Key words
thyrotropin - insulin resistance - obesity - metabolism
Introduction
Subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) is a worldwide health problem and its prevalence is
increasing all over the world especially in the patients with obesity and nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease (NAFLD). SH is characterized by mildly increased thyroid stimulating
hormone (TSH) (typically 5–10 mU/l) with normal free thyroxine (FT4) and free triodothyronine
(FT3) levels. In most cases, increased TSH levels result from overt hypothyroidism
[1]. Peripheral and central mechanism regulate T3 homeostasis together in human [2]. Cut-off of circulating TSH value above 2.5 mIU/l has also been proposed for defining
SH [3]
[4]. There is a positive association between body mass index and increased TSH levels
[5]. However, the causal relationship between obesity and SH is not fully understood
[6].
Previous studies have shown that SH has negative metabolic effects on the affected
patients [7]. SH is related to a variety of metabolic abnormalities such as increased body mass
index and abnormal lipoprotein profiles [8]. Each unit increase in TSH was associated with a 3% increase in the odds of prevalent
metabolic syndrome [9]. Additionally, cardiac structural and functional deteriorations are associated with
SH in obese patients [10]. Clinical and the subclinical manifest forms of thyroid dysfunctions are associated
with an increased risk to develop atrial fibrillation and obesity (RR=2.21) is one
of the main risk factors that led to atrial fibrillation among the patients with SH
[11]. A previous study found that SH is a secondary phenomenon to the abnormal fat accumulation
and redistributions and not a real hypothyroid state in morbidly obese subjects, as
SH is usually corrected after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese
patients [12]. Previous studies also have shown that dyslipidemia in the high-normal TSH group
was more serious than the lower-normal TSH group [13].
However, it remains unknown to find out the difference of metabolic characteristics
in obese patients with normal TSH and mild increased TSH, which we have named as mild
thyroid hormone deficiency or compensatory hypothyroidism. In the present study, 219
obese patients were enrolled to investigate the different patterns of metabolic profiles
with normal TSH and mild increased TSH.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
This cross-sectional study enrolled 219 obese Chinese patients from the outpatient
department of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital aged between 18–60 years old with body
mass index (BMI) over 28 kg/m2. All the subjects signed the informed consent. The patients were divided into 2 groups:
101 obese patients with normal TSH and 118 patients with mild increased TSH, which
we have named as compensatory hypothyroidism or mild thyroid hormone deficiency. Both
groups were matched for age and BMI. Patients with normal TSH were defined in this
study as a TSH level ranging from 0.35 to 2.5 mU/l and a normal free-thyroxine level.
Mild increased TSH was defined in this study as a TSH level ranging from 2.5 to 5.5 mU/l
with a normal free-thyroxine level [3]
[4]. This study and research protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai
Tenth People’s Hospital. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Patients having
a history of thyroid disease under thyroxine or antithyroid drugs treatment; 2) Patients
taking medications affecting thyroid function; and 3) Patients with overt hyperthyroidism
or overt hypothyroidism.
Anthropometric measurement
Weight, BMI, percentage of body fat (%), visceral fat fraction, and basal metabolism
(BM) were measured by Omron HBF-358 (Q40102010L01322F, Japan) with the subjects wearing
light clothes and without shoes. Waist circumstances (WC) was measured at the midway
between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest with the subjects standing with their
feet 25–30 cm apart, and without undue pressure applied to the measuring tape. Neck
circumference (NC) was measured with head upright and eyes facing forward, horizontally
at the upper margin of laryngeal prominence. Hip circumstance (HC) was measured at
the fullest point around the buttocks by a specialized personnel. Waist/hip ratio
was calculated with the following formula: Waist/hip ratio=waistline (cm)/hipline
(cm). Blood pressure was measured by a mercury-gravity sphygmomanometer after the
patients have rested for 10 min in a sitting position. All the anthropometric data
were measured twice and their average value was adopted for analysis.
