Keywords sleep - autonomic nervous system - adolescent - exercise - cardiovascular system
Introduction
During development, adolescents may experience sleep-related problems: delayed sleep
onset, insomnia, and insufficient sleep. Complications of sleep-related illnesses
have steadily developed into an increasing issue worldwide.[1 ]
[2 ] Altered sleep-wake cycle impairs concentration, promotes behavior and emotional
instability, and is associated with poor prognostic of cardiovascular health problems:
hypertension and disordered autonomic nervous function.[3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ]
Cardiac autonomic modulation regulated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems
can indicate cardiovascular dysfunction.[6 ]
[7 ]
[8 ] In adolescents, a decrease in parasympathetic and an increase in sympathetic modulation
is associated with obesity,[9 ]
[10 ] high blood pressure,[11 ] and low physical activity levels.[12 ]
Based on the aforementioned findings, a correlation between cardiovascular outcomes
and sleep quality/duration[3 ]
[13 ]
[14 ] suggests that adolescents with shorter or poor sleep quality experience poor cardiac
autonomic modulation.[4 ] Furthermore, sleep quality and variability in sleep duration increased sympathetic
modulation and decreased parasympathetic modulation.[4 ]
[5 ]
Physical activity and obesity (especially abdominal obesity) are related to cardiovascular
risk in adolescents.[15 ]
[16 ] For example, a recent study observed a disrupted balance in autonomic nervous system
regulation during all sleep stages only in obese adolescents.[17 ] Another study recognized that physical activity, not the sleep pattern, relates
to sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic modulation in adolescents.[16 ] However, as previous studies have analyzed the relationship between cardiac autonomic
modulation and sleep stages, whether the overall sleep quality and sleep duration
relate to cardiac autonomic modulation in obese adolescents remains unclear. Furthermore,
whether physical activity modulates this relationship is still unknown.
Thus, the present study aimed to verify the association between sleep quality and
duration and cardiac autonomic modulation in adolescents and to verify if this association
occurs independently of obesity and physical activity levels.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Subjects
The present cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional Ethics in Research
Committee, and it followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies
in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines,[18 ] a the Brazilian human research ethics evaluation system, composed by the Research
Ethics Committees (Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa, CEPs, in Portuguese) and the National
Research Ethics Commission (Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, CONEP,in Portuguese)
called the CEP-CONEP System, and the guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki,
revised in 1983.
The focus demographic group comprises male adolescents aged between 14 and 19 years,
who are students in the public school system of the state of Pernambuco – northeastern
Brazil. The adolescents could not have diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease,
neurological or mental disabilities. Adolescents who used alcohol, tobacco, illicit
drugs, or performed moderate to vigorous physical activity within the last 24 hours
before evaluation were not included in the study. Procedures were according to previous
studies.[8 ]
[9 ]
[11 ]
[19 ]
[20 ]
[21 ]
Data Collection
Data collection began in May 2011 and ended in October 2011 while the students, adolescents,
attended class throughout the day: morning, afternoon, and evening. Cardiac autonomic
function parameters (outcomes), sleep quality/duration (independent variable), abdominal
obesity, and physical activity (covariates) comprised the data collected using the
Global School-based Student Health Survey, as proposed by the World Health Organization
(WHO) for similar epidemiologic studies in children and adolescents, which is available
at www.who.int/chp/gshs/en .[22 ]
Cardiac Autonomic Modulation
The cardiac autonomic modulation was evaluated through the heart rate variability
(HRV). After 30 minutes of rest, HRV was registered for 10 minutes using a heart rate
monitor, (POLAR, RS 800CX; Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland), without breathing
control. All analyses were performed with Kubios HRV software (Biosignal Analysis
and Medical Imaging Group, Joensuu, Finland) by a single evaluator blinded to the
other study variables, following the recommendations of the Task Force of the European
Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.[23 ] The intraclass correlation coefficient of this evaluator was 0.99.[24 ]
The frequency-domain parameters utilized spectral analysis of HRV following the recommendations
of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society
of Pacing and Electrophysiology.[23 ] Stationary periods of the tachogram, with at least 5 minutes, were broken down into
bands of low (LF) and high (HF) frequencies using the autoregressive method, and the
order of the model was chosen according to Akaike's criterion. The power of each spectral
component was normalized by dividing the power of each spectrum band by the total
variance and subtracting the value of the very low frequency band (< 0.04 Hz), and
then multiplying the result by 100.
