Key words conventional radiography - CT - MR-imaging - trauma - scaphoid fracture
Epidemiology and Problems
Epidemiology and Problems
Scaphoid fractures are the most common injuries to the wrist, accounting for approximately
70 % of hand injuries. Even today they are overlooked or diagnosed only after development
of scaphoid pseudarthrosis. The reasons for this can vary. The patient can minimalize
the hand injury and not bother to get medical advice, or therapy is inadequate despite
a proper diagnosis. A scaphoid fracture can only be properly detected based on symptoms
and clinical examination (“snuff box” tenderness, compression pain at the base of
the thumb). However, diagnosis has only 85 % sensitivity and a 40 % specificity [1 ]. The finding of the physical examination should be largely indicative of the need
for radiological diagnosis which should be carried out as early as possible.
Based on experience, a scaphoid fracture is frequently not detected during the first
medical consultation because initial imaging was limited to a projection radiograph,
and a definitive diagnosis was not forthcoming. But subsequent diagnosis using CT
and MRI examination may obscure the proper diagnosis if the clinical indication is
insufficiently focused or cross-sectional diagnosis was performed using acquisition
parameters that did not take into account the particular anatomy of the scaphoid.
The following overview is essentially based on the diagnostic section of the currently
approved AMWF-S3 Guideline “Scaphoid Fracture” [2 ] and provides commentary on its contents.
Scaphoid Anatomy
Orientation
The scaphoid extends in two directions, and is oriented radially approx. 45 degrees
in the coronal plane and approx. 45 degrees in the palmar direction in the sagittal
plane. Due to its oblique orientation in the region, the radiological length of the
scaphoid is attenuated accordingly in the dorsopalmar and lateral projection planes
([Fig. 1 ]).
Fig. 1 a Scaphoid topography within the carpus as seen in CT images. 3 D VRT image with dorsal
view of the carpus. The longitudinal axes are delineated by the radius and scaphoid.
b 3 D VRT image with radial view of the carpus The longitudinal axes are delineated
by the radius and scaphoid. c Coronal MPR image through the carpus. The scaphoid appears shortened. Longitudinal
axes are delineated by the radius and scaphoid. d Sagittal MPR image at scaphoid height. This appears shortened. Longitudinal axes
are delineated by the radius and scaphoid. e Oblique coronal MPR image parallel to longitudinal axis of the scaphoid. Compare
the full extension of the scaphoid with Fig. 1c. f Oblique sagittal MPR image parallel to longitudinal axis of the scaphoid. Compare
the full extension of the scaphoid with Fig. 1 d .
Surface
Since the scaphoid articulates with five partners (radius, capitate, lunate, trapezoid
and trapezium), it is covered 90 % by cartilage, with only the tubercle and a dorsal
bony ridge being exposed. Due to the wide cartilage covering and resulting absent
open periosteum there is no appreciable formation of periosteal callus when the fracture
heals.
Vascularization
The scaphoid is supplied by vessels of the radial artery entering distally via a dorsal
bony ridge into the scaphoid bone, then distributed to the waist and distal bone segments.
Thus the waist and distal scaphoid bone segments have a sufficient blood supply, whereas
the proximal portion as a final route is supplied via an intraosseous collateral network,
thus representing a vascular terminal zone. The retrograde blood flow has an important
influence on the healing of scaphoid fractures. In the case of proximal fractures,
the intraosseous vascular network can be critically interrupted, and the proximal
pole can develop nutritive deficiency with hypoxia. In proximal scaphoid fractures,
the thus disturbed vitality can frequently lead to pseudarthosis and osteonecrosis
of the proximal fragment.
Scaphoid Fracture Biomechanics
Scaphoid Fracture Biomechanics
Force vectors
The following pathoanatomical mechanisms can underlie scaphoid fracture.
Generally there has been a fall onto the outstretched hand, and the extended scaphoid
bone is caught between the ground surface and the dorsal edge of the radius (proximal
scaphoid section in a fixed position between the radius and the radioscaphocapitate
ligament, unprotected distal scaphoid). Anatomy of the joint and the force vector
in the combined extension radialduction result in a distal scaphoid fracture, whereas
a combined flexion ulnarduction causes a proximal fracture.
