The rise of open-access (OA) journals has brought about a significant shift in the
publishing model over the past two decades. This change has been driven by two key
developments. Firstly, public funded groups, such as the National Institutes of Health,
The Wellcome Trust (U.K.), and Research Councils UK (RCUK), now require open access
publication of research they fund.[1] Secondly, the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) and Attribution-Noncommerical No
Derivative (CC-BY-NC-ND) provide authors with copyrights, a privilege that was previously
held by publishers or societies under the subscription model.
To accommodate the new mandatory OA articles, traditional subscription-based journals
with paywalls for access have turned into hybrid modes.[2] In this model, authors have the option to pay for their articles to be made OA in
traditional journals. Additionally, well-established journals have launched sister
OA journals that require all authors to pay article processing charges (APCs) for
publication, regardless of their funding. The burden of this model has impacted a
large section of authors who need a source of funding or institutional support to
publish in paid journals. In this context, the Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (IJPS) remains the best and possibly the only credible choice for authors to publish in
plastic surgery journals without having to pay.
Funding Models of OA Publications
Funding Models of OA Publications
The OA model offers free access, a significant advantage for readers, authors, and
the journal. With the free flow of knowledge, articles are read and cited more frequently.
The cost of providing “free access” is usually passed on to the author in terms of
APCs. Authors from low- and middle-income countries are often unable to pay the APCs
for most OA journals, which are usually exorbitant and unreasonable.
Green, gold, and diamond OA journals are categorized predominantly on their revenue
model. Articles in the green OA can be found through the institution repository, often
in a preprint version or following a specific embargo period after publication. The
gold OA publication requires authors or funding agencies to pay APCs. No fee charged
to either the author or the reader in the diamond or platinum OA model. The affiliated
societies generally fund the latter model, which remains a nonprofit venture for the
publisher and society.
Credibility of Open Access Journals
Credibility of Open Access Journals
The credibility of OA journals was eroded by the rapid proliferation of predatory
journals that charged high fees for publication. In 2003, the Directory of Open Access
Journals (DOAJ) provided guidelines for OA journals, and DOAJ-indexed journals adhere
to quality, oversight, and sustainability criteria. OA journals gained credibility
among researchers, funding agencies, and institutions following DOAJ, Scopus, and
PubMed indexing. Thus, paying for publishing an article became an acceptable practice
with the advantage of free access reaching a wide readership.
Copyright Issues
Copyrights in OA journals are granted to authors under the Creative Commons License
(CC-BY) and Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND). Gold OA models
typically involve authors paying an APC, obtaining full copyright, and publishing
their articles with free access. However, well-established, indexed diamond OA journals
affiliated with and funded by the associations for official publication have copyrights
owned by the association. Although DOAJ insists in favor of authors, granting full
copyright (CC-BY) may not be acceptable for diamond OA journals when authors are not
charged publication fees. Societies could be compelled to switch to paid publication
models if their control over copyrights is not respected. This conflict further diminishes
the option of free publication, which significantly impacts the authors.
Each journal has a different APC criteria depending on its reputation, impact factor,
society membership, country affiliations, income groups of countries, etc. However,
the APCs currently are on higher to exorbitantly unaffordable levels. Authors are
charged over $2,000 for a full-length article, some even charging close to $4,000
in plastic surgery OA journals ([Table 1]). However, the cost for each article is estimated to be under $900 per submission.[3] Such a high cost for publication has now become an industry standard, an almost
unaffordable out-of-pocket expense for most individual authors.