Laboratory measurementws
Blood samples were obtained after overnight fasting of 8–10 h for the measurements
of FT3, FT4, total thyroxine (TT3), total triiodothyronine (TT4), TSH, alanine transaminase
(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), fasting plasma glucose(FPG), fasting insulin
(FINS), fasting C peptide (CP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride
(TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL-C), C reactive protein (CRP), free fatty acids (FFA), uric acid (UA), and 25-hydroxyvitamin
D. The Homoeostasis Model of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score was calculated to
estimate the level of insulin resistance using the following formula: HOMA-IR=FPG
(mol/l)×FINS (μU/ml)/22.5. Static parameter for the function of pituitary was evaluated
by Jostel’s TSH index (TSHI) with an accurate estimate of the severity of pituitary
dysfunction with the following formula: TSHI=logTSH+0.1345×FT4 [14]. Standard TSH index (sTSHI) also was calculated to assess the pituitary thyrotroph
function. It was defined as sTSHI=(TSH–2.70)/0.676 [14]. The function of thyroid secretory was evaluated as thyroid’s secretory capacity
(GT), which was calculated as GT=[βT×(DT+TSH)×TT4]/αT×TSH [15]. The function of deiodination was evaluated by deiodinase sum activity (GD), which
was calculated as GD=[β31×(KM1+FT4)×TT3]/α31×FT4 [15]. Constants in these formulas were as following: βT=1.1×10−6/s, DT=2.75 mU/l, αT=0.1/l, β31=8×10−6/s, KM1=KM1 5×10−7 mol/l, and α31=0.026/l [15].
Body fat content and distribution measurements
Body fat content and its composition were measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry
(DEXA) (Hologic QDR4500, USA). DEXA data included fat mass in different areas (limbs,
trunk, trunk, head and total fat mass, total lean mass, total fat mass%, and trunk/limbs
ratio).
Definition of dyslipidemia, impaired fasting glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia and
hyperuricemia
High TG was defined as fasting plasma TG≥1.7 mmol/l, low HDL-C was defined as fasting
HDL-C<1.04 mmol/l, high LDL-C was defined as LDL-C≥3.37 mmol/l, and high TC was defined
as TCH≥5.18 mmol/l [16]. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined as fasting plasma glucose level ranging
from 6.1 mmol/l to 6.9 mmol/l [17]. Hyperinsulinemia was defined as fasting plasma insulin concentrations≥15 mU/l [18]. Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid concentration≥7 mg/dl (≥ 417 μmol/l)
and ≥ 6 mg/dl (≥ 357 μmol/l) in men and women, respectively [19].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software. All continuous data were
expressed as means±standard deviation (SD). The comparison between the 2 groups was
analyzed by independent-samples t-test. The correlation between serum TSH and metabolic variables was assessed using
Pearson’s correlation analysis. Comparison of the count data was performed by χ2 test. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Anthropometric measurements and glucose metabolism between the 2 groups
The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in [Table 1]. Age and BMI well matched obese patients complicated by increased TSH or normal
TST were included. The levels of FINS were significantly higher in the obesity with
mild increased TSH group than in the obesity with normal TSH group (29.35±16.61 vs.
22.93±12.93 μU/l, p=0.003).The levels of FPG were significantly lower in the obesity
with mild increased TSH group when compared to the obesity with normal TSH group (5.53±2.01
vs. 6.17±2.39 mmol/l, p=0.044). However, there was no significant difference in NC,
WC, HC, waist/hip ratio, percentage of body fat, visceral fat fraction, BM, diastolic
blood pressure (DBP), systolic pressure (SBP), CP, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c (p>0.05). The
WC, HC, waist/hip ratio, percentage of body fat, CP, and HOMA-IR were slightly higher
in the obesity with mild increased TSH group without significant difference (p>0.05).
Additionally, SBP, DBP, and HbA1c were slightly lower in the obesity with mild increased
TSH group also without significant difference (p>0.05).
