Background: We aim to present our experience with measures resulting in increased workflow efficiency
in our clinical practice, and to evaluate the effect of these changes on the time
elapsed at each stage of the workflow process and how it impact overall workflow efficiency.
Method(s): We implemented a set of changes at each stage of the workflow process from patient
registration, pre-operative workup, procedure, post-operative care, and discharge.
Average time for completion of each stage of the process was determined before and
after implementing the changes. Weekly case volume (WCV), weekly mean overtime hours
(WMOH) and monthly percentage of first case on time (FCOT%) were compared before and
after the intervention. Patient profiles including age, sex, and BMI where tracked
to account for confounding variables. Student’s t-test was used to compare variables
before and after intervention. F- test was used to compare variance before and after
intervention. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Result(s): No statistically significant difference was seen in the age, sex or BMI of patient
population before and after intervention (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant
20% increase in WCV from 200 to 240, 45% decrease in WMOH from 10.8 hours to 4.9 hours
and 25% increase in monthly FCOT% from 50% to 75% (p<0.01). Conclusion(s): Our workflow intervention resulted in better WCV, WMOH and FCOT%. Improved workflow
efficiency is critical in the success of an interventional radiology department, and
results in better patient care and overall patient satisfaction.