The spectral components used the autoregressive methods and the order of the model
based on Akaike's criterion. The power of each spectral component converts normally
by dividing the power of each spectrum band by the total variance and then subtracting
the value of the very-low-frequency band (< 0.04 Hz), and then multiplying by 100.
Interpretation of the results includes LF and the HF components of the HRV as representatives
of predominance of the sympathetic and vagal modulations of the heart respectively.
The ratio between these bands (LF/HF) was defined as the cardiac sympathovagal balance.
Low HF values (≤ 53.8 n.u.), high LF values (≥ 46.1 n.u.), and high LF/HF (≥ 0.85)
were indicators of poor cardiac autonomic modulation.[8 ]
Sleep Variables
Sleep quality assessment required the participants to answer the question, “how do
you evaluate the quality of your sleep?” Thus, participants choose one of two options:
poor (bad or regular) or good (very good or great). According to the questionnaire,
the sleep duration was assessed by the number of hours of sleep per night as follow:
“On weekdays and weekends, on average, how many hours do you sleep a day?” Adolescents
choose between the options: 4 or less hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours,
or 10 or more hours.
Abdominal Obesity
Waist circumference (WC) was measured using an inextensible tape, and it was determined
as the minimum circumference between the iliac crest and rib cage. Abdominal obesity
was assessed and defined as WC > 80th percentile based on other adolescents.[25 ]
Physical Activity Level
A question on the questionnaire evaluated physical activity level, “During the past
7 days, on how many days were you physically active for a total of at least 60 minutes
per day?” The low physical activity category consisted of < 5 days per week of moderate
to vigorous physical activity.[22 ]
[26 ] Additionally, on the reproducibility indicators of the physical activity levels,
the kappa coefficient and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between 0.60 and
0.82, respectively.
Statistical Analyses
The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software, version
20.0, was used in the statistical analysis of the HRV data. The data were presented
as mean and standard deviation (SD) values, and the categorical variables were summarized
as frequencies, whereas the binary logistic regression analyses, albeit done crudely,
analyzed the association between the HRV parameters and sleep quality. For analysis,
sleep duration was categorized into < 6 hours a day, 7 to 8 hours a day, or 9 hours
per day. The analyses adjusted for age, the period of the day (either morning, afternoon,
or evening), abdominal obesity (nonobese and obese), and physical activity (low and
high physical activity.) The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) received
information per parameter. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test evaluated the goodness of fit
and the significance level for all analyses was set at p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 1,212 boys were enrolled in the study, of whom 60 could no longer participate
due to low signal quality (stationary periods of the tachogram length < 5 minutes),
and another two for not answering the questions within the allowed time. Therefore,
the final analysis included data from 1,150 boys ([Figure 1 ]). [Table 1 ] shows the general characteristics of the subjects. Regarding the health outcomes,
only 21.7% reported poor sleep quality and 15.4% were classified as obese. On the
other hand, most of them (64.4%) reported low levels of physical activity.
Fig. 1 Flowchart of the present study.
Table 1
General characteristics of the adolescents (n = 1,150) in the present study.
Variable
Values
Age (in years): mean ± standard deviation
16.6 ± 1.2
Weight (in kg): mean ± standard deviation
63.7 ± 12.6
Height (in cm): mean ± standard deviation
171.6 ± 7.1
Waist circumference (in cm): mean ± standard deviation
76.6 ± 9.4
Ethnicity: non-white (%)
72.0
Class shift: evening (%)
26.2
Place of residence: urban (%)
79.2
Abdominal obesity (%)
15.4
Low physical activity level (%)
64.4
Poor sleep quality (%)
21.7
Hours slept on weekdays (%)
≤ 6 per day
27.0
7 to 8 per day
46.7
≥ 9 per day
26.3
Hours slept on weekends (%)
≤ 6 per day
20.5
7 to 8 per day
35.3
≥ 9 per day
44.2
The association between HRV parameters and sleep quality in boys is presented in [Table 2 ]. Poor sleep quality leads to lower HF, regardless of age, time of the day, abdominal
obesity, and physical activity levels. No significant association was observed between
LF and LF/HF.