The less frequent fall upon the flexed hand generally results in a shear fracture
of the tubercle of the scaphoid bone.
A high-velocity injury to the wrist can result in a complex luxation fracture including
scaphoid fracture, e. g. trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation.
In rare cases scaphoid fracture is associated with a distal fracture of the radius.
Fracture localization
For purposes of localization, the scaphoid bone is divided topographically into three
parts [3 ]. Scaphoid fractures occur more frequently in the waist (60 %), whereas the proximal
and distal thirds account for about 15 % each. The remaining 10 % concern fractures
of the extra-articular tubercle of the scaphoid bone.
Fragment dislocation
Two forms of dislocation are characteristic of scaphoid fractures.
The first is the so-called “humpback” deformity due to the curved shape and palmar
alignment of the scaphoid, whereby the distal scaphoid fragment tends toward further
palmar tilting and the proximal fragment is pulled into extension. The buckled angular
deformity leads to increased pressure load on the palmar fracture segment. The consequence
is increased bone resorption with further development of the existing humpback deformation
[4 ].
The second form is adlatus dislocation frequently occurring with fractures of the
proximal scaphoid pole. In this case, the fracture line runs parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the forearm, thereby subjecting the proximal fragment to increased rotational
load.
The humpback dislocation is in the waist of the scaphoid bone, the lateral dislocation
in the proximal third.
Classification and Stability
Classification and Stability
The descriptive classification according to Russe [3 ] distinguishes between horizontally-oblique fractures and those that are transverse
or vertically oblique. In the AO classification, scaphoid fractures are distinguished
as type C1 (ligament avulsion), potentially unstable type C2 (horizontal, transverse
and oblique fractures) and unstable type C3 (vertical or multiple fragment fractures).
From the therapeutic viewpoint, the fracture classification according to Herbert and
Fischer [5 ], based on conventional projection radiography, and its modification by Krimmer,
Schmitt and Herbert [6 ] have achieved prominence ([Table 1, ]
[Fig. 2 ]), the latter being based on image analysis of anatomically-oriented CT thin slices.
A distinction is made between stable (types A1 and A2) and unstable (types B1 through
B4) scaphoid fractures. Classification of a scaphoid fracture should preferably be
based on computed tomography, since all its fracture-related parameters (localization,
course, dislocation, instability) can be assessed with greater certainty.
Table 1
Scaphoid fracture classification according to Herbert and Fischer (1984) as well as
Krimmer, Schmitt und Herbert (2000).
type
stability
fracture localization and morphology
therapy
A1
stable
fracture of the tubercle of the scaphoid bone
immobilization
A2
stable
non-dislocated transverse fracture in waist and distal third
immobilization or surgery[1 ]
B1
unstable
extended oblique fractures
surgery
B2
unstable
all dislocated or gaping transverse fractures
surgery
B3
unstable
all fractures of the proximal third
surgery
B4
unstable
transscaphoidal perilunate luxation fractures
surgery
1 A2 fractures can also be surgically treated in order to shorten immobilization.
Fig. 2 Scaphoid fracture classification according to Herbert and Fischer (1984) as well
as Krimmer, Schmitt and Herbert (2000). A distinction is made between stable (types
A1 and A2) and unstable (types B1 through B4) fractures. The details are explained
in the test and in Table 1.
Types A1 and A2 stable scaphoid fractures undergoing conservative therapy have a high
chance of healing regardless whether the course of the fracture is complete or partial.
Unstable scaphoid fractures have reduced healing potential, and thus an increased
risk of developing pseudarthosis. Types B1 and B2 fractures generally exhibit fragment
dislocation greater than 1 mm or fragmentation zones, whereby healing depends on the
degree of dislocation. The likelihood of healing significantly decreases when the
fracture gap is 2 mm or wider [7 ]. In principle, all fractures in the proximal third (type B3) are considered unstable,
independent of the degree of dislocation, due to their critical perfusion situation
and increased rotational load. This likewise applies to scaphoid fractures with accompanying
perilunate luxation fracture (type B4). In the case of unstable scaphoid fractures
(location in proximal third, fracture dislocation, fragmentation zone), surgical therapy
(closed or open screw fixation, palmar or dorsal access path) can be precisely planned.
