Keywords
COVID-19 - cancer - Epidemiolgy - vaccination - hospitalization
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide,
particularly impacting vulnerable populations such as oncology patients. Understanding
the epidemiological and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in this group is crucial for
developing effective management strategies. Our study analyzed its impact on Brazilian
oncology patients.
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the epidemiological and clinical outcomes of 125
oncology patients with COVID-19 treated at the Cancer Hospital from 2020 to 2022.
Data on tumor types, mortality, and associated factors were collected and analyzed.
The impact of COVID-19 vaccination on hospitalization and mortality among these patients
was also assessed.
Results: The most common tumor types were breast cancer and cancers of the hematopoietic and
reticuloendothelial systems. Mortality among oncology patients with COVID-19 was significantly
higher compared to those who died from cancer-related causes, emphasizing the severity
of the infection in Brazilian oncology patients. COVID-19 exhibited a higher lethality
in cancers of unknown primary sites (metastatic cancer), bronchi and lungs, and bladder.
Factors such as age, education level, and smoking history were significantly associated
with mortality. A notable association was also found between COVID-19 vaccination
and hospitalization among cancer patients. Vaccination not only reduced hospitalizations
but also contributed to the survival of cancer patients.
Conclusion: These findings indicate the critical importance of vaccination in cancer patients
to mitigate the adverse impacts of COVID-19 in this vulnerable population.
Corresponding author: Sérgio Gomes da Silva (e-mail: sergio.silva@fcv.org.br).
Bibliographical Record
Sérgio Gomes da Silva, Alice Muglia Amancio, Bruno Licy Gomes da Mello. Impact of
Covid-19 on Brazilian oncology patients: an analysis in Southeast Minas Gerais. Brazilian
Journal of Oncology 2025; 21.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1807810