Keywords
ARSA - aberrant right subclavian artery - esophageal bleeding - nasogastric tube
Introduction
An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) with retroesophageal course is a common
anomaly of the aortic arch.[1] Erosion of the esophagus due to pressure necrosis from prolonged indwelling objects
(nasogastric tube and metallic stents), radiation therapy, esophageal carcinoma, or
iatrogenic injury lead to the development of a fistula between the ARSA and the esophagus.
Endovascular interventions, such as balloon occlusion, covered stent deployment, and
coil embolization, can be life-saving, as hypovolemic shock precludes surgery in most
patients.
Case Presentation
A 14-year-old girl was referred to a radiology department with sudden onset of massive
hematemesis. She had history of quadriparesis and respiratory failure a month ago
and was reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive for novel
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). She had been intubated 18 days back with placement
of nasogastric tube (NGT) 20 days before the hematemesis episode. Computed tomography
(CT) angiography ([Fig. 1]) showed ARSA with retroesophageal course with active extravasation of contrast into
the esophagus.
Fig. 1
(a) Axial and (b) sagittal CT angiography images showing the retroesophageal aberrant right subclavian
artery (small arrows). Nasogastric tube (larger arrows) and tracheostomy tube with
bulb (asterix) is seen in situ. There is contrast extravasation into the esophagus
(curved arrows). CT, computed tomography.
The selective cannulation of ARSA was done using 5F Vert catheter (Cook Medical, Ireland)
which revealed active, rapid extravasation of contrast into the esophagus, suggesting
ARSA–esophageal fistula ([Fig. 2]). A plan was made to perform a balloon occlusion followed by deployment of an covered
stent across defect. Unfortunately, she went into cardiopulmonary arrest and could
not be revived.
Fig. 2 A digital subtraction angiogram performed in antero-posterior oblique projection
showing the aberrant right subclavian artery (asterix) with arterioesophageal fistula
(larger arrow) and contrast extravasation along the esophagus (curved arrows) close
to nasogastric tube (arrow heads). Left subclavian artery is also visualized in same
image (dashed arrow).
Discussion
The prevalence of an ARSA is 0.5 to 2% in the general population.[1] The occlusion of vasa vasorum of pressure necrosis and erosion of the esophagus
lead to the formation of a fistula with the ARSA.[2] Prolonged endotracheal and/or nasogastric intubation is the most common predisposing
factor for fistula formation. On literature review, we found a total of 17 cases of
aberrant subclavian artery–esophageal fistula in which the prolonged endotracheal
and/or nasogastric intubation has been listed as a causative factor of fistula formation[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] ([Table 1]). The average duration between NGT and endotracheal tube (ET) placement and first
episode of bleeding is of 29 (6–56) and 23 (13–31) days, respectively. In index case,
NGT and ET placements were done 20 and 18 days back, respectively. The steroid use
and secondary infection have also been reported as risk factors for the fistula formation.[7] The index patient did not received steroids in her course in the hospital. The COVID-19
infection has been shown to have more risk of development and rupture of pseudoaneurysms
due to endothelial inflammation.[20] In few cases, initial “alarming” episodes of minimal bleeding have also been reported.[7]
[9]
[10]
[19]
[21]
Table 1
Reported cases of aberrant subclavian artery–esophageal fistula due to prolonged use
of nasogastric or endotracheal tube
Sr. no.
