Background: Cardiac surgery has made tremendous achievements once cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
was able to support circulation and cardioplegia was able to protect the arrested
heart during the operative procedure. Continuous improvements made surgery better
and safer until today, despite significant changes in today's patient profiles (i.e.,
advanced age, higher likelihood of comorbidities). With cardioplegic arrest being
a key component of avoiding ischemic damage to the heart from the operative procedure,
we aimed to assess the role of cardioplegia in most recent outcomes.
Method: A systematic literature search was performed for studies correlating specific cofactors
with patient survival. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Database, Google
Scholar, and Ovid for the keywords “cardioplegia,” “myocardial protection,” “aortic
cross-clamp time,” and “mortality.” Search terms were used as key words and in combination
as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms.
Results: Academic interest in cardioplegia declined in the past two decades. The number of
publications in the time frames of 1990 to 2000 (n = 1,106) and 2010 to 2020 (n = 611) has been cut in half. The relative percentage of cardioplegia studies related
to all cardiac surgical publications has been reduced to one-fifth (1.3–0.25%). The
youngest cardioplegia solution has been introduced to the market 28 years ago (del
Nido's); the oldest (Bretschneider's) had already been developed in the 1960s and
1970s. The search for duration of cardioplegic arrest times and mortality revealed
a significant correlation with higher mortality at higher clamp-times, which was independent
of cardioplegia type or delivery details. Age was qualified as a strong independent
risk factor for mortality.
Conclusion: Given the results of this analysis, improved outcomes in cardiac surgery in the past
two decades cannot be attributed to changes in our way to use cardioplegia. However,
there is still a significant relationship between cardioplegic cross-clamp time and
mortality making the field attractive for further investigations specifically for
a changing and often older and sicker patient population.