If immobilization or minimal osteosynthesis does not consolidate a scaphoid fracture
within 8 weeks, the situations should not be considered delayed union. It should instead
be assessed as scaphoid pseudarthrosis and treated as such.
Radiological Diagnosis
Projection radiography
When a fracture is suspected, projection radiography is first performed as a basic
diagnosis of the wrist.
Technique
The standard procedure is to obtain three defined projections on the wrist without
either a cast or splint.
Maintaining a neutral position is important for the dorsopalmar and lateral image.
The dorsopalmar image must be obtained at shoulder height with abduction of the upper
arm and elbow flexion each at 90°. For the lateral image, the upper arm is moved toward
the trunk and the elbow is bent 90°.
The so-called Stecher's view is obtained in a dorsopalmar projection with closed fist
and ulnar deviation. The purpose of this projection is film-parallel alignment of
the palmar-facing scaphoid in its entire longitudinal extension [8 ].
Free exposure employs an image voltage of 48 to 55 kV and tube current of 4 to 5 mA.
If CT or MRI diagnosis can be ensured, the earlier scaphoid quartet series (images
with closed fist and ulnar deviation, 45° semi-pronated, extended and in hyperpronation)
can be omitted.
Findings
The projection radiographs of a scaphoid fracture can contain the following indications.
In a pseudo-normal finding the X-ray image appears unremarkable if the fragments have
readapted exactly to their original position due to restoring forces or if a discrete
fragment offset is not recognizable in the projections. Despite the fracture, the
cortex appears attached on all sides and the trabecular network seems to be intact.
False-negative findings account for 15 – 30 % of projection radiographs [9 ].
The scaphoid fat stripe sign is an indirect and unreliable fracture criterion. Physiologically
a 1 mm wide transparent fat stripe runs between radial collateral ligament and the
tendon of the extensor pollicis brevis muscle. In scaphoid fractures, hemarthrosis
can result in a shift or obliteration of the fat stripe.
A certain fracture exists if a fracture line with interruption of the cortex and trabecula
is visible ([Fig. 3 ]) or if the scaphoid exhibits a change in shape as a result of fragment dislocation.
A scaphoid fracture is characterized both by a humpback deformation in which the proximal
fragment rotates during extension and the distal fragment turns during flexion, as
well as misalignment of a fragment in the case of proximal fractures.
In a perilunate injury pattern a scaphoid fracture can be combined with other wrist
fractures and luxations, frequently along the greater arc running through the radial
styloid process, the scaphoid, the capitate, the hamatum or triquetum, as well as
the ulnar styloid process.
Fig. 3 a Projection radiograph of a scaphoid fracture. Initial presentation of a 26-year-old
football player 10 days after a fall. a Dorsopalmar projection with suspicion of fracture in the scaphoid waist. b Lateral projection unremarkable. Normal joint arrangement of scaphoid with central
carpal pillar. c Stecher projection with distinct oblique fracture in scaphoid waist (fracture type
B2).
Evaluation
In almost a third of scaphoid fractures, projection radiography provides uncertain
or false-negative findings when confirming fracture, i. e. the fracture is not apparent
in the X-ray image. Furthermore, diagnostic radiology allows only insufficient determination
of fragment dislocation. Finally, a secondary cross-sectional image should be undertaken
for the purpose of
confirmation of fracture if conventional X-ray projections are suspicious, and
fracture staging if a fracture has been ascertained.
Early utilization of cross-sectional imaging shortens the time to diagnosis and eliminates
the previous repeated X-ray after 2 weeks as well as bone scintigraphy.
Computed Tomography
CT is the imaging method of choice for demonstrating the bone structure of the scaphoid.
Technique
Due to the size range of the scaphoid, from 24 mm to 28 mm, the following parameters
are used for CT of the bone: field of view (FOV) 50 mm to 60 mm, acquired (or calculated
slice thickness 0.5 mm or 0.6 mm (always smaller than 1 mm), high-resolution ossification
center in image calculation and overlapping image reconstruction (increment less than
70 %).
Representation of the scaphoid in its entire length in oblique-coronal and oblique-sagittal
slices are important for the topographic diagnosis of the fracture and operation planning.
Two procedures are possible, depending of the equipment [10 ]
[11 ].