Table 1 Comparison of metabolic profiles of the patients.
|
Obesity+normal TSH
|
Obesity+mild increased TSH
|
p-Value
|
|
Number
|
101
|
118
|
|
M/F
|
40/61
|
33/85
|
0.069
|
|
Age (years)
|
28.56±7.54
|
26.50±9.27
|
0.104
|
|
Weight (kg)
|
90.57±19.23
|
91.73±19.55
|
0.663
|
|
BMI (kg/m2)
|
33.29±10.89
|
33.26±5.59
|
0.979
|
|
NC (cm)
|
39.52±4.62
|
39.12±4.71
|
0.585
|
|
WC (cm)
|
102.38±14.40
|
104.99±13.76
|
0.218
|
|
HC (cm)
|
109.41±9.98
|
111.56±11.05
|
0.177
|
|
Waist/hip ratio
|
0.93±0.08
|
0.94±0.06
|
0.564
|
|
Percentage of body fat (%)
|
34.72±4.87
|
35.00±4.86
|
0.695
|
|
Visceral fat fraction
|
14.44±6.37
|
14.15±6.74
|
0.772
|
|
BM (kcal)
|
1 725.46±296.76
|
1 753.36±315.81
|
0.538
|
|
SBP (mmHg)
|
134.14±19.62
|
129.29±17.26
|
0.154
|
|
DBP (mmHg)
|
85.27±11.40
|
82.07±13.29
|
0.166
|
|
FT3 (pmol/l)
|
4.72±0.67
|
4.90±0.68
|
0.060
|
|
FT4 (pmol/l)
|
15.72±2.24
|
15.71±2.30
|
0.977
|
|
TT3 (nmol/l)
|
1.77±0.49
|
1.94±0.63
|
0.224
|
|
TT4 (nmol/l)
|
114.42±23.38
|
111.88±29.29
|
0.702
|
|
TSH (mU/l)
|
1.42±0.51
|
3.64±1.43
|
<0.001 **
|
|
TSHI
|
2.21±0.43
|
2.65±0.32
|
<0.001 **
|
|
sTSHI
|
−1.72±0.61
|
1.30±0.97
|
<0.001 **
|
|
GT (pmol/s)
|
3.40±0.80
|
2.24±0.65
|
<0.001 **
|
|
GD (nmol/s)
|
18.04±4.96
|
18.97±6.03
|
0.539
|
|
ALT (U/l)
|
43.04±28.38
|
48.83±39.72
|
0.266
|
|
AST (U/l)
|
30.77±16.95
|
33.85±22.29
|
0.318
|
|
FPG (mmol/l)
|
6.17±2.39
|
5.53±2.01
|
0.044*
|
|
FINS (μU/l)
|
22.93±12.93
|
29.35±16.61
|
0.003 **
|
|
C-peptide(ng/ml)
|
3.77±1.50
|
3.99±1.49
|
0.330
|
|
HOMA-IR
|
6.38±4.35
|
7.28±6.02
|
0.241
|
|
HbA1c (mmol/mol)
|
53.98±25.94
|
46.59±19.06
|
0.198
|
|
TC (mmol/l)
|
5.03±1.71
|
4.79±1.09
|
0.256
|
|
TG (mmol/l)
|
2.16±1.96
|
2.00±1.22
|
0.494
|
|
HDL-C (mmol/l)
|
1.16±0.29
|
1.07±0.19
|
0.024*
|
|
LDL-C (mmol/l)
|
2.83±0.88
|
2.92±0.70
|
0.455
|
|
CRP (mg/l)
|
3.19±2.41
|
4.26±2.50
|
0.008 **
|
|
FFA (mmol/l)
|
0.60±0.23
|
0.63±0.21
|
0.293
|
|
UA (μmol/l)
|
392.05±109.21
|
416.43±110.85
|
0.155
|
|
25-Hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/l)
|
52.58±8.92
|
42.00±12.99
|
0.012*
|
Data are presented as mean±SD; compared with obesity+normal TSH group,*p<0.05, ** p<0.01
Lipid profiles, inflammation, and liver function between the 2 groups
The data of lipid profile, inflammation, and liver function in these subjects are
presented in [Table 1]. Data on liver function showed that there was no significant difference in ALT and
AST between the 2 groups (p>0.05). However, levels of HDL-C were significantly lower
in obesity with mild increased TSH group when compared to the obesity with normal
TSH (1.07±0.19 vs. 1.16±0.29 mmol/l, p=0.024). The lipid profiles of TC, TG, and LDL-C
showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (p>0.05). Additionally, the
levels of CRP were significantly higher in the obesity with mild increased TSH group
than in the obesity with normal TSH group (4.26±2.50 vs. 3.19±2.41 mg/l, p=0.008).
