Keywords
perianal burn - diaper-based wound care - wound contamination
Introduction
Most perianal burns are part of larger injuries. Scald burns are typical for children,
whereas flame and chemical burn happens more often in adults.[1]
[2] Wound care of perineal burn poses many challenges. When these burns occur in small
children or patients who are unable to convey soiling of perineal dressings because
of passage of stools, it leads to maceration of surrounding skin, wound contamination,
and increased probability of invasive infection.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
We thought that if we could use diapers as disposable, sterile, nonadherent dressing
that can be replaced at regular interval easily, it will reduce the contamination
period and maceration. Compared with the conventional dressing methods that are usually
changed every 24 hours, because of the ease of change of diaper-based wound care,
it will be possible to employ a scheduled dressing change at 6-hour interval.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in the burn department affiliated to a tertiary care center
over a period of 18 months. Informed consent and consent for photography were obtained
from all patients or their legal guardian. The authors assert that all procedures
contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national
and institutional guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration
of 1975, as revised in 2008.
It is a prospective, descriptive case series study. The study objective was to determine
the effect of diaper-based wound care method in reducing wound contamination period
(daily mean and total) in patients suffering from perianal burn wound.
Patients who suffered perianal burns that were largely second-degree burn and were
unable to convey passage of stools were included in the study. Patients who had a
total burn surface area over 30% or whose large part of wound were third or fourth
degree burn or had significant comorbidities were excluded from the study. Patients
satisfying above-mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied diaper-based
dressings. These diapers were Pampers Active Baby-taped diapers made by Procter &
Gamble Home Products Private Ltd in India. Most common size used was medium size (6–11 kg)
with cost of 12 rupees per diaper. For some patients, large size (9–14 kg) was used
that cost 14 rupees per diaper. Approximately 4.6 diapers per day per patient were
used (averaged). These diapers were ethylene trioxide sterilized. The burn wound apart
from perianal area was dressed as per institutional protocol that is considered as
conventional dressing method in this study. It includes 1% silver sulfadiazine cream,
nonadherent gauze covered with absorbent Gamjee roll that is secured with roller bandages.
The perianal area is covered with these diapers whose inner layer was coated with
thin layer of liquid paraffin and 1% silver sulphadiazine cream ([Fig. 1]). This diaper dressing was replaced every 6 hours with another similar diaper dressing.
Rest of body dressing was not changed. In case of soiling because of passing of stools,
the remaining number of hours to next day dressing time were recorded as T (number of hours of prevented contamination or soiling period). Total prevented contamination
period was calculated and was averaged to mean daily prevented contamination period.
Fig. 1 (A) A patient with perianal burn wound; (B) Wound apart from perianal area (covered with diaper-based dressing) dressed as per
conventional protocol; (C) Diaper-based dressing applied to perianal burn wound.
Maceration around wound edge and time to heal were also noted. The maceration was
noted around the wound edges as nil (0), minimum (<1cm), moderate (1–3 cm), and severe
(>3 cm). These factors were noted till perianal wounds healed ([Fig. 2]). The findings were averaged to per day number of hours for which contamination
of the wound was prevented and were recorded in master sheet. The time to heal (complete
epithelialization) for part of the wound which was covered with diapers was noted
as number of days. Weekly wound swabs were taken from the perianal part of wound that
clinically appeared to be most likely infected. The results were noted in case record
form.
Fig. 2 (A, B) A patient with perianal burn wound on day 4; (C, D) Same wound on day 12 showing minimal maceration and good healing.
Any replacement of the diaper dressing apart from those planned in the study (either
due to irritability of the child or due to noticing of passage of stools by parents
or hospital staff) was not included for data to be recorded, as these dressings would
have been changed in conventional wound care too and it would have led erroneous increase
in the prevented contamination period.
The data was analyzed statistically to calculate mean, mode, and range.
Results and Analysis
Out of the total 26 patients enrolled in the study, 8 were females and rest were males.