Using the latest generation of high-end CT scanners, a volume data set of the entire
carpus can be acquired by means of isotropic voxel sizes (slice thickness 0.4 to 0.6 mm,
image matrix 1024x1024, voxel edge length of 0.5 mm or less). During subsequent postprocessing,
oblique-coronal and oblique-sagittal thin slices through the scaphoid are calculated
with the same slice thickness using multiplane reconstruction (MPR).
When using older CT scanners with poorer imaging geometry allowing only anisotropic
voxel sizes, the best detail of the scaphoid is represented via primary acquisition
of oblique-sagittal slices parallel to the longitudinal axis. Perpendicular to this,
multiplane reconstruction is subsequently used to calculate oblique-coronal images.
The patient is placed on the examination table in prone position with the arm above
the head (“Superman” position) so that the lower arm is positioned 45° to the longitudinal
direction of the table and the hand is placed in pronation. The thumb is abducted,
thus parallel to the gantry laser. After a coronal planning image, oblique-sagittal
primary slices are acquired parallel to the longitudinal axis of the scaphoid (voltage
100 kV or 120 kV, current strength 100 mA to 150 mA).
Findings
Unlike conventional radiography which projects the entire carpal volume into the imaging
plane as a summation method, thin slices are generated in CT which substantially facilitate
diagnosis of scaphoid fractures due to detailed representation of the scaphoid in
sub-millimeter slices. CT offers the following advantages:
by means of CT the fracture is detected with high sensitivity (85 to 95 %) and specificity
(95 to 100 %) and is thus greater than in projection radiography (sensitivity by 70 %,
specificity 70 % to 85 %) [9 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]. Cortical and trabecular disruptions are sensitively demonstrated in CT ([Fig. 4 ]). A fracture gap or trabecular impaction has to be visible in several adjoining
slices [7 ]
[14 ]
[15 ]. If, however, there is no dislocation of the compact and spongy bone, the fracture
cannot be detected, even using CT [16 ]. In the rare case that MRI is used to detect or exclude fracture, its sensitivity
is 100 % (“no fracture missed”), but its specificity – 80 to 90 % – is lower than
CT [17 ].
Fragment dislocation can be precisely ascertained with CT, in particular with respect
to small cortical fragments and multiple-fragment fractures [11 ]
[18 ]. The extent of axis buckling of humpback dislocation can only be determined exactly
using oblique-sagittal CT ([Fig. 4 d ]). Likewise, CT better displays adlatus dislocation of fractures on the proximal
scaphoid pole.
Utilization of CT is decisive in assessing fracture stability. Instability criteria
include: a) fracture dislocation in the proximal third, b) adlatus displacement of
a fragment larger than 1 mm c) humpback dislocations as well as d) scaphoid fracture
in conjunction with perilunate luxation damage.
Concomitant carpal fractures, even in the form of perilunate damage patterns, are
more frequently revealed in CT compared to projection radiography if the entire carpus
lies in the CT examination volume.
Fracture consolidation: A periosteal callus does not form when a scaphoid fracture
heals. CT allows an exact view of the sub-millimeter anatomy of the fracture gap where
endosteal bone regeneration exclusively occurs [7 ]
[15 ]
[19 ]. In the first 4 weeks there is physiological descaling on the fragment margins,
making the gap appear widened. Afterward remineralization sets in, followed by fine
bony bridges in the fracture gap. Starting with the 6th week the bridges are visible
in CT; they largely cover the gap by the 9th week. Bony regeneration of the fracture
is underway if bridging bones are evident in at least 8 adjacent slices with 0.5 mm
thickness (corresponding to 5 layers that are 0.75 mm thick) ([Fig. 5 ]). Even after complete union. trough-shaped depressions remain on the periphery.
CT can demonstrate normal or absent union with certainty.
Postoperative status can be well documented using CT, since the HBS® or Accutrac® screws create few artifacts [20 ], as they result in a narrow hardening zone at the edge of the screw, whereas large
sections of the fracture zone can be evaluated without restriction. Improperly positioned
screws are more easily identified using CT compared to projection radiography.