The concentrations of inflammation markers UA and FFA did not differ between both
groups (p>0.05). Additionally, the levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were lower in the
obesity with mild increased TSH group than obesity with normal TSH group with statistical
difference (42.00±12.99 vs. 52.58±8.92 nmol/l, p=0.012). Results of static parameters
for the function of pituitary, thyroid, and deiodinases showed that TSHI and sTSHI
were significantly higher in obesity with mild increased TSH when compared to obesity
with normal TSH (both p<0.001). GT was significantly lower in obesity with mild increased
TSH group when compared to obesity with normal TSH group (p<0.001). Additionally,
GD did not differ between both groups (p>0.05).
Fat distribution
The fat content and its distribution did not differ between both groups (p>0.05).
All these data are shown in [Table 2].
Table 2 Fat content and fat distribution of the patients.
|
Obesity+normal TSH
|
Obesity+mild increased TSH
|
p-Value
|
|
Upperlimb fat mass (g)
|
5 209.54±1 492.79
|
5 621.64±1 471.14
|
0.198
|
|
Lower limb fat mass (g)
|
9 864.86±2 504.47
|
10 073.48±2 798.38
|
0.716
|
|
Limb fat mass (g)
|
15 074.40±3 463.37
|
15 680.16±3 961.03
|
0.452
|
|
Trunk fat mass (g)
|
17 419.82±4 321.45
|
17 373.72±4 580.25
|
0.962
|
|
Trunk fat mass (%)
|
40.72±4.99
|
41.16±5.75
|
0.705
|
|
Head fat mass (g)
|
1 659.68±367.30
|
1 680.13±321.33
|
0.786
|
|
Total fat mass (g)
|
34 148.55±7 323.08
|
34 924.53±7 286.29
|
0.626
|
|
Tota fat mass (%)
|
38.84±5.47
|
39.38±5.11
|
0.642
|
|
Total lean mass (g)
|
50 799.66±11 780.50
|
51 710.93±10 636.37
|
0.727
|
|
Trunk/limb fat mass
|
1.17±0.26
|
1.13±0.30
|
0.474
|
Data are presented as mean±SD; compared with obesity+normal TSH group
Correlation of serum TSH with anthropometric and metabolic variables
In obese patients complicated by mild increased TSH group, serum TSH was significantly
positively associated with ALT, AST, and CP (p<0.05). In obese patients with normal
TSH, serum TSH was significantly positively correlated with UA (p<0.05). In all subjects,
serum TSH was significantly positively correlated with ALT, AST, FINS, CP, CRP, and
UA (p<0.05), but significantly negatively correlated with DBP, FPG and HDL-C (p<0.05).
All the correlation of serum TSH with anthropogical and metabolic variables are presented
in [Table 3].
Table 3 Correlations of serum TSH levels with anthropometric variables, glucose-lipid metabolism,
and fat distribution.