|
Study (year)
|
Age (y)/sex
|
Basic disease
|
ET/tracheostomy duration (d)
|
NGT duration (d)
|
Proposed risk factor for fistula
|
Endovascular treatment
|
Surgical treatment/esophageal ballooning
|
Follow-up
|
Outcome
|
1
|
Livesay et al[4] (1982)
|
25/M
|
Trauma
|
13
|
7
|
Inflated tracheostomy balloon + NGT
|
None
|
Repaired
|
2 weeks
|
Died
|
2
|
Jungck and Püschel[5] (1983)
|
6/M
|
Trauma
|
28
|
42
|
Inflated tracheostomy balloon + NGT
|
None
|
Esophageal balloon
Thoracotomy
|
Same day
|
Died
|
3
|
Belkin et al[6] (1984)
|
27/M
|
Right retromolar carcinoma
|
No
|
56
|
Prolonged NGT
|
None
|
Esophageal balloon
Ligation
|
10 days
|
Died
|
4
|
Edwards et al[7] (1984)
|
36/F
|
Cerebral aneurysm
|
Yes/NA
|
27
|
Prolonged NGT/steroid use/secondary infection
|
None
|
None
|
Same day
|
Died
|
5
|
Gossot et at[8] (1985)
|
72/F
|
Aortic repair
|
30
|
30
|
Prolonged NGT/ET/secondary infection
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Died
|
6
|
Guzzetta et al[9] (1989)
|
4 mo/F
|
Congenital heart disease and its repair
|
28
|
56
|
Prolonged NGT
|
None
|
Ligation
|
14 weeks
|
Died
|
7
|
Ikeda et al[10] (1991)
|
9/M
|
Congenital heart disease
|
Yes/NA
|
Yes/NA
|
Prolonged NGT
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Died
|
8
|
Hirakata et al[11] (1991)
|
55/M
|
Esophagus carcinoma surgery
|
(NA)
|
44
|
Prolonged NGT, Radiation enteritis, surgical trauma
|
Ballooning
|
Ligation
|
NA
|
Survived
|
9
|
Miller et al[12] (1996)
|
11/F
|
Intraventricular bleed
|
14
|
17
|
Prolonged NGT/ET
|
None
|
Esophagus balloon
Ligation
|
2 years
|
Survived
|
10
|
Minyard and Smith[13] (2000)
|
39/F
|
Head trauma
|
NA
|
6
|
NGT
|
None
|
None
|
6 days
|
Died
|
11
|
Feugier et al[14] (2003)
|
24/M
|
Polytrauma
|
31
|
31
|
Prolonged NGT and ET
|
Ballooning
|
Ligation
|
4 month
|
Survived
|
12
|
Chapman et al[15] (2010)
|
34/F
|
NA
|
Yes/NA
|
Yes/NA
|
Prolonged NGT
|
Ballooning
|
Ligation
|
NA
|
Died
|
13
|
Jain et al[16] (2012)
|
57/M
|
Scimitar syndrome
|
18
|
18
|
Prolonged NGT and ET
|
Coiling
|
Esophageal balloon
Ligation
|
3 weeks
|
Survived
|
14
|
Oliveira et al[3] (2016)
|
20/M
|
Trauma
|
22
|
22
|
Prolonged NGT and ET
|
None
|
Ligation
|
6 weeks
|
Survived
|
15
|
Kudose et al[17] (2017)
|
20/M
|
VATER
Status lung transplant
|
Yes/NA
|
Yes/NA
|
Prolonged NGT and ET
|
None
|
None
|
Same day
|
Died
|
16
|
Shires and Rohrer[18] (2018)
|
41/M
|
Pneumonia
|
Yes/NA
|
16
|
NGT and ET
|
Stenting
|
None
|
Same day
|
Died
|
17
|
Kim et al[19] (2021; ALSA)
|
63/M
|
Intracranial Bleed
|
NA
|
Yes/NA
|
NGT, biopsy
|
TEVAR
Coiling
|
None
|
2 months
|
Died
|
18
|
Index case (2021)
|
14/F
|
Porphyria
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
18
|
20
|
NGT/ET/COVID-19
|
None
|
None
|
Same day
|
Died
|
Abbreviations: ALSA, aberrant left subclavian artery; COVID-19, novel coronavirus
disease 2019; ET, endotracheal tube; F, female; M, male; NA, data not available; NGT,
nasogastric tube; VATER (VACTERL), vertebrae, anus, heart, trachea, esophagus, kidney
and limbs.
ARSA can be visualized on CT angiography and can be confirmed on conventional angiography.
Placement of esophageal Sengstaken–Blakemore tube can help in temporary control of
bleeding.[6] Surgical options include ligation of the subclavian artery with revascularization
of the right arm.[14] In endovascular approach, angioplasty balloon can be inflated across the fistulous
segment as a temporary measure before the definitive surgery.[14] More recently, successful usage of covered stents as a definitive measure has been
described.[18] Despite all attempts at management, the reported overall survival rate of ARSA–esophageal
fistula is only 35.7%.[17] In present literature review of NGT or ET, the overall survival found to be 29.4%
as a cause of the fistula formation. Out of these 17 cases, four patients died on
the same day of bleeding episode.[5]
[7]
[17]
[18] Therefore, it is very important to recognize and manage this fatal condition as
soon as possible. The authors also recommend to avoid prolonged nasogastric tube placement
in patient with aberrant subclavian artery.
Conclusion
The fistulization of ARSA into the esophagus is a rare and lethal complication and
may be seen in patients with prolonged nasogastric or endotracheal intubation. A high
index of suspicion and careful evaluation of radiological imaging is required in its
timely recognition and treatment.