Mean age of patients was 22.6 months with a range of 4 and 36 months. Commonest mechanism
of burn was scald burn (22), while it was flame burns for the remaining four patients.
Mean total body surface area was 17 with a range of 5 and 28 (standard deviation [SD]:
5.87). Their wounds healed in an average 13.65 days with range of 10 and 17 days (SD:
2.17 days; [Table 1]).[5]
Table 1
Descriptive analysis
|
Sr. no
|
Age in months
|
Gender
|
Mechanism of burn
|
TBSA
|
No. of days for healing
|
Total duration of prevented contamination in no. of hours
|
Average (daily) duration of prevented contamination in no. of hours (T mean)
|
Wound swabs (number sent, positive (P) or negative (N) for bacterial growth
|
Maceration around wound edge (averaged)
No = 0, minimal <1cm, moderate > 1cm–3 cm, severe >3cm
|
Comment
|
|
Number
|
26
|
M = 18
F = 8
|
Scald = 22
Flame = 4
|
|
|
|
|
Total swabs = 55
Positive =3
Negative = 52
|
No= 4
Minimal = 18
Moderate = 4
Severe = 0
|
2 patients had loose motions
|
|
Mean
|
22.65
|
|
|
17
|
13.65
|
103.153846
|
7.656
|
|
|
|
|
Mode
|
36
|
M
|
Scald
|
20
|
13
|
108
|
7.5
|
Negative
|
Minimal
|
|
|
Min
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
10
|
78
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
Max
|
36
|
|
|
28
|
17
|
144
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
SD
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
2.17
|
14.6988
|
1.117
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TBSA, total body surface area.
Average total duration of prevented contamination till wound healing was 103.15 hours
with a range of 78 and 144 hours (SD: 14.69 hours). Average mean duration per day
of prevented contamination of perianal wound was 7.656 hours with a range of 5.2 and
10.2 hours (SD: 1.117 hours).
Of total 55 wound swabs sent for cultures, only 4 were positive. The isolated microorganism
in these was pseudomonas aeruginosa in two cases and Klebsiella pneumoniae in two cases.
Only four of twenty-six patients had moderate maceration (1–3 cm). Two of them had
loose motions. Rest of the 22 patients had either no or minimal maceration.
Discussion
Despite advances in burn wound management, wound care of perineal region burn is a
major challenge to surgeons involved in burn care.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4] Many of the wound care methods in other parts of body are being kept in place for
more than a day or two. The rationale was maintenance of moist, aseptic environment
with less disruption of body's healing mechanism.[6]
Perianal area along with gluteal region has a unique difference in requirement in
terms of wound care that it is frequently a source of wound contamination because
of passage of stools.[2] Often the problem is compounded if patient experiences antibiotic-related diarrhea.
A diverting colostomy[7]
[8] or a nonsurgical fecal diversion[9]
[10] has been well described in literature. Bordes et al have working recommendations
for perineal burn wound.[11] All these point to the need for management of fecal contamination in perianal burn
wound care. Some surgeons prefer open method of wound care for the ease of access,
which will allow cleaning, and reduce contamination and maceration.
Diapers have been described as an effective dressing for patients undergoing arthroscopy.[12] We used diaper-based dressing method as described above. We believe it would have
the benefits of closed wound care while simultaneously reducing contamination of the
wound and maceration of the surrounding skin.
Dressing change when fecal soiling occurs is desirable but frequently impractical.
In conscious, cooperative adult patients, one may be able to minimize if not prevent
this contamination, but in population where patient is unable to convey the motion
(small children, unconscious, critical or comatose patients) contamination is difficult
to minimize.
The diaper-based dressings that we used were easy to change. It reduced the contamination
period.
Conclusion
The diaper-based wound care method reduces wound contamination period in patients
suffering from perianal burn wound. For perianal burn wounds, this method can become
a practical alternative to conventional dressing method because of its ease of application.