Table 1
Plastic surgery journals with open access
|
Journal title
|
Sister publication of:
|
Society/region
|
Publication type
|
Year
|
Open access: APC
|
Frequency
|
Impact factor
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: PRS Global Open (PRS-GO)
[5]
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS)
|
American Society
|
Open access
|
2013
|
$489–2,495
|
12
|
1.5
|
|
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (JPRAS Open)
[6]
|
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (JPRAS)
|
British and European society
|
Open access
|
|
€650–1,750
|
4
|
1.5
|
|
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
[7]
|
–
|
Europe
|
Hybrid
|
1973
|
$3,690
|
|
0.6
|
|
Plastic Surgery
[8]
|
–
|
Canadian
|
Hybrid
|
1993
|
$3,900
|
4
|
0.7
|
|
Archives of Plastic Surgery
[9]
|
–
|
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
|
Open access
|
1974
|
$300–700
|
6
|
1.3
|
|
The Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online (JHS GO)
[10]
|
The Journal of Hand Surgery
|
American Society for Surgery of the Hand
|
Open access
|
2019
|
$1,250–2,500
|
6
|
–
|
|
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open (JRMO)
[11]
|
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
|
|
Open access
|
2016
|
$3,050
|
2
|
–
|
|
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
[12]
|
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
|
|
Open access
|
2019
|
$1,400–2,900
|
|
–
|
|
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
|
–
|
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
|
Open access
|
1968
|
None
|
6
|
0.8
|
Note: This list does not include all plastic surgery titles.
Rise of Sister Open Access Journal with Identical Titles
Rise of Sister Open Access Journal with Identical Titles
Over the past decade, several established journals and official publications of scholarly
societies have begun adopting new publication models. Sister open-access journals
have been launched, preserving the original titles of subscription journals. This
additional OA journal adds several advantages to the established journal, such as
an identical title, single portal submission, retention of authors' base, and utilization
of an existing pool of reviewers, editorial team, publisher, and promotions. Many
journals and publishers have found this business model successful and profitable.
Authors often can choose the OA model during article submission if their article is
rejected without having to resubmit the article file. Authors may find this “transfer-out”
option of the manuscript attractive if they can afford it. After paying APC, several
lower-level evidence articles will likely be accepted in the peer-reviewed OA sister
journal. The identical title's appeal attracts authors who get the chance to publish
in a reputable name, albeit in secondary titles on payment. I have encountered many
professionals confused about the distinction between similar titles of traditional
and OA journals, often erroneously assigning higher credentials to the OA journal.
The emergence of sister open-access journals based on the APC revenue, has raised
concerns about the quality of the peer review process and lowered standards for accepting
articles. A study on plastic surgery journals comparing traditional versus OA model
sister journals concludes that “Methodological quality scores were higher among traditional
access journals and Higher degrees of peer review may be necessary to ensure appropriate
methodological quality in OA plastic surgery publications.”[4]
The IJPS: A Rare Diamond Open Access Model among Plastic Surgery Titles
The IJPS: A Rare Diamond Open Access Model among Plastic Surgery Titles
Authors do not pay for articles in the IJPS, which is published in a diamond OA model and provides free access to readers. The
primary objective is to disseminate scientific knowledge without a paywall barrier
and assist authors in publishing high-quality content without putting a strain on
their finances. As an official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons
of India (APSI), from its first issue in 1968 to now, the journal has made all its
archives available. With a double-blind peer review process and unbiased decisions,
the journal has credible quality metrics indexing in DOAJ, Scopus, and PubMed. The
credibility and reputation of IJPS have been enhanced thanks to the much-deserved first impact factor received last
year. However, due to the publication of a high number of archived articles from the
last 50 years, the impact factor is likely to be affected for a couple of years.
The journal is on a fast track to growth, receiving a wider readership and authorship
globally. Thanks to the members of the APSI for their unflinching support and contributions.
Nevertheless, we still need more quality submissions with evidence-based research,
peer reviewers, more citations, and support in subscriptions from institutions. For
more than fifty years, the IJPS has been an exceptional open-access journal that has
stood strong and upheld ethical publishing and scientific values. It remains the oldest
and most credible open-access journal in plastic surgery today. Before considering
publishing in other “reputed titles” of paid OA journals, I urge our members to assess
the journal's basic credentials and metrics alongside the IJPS.