Fig. 4 a Compilation of scaphoid fractures according to the classification of Herbert and
Fischer (1984) as well as Krimmer, Schmitt and Herbert (2000). Oblique-sagittal CT
images of 6 different patients are shown. a Scaphoid fracture in distal third, 3 weeks old (fracture type A1). b Non-dislocated transverse fracture in waist (fracture type A2). c Non-dislocated oblique fracture in waist (fracture type B1). Small palmar cortical
fragment. d Slightly dislocated transverse fracture in waist (fracture type B2). The fracture
gap gapes dorsally with minimum humpback deformity. e Non-dislocated transverse fracture in proximal third (fracture type B3). 3 mm-long
fragment already with margin resorption of 2-week-old fracture. f Non-dislocated transverse fracture in waist in combination with distal fracture of
the radius with intra-articular course (fracture type B4).
Fig. 5 a Healing of conservatively treated scaphoid fracture (type A2). With oblique-sagittal
CT images. a Finding 1 week post-trauma. b Finding after 5 weeks with margin resorption. c Finding after 10 weeks with initial bony bridges. d Finding after 20 weeks with complete union. From: Schmitt R, Krimmer H. Skaphoidfrakturen.
In: Schmitt R, Lanz U. Bildgebende Diagnostik der Hand. 3 rd edition. Thieme. Stuttgart
2004: 283 – 296.
Evaluation
In cases of clinical suspicion and unremarkable X-ray findings, CT is well-suited
to detect fractures. CT has a lower sensitivity compared to MRI when detecting fracture,
but it has a higher specificity, particularly with respect to cortical fractures.
For scaphoid fractures, CT is the imaging method of choice in pre-therapeutic fracture
staging (extent, stability and classification of the fracture). Therefore CT should
be employed for detection and well as staging of acute scaphoid fractures. In case
of questions regarding healing, CT significantly contributes to definitive clarification.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Flux densities of 1.5 Tesla or 3.0 Tesla and a gradient field strength greater than
15mT/m are required for diagnosis of the hand. The strength of MRI lies in detection
of bone marrow edema which is detectable in fractures on the scaphoid with a sensitivity
of about 100 % [12 ]
[13 ].
Technique
In order to perform an MRI of the scaphoid, the hand is positioned either using the
“in-center” technique in which the hand is placed above the patient in the prone position
(“Superman” position) or using the “off-center” technique with the patient in supine
position, with the hand placed sagittal next to the hip. Dedicated phased-array multichannel
coils (8-, 16- or 32-channel coils) are recommended to take advantage of parallel
imaging. Alternatives are wrap-around coils and sandwich coils. Data acquisition employs
a high-resolution coil to provide a field of view of 80 mm to 100 mm and a slice thickness
of 2.0 mm or 1.5 mm without slice gaps (interleaved technique). In addition to the
orthogonal standard planes, the scaphoid should be imaged in at least one sequence
parallel to its length, i. e. in oblique-sagittal and or oblique-coronal orientation
[11 ].
Two types of sequences with fat tissue suppression can be used to show marrow edema:
frequency-selective (spectrally) saturated TSE sequences with medium repetition time
(PD weighting) or longer repetition time (T2 weighting), and
the STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery) sequence which physically represents T1 weighting,
but in the diagnosis based on the image impression appears as “T2-like”.
In both sequence types, the edema appears hyperintense compared to the fat-suppressed
and therefore hypointense bone marrow.
A contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted sequence without fat saturation can be used to try
to display the hypointense fracture as highly-contrasted compared to the marrow with
slightly-raised signal intensity. In addition, intravenous administration of contrast
medium facilitates detection of collateral damage to the adjoining scapholunate ligament
using focal enhancement.
Findings
The hyperintense bone marrow edema is a sensitive but unspecific sign of fracture
to the scaphoid bone [12 ]
[13 ]. A distinction must be made among three post-injury situations with similar edema
patterns, but with different therapeutic consequences.
Post-traumatic diffuse edema without indication of a fine, generally hypointense fracture
line or a gaping fracture represents a bone bruise to the scaphoid [16 ]
[18 ]. A bone bruise is a microtrabecular infraction without destabilizing discontinuity.
