing 2020
• 12 Patton ML, Mullins RF, Smith D, Korentager R. An open, prospective, randomized pilot investigation evaluating pain with the use of a soft silicone wound contact layer vs bridal veil and staples on split thickness skin grafts as a primary dressing. J Burn Care Res 2013; 34 (06) 674-681
• 13 Reddy S, El-Haddawi F, Fancourt M. et al. The incidence and risk factors for lower limb skin graft failure. Dermatol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 582080
• 14 Bernabé B, Lasbleiz S, Gerber RA. et al. URAM scale for functional assessment in Dupuytren’s disease: a comparative study of its properties. Joint Bone Spine 2014; 81 (05) 441-444
• 15 Felici N, Marcoccio I, Giunta R. et al. Dupuytren contracture recurrence project: reaching consensus on a definition of recurrence. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46 (06) 350-354
• 16 Tubiana R. Dupuytren’s disease of the radial side of the hand. Hand Clin 1999; 15 (01) 149-159
• 17 Turesson C, Kvist J, Krevers B. Patients’ needs during a surgical intervention process for Dupuytren’s disease. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41 (06) 666-673
• 18 Werker PMN, Pess GM, van Rijssen AL, Denkler K. Correction of contracture and recurrence rates of Dupuytren contracture following invasive treatment: the importance of clear definitions. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 2095-2105
• 19 Hall PN, Fitzgerald A, Sterne GD, Logan AM. Skin replacement in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (02) 193-197
• 20 Tonkin MA, Burke FD, Varian JP. Dupuytren’s contracture: a comparative study of fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy in one hundred patients. J Hand Surg [Br] 1984; 9 (02) 156-162
• 21 Ball C, Izadi D, Verjee LS, Chan J, Nanchahal J. Systematic review of non-surgical treatments for early Dupuytren’s disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17 (01) 345
• 22 Kitridis D, Karamitsou P, Giannaros I, Papadakis N, Sinopidis C, Givissis P. Dupuytren’s disease: limited fasciectomy, night splinting, and hand exercises-long-term results. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29 (02) 349-355
• 23 Turesson C. The role of hand therapy in Dupuytren disease. Hand Clin 2018; 34 (03) 395-401
• 24 Ray S, Rao K. Full thickness skin grafts. In: Spear M, ed. Skin Grafts—Indications, Applications and Current Research. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech 2011: 43-54