Table 2
Crude and adjusted binary logistic regression analysis of the association between
heart rate variability parameters and sleep quality in boys.
Low HF
High LF
High LF/HF
Crude
Adjusted
Crude
Adjusted
Crude
Adjusted
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
Good sleep quality
1
1
1
1
1
1
Poor sleep quality
1.85 (1.05–3.24)
1.80 (1.02–3.17)
0.86 (0.65–1.15)
0.85 (0.64–1.14)
0.84 (0.63–1.12)
1.15 (0.62–1.10)
Abbreviations: 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HF, high-frequency component in normalized
units; LF, low-frequency component in normalized units; OR, odds ratio.
Notes: Adjusted for age, time of day, physical activity level, and abdominal obesity.
Hosmer-Lemeshow test for HF: χ2 = 7.26; p = 0.508; Hosmer-Lemeshow test for LF: χ2 = 12.00; p = 0.151; Hosmer-Lemeshow test for LF/HF: χ2 = 10.65; p = 0.222.
[Table 3 ] shows the associations between the number of sleeping hours on weekends and weekdays
and HRV parameters in boys. There was no significant association between HRV and sleep
duration (p > 0.05 for all).
Table 3
Association between number of sleeping hours and heart rate variability parameters
in boys.
Low HF
High LF
High LF/HF
Crude
Adjusted
Crude
Adjusted
Crude
Adjusted
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
OR (95%CI)
Hours slept on weekdays
≤ 6per day
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 to 8 per day
0.99 (0.62–1.58)
0.98 (0.61–1.57)
1.25 (0.94–1.66)
1.21 (0.90–1.62)
1.26 (0.95–1.69)
1.22 (0.91–1.64)
≥ 9per day
1.13 (0.66–1.95)
1.15 (0.66–2.01)
1.07 (0.77–1.47)
0.99 (0.71–1.38)
1.05 (0.76–1.45)
0.98 (0.70–1.36)
Hours slept on weekends
≤ 6per day
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 to 8 per day
1.20 (0.73–2.01)
1.08 (0.64–1.81)
1.01 (0.73–1.40)
0.94 (0.67–1.32)
1.00 (0.72–1.39)
0.94 (0.67–1.31)
≥ 9per day
1.46 (0.88–2.42)
1.38 (0.83–2.32)
1.21 (0.88–1.66)
1.19 (0.86–1.64)
1.17 (0.85–1.61)
1.15 (0.83–1.60)
Abbreviations: 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HF, high-frequency component in normalized
units; LF, low-frequency component in normalized units; OR, odds ratio.
Notes: Adjusted for age, time of day, abdominal obesity, and physical activity level.
Hours slept on weekdays: Low HF– Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 8.63; p = 0.375; High LF – Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 13.30; p = 0.102; High LF/HF – Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 12.94; p = 0.114.
Hours slept on weekends: Low HF – Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 16.10; p = 0.041; High LF – Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 15.00; p = 0.054; High LF/HF – Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 7.87; p = 0.446.
Discussion
Our findings show that the study found that poor sleep quality relates to lower parasympathetic
cardiac modulation, independently of abdominal obesity and physical activity levels.
On the other hand, sleep duration did not impact the modulation of cardiac functions
in adolescents.
Typically, adolescents receive less than the recommended number of hours per night
of sleep (eight versus nine hours, respectively).[27 ] About 20% of them have significant sleeping problems.[27 ] However, in the present study, we did not observe a significant association between
cardiac autonomic modulation and self-reported sleep duration. In children and adolescents,
the study perceives an inconsistent relationship between sleep duration and cardiac
autonomic dysfunction.[4 ]
[5 ] For example, Michels et al.[5 ] found no significant association between objectively measured sleep duration and
cardiac autonomic modulation in 334 children aged between 5 and 11 years old, whereas
Rodríguez-Colón et al.[4 ] observed that higher habitual sleep duration associated with poor cardiac autonomic
modulation in 421 adolescents (mean 16.7 ± 2.3 years old).