A demonstrative guiding symptom of scaphoid fracture is a combination of bone marrow
edema and a long fracture line running through the scaphoid [18 ]
[21 ]. In a non-dislocated fracture, the fracture line is hypointense in T1 and T2 weighting;
on the other hand, a fracture gap with articular effusion is hyperintense in T2 weighting.
Bone marrow edema is found in both fragments ([Fig. 6 ]). Scaphoid fracture may not be diagnosed in MRI without evidence of a fracture line
or gap in several adjacent slices.
The disadvantage of MRI compared to CT is its specificity of only 80 to 90 % in the
correlation of a pathological bone marrow signal with a scaphoid fracture or bone
bruise [16 ]
[18 ].
As a consequence of an osteoligamentous avulsion fracture the scaphoid develops a
focal or diffuse bone marrow edema without evidence of a transverse fracture gap. Generally
the dorsally-attached intercarpal dorsal ligament (DICL) is affected. The situation
is biomechanically stable. Display of small avulsion fragments is poorer in MRI compared
to CT [16 ]
[18 ].
Fig. 6 a MRI diagnosis of two scaphoid fractures in conjunction with projection radiography
and CT diagnosis. a –d Scaphoid fracture in the waist (type A2) visible in all imaging procedures. Stecher's
projection a MPR CT image b , oblique-coronal image of a fat-saturated PD-FSE sequence c and oblique-sagittal T1 FSE image d . The fracture gap is recognizable in both MRI images, the associated bone marrow
edema is hyperintense in T2-weighting c and hypointense in T1-weighting d . b MRI diagnosis of two scaphoid fractures in conjunction with projection radiography
and CT diagnosis. a –d Scaphoid fracture in the waist (type A2) visible in all imaging procedures. Stecher's
projection a MPR CT image b , oblique-coronal image of a fat-saturated PD-FSE sequence c and oblique-sagittal T1 FSE image d . The fracture gap is recognizable in both MRI images, the associated bone marrow
edema is hyperintense in T2-weighting c and hypointense in T1-weighting d . c MRI diagnosis of two scaphoid fractures in conjunction with projection radiography
and CT diagnosis. a –d Scaphoid fracture in the waist (type A2) visible in all imaging procedures. Stecher's
projection a MPR CT image b , oblique-coronal image of a fat-saturated PD-FSE sequence c and oblique-sagittal T1 FSE image d . The fracture gap is recognizable in both MRI images, the associated bone marrow
edema is hyperintense in T2-weighting c and hypointense in T1-weighting d . d MRI diagnosis of two scaphoid fractures in conjunction with projection radiography
and CT diagnosis. a –d Scaphoid fracture in the waist (type A2) visible in all imaging procedures. Stecher's
projection a MPR CT image b , oblique-coronal image of a fat-saturated PD-FSE sequence c and oblique-sagittal T1 FSE image d . The fracture gap is recognizable in both MRI images, the associated bone marrow
edema is hyperintense in T2-weighting c and hypointense in T1-weighting d . e e –h Occult (hidden to X-ray and CT) scaphoid fracture in proximal third (type B3). Examinations
on day of accident. Unremarkable dorsopalmar radiograph e . Likewise no fracture in oblique-sagittal CT. f e –h Occult (hidden to X-ray and CT) scaphoid fracture in proximal third (type B3). Examinations
on day of accident. Unremarkable dorsopalmar radiograph e . Likewise no fracture in oblique-sagittal CT. g e –h Occult (hidden to X-ray and CT) scaphoid fracture in proximal third (type B3). Examinations
on day of accident. Unremarkable dorsopalmar radiograph e . Likewise no fracture in oblique-sagittal CT. h e –h Occult (hidden to X-ray and CT) scaphoid fracture in proximal third (type B3). Examinations
on day of accident. Unremarkable dorsopalmar radiograph e . Likewise no fracture in oblique-sagittal CT.
A supplementary CT is recommended to exclude or confirm a scaphoid fracture and to
provide classification if needed if there is planar bone marrow edema and a questionable
fracture gap.
Using a contrast-enhanced MRI, the vitality of a nutritionally vulnerable proximal
scaphoid fragment can be estimated based on the intensity of the contrast enhancement.
There is no therapeutic benefit to predicting the healing of fresh scaphoid fractures
using MRI.