|
Parameters
|
Obesity+normal TSH
|
Obesity+mild increased TSH
|
Total
|
|
r
|
p
|
r
|
p
|
r
|
p
|
|
BMI
|
0.039
|
0.709
|
0.093
|
0.327
|
0.039
|
0.571
|
|
NC
|
0.058
|
0.621
|
0.094
|
0.375
|
0.026
|
0.744
|
|
WC
|
−0.107
|
0.345
|
0.136
|
0.177
|
0.117
|
0.119
|
|
HC
|
−0.042
|
0.711
|
0.074
|
0.462
|
0.105
|
0.162
|
|
Waist/hip ratio
|
−0.128
|
0.259
|
0.125
|
0.216
|
0.069
|
0.360
|
|
SBP
|
0.092
|
0.509
|
0.026
|
0.835
|
−0.068
|
0.464
|
|
DBP
|
0.012
|
0.930
|
−0.201
|
0.109
|
−0.192
|
0.036*
|
|
ALT
|
−0.040
|
0.723
|
0.320
|
0.002 **
|
0.232
|
0.002 **
|
|
AST
|
−0.028
|
0.813
|
0.380
|
<0.001 **
|
0.267
|
0.001 **
|
|
FPG
|
−0.057
|
0.596
|
−0.071
|
0.452
|
−0.142
|
0.043*
|
|
FINS
|
−0.086
|
0.415
|
0.184
|
0.052
|
0.240
|
0.001*
|
|
C-peptide
|
0.006
|
0.955
|
0.227
|
0.028*
|
0.171
|
0.024*
|
|
HOMA-IR
|
−0.152
|
0.158
|
0.144
|
0.135
|
0.126
|
0.078
|
|
HbA1c
|
0.017
|
0.936
|
0.059
|
0.723
|
−0.086
|
0.503
|
|
TC
|
0.077
|
0.487
|
0.016
|
0.876
|
−0.043
|
0.561
|
|
TG
|
0.133
|
0.221
|
0.015
|
0.882
|
−0.006
|
0.933
|
|
HDL-C
|
−0.107
|
0.335
|
−0.013
|
0.901
|
−0.151
|
0.045*
|
|
LDL-C
|
−0.015
|
0.893
|
−0.058
|
0.590
|
0.009
|
0.910
|
|
CRP
|
−0.070
|
0.575
|
0.128
|
0.235
|
0.204
|
0.011*
|
|
FFA
|
−0.089
|
0.421
|
−0.022
|
0.831
|
0.032
|
0.664
|
|
UA
|
0.240
|
0.041*
|
0.196
|
0.055
|
0.210
|
0.006 **
|
|
25-Hydroxyvitamin D
|
−0.221
|
0.489
|
0.247
|
0.308
|
−0.122
|
0.513
|
|
Upperlimb fat mass
|
−0.241
|
0.115
|
−0.032
|
0.840
|
0.045
|
0.682
|
|
Lower limb fat mass
|
−0.026
|
0.869
|
0.167
|
0.289
|
0.102
|
0.352
|
|
Limb fat mass
|
−0.123
|
0.428
|
0.110
|
0.487
|
0.091
|
0.406
|
|
Trunk fat mass
|
−0.135
|
0.381
|
0.022
|
0.891
|
−0.018
|
0.868
|
|
Trunk fat mass%
|
−0.225
|
0.148
|
−0.050
|
0.750
|
−0.031
|
0.774
|
|
Head fat mass
|
−0.108
|
0.489
|
0.101
|
0.525
|
0.042
|
0.703
|
|
Total fat mass
|
−0.145
|
0.355
|
0.152
|
0.335
|
0.079
|
0.470
|
|
Tota fat mass%
|
−0.145
|
0.359
|
−0.063
|
0.689
|
−0.016
|
0.886
|
|
Total lean mass
|
−0.031
|
0.854
|
0.105
|
0.541
|
0.066
|
0.571
|
|
Trunk/limb fat mass
|
0.018
|
0.905
|
−0.117
|
0.462
|
−0.108
|
0.322
|
compared with obesity+normal TSH group,*p<0.05, ** p<0.01
The biochemical features
The prevalence of hyperinsulinemia was significantly higher in mild increased TSH
group when compared to the normal TSH group (p=0.046). However, the prevalence of
high-TC, high-TG low-HDL, high-LDL, and hyperuricemia have no significant difference
between the 2 groups (p>0.05). There were slightly higher prevalence of high-TG, low-HDL,
and high-LDL in mild increased TSH group than the normal TSH group but without significant
difference (p>0.05). All these data are presented in [Table 4].
Table 4 The clinical and biochemical features of the obese patients with lower and higher
TSH.
|
High-TC (%)
|
High-TG (%)
|
Low-HDL (%)
|
High-LDL (%)
|
Hyperuricemia (%)
|
Hyperinsulinemia (%)
|
IFG (%)
|
|
Obesity+normal TSH
|
48.5
|
55.4
|
31.7
|
43.6
|
73.3
|
73
|
42.6
|
|
Obesity+mild increased TSH
|
44.5
|
58
|
36.1
|
47.1
|
75.6
|
84
|
27.7
|
|
p-Value
|
0.556
|
0.705
|
0.488
|
0.604
|
0.688
|
0.046*
|
0.021*
|
Data are presented as n (%); compared with obesity+normal TSH group,*p<0.05
Discussion and Conclusions
Discussion and Conclusions
SH is defined as an elevated TSH associated with normal levels of free thyroxine.