Now, for the present study, other factors may affect the result. For example, people
can have a difference in opinion when answering how they measure their sleep quality.
Differently from the present study, poor sleep quality assessed through the Pittsburgh
Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ranged between 53[28 ] and 82%[29 ] in Brazilian adolescents; however, when analyzing specifically the PSQI domains,
12% of adolescents had poor sleep quality,[28 ] which is consistent with results of the present study even with a different questionnaire.
Participants may self-report sleep duration as an over or underestimation. Secondly,
only ∼ 27 of the adolescents slept below the recommended amount: only extreme sleep
deprivation would affect autonomic cardiac modulation. Thirdly, the amount of sleep
required for homeostatic sleep regulation may vary between individuals, of course
respecting biological individuality: Short sleepers, people who need < 6 hours of
daily sleep, and long sleepers, people that need ≥ 9 hours of sleep per day to meet
their needs.[30 ]
Insufficient sleep at an adolescent age associates with increased cardiovascular risk.[3 ] Michels et al.,[5 ] in a study on the relationship between low sleep quality and cardiac autonomic modulation,
observed that poor sleep quality could lead to autonomic imbalance, higher sympathetic
modulation, and lower parasympathetic modulation in children with no obesity; however,
the results may differ from our study, as we used abdominal obesity as an adjustment.
In this sense, adiposity in the abdominal region has previously been associated with
worse cardiac autonomic modulation[8 ] and could influence the relationship between the number of hours of sleep per night
and HRV.
Divergence results between sleep duration and sleep quality indicate that self-perceived
sleep quality influences cardiac autonomic control over the time spent sleeping. Supporting
this claim, a study with 300 children (aged between 5 and 11 years), observed that
low sleep quality, dismissing the low sleep duration reported by the parent, induced
sympathetic dominance.[5 ] Additionally, another study that analyzed 223 healthy white-collar male workers
found a similar response to sympathetic dominance.[31 ] Poor sleep quality can also directly impact stress levels, affecting norepinephrine
and epinephrine,[32 ]
[33 ]
[34 ] and cardiac autonomic modulation.[35 ] Sleep deprivation also increases proinflammatory status,[36 ]
[37 ]
[38 ] which leads to reduced autonomic cardiac modulation to the heart.[39 ]
[40 ]
Overall, the association between poor sleep quality and reduction in effective cardiac
autonomic modulation obtained in the present study clinically reveals the importance
of cardiovascular health.[9 ]
[11 ] Regardless of obesity and physical activity, people should develop sleep strategies
to improve their quality of sleep understanding that cardiac autonomic modulation
within adolescents could lead to better knowledge and clinical care for at-risk cardiovascular
adult patients.[14 ]
As limitations of the present study, the cross-sectional design and the correlative
nature of the data preclude us from establishing a causal relationship between HRV
and sleep variables. Although the ages of the participants were tightly controlled,
we could not determine the Tanner stage of the participants. Longitudinal evaluations
in multiethnic adolescent populations and both sexes are needed to make these conclusions.
The use of self-reported measures for physical activity and sleep variables are important
limitations that need to be considered. Finally, although the sleep deficit has been
shown to be associated to sleep patterns,[41 ] it was not assessed in the present study. However, as strong aspects, to our knowledge,
population-based study to verify the influence of lifestyle parameters such as physical
activity level and obesity in the association between sleep and cardiac autonomic
modulation in adolescents. Secondly, HRV analyzed by a single researcher, as part
of the double-blind experiment, used a low-cost instrument widely accepted in the
literature. Third, we emphasize the large sample number used in the present study,
comprising several cities in a state in the northeast region of Brazil.
In conclusion, regardless of the physical activity level and abdominal obesity, sleep
quality, but not sleep duration, was associated with lower parasympathetic autonomic
modulation in adolescent boys.