After a scaphoid fracture has consolidated the former fracture zone in the MRI is
highly dependent on the local degree of sclerosis. The fracture region can appear
hyperintense if fatty bone marrow has developed, or hypointense if a sclerotic zone
has formed [19 ]. Because of this, MRI-based diagnosis cannot be used for assessing fracture union
and progression, since signal interference can be associated with both consolidated
and non-consolidated scaphoid fractures.
Evaluation
The possibilities for the use of MRI in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture must be
evaluated differentially. With a sensitivity of 100 %, MRI provides good evidence
of a scaphoid fracture. However its specificity is only 80 to 90 % in differentiating
a fracture from a bone bruise and cortical avulsion injury. Therefore MRI should be
employed to rule out a fracture, if despite clinical suspicion of a fracture, the
projection radiographic findings and CT are negative or uncertain, thus MRI serves
as a “referee” in such cases. Irrespective of MRI findings, CT is the imaging method
of choice for the determination of bone-related morphology, classification and stability
of scaphoid fractures. MRI has only limited applicability in planning therapy and
assessing bone healing.
Bone Scintigraphy
Using hotspots, 99 m technetium MDP three-phase scintigraphy can confirm scaphoid fractures. The utilization
of three-phase scintigraphy is supported by the high negative predictive value after
the third day post-injury, the high positive predictive value in the case of patients
with an initial negative X-ray finding and simultaneous evidence of injury to the
remaining bones of the hand [13 ]
[17 ]
[22 ]. Due to its poor spatial resolution and low specificity, positive findings in scintigraphy
must always be supplemented by a subsequent CT and/or MRI diagnosis. Bone scintigraphy
is no longer recommended for diagnosing fresh scaphoid fractures, as its application
is very limited due to methodological redundancy and an average radiation exposure
of 3 mSv.
Sonography
Sonographic examination of the scaphoid employs a high-frequency transducer (sound
frequency > 10 MHz) applied to the radial side of the wrist that has been placed in
ulnar deviation. Sonography can detect dislocated fractures of the scaphoid waist
based on cortical disruption and/or parossal hematoma [23 ]. Limitations of the method pertain to the proximal and distal thirds of the scaphoid,
since these are difficult to scan. Non-dislocated fractures are likewise difficult
to detect. Currently sonography is recommended only to be used for position monitoring
of previously identified childhood fractures. Its use requires high expertise in musculoskeletal
ultrasound.
Digital Volume Tomosynthesis (DVT)
In this recently-developed procedure, the tube/detector unit moves in a 180° direction
around the wrist, creating a series of radiographs based on various projections. According
to the literature, the detection rate of scaphoid fractures is better than projection
radiography, but poorer compared to CT [24 ]. The related radiation exposure is in the range of conventional diagnostic radiology.
Therapeutic Methods
The goal of treatment is the restoration of hand function using conservative or surgical
procedures. The selection of therapeutic method is essentially determined by the location,
degree of dislocation and stability of the fracture.
Stable scaphoid fractures as a rule are treated using immobilization for 4 weeks (type
A1) or 6 to 8 weeks (type A2) using a plaster (plastic) cast on the lower arm. To
shorten the immobilization time, stable scaphoid waist fractures (type A2) can also
be treated using percutaneous screw fixation.
Unstable scaphoid fractures are treated surgically with cannulated double-threaded
(HBS® ) screws or headless compressions screws (Accutrac® ), frequently 22 mm in length. Both screw types achieve the same therapeutic result.
Open reduction is necessary in cases of dislocated scaphoid fractures via dorsal access
to proximal fractures (type B3) or via expanded palmar access in the case of types
B1, B2 and B4 dislocated fractures. Four-week post-surgical immobilization is required
for B1 and B2 fractures. B3 and B4 fractures require 6 weeks of immobilization followed
by functional treatment for an additional 4 weeks.
Diagnostic Algorithm
The chronology of the treatment of scaphoid fractures includes the following diagnostic
stages:
Primary Diagnosis
Detection and staging of a scaphoid fracture should be undertaken shortly after occurrence
of the injury. To avoid re-examination, cross-sectional imaging should be performed
as early as possible. CT evaluation of a perilunate luxation fracture is useful in
an emergency situation; however further diagnosis should not cause a delay of required
repositioning of the fracture. Based on an exact clinical examination, the following
radiological sequence of procedures is recommended ([Fig. 7 ]).