The most common endogenous cause of SH is chronic autoimmune thyroiditis associated
with antithyroid peroxidase antibodies [20]. The prevalence of SH is significantly higher in obese patients than in general
population [21]. Current evidence shows that substantial weight loss results in a decreased TSH
levels, which suggests a causal relationship between obesity and SH is not anticipated
[22]. Demidova et al. [23] reported that abnormally high level of TSH may be a component of metabolic syndrome
(MS) in 60 women with obesity and hypothyroidism. Serum TSH in MS group was higher
as compared to the non-MS group (p<0.05) [24]. The prevalence of SH is also influenced by risk factors like type 2 diabetes (T2DM)
[25]. Patients with hypothyroid dysfunction possess several cardiometabolic risk factors
that include obesity. High TSH level in subclinical hypothyroidism is a risk factor
in atherosclerosis formation [26]. The relatively low thyroid hormone level in obese patients may result in increased
TSH levels. The association between TSH and BMI is related to leptin concentration
in obesity is related to BMI and TSH, indicating the increased TSH in the obesity
is the result of fat mass accumulation and a positive energy-balance [27]. TSH levels within the reference range was positively associated with BMI (p<0.001)
and with the prevalence of obesity (p<0.005) [28]. Overweight also increases risk of thyroid dysfunction in iodine-deficient pregnant
women [29]. Additionally, the compensatory hypothyroidism with higher-normal TSH that has not
yet reached SH diagnostic levels, also showed more severe dyslipidemia than the lower-normal
TSH group [13]. In this study, we compared the metabolic profiles of the obese patients with mild
increased TSH (above 2.5 mIU/l), also defined as SH [3]
[4] to the obese patients with normal TSH. Results showed significant difference in
glucose-lipid metabolism and inflammation state.
In another study, patients with SH had a significantly higher BMI than the controls
(p+< 0.001)[30]. Previous studies showed that TSH levels were significantly higher in obese patients
and were positively correlated with BMI and waistline [10]
[31]
[32]. However, bariatric surgery can improve or normalize thyroid hormone levels as a
mean BMI reduction from 49 to 32 kg/m2 was associated with a reduction in the TSH levels from 4.5 to 1.9 mU/ml [32]. There is also a significant correlation between a TSH decrease and weight loss
in the morbidly obese patients 12 months after bariatric surgery (p= 0.007) [12]. Central obesity is associated with clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism, independent
of age, sex, BMI, and type2 diabetes [33]. However, central obesity parameters of WC, waist/hip ratio, and trunk fat mass%
were slightly higher in obese patients with mild increased TSH. No statistical difference
was noted in this study. Liu et al. [34] explored the relationship between different levels of TSH and blood pressure in
patients with SH with result showing that the hypertension in SH group was significantly
higher than in the euthyroid group. In this study, we compared the blood pressure
between patients of the 2 groups with results showing a slightly lower blood pressure
in the obesity with mild thyroid hormone deficiency. Additionally, the serum TSH levels
were significantly negatively correlated with DBP in all subjects in this study.
Previous study showed that elevated TSH values in obese adolescents with nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were positively correlated with insulin (r=0.607, p=0.001)
and HOMA-IR (r=0.596, p=0.002) [35]. TSH decrease has a significant correlation with glucose and glycated hemoglobin
decrease at 6 months after bariatric surgery in the morbidly obese patients [12]. Our study investigated glucose metabolism in the obesity with mild increased TSH
and normal TSH groups and the results indicated that fasting insulin levels were significantly
higher in the obesity with mild thyroid hormone deficiency and serum TSH was significantly
positively correlated with FINS, which may elaborate the obesity and increased TSH
levels together leading to the hyperinsulinemia and slightly insulin resistance.