Fig. 7 Algorithm for imaging diagnosis of scaphoid fractures according to current S3 guidelines
(AWMF 2015). The staged diagnosis with the sequence of projection radiography, CT
and MRI is explained in detail in the text.
First-choice diagnostic method: Projection radiography, which can be limited to three
standardized images (dorsopalmar, lateral and Stecher projections) allows an initial
overview of the distal lower arm, the wrist and metacarpus.
Second-choice diagnostic method: CT is used for primary diagnosis to detect a scaphoid
fracture, support staging (fracture location, fragment dislocation, stability) and
aid in fracture classification. The submillimeter oblique-coronal and oblique-sagittal
CT slices are ultimately needed for treatment planning of every scaphoid fracture.
If an accompanying carpal fracture is suspected, the CT examination volume also includes
the entire wrist.
Third-choice diagnostic method: Since it is the most sensitive detection method, MRI
should be utilized if projection radiography and CT fail to detect a fracture and
cannot clarify the clinical symptoms of the radial wrist.
Intraoperative Diagnosis
Surgical fragment repositioning and screw fixation are guided with fluoroscopy using
a C-arm system. It is recommended that the three standard projections be preferably
employed for fragment position control and monitoring of the screw fixation procedure.
To document the surgical results, intraoperative fluoroscopic images can be acquired
in the dorsopalmar, lateral and Stecher projection and subsequently stored in the
clinic’s PACS archive. Alternatively, documentation of the results can be obtained
on the same or following day in the Radiology department using standardized projection
radiographs without a cast. X-rays obtained immediately post-surgery are important
because they represent the base documentation for the assessment of the continued
healing process. An early CT control is indicated only in cases of uncertain fragment
position and/or implant position.
Diagnosis of the Union
The evaluation of fracture union is based on both the general laws of the chronology
and biology of fracture healing (stages of bone resorption, mesenchymal regeneration,
formation of woven bone and transformation in lamellar bones), as well as on the fact
that periosteal callus generally develops on the scaphoid after screw implantation.
After the cast is removed, evaluation of fracture healing should be based primarily
on the three projection radiographs. The following are useful time points for diagnostic
radiology:
termination of immobilization (4 to 8 weeks depending on fracture type), and
approval for full load bearing on the joint.
If fracture healing cannot be assessed with certainty, a supplemental CT should be
performed after the 9th week after the injury or operation at the earliest [15 ]. If healing has not taken place, bone graft should be considered as in the case
of scaphoid pseudarthrosis.
Diagnosing Complications
In the long term after treatment of the fracture, scaphoid pseudarthrosis can result
in 4 to 11 % of fractures with or without proximal osteonecrosis as well as carpal
arthrosis. Proximal, primary dislocated and unstable scaphoid fractures as well as
fractures with additional concomitant carpal injuries have a poor prognosis. Following
are primary diagnostic recommendations for post-treatment follow-up of an earlier
scaphoid fracture as well as diagnosis of an older, non-primarily diagnosed fracture.
Delayed or absent post-fracture union is best determined in CT based on bridging bony
structures. These are insufficiently observed in MRI. Scaphoid pseudarthrosis is presumed
without time restrictions if resorption cysts develop within the fragments in the
vicinity of the pseudarthosis gap [19 ].
The most serious complication of a scaphoid fracture is the formation of pseudarthosis
[25 ], the consequence of which is regular periscaphoid osteoarthritis, followed by carpal
structural breakdown with a loss of carpus height as well as radio- and mediocarpal
osteoarthritis (so-called SNAC wrist – Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse). The cause
of the phased development is loss of the stabilizing effect of the scaphoid, which
after development of unstable pseudarthosis is no longer able to maintain the level
between the proximal and carpal row. Carpal collapse (SNAC wrist) has three severity
levels: SNAC 1 with focal arthrosis on the radial styloid process; SNAC 2 with arthrosis
of the entire radioscaphoid compartment; and SNAC 3 after transition to mediocarpal
arthritis [26 ]. In order to grade arthrosis in the case of carpal collapse, the entire wrist must
be acquired in the projection radiographs and imaging procedures [11 ].