SH is a relatively common endocrine disorder accompanied with lipid abnormalities
and is also one of the causes of secondary lipid abnormalities [7]
[36]. Serum TC and TG levels were significantly higher in women with SH and for a while
SH patients have lower levels of HDL-C as compared to euthyroid controls [7]. Additionally, TG levels is significantly higher and HDL-C is lower in SH group
when compared with euthyroid controls (p<0.05) [24]. Elevated TSH values in obese adolescents with NAFLD were positively correlated
with TC (r=0.606, p=0.001), TG (r=0.476, p=0.016) and LDL-C (r=0.461, p=0.004) [35]. TSH has positive correlations with serum TC, TG and LDL-C levels regardless of
sex, age, season, obesity, or menopausal status (all p<0.01) [37]. There is a significant association between TSH decrease and TG and HDL-C reductions
after bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients [12]. Another study showed that the TC, TG and HDL-C levels between SH and euthyroid
subjects were not different [38]. However, the influence of a raised serum TSH on the lipid metabolism in morbid-obese,
compared to nonobese patients, is different [39]. It has been reported that morbid-obese patients with increased serum TSH show lower
serum TC levels (200.8±35.6 vs. 226.9±41.4 mg/dl, p<0.001) and a lower prevalence
of hypercholesterolemia (50.9 vs. 72.7%, p<0.01) than the nonobese patients [39]. In this study, the HDL-C levels were significantly lower in the obesity with mild
increased TSH group than the obesity with normal TSH group. Moreover, serum TSH correlated
negatively with the levels of HDL-C in all subjects. Therefore, correction of dyslipidemia
by levothyroxine supplement in the obesity with mild increased TSH may be effective.
Further study is needed to verify the difference of lipid profiles between obesity
with normal TSH and the obese patients with mild thyroid hormone deficiency and the
therapeutic effect of levothyroxine in improving dyslipidemia in the obesity.
The adipocytes and pre-adipocytes express TSH receptors, responsible for the action
of TSH in fat tissue [40]. Stimulation of brown adipose tissue through thyroid-hormone-mediated pathways has
been proven in previous study to be a promising therapeutic method for obesity [41]. The underlying mechanism of the relationship between TSH and obesity is that TSH
acted as a master regulator of adipogenesis indicating that modification of the AMPK/PPARγ/GPAT3
(glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 3) axis via the TSH receptor might serve as
a potential therapeutic method for obesity [42]. In this study, we investigated the fat content and it distribution in the obese
patients with mild thyroid hormone deficiency and the obese patients with normal TSH.
The results showed no difference in fat content and distribution in these 2 groups.
It may due to the fact that the action of the slightly increased TSH levels in adipocytes
is mild. However, the levels of CRP were significantly higher in obesity with mild
increased TSH group. Additionally, serum TSH was positively correlated with CRP and
UA in all subjects. The results may indicate that the compensatory thyroid insufficiency
may be accompanied with a low-grade inflammatory state.
Previous study showed that vitamin D deficiency is common and has been related to
several non-bone related outcomes that includes insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes
[43]. The results of this study showed that the levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were lower
in the obesity with mild increased TSH group than obesity with normal TSH group with
statistical difference. This indicated that the mild hypothyroidism may exhibit decreased
25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Peripheral FT4 concentrations regulate TSH secretion by negative feedback inhibition
[44]. Therefore, TSH values alone may not be a true measure of hypopituitarism. The TSHI
and sTSHI were calculated to estimate the pituitary-thyrotroph function. The results
showed that TSHI and sTSHI were significantly higher in obesity with mild increased
TSH. That may mean central thyroid hormone signaling is impaired in obesity. Additionally,
a significantly lower GD level was observed in obesity with mild increased TSH group
when compared to obesity with normal TSH group. The reduced GT may afford proof that
exist impaired secretory capacity at the site of the thyroid in obesity. Therefore,
we can infer that a multifactorial mechanism may act in common leading to increased
TSH concentrations in obesity.
The obese patients complicated by mild thyroid hormone deficiency had higher insulin
levels, more serious lipid metabolism, and low-grade inflammation. A multifactorial
mechanism leads to increased TSH concentrations in obesity. The need to infer the
mild increased TSH for improving thyroid function may not only improve the glucose
and lipid metabolism but also reduce the low-grade inflammation in